Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An Evaluation of the Toxicity of Accumulated Sediments in Forebays of Stormwater Wetlands and Wetponds

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forebays, small settling basins placed at the inlet of Stormwater Best Management Practices, encourage sedimentation with the intention of pollutant consolidation and capture. Regularly, accumulated sediments are excavated to restore forebay storage volume and to further prevent contamination of downstream waterbodies during large storm events. Disposal measures vary according to the toxicity of sediments. To test for the potential toxicity of forebay spoils, 30 stormwater wetland and wetpond forebays of varying age, size, and upstream landuse were sampled across North Carolina and analyzed for seven metals: cadmium, chromium, copper, iron, lead, nickel, and zinc. Ten of 30 sites were also sampled near the outlet structures for spatial comparison of settled sediment and pollutant presence. The relative toxicity of all sampled sediment metal concentrations was evaluated using existing aquatic health sediment guidelines and US Environmental Protection Agency standards for the land application of biosolids (40 CFR503). Of 30 sites, 17 exceeded sediment guidelines for aquatic health, emphasizing the need for routine forebay sediment removal. However, all samples were less than 40 CFR 503 limits with factors of safety ranging from 2.3 to 28, indicating that land application of forebay sediment is unlikely to pose an environmental threat. Additionally, forebay sediment tended to have lower metal toxicity than sediment collected at the pond or wetland outlet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC): Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand. (2000). Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality: volume 2—Aquatic Ecosystems—Rationale and Background Information. http://www.mincos.gov.au/publications/australian_and_new_zealand_guidelines_for_fresh_and_marine_water_quality/volume_2

  • Buchman (2008). NOAA Screening Quick Reference Tables, NOAA OF&R Report 08-1, Seattle WA, Office of Response and Restoration Division, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 34 pages.

  • Burton, G. (1992). Assessing contaminated aquatic sediments. Environmental Science & Technology, 26(10), 1862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Canadian Council of Ministers of the Environment. 2001. Canadian Environmental Quality Guidelines. http://www.elaw.org/system/files/sediment_summary_table.pdf

  • Councell, T., Duckenfield, K., Landa, E., & Callender, E. (2004). Tire-wear particles as a source of zinc to the environment. Environmental Science & Technology, 38(15), 4206–4214.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, A., Quintin, R., Exall, K., & Marsalek, J. (2007). Controlling urban stormwater pollution by constructed wetlands: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Water, 3(3), 214–230.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A., Shokouhian, M., & Ni, S. (2001). Loading estimates of lead, copper, cadmium, and zinc in urban runoff from specific sources. Chemosphere, 44(5), 997–1009.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gee, G. W., & Bauder, J. W. (1986). Methods of soil analysis, part 1. Physical and mineralogical methods–Agronomy Monograph no 9 (2nd ed.). Madison: American Society of Agronomy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, E., & Lei, J. (2000). Stormwater management ponds and wetlands sediment maintenance. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 35(3), 525–539.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy, D., Myers, J., and Stokes, C. (2008) “Heavy metals in North Carolina soils, occurrence and significance.” North Carolina Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services: Agronomic Division. Raleigh, NC. http://www.ncagr.gov/agronomi/pdffiles/hmetals.pdf

  • Hathaway, J. M., & Hunt, W. F. (2010). An evaluation of stormwater wetlands in series in Piedmont, North Carolina. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 136(1), 140–146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, K., Hepburn, D., & Lunn, R. (2006). Sediment management in sustainable urban drainage system ponds. Water Science and Technology, 53(10), 219–227.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, C., & Davis, A. P. (2005). Evaluation and optimization of bioretention media for treatment of urban storm water runoff. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 131(11), 1521–1531.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt, W. F., Jarrett, A. R., Smith, J. T., & Sharkey, L. J. (2006). Evaluating bioretention hydrology and nutrient removal at three field sites in North Carolina. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, 132(6), 600–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, J. 2007. “Evaluation of stormwater wetland and wet pond forebay design and stormwater wetland pollutant removal efficiency.” M.S. thesis. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University, Biological and Agricultural Engineering

  • Lau, S., & Stenstrom, M. (2005). Metals and PAHs adsorbed to street particles. Water Research, 39(17), 4083–4092.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, J. H., Bang, K., Ketchum, L., Choe, J., & Yu, M. (2002). First flush analysis of urban storm runoff. The Science of the Total Environment, 293(1), 163–175.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, H., & Davis, A. (2008). Heavy metal capture and accumulation in bioretention media. Environmental Science & Technology, 42(14), 5247–5253.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liebens, J. (2002). Heavy metal contamination of sediments in stormwater management systems: The effect of land use, particle size, and age. Environmental Geology, 41(3–4), 341–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsalek, J., & Marsalek, P. (1997). Characteristics of sediments from a stormwater management pond. Water Science and Technology, 36(8–9), 117–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NOAA. (1999). Sediment Quality Guidelines developed for the National Status and Trends Program. http://response.restoration.noaa.gov/book_shelf/121_sedi_qual_guide.pdf

  • Obarska-Pempkowiak, H., & Klimkowska, K. (1999). Distribution of nutrients and heavy metals in a constructed wetland system. Chemosphere, 39(2), 303–312.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OMOE, Ontario Ministry of the Environment. (2003). Stormwater management practices, planning, and design manual. Toronto, Canada. http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/gp/4329e_preface.pdf

  • Polta, R. (2004). A survey of regulations used to control the use and disposal of stormwater pond sediments in the United States and Canada. Metropolitan Council Environmental Services: EQA Report 04-542 (accessed 11/25/2008).

  • Scarborough, R.W. and Mensinger, M.G. 2005. Evaluation of the storm water sediment control forebay at Anchorage Canal, South Bethany, DE. Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control Division of Soil and Water Conservation Delaware Coastal Programs. Submitted to: Delaware Department of Transportation. Dover, DE. http://www.deldot.gov/stormwater/pdfs/SouthBethanyForebayMonitoringReport.pdf (accessed 2-10-10)

  • Sonon, L. and Gaskin, J. (2009). Metal concentration standards for land application of biosolids and other by-products in Georgia. The University of Georgia College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences: Cooperative Extension, Bulletin 1353. http://pubs.caes.uga.edu/caespubs/pubcd/B1353/B1353.htmla (last accessed 4/216/09).

  • State of Minnesota Stormwater Advisory Group. 1997. “Storm-water and wetlands: planning and evaluation, guidelines for addressing potential impacts of urban storm-water and snow-melt runoff on wetlands.” http://www.pca.state.mn.us/publications/reports/wq-strm1-07.pdf (accessed 2-10-10).

  • Urbonas, B. R. (1995). Recommended parameters to report with BMP monitoring data. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 121(1), 23–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USEPA. (1983). Results of Nationwide Urban Runoff Program, Volume 1–Final Report. WH-554, Washington D.C.

  • USEPA, (1996). Method 3050B: Acid digestion of sediments, sludges, and soils: revision 2. http://www.epa.gov/waste/hazard/testmethods/sw846/pdfs/3050b.pdf, last accessed 1/18/10

  • VanLoon, G., Anderson, B. C., Watt, W. E., & Marsalek, J. (2000). Characterizing stormwater Sediments for ecotoxic risk. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada, 35(3), 341–364.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Several NCSU students and faculty assisted with data collection of this project: Cole Ammons, Robert Brown, Amelia Clark, W. Evan Corbin, Shawn Kennedy, Trisha Moore, Bill Price, and Erica Tillinghast. Public works officials in the following municipalities are very much appreciated: Apex Charlotte, Durham, and High Point. Each assisted with pond and wetland identification and location. Officials in Durham expended a substantial amount of effort in helping the research team and are especially thanked.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jacquelyn K. McNett.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

McNett, J.K., Hunt, W.F. An Evaluation of the Toxicity of Accumulated Sediments in Forebays of Stormwater Wetlands and Wetponds. Water Air Soil Pollut 218, 529–538 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0665-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-010-0665-9

Keywords

Navigation