Skip to main content
Log in

Performance in new product development: a comprehensive framework, current trends, and research directions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Management Control Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

New product development (NPD) is critical for a firm’s competitive advantage. Since the early 1980s, NPD research has steadily increased and has defined successful practices. However, owing to this research field’s fragmentedness, there is ambiguity about what successful NPD looks like. Evidence of the effective design of management control systems (MCS) concerning NPD performance is inconclusive and calls for comprehensive analysis. Yet, there is no holistic framework that covers promising practices and structures. Drawing on a body of 284 article publications, we inductively develop a framework with nine clusters that, taken together, make up NPD performance. These are grouped addressing firm-external and firm-internal phenomena, for instance, cooperation, expertise, and the NPD process. We populate each cluster with variables that are proposed to drive performance, and derive current research trends and paths for future research on NPD. The review makes two contributions to the literature and one to practice. First, the comprehensive framework of NPD performance drivers supports the adjustment of prior general MCS design implications to specific NPD settings. Second, the inductive approach sets this review apart from prior reviews of NPD performance by proposing a holistic framework that is neither biased in a domain, nor in a pre-defined structure. Third, firms will benefit from the framework, because it helps to customize the MCS such that firms can comprehensively evaluate their NPD activities and can enhance performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We define new product development (NPD) as the process from a conceptualized idea to market launch of novel or updated goods (see Neely et al. 1995). We delineate NPD from research projects that involve basic research activities that eventually provide input to subsequent NPD (see Chiesa and Frattini 2007). In contrast to NPD, which refers to the development process, innovation also refers to NPD’s output—the commercialized novel or updated good (for taxonomies of innovation, see de Jong and Marsili (2006)). Yet, some studies refer to innovation as a process (see Garcia and Calantone 2002).

  2. The search algorithm reads: (“NPD” OR “New Product Development”) AND (Project* OR Process* OR Performance OR Success OR Efficiency OR Effectiveness OR Productivity OR Evaluati*). The asterisk in the search algorithm allows for flexible endings.

  3. Screening publications’ abstracts for the defined search algorithm generated 6,830 hits.

  4. The ABDC ranking comprises 2,767 journals that are divided into four categories of quality (A*, A, B, and C) based on qualitative and quantitative assessments.

    The JQ3 ranking considers 889 journals evaluated along multiple dimensions by the association’s members, who are academic business researchers. The highest reputed journals are ranked A+ and decrease via A, B, C, to D.

  5. For instance, we allocated a conceptual paper that develops a model on personality’s role in NPD teams (see Reilly et al. 2002) to the management of teams and team characteristics. In contrast, a best practice study on general drivers of success in NPD could not be allocated clearly (see Barczak et al. 2009). Thus, we excluded the latter from analysis.

  6. Two articles referred to identically named journals that were not considered in the ranking. One article was included twice in the output with very similar labelling.

  7. Excluded owing to a meta-perspective that could not be allocated to a single cluster: Barczak et al. (2009), Cooper (1983), Ernst (2002), Kandemir et al. (2006), Lester (1998), Page (1993), Rao (1997), Storey and Easingwood (1993), Wind and Mahajan (1988).

  8. For examples of management control studies with innovation in the title, see Davila et al. (2009), Bisbe and Malagueño (2009, 2015), Haustein et al. (2014), Bedford (2015).

  9. Fan et al. (2009) evaluated approaches to operationalize collaboration satisfaction, which is related to cohesiveness.

  10. Procedural justice, distributive justice, and transformational leadership are antecedents of trust (Dayan et al. 2009).

  11. Tighe (1998) developed a framework to gain managerial approval for NPD projects in autonomous settings: defining the project, impacts on the organization, and effects on the organization’s financials.

  12. Market orientation is dichotomized as responsive and proactive. A responsive market orientation serves current customer needs, while a proactive market orientation discovers and satisfies latent and emerging customer needs. (Chen 2015, p. 36).

  13. Process-based rewards are tied to procedures, behaviors, or other means of achieving desired outcomes. Outcomes-based rewards are tied to the actual results. (Chen 2015, p. 39).

  14. For eight propositions of good R&D-marketing cooperation, see Souder (1988).

  15. For conceptual frameworks of antecedents and outcomes of knowledge acquisition, see Murray and Chao (2005); for organizational learning, see Bartezzaghi et al. (1997), Ruy and Alliprandini (2008), and Akbar and Tzokas (2013).

  16. For knowledge transfer models in NPD teams, see Frank and Ribeiro (2014); among actors in the firm, see Jepsen (2013); across firm boundaries, see Corallo et al. (2012).

  17. Team intuition depends on past team member experience, transactive memory systems (knowledge possessed by each member and awareness of who knows what), team empowerment, decision importance, and decision motives (opportunity or crisis; Dayan and Elbanna 2011).

  18. A selection of decision-making support tools are: narrowing down alternatives by applying multiple-criteria decision-making techniques as the analytic hierarchy process (Ayag 2005a, b; Akomode 1999), developing a structuring matrix, for instance uncertainty vs. R&D option value (Lint and Pennings 2001), risk-scenario decision tool (Marmier et al. 2013), applying neural network decision support (Thieme et al. 2000), monetary quantification of differences among alternatives (Wouters et al. 2009), process model for resource scheduling and allocation (Abrantes and Figueiredo 2015), sensitizing for role of internal politics (Jones and Stevens 1999), operationalization to reduce escalation of commitment (Donthu and Unal 2014), grouping actors in collaborative decisions (Jaber et al. 2015), applying portfolio thinking (Kester et al. 2014), and integrative model of the NPD decision process (Calantone and di Benedetto 1988).

  19. Speed-to-market facilitates NPD project success (Jayaram and Narasimhan 2007; Ranjbar 2013), product profitability (McNally et al. 2011), and timeliness of product rollout (Chryssochoidis and Wong 2000).

  20. For case studies of accelerated NPD processes, see Karagozoglu and Brown (1993) and Bernasco et al. (1999).

  21. Further antecedents to speed-to-market were referred to in other clusters: work experience in the firm (McDonough 1993), perceived stress in combination with management support (Akgün et al. 2007a), technological competence (Acur et al. 2010), telework (Coenen and Kok 2014), and co-location (Lakemond and Berggren 2006).

  22. For research that models concurrent NPD processes, see Haque and Pawar (2001), Juan et al. (2009), Wang and Lin (2009), and Koyuncu and Erol (2015).

  23. For NPD process models and their assessment, see: a sphenomorph model for complex settings (Barclay et al. 1995); core characteristics of NPD process (Calantone et al. 1995); an NPD process for financial services (Edgett 1996); a fractal model of the NPD process (Spivey et al. 1997); revamping a NPD process (McDonough and Barczak 1999); NPD process with a focus on design and manufacturing (Bajaj et al. 2004); an NPD process in the toy industry (Sun and Wing 2005); cognitive maps to analyze processes (Carbonara and Scozzi 2006); the technology acquisition process (Cáñez et al. 2007); agile NPD process design (Fekri et al. 2009); fuzzy linear programming to maximize customer satisfaction (Chen and Ko 2010); NPD proficiency (Sandvik et al. 2011).

  24. A selection of success factors encompasses formalized planning and coordination (Malhotra et al. 1996); the project evaluation process; the existence of new product managers (Reidenbach and Moak 1986); a strategic market focus in the NPD process (Balbontin et al. 1999); resource and skills availability (Huang et al. 2002); a lead user process to generate ideas (Lilien et al. 2002); actor networks during idea generation (Simon and Tellier 2011); a value proposition process to assess ideas (Hughes and Chafin 1996); customer support process during product design (Goffin 1998); compatibility and customer interface standards (Sahay and Riley 2003); proficiency in idea development, market opportunity analysis, technological development, product testing, and commercialization (Song and Perry 1997). For NPD process best practice studies, see Barclay (1992a, b).

  25. Other contingency factors are industry competitiveness, cycle time, senior management involvement, process formality, customer inputs, cross-functional integration (Harmancioglu et al. 2007), extent of centralization, and experience in new product development (Varela and Benito 2005).

  26. For a description of a promising NPD process for discontinuous innovations, see Veryzer (1998).

  27. A selection of tools, methods, and techniques covers: output controls, non-technical outside assistance (LaBahn et al. 1996), target costing (Afonso et al. 2008), portfolio assessment tied to program profitability and impact (Cooper and Kleinschmidt 1995), a Lagrangian decomposition heuristic (Varma et al. 2007), predictive models (Watkins 1984), risk management practices (Oehmen et al. 2014), design for excellence, failure mode and effects analysis, conjoint analysis (Yeh et al. 2010), focus groups, partnering customers and lead users, prototyping for highly innovative projects, and cross-functional development teams (Tidd and Bodley 2002). For compilations of management tools for NPD projects, see Maylor (2001, p. 95) and González and Palacios (2002, p. 263).

  28. A selection of performance management systems covers: total cost analysis (Chen et al. 2006), dynamic multi-project management (de Maio et al. 1994), Six Sigma quality improvement (Jou et al. 2010), governance stage-gate controls (Baker and Bourne 2014), a risk management framework (Mu et al. 2009), and procedural guidelines to a performance management system (Rogers et al. 2005).

  29. A successful cooperation depends on variables such as communication management, commitment to the collaboration (Lam and Chin 2005), the intensity and media richness of communication (Badir et al. 2008, 2009; Oke and Idiagbon-Oke 2010; Thomas 2013), openness to change, willingness to cooperate, high trust level (Tomes et al. 1996; Jassawalla and Sashittal 1998; Schleimer and Shulman 2011), individual-level innovative work behavior and expertise and team-level innovation norms, cohesion, and decision-making autonomy (Stock 2014), informal social systems (Cui et al. 2013), comprehensiveness in contractual governance (Parker and Brey 2015), an alliance governance structure, partner technological capability, the competitiveness of market environments (Fang et al. 2015), lifecycle stage (Eng and Wong 2006; Pujari 2006), explorative vs. exploitative strategy (Lambe et al. 2009), shared problem-solving, psychological safety, management direction (Bstieler and Hemmert 2010), goal congruence, complementary capabilities, and inter-firm coordination efforts (Yan and Dooley 2014). For a framework for successful collaborative NPD, see Zolghadri et al. (2011b).

  30. Classification patterns of coordination: (1) innovation intermediaries as brokers, mediators, collectors, and connectors (Colombo et al. 2015), (2) buyer as mediator, buyer-designer partnership, designer as integrator, and team design activities (Ateş et al. 2015), (3) single participation vs. dual participation, separate work vs. integrated work, project manager vs. team consensus (Gerwin and Ferris 2004).

  31. Sicotte and Bourgault (2008) illustrate four uncertainty types: technical and project uncertainty, market uncertainty, fuzziness and complexity. Kim and Wilemon (2003) break complexity down further, i.e. technological, market, development, marketing, organizational, and intra-organizational complexity. Siu et al. (2006) add governmental intervention.

  32. More recently, Racela (2015) found that combining strategic orientations (i.e. customer, entrepreneurial, and IT orientations) is the most promising regarding performance. Pujari et al. (2003) propose that an additional ecological orientation can result in partial synergies of being simultaneously ecologically friendly and economically competitive.

  33. Innovation culture is “involving entrepreneurship, risk taking, and openness to new ideas for new product development” (de Brentani and Kleinschmidt 2004, p. 312).

    Globalization culture is an “international mindset and a global readiness [...] to deal effectively with the complexities and opportunities that result from different national cultures, geographic dispersion of markets and participants, building trust and cooperation among dispersed affliates, and cross-locational/-cultural idea generation and resource utilization” (de Brentani and Kleinschmidt 2004, p. 313).

References

References to articles that are included in the systematic review are marked with an asterisk (*)

  • Abrantes*, R., & Figueiredo, J. (2014). Feature based process framework to manage scope in dynamic NPD portfolios. International Journal of Project Management, 32(5), 874–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abrantes*, R., & Figueiredo, J. (2015). Resource management process framework for dynamic NPD portfolios. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1274–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acur*, N., Kandemir, D., & Boer, H. (2012). Strategic alignment and new product development: Drivers and performance effects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 304–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acur*, N., Kandemir, D., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., & Song, M. (2010). Exploring the impact of technological competence development on speed and NPD program performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 915–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams, R., Bessant, J., & Phelps, R. (2006). Innovation management measurement: A review. International Journal of Management Reviews, 8(1), 21–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams*, M. E., Day, G. S., & Dougherty, D. (1998). Enhancing new product development performance: An organizational learning perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(5), 403–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afonso*, P., Nunes, M., Paisana, A., & Braga, A. (2008). The influence of time-to-market and target costing in the new product development success. International Journal of Production Economics, 115(2), 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmada*, S., Mallick, D. N., & Schroeder, R. G. (2013). New product development: Impact of project characteristics and development practices on performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(2), 331–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahn*, J. H., Lee, D. J., & Lee, S. Y. (2006). Balancing business performance and knowledge performance of new product development. Long Range Planning, 39(5), 525–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akbar*, H., & Tzokas, N. (2013). An exploration of new product development’s front-end knowledge conceptualization process in discontinuous innovations. British Journal of Management, 24(2), 245–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün*, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Keskin, H., Lynn, G. S., & Imamoglu, S. Z. (2005). Knowledge networks in new product development projects: A transactive memory perspective. Information & Management, 42(8), 1105–1120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün*, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., & Keskin, H. (2007a). Team stressors, management support, and project and process outcomes in new product development projects. Technovation, 27(10), 628–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün*, A. E., Byrne, J. C., Lynn, G. S., & Keskin, H. (2007b). New product development in turbulent environments: Impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 24(3), 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün*, A. E., & Lynn, G. S. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of team stability on new product development performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(3–4), 263–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akgün*, A. E., Lynn, G. S., & Yılmaz, C. (2006). Learning process in new product development teams and effects on product success: A socio-cognitive perspective. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(2), 210–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akomode*, O. J. (1999). Evaluating risks in new product development and the satisfaction of customers through technology. Production Planning & Control, 10(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronsona*, Z. H., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2006). The impact of leader personality on new product development teamwork and performance: The moderating role of uncertainty. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(3), 221–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aronson*, Z. H., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2008). The role of leader personality in new product development success: An examination of teams developing radical and incremental innovations. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(1–2), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ateş*, M. A., Van den Ende, J., & Ianniello, G. (2015). Inter-organizational coordination patterns in buyer-supplier-design agency triads in NPD projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 35(11), 1512–1545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atuahene-Gima, K., & Li, H. (2006). The effects of formal controls on supervisee trust in the manager in new product selling: Evidence from young and inexperienced salespeople in China. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(4), 342–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayag*, Z. (2005a). A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Transactions, 37(9), 827–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayag*, Z. (2005b). An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment. International Journal of Production Research, 43(4), 687–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badir*, Y. F., Büchel, B., & Tucci, C. L. (2008). The role of communication and coordination between ‘network lead companies’ and their strategic partners in determining NPD project performance. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(1–2), 269–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badir*, Y. F., Büchel, B., & Tucci, C. L. (2009). The performance impact of intra-firm organizational design on an alliance’s NPD projects. Research Policy, 38(8), 1350–1364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badir*, Y. F., Büchel, B., & Tucci, C. L. (2012). A conceptual framework of the impact of NPD project team and leader empowerment on communication and performance: An alliance case context. International Journal of Project Management, 30(8), 914–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badir*, Y. F., & O’Connor, G. C. (2015). The formation of tie strength in a strategic alliance’s first new product development project: The influence of project and partners’ characteristics. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 154–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bajaj*, A., Kekre, S., & Srinivasan, K. (2004). Managing NPD: Cost and schedule performance in design and manufacturing. Management Science, 50(4), 527–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker*, M., & Bourne, M. (2014). A governance framework for the idea-to-launch process: Development and application of a governance framework for new product development. Research-Technology Management, 57(1), 42–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balaji*, S., Ranganathan, C., & Coleman, T. (2011). IT-led process reengineering: How Sloan Valve redesigned its new product development process. MIS Quarterly Executive, 10(2), 81–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balbontin*, A., Yazdani, B., Cooper, R., & Souder, W. E. (1999). New product development success factors in American and British firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 17(3), 259–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay*, I. (1992a). The new product development process: Past evidence and future practical application, Part 1. R&D Management, 22(3), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, I. (1992b). The new product development process: Part 2. Improving the process of new product development. R&D Management, 22(4), 307–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay*, I., Holroyd, P., & Poolton, J. (1995). The new product development process: A sphenomorphic management model. International Journal of Vehicle Design, 16(4–5), 356–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barczak, G., Griffin, A., & Kahn, K. B. (2009). Perspective: Trends and drivers of success in NPD practices: Results of the 2003 PDMA best practices study*. Journal of product innovation management, 26(1), 3–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartezzaghi*, E., Corso, M., & Verganti, R. (1997). Continuous improvement and inter-project learning in new product development. International Journal of Technology Management, 14(1), 116–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bassett*, M. H., Gardner, L. L., & Steele, K. (2004). Dow AgroSciences uses simulation-based optimization to schedule the new-product development process. Interfaces, 34(6), 426–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bedford, D. S. (2015). Management control systems across different modes of innovation: Implications for firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 28(9), 12–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bendoly*, E., Bharadwaj, A., & Bharadwaj, S. (2012). Complementary drivers of new product development performance: Cross-functional coordination, information system capability, and intelligence quality. Production and Operations Management, 21(4), 653–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernasco*, W., Weerd-Nederhof, D., Petra, C., Tillema, H., & Boer, H. (1999). Balanced matrix structure and new product development process at Texas Instruments Materials and Controls Division. R&D Management, 29(2), 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bessant*, J., & Francis, D. (1997). Implementing the new product development process. Technovation, 17(4), 189–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhuiyan*, N., Gerwin, D., & Thomson, V. (2004). Simulation of the new product development process for performance improvement. Management Science, 50(12), 1690–1703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., & Malagueño, R. (2009). The choice of interactive control systems under different innovation management modes. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 371–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., & Malagueño, R. (2015). How control systems influence product innovation processes: Examining the role of entrepreneurial orientation. Accounting and Business Research, 45(3), 356–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisbe, J., & Otley, D. (2004). The effects of the interactive use of management control systems on product innovation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29(8), 709–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonner*, J., Ruekert, R. W., & Walker, O. C. (2002). Upper management control of new product development projects and project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(3), 233–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradfield*, D. J., & Gao, J. X. (2007). A methodology to facilitate knowledge sharing in the new product development process. International Journal of Production Research, 45(7), 1489–1504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler*, L. (2005). The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on new product development and time efficiency. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(3), 267–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler*, L., & Hemmert, M. (2010). Increasing learning and time efficiency in inter-organizational new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(4), 485–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bstieler*, L., & Hemmert, M. (2015). The effectiveness of relational and contractual governance in new product development collaborations: Evidence from Korea. Technovation, 45, 29–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüközkan*, G., Baykasoğlu, A., & Dereli, T. (2007). Integration of internet and web-based tools in new product development process. Production Planning and Control, 18(1), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffyn*, S. (1997). Extending continuous improvement to the new product development process. R&D Management, 27(3), 253–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caffyn*, S., & Grantham, A. (2003). Fostering continuous improvement within new product development processes. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(8), 843–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone*, R. J., & di Benedetto, C. A. (1988). An integrative model of the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(3), 201–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calantone*, R. J., Vickery, S. K., & Dröge, C. (1995). Business performance and strategic new product development activities: An empirical investigation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(3), 214–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cáñez*, L., Puig, L., Quintero, R., & Garfias, M. (2007). Linking technology acquisition to a gated NPD process. Research-Technology Management, 50(4), 49–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonara*, N., & Scozzi, B. (2006). Cognitive maps to analyze new product development processes: A case study. Technovation, 26(11), 1233–1243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang*, S. L., Chen, C. Y., & Wey, S. C. (2007). Conceptualizing, assessing, and managing front-end fuzziness in innovation/NPD projects. R&D Management, 37(5), 469–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, C. C., Yeh, T. M., & Yang, C. C. (2006). Performance measurement for new product development: A model based on total costs. International Journal of Production Research, 44(21), 4631–4648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, C. H., & Lin, M. J. J. (2011). An assessment of post-M&A integration influences on new product development performance: An empirical analysis from China, Taiwan, and HK. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 28(4), 807–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, J., Guo, Y., & Zhu, H. (2012). Can me-too products prevail? Performance of new product development and sources of idea generation in China-an emerging market. R&D Management, 42(3), 273–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, J., Neubaum, D. O., Reilly, R. R., & Lynn, G. S. (2015). The relationship between team autonomy and new product development performance under different levels of technological turbulence. Journal of Operations Management, 33(January), 83–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, L. H., & Ko, W. C. (2010). Fuzzy linear programming models for NPD using a four-phase QFD activity process based on the means-end chain concept. European Journal of Operational Research, 201(2), 619–632.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen*, Y. J. (2015). The role of reward systems in product innovations: An examination of new product development projects. Project Management Journal, 46(3), 36–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open business models: How to thrive in a new innovation landscape. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang*, Y. H., & Shih, H. A. (2011). Knowledge-oriented human resource configurations, the new product development learning process, and perceived new product performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(15), 3202–3221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chien*, S. H., & Chen, J. J. (2010). Supplier involvement and customer involvement effect on new product development success in the financial service industry. The Service Industries Journal, 30(2), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V., & Frattini, F. (2007). Exploring the differences in performance measurement between research and development: Evidence from a multiple case study. R&D Management, 37(4), 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chryssochoidis*, G. M., & Wong, V. (2000). Customization of product technology and international new product success: Mediating effects of new product development and rollout timeliness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 17(4), 268–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu*, C. P., Li, C. R., & Lin, C. J. (2011). The joint effect of project-level exploratory and exploitative learning in new product development. European Journal of Marketing, 45(4), 531–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung*, S., & Kim, G. M. (2003). Performance effects of partnership between manufacturers and suppliers for new product development: The supplier’s standpoint. Research Policy, 32(4), 587–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coenen*, M., & Kok, R. A. (2014). Workplace flexibility and new product development performance: The role of telework and flexible work schedules. European Management Journal, 32(4), 564–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen*, M. A., Eliasberg, J., & Ho, T. H. (1996). New product development: The performance and time-to-market tradeoff. Management Science, 42(2), 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo*, G., Dell’Era, C., & Frattini, F. (2015). Exploring the contribution of innovation intermediaries to the new product development (NPD) process: A typology and an empirical study. R&D Management, 45(2), 126–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook*, D. J., Greengold, N. L., Ellrodt, A. G., & Weingarten, S. R. (1997). The relation between systematic reviews and practice guidelines. Annals of Internal Medicine, 127(3), 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1981). The components of risk in new product development: Project new prod. R&D Management, 2(11), 47–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, R. G. (1983). A process model for industrial new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 2–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper*, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1995). Benchmarking the firm’s critical success factors in new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 12(5), 374–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corallo*, A., Lazoi, M., & Secundo, G. (2012). Inter-organizational knowledge integration in Collaborative NPD projects: Evidence from the aerospace industry. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 10(4), 354–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordón-Pozo*, E., Garcia-Morales, V. J., & Aragón-Correa, J. A. (2006). Inter-departmental collaboration and new product development success: A study on the collaboration between marketing and R&D in Spanish high-technology firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 35, 52–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins*, P. D., & Lawson, B. (2007). The effect of socialization mechanisms and performance measurement on supplier integration in new product development. British Journal of Management, 18(3), 311–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cousins*, P. D., Lawson, B., Petersen, K. J., & Handfield, R. B. (2011). Breakthrough scanning, supplier knowledge exchange, and new product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 930–942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Cázares, C., Bayona-Sáez, C., & García-Marco, T. (2013). You can’t manage right what you can’t measure well: Technological innovation efficiency. Research Policy, 42(6–7), 1239–1250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui*, N., Wen, N., Xu, L., & Qin, Y. (2013). Contingent effects of managerial guanxi on new product development success. Journal of Business Research, 66(12), 2522–2528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danese*, P., & Filippini, R. (2010). Modularity and the impact on new product development time performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 30(11), 1191–1209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das, T. K., & Teng, B.-S. (1998). Between trust and control: Developing confidence in partner cooperation in alliances. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 491–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A. (2000). An empirical study on the drivers of management control systems’ design in new product development. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25(4–5), 383–409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davila, A., Foster, G., & Oyon, D. (2009). Accounting and control, entrepreneurship and innovation: Venturing into new research opportunities. European Accounting Review, 18(2), 281–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan*, M. (2010). Managerial trust and NPD team performance: Team commitment and longevity as mediators. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(2), 94–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan*, M., & Basarir, A. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25(1), 18–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan*, M., di Benedetto, C. A., & Colak, M. (2009). Managerial trust in new product development projects: Its antecedents and consequences. R&D Management, 39(1), 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayan*, M., & Elbanna, S. (2011). Antecedents of team intuition and its impact on the success of new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 159–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brentani*, U., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (2004). Corporate culture and commitment: Impact on performance of international new product development programs. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21(5), 309–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Brentani*, U., Kleinschmidt, E. J., & Salomo, S. (2010). Success in global new product development: Impact of strategy and the behavioral environment of the firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(2), 143–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. P. J., & Marsili, O. (2006). The fruit flies of innovations: A taxonomy of innovative small firms. Research Policy, 35(2), 213–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Maio*, A., Verganti, R., & Corso, M. (1994). A multi-project management framework for new product development. European Journal of Operational Research, 78(2), 178–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • den Hond*, F. (1998). On the structuring of variation in innovation processes: A case of new product development in the crop protection industry. Research Policy, 27(4), 349–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Visser*, M., de Weerd-Nederhof, P., Faems, D., Song, M., Van Looy, B., & Visscher, K. (2010). Structural ambidexterity in NPD processes: A firm-level assessment of the impact of differentiated structures on innovation performance. Technovation, 30(5), 291–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Visser*, M., Faems, D., Visscher, K., & de Weerd-Nederhof, P. (2014). The impact of team cognitive styles on performance of radical and incremental NPD projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1167–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Weerd-Nederhof*, P. C., Visscher, K., Altena, J., & Fisscher, O. A. (2008). Operational effectiveness and strategic flexibility: Scales for performance assessment of new product development systems. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3–4), 354–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donthu*, N., & Unal, B. (2014). Identifying escalation of commitment in B2B new product development projects using data envelopment analysis. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 29(3), 209–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durmuşoğlu*, S. S., & Barczak, G. (2011). The use of information technology tools in new product development phases: Analysis of effects on new product innovativeness, quality, and market performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durmuşoğlu*, S. S., Calantone, R. J., & McNally, R. C. (2013). Ordered to innovate: A longitudinal examination of the early periods of a new product development process implementation in a manufacturing firm. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(4), 712–731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgett*, S. J., Shipley, D., & Forbes, G. (1992). Japanese and British companies compared: Contributing factors to success and failure in NPD. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edgett*, S. J. (1996). The new product development process for commercial financial services. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 507–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eng*, T. Y., & Wong, V. (2006). Governance mechanisms and relationship productivity in vertical coordination for new product development. Technovation, 26(7), 761–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, H. (2002). Success factors of new product development: A review of the empirical literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(1), 1–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernst*, H., Hoyer, W. D., & Rübsaamen, C. (2010). Sales, marketing, and research-and-development cooperation across new product development stages: Implications for success. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 80–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fain*, N., Schoormans, J., & Duhovnik, J. (2011). The effect of R&D-Marketing integration on NPD success â the case of SMEs in the growing economy of Slovenia. International Journal of Technology Management, 56(1), 92–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan*, Z. P., Feng, B., & Suo, W. L. (2009). A fuzzy linguistic method for evaluating collaboration satisfaction of NPD team using mutual evaluation information. International Journal of Production Economics, 122(2), 547–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang*, E., Lee, J., & Yang, Z. (2015). The timing of codevelopment alliances in new product development processes: Returns for upstream and downstream partners. Journal of Marketing, 79(1), 64–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faure*, C. (2009). Attribution biases in the evaluation of new product development team members. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(4), 407–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fekri*, R., Aliahmadi, A., & Fathian, M. (2009). Identifying the cause and effect factors of agile NPD process with fuzzy DEMATEL method: The case of Iranian companies. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 20(6), 637–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felekoglu*, B., Maier, A. M., & Moultrie, J. (2013). Interactions in new product development: How the nature of the NPD process influences interaction between teams and management. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(4), 384–401.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferreira, A., & Otley, D. (2009). The design and use of performance management systems: An extended framework for analysis. Management Accounting Research, 20(4), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank*, A. G., & Ribeiro, J. L. D. (2014). An integrative model for knowledge transfer between new product development project teams. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 12(2), 215–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frishammar*, J., & Hörte, S. A. (2007). The role of market orientation and entrepreneurial orientation for new product development performance in manufacturing firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(6), 765–788.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. J. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: A literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19(2), 110–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gemser*, G., & Leenders, M. A. (2011). Managing cross-functional cooperation for new product development success. Long Range Planning, 44(1), 26–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genç*, E., & di Benedetto, C. A. (2015). Cross-functional integration in the sustainable new product development process: The role of the environmental specialist. Industrial Marketing Management, 50, 150–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin*, D., & Ferris, J. S. (2004). Organizing new product development projects in strategic alliances. Organization Science, 15(1), 22–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerwin*, D., & Moffat, L. (1997). Authorizing processes changing team autonomy during new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 14(3), 291–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godener*, A., & Söderquist, K. E. (2004). Use and impact of performance measurement results in R&D and NPD: An exploratory study. R&D Management, 34(2), 191–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goffin*, K. (1998). Evaluating customer support during new product development-an exploratory study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 42–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes*, J. F., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Pearson, A. W., & Cunha, M. P. (2003). Is more always better? An exploration of the differential effects of functional integration on performance in new product development. Technovation, 23(3), 185–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González*, F. J. M., & Palacios, T. M. B. (2002). The effect of new product development techniques on new product success in Spanish firms. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(3), 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gopalakrishnan*, M., Libby, T., Samuels, J. A., & Swenson, D. (2015). The effect of cost goal specificity and new product development process on cost reduction performance. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 42(April), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green*, S. G., Welsh, M. A., & Dehler, G. E. (2003). Advocacy, performance, and threshold influence on decisions to terminate new product development. Academy of Management Journal, 46(4), 419–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönlund*, J., Sjödin, D. R., & Frishammar, J. (2010). Open innovation and the stage-gate process: A revised model for new product development. California Management Review, 52(3), 106–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta*, A. K., Brockhoff, K., & Weisenfeld, U. (1992). Making trade-offs in the new product development process: A German/US comparison. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(1), 11–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haon*, C., Gotteland, D., & Fornerino, M. (2009). Familiarity and competence diversity in new product development teams: Effects on new product performance. Marketing Letters, 20(1), 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameri*, A. P., & Nihtilä, J. (1997). Distributed new product development project based on Internet and World-Wide Web: A case study. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(2), 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque*, B., & Pawar, K. S. (2001). Improving the management of concurrent new product development using process modelling and analysis. R&D Management, 31(1), 27–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmancioglu*, N., Dröge, C., & Calantone, R. J. (2009). Strategic fit to resources versus NPD execution proficiencies: What are their roles in determining success? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(3), 266–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmancioglu*, N., McNally, R. C., Calantone, R. J., & Durmuşoğlu, S. S. (2007). Your new product development (NPD) is only as good as your process: An exploratory analysis of new NPD process design and implementation. R&D Management, 37(5), 399–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart*, S., Hultink, E. J., Tzokas, N., & Commandeur, H. R. (2003). Industrial companies’ evaluation criteria in new product development gates. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(1), 22–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haustein, E., Luther, R., & Schuster, P. (2014). Management control systems in innovation companies: A literature based framework. Journal of Management Control, 24(4), 343–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempelmann*, F., & Engelen, A. (2014). Integration of finance with marketing and R&D in new product development: The role of project stage. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(4), 636–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hise*, R. T., O’Neal, L., Parasuraman, A., & McNeal, J. U. (1990). Marketing/R&D interaction in new product development: Implications for new product success rates. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 142–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu*, Y. H., & Fang, W. (2009). Intellectual capital and new product development performance: The mediating role of organizational learning capability. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 76(5), 664–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang*, X., Soutar, G. N., & Brown, A. (2002). New product development processes in small and medium-sized enterprises: Some Australian evidence. Journal of Small Business Management, 40(1), 27–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes*, G. D., & Chafin, D. C. (1996). Turning new product development into a continuous learning process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(2), 89–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hultink*, E. J., Talke, K., Griffin, A., & Veldhuizen, E. (2011). Market information processing in new product development: The importance of process interdependency and data quality. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(2), 199–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh*, V. N., & Nakamori, Y. (2011). A linguistic screening evaluation model in new product development. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(1), 165–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ignatius*, J., Leen, J. Y. A., Ramayah, T., Hin, C. K., & Jantan, M. (2012). The impact of technological learning on NPD outcomes: The moderating effect of project complexity. Technovation, 32(7), 452–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaber*, H., Marle, F., & Jankovic, M. (2015). Improving collaborative decision making in new product development projects using clustering algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 62(4), 475–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jassawalla*, A. R., & Sashittal, H. C. (1998). An examination of collaboration in high-technology new product development processes. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(3), 237–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram*, J. (2008). Supplier involvement in new product development projects: Dimensionality and contingency effects. International Journal of Production Research, 46(13), 3717–3735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram*, J., & Malhotra, M. K. (2010). The differential and contingent impact of concurrency on new product development project performance: A holistic examination. Decision Sciences, 41(1), 147–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayaram*, J., & Narasimhan, R. (2007). The influence of new product development competitive capabilities on project performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 54(2), 241–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jepsen*, L. B. (2013). Complex new product development projects: How the project manager’s information sharing with core actors changes over time. Project Management Journal, 44(6), 20–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jespersen*, K. R. (2012). Stage-to-Stage information dependency in the NPD process: Effective learning or a potential entrapment of NPD gates? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(2), 257–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones*, O., & Stevens, G. (1999). Evaluating failure in the innovation process: The micropolitics of new product development. R&D Management, 29(2), 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jou*, Y., Chen, C., Hwang, C., Lin, W., & Huang, S. (2010). A study on the improvements of new product development procedure performance: An application of design for Six Sigma in a semi-conductor equipment manufacturer. International Journal of Production Research, 48(19), 5573–5591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juan*, Y. C., Ou-Yang, C., & Lin, J. S. (2009). A process-oriented multi-agent system development approach to support the cooperation-activities of concurrent new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(4), 1363–1376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kandemir, D., Calantone, R., & Garcia, R. (2006). An exploration of organizational factors in new product development success. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 21(5), 300–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karagozoglu*, N., & Brown, W. B. (1993). Time-based management of the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(3), 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karakaya*, F., & Kobu, B. (1994). New product development process: An investigation of success and failure in high-technology and non-high-technology firms. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(1), 49–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keupp, M. M., Palmié, M., & Gassmann, O. (2012). The strategic management of innovation: A systematic review and paths for future research. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14(4), 367–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller*, R. T. (2001). Cross-functional project groups in research and new product development: Diversity, communications, job stress, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 44(3), 547–555.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerssens-van Drongelen, I. C., Nixon, W., & Pearson, A. (2000). Performance measurement in industrial R&D. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2(2), 111–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kester*, L., Hultink, E. J., & Griffin, A. (2014). An empirical investigation of the antecedents and outcomes of NPD portfolio success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1199–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim*, J., & Wilemon, D. (2003). Sources and assessment of complexity in NPD projects. R&D Management, 33(1), 15–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinschmidt*, E. J., de Brentani, U., & Salomo, S. (2007). Performance of global new product development programs: A resource-based view. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(5), 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen*, M. P. (2007). The relative importance of interfirm relationships and knowledge transfer for new product development success. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(2), 117–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong*, T., Li, G., Feng, T., & Sun, L. (2015). Effects of marketing-manufacturing integration across stages of new product development on performance. International Journal of Production Research, 53(8), 2269–2284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koyuncu*, E., & Erol, R. (2015). PSO based approach for scheduling NPD projects including overlapping process. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85(July), 316–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kyriazis*, E., Couchman, P., & Johnson, L. W. (2012). Psychosocial antecedents of communication, trust, and relationship effectiveness in new product development projects: A functional manager perspective. R&D Management, 42(3), 207–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaBahn*, D. W., Ali, A., & Krapfel, R. (1996). New product development cycle time: The influence of project and process factors in small manufacturing companies. Journal of Business Research, 36(2), 179–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakemond*, N., & Berggren, C. (2006). Co-locating NPD? The need for combining project focus and organizational integration. Technovation, 26(7), 807–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam*, P. K., & Chin, K. S. (2005). Identifying and prioritizing critical success factors for conflict management in collaborative new product development. Industrial Marketing Management, 34(8), 761–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambe*, C. J., Morgan, R. E., Sheng, S., & Kutwaroo, G. (2009). Alliance-based new product development success: The role of formalization in exploration and exploitation contexts. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 16(3), 242–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson*, B., Krause, D., & Potter, A. (2015). Improving supplier new product development performance: The role of supplier development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(5), 777–792.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson*, B., & Potter, A. (2012). Determinants of knowledge transfer in inter-firm new product development projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 32(10), 1228–1247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechler*, T. G., & Thomas, J. L. (2015). Examining new product development project termination decision quality at the portfolio level: Consequences of dysfunctional executive advocacy. International Journal of Project Management, 33(7), 1452–1463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledwith*, A., & O’Dwyer, M. (2009). Market orientation, NPD performance, and organizational performance in small firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 652–661.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee*, K. B., & Wong, V. (2011). Identifying the moderating influences of external environments on new product development process. Technovation, 31(10), 598–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lester, D. H. (1998). Critical success factors for new product development. Research Technology Management, 41(1), 36–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis*, M. A. (2001). Success, failure and organisational competence: A case study of the new product development process. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 18(2), 185–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li*, C. R., Chu, C. P., & Lin, C. J. (2010). The contingent value of exploratory and exploitative learning for new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 39(7), 1186–1197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilien*, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M., & von Hippel, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea-generation process for new product development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin*, M. J. J., & Huang, C. H. (2013). The impact of customer participation on NPD performance: The mediating role of inter-organisation relationship. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 28(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lint*, O., & Pennings, E. (2001). An option approach to the new product development process: A case study at Philips Electronics. R&D Management, 31(2), 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu*, J., Chen, J., & Tao, Y. (2015). Innovation performance in new product development teams in China’s technology ventures: The role of behavioral integration dimensions and collective efficacy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(1), 29–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu*, P. L., Chen, W. C., & Tsai, C. H. (2005). An empirical study on the correlation between the knowledge management method and new product development strategy on product performance in Taiwan’s industries. Technovation, 25(6), 637–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCormack*, A., Crandall, W., Henderson, P., & Toft, P. (2012). Do you need a new product-development strategy? Research-Technology Management, 55(1), 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magni*, M., Maruping, L. M., Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2013). Managing the unexpected across space: Improvisation, dispersion, and performance in NPD teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 30(5), 1009–1026.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra*, M. K., Grover, V., & DeSilvio, M. (1996). Reengineering the new product development process: A framework for innovation and flexibility in high technology firms. Omega, 24(4), 425–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marion*, T. J., Eddleston, K. A., Friar, J. H., & Deeds, D. (2015). The evolution of inter-organizational relationships in emerging ventures: An ethnographic study within the new product development process. Journal of Business Venturing, 30(1), 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham*, S. K., & Lee, H. (2014). Marriage and family therapy in NPD teams: Effects of we-ness on knowledge sharing and product performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1291–1311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marmier*, F., Gourc, D., & Laarz, F. (2013). A risk oriented model to assess strategic decisions in new product development projects. Decision Support Systems, 56, 74–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martínez León*, H. C., Farris, J. A., Letens, G., & Hernandez, A. (2013). An analytical management framework for new product development processes featuring uncertain iterations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 30(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massey*, G. R., & Kyriazis, E. (2007). Interpersonal trust between marketing and R&D during new product development projects. European Journal of Marketing, 41(9–10), 1146–1172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maylor*, H. (2001). Assessing the relationship between practice changes and process improvement in new product development. Omega, 29(1), 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough*, E. F. (1993). Faster new product development: Investigating the effects of technology and characteristics of the project leader and team. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(3), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonough*, E. F., & Barczak, G. (1999). How ‘EPC Co’. Revamped its NPD process. Research Technology Management, 42(3), 9–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonough*, E. F., & Kinnunen, R. M. (1984). Management control of new product development projects. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 1, 18–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNally*, R. C., Akdeniz, M. B., & Calantone, R. J. (2011). New product development processes and new product profitability: Exploring the mediating role of speed to market and product quality. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 63–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melander*, L., & Lakemond, N. (2015). Governance of supplier collaboration in technologically uncertain NPD projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 116–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mihm*, J. (2010). Incentives in new product development projects and the role of target costing. Management Science, 56(8), 1324–1344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra*, A. A., & Shah, R. (2009). In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects. Journal of Operations Management, 27(4), 324–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moenaert*, R. K., & Souder, W. E. (1990). An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 7(2), 91–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montoya-Weiss*, M. M., & Calantone, R. J. (1994). Determinants of new product performance: A review and meta-analysis. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 11(5), 397–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu*, J. (2014). Networking capability, network structure, and new product development performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 61(4), 599–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu*, J. (2015). Marketing capability, organizational adaptation and new product development performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 49, 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu*, J., Peng, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2009). Effect of risk management strategy on NPD performance. Technovation, 29(3), 170–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu*, J., Zhang, G., & MacLachlan, D. L. (2011). Social competency and new product development performance. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 58(2), 363–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray*, J. Y., & Chao, M. C. (2005). A cross-team framework of international knowledge acquisition on new product development capabilities and new product market performance. Journal of International Marketing, 13(3), 54–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natter*, M., Mild, A., Feurstein, M., Dorffner, G., & Taudes, A. (2001). The effect of incentive schemes and organizational arrangements on the new product development process. Management Science, 47(8), 1029–1045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neely, A., Gregory, M., & Platts, K. (1995). Performance measurement system design: A literature review and research agenda. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 15(4), 80–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newey*, L., & Verreynne, M. L. (2011). Multilevel absorptive capacity and interorganizational new product development: A process study. Journal of Management & Organization, 17(1), 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nihtilä*, J. (1999). R&D-Production integration in the early phases of new product development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 16(1), 55–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oehmen*, J., Olechowski, A., Kenley, C. R., & Ben-Daya, M. (2014). Analysis of the effect of risk management practices on the performance of new product development programs. Technovation, 34(8), 441–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke*, A., & Idiagbon-Oke, M. (2010). Communication channels, innovation tasks and NPD project outcomes in innovation-driven horizontal networks. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 442–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olin*, T., & Shani, A. B. (2003). NPD as a sustainable work process in a dynamic business environment. R&D Management, 33(1), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olson*, E. M., Walker, O. C., Ruekert, R. W., & Bonner, J. M. (2001). Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(4), 258–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens*, J. D. (2007). Why do some UK SMEs still find the implementation of a new product development process problematical? Management Decision, 45(2), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer*, M. (2003). Process implications of the use of the Internet in new product development: A conceptual analysis. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(6), 517–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, A. L. (1993). Assessing new product development practices and performance: Establishing crucial norms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 10(4), 273–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappas, R. A., & Remer, D. S. (1985). Measuring R and D productivity. Research-Technology Management, 28(3), 15–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park*, H., Lim, W. J., & Birnbaum-More, P. H. (2009). The effect of multi-knowledge individuals on performance in cross-functional new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(1), 86–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker*, H., & Brey, Z. (2015). Collaboration costs and new product development performance. Journal of Business Research, 68(7), 1653–1656.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry*, M. E., Song, M., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., & Visscher, K. (2009). The impact of NPD strategy, product strategy, and NPD processes on perceived cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasche*, M., Persson, M., & Löfsten, H. (2011). Effects of platforms on new product development projects. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 31(11), 1144–1163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patanakul*, P., Shenhar, A. J., & Milosevic, D. Z. (2012). How project strategy is used in project management: Cases of new product development and software development projects. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 29(3), 391–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng*, D. X., Heim, G. R., & Mallick, D. N. (2014). Collaborative product development: The effect of project complexity on the use of information technology tools and new product development practices. Production and Operations Management, 23(8), 1421–1438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perks*, H., Kahn, K., & Zhang, C. (2009). An empirical evaluation of R&D-Marketing NPD integration in Chinese firms: The guanxi effect. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(6), 640–651.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen*, K. J., Handfield, R. B., & Ragatz, G. L. (2005). Supplier integration into new product development: Coordinating product, process and supply chain design. Journal of Operations Management, 23(3–4), 371–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pons*, D. (2008). Project management for new product development. Project Management Journal, 39(2), 82–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prašnikar*, J., & Škerlj, T. (2006). New product development process and time-to-market in the generic pharmaceutical industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(6), 690–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari*, D. (2006). Eco-innovation and new product development: Understanding the influences on market performance. Technovation, 26(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pujari*, D., Wright, G., & Peattie, K. (2003). Green and competitive. Journal of Business Research, 56(8), 657–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pullen*, A. J. J., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., Groen, A. J., & Fisscher, O. A. M. (2012). Open innovation in practice: Goal complementarity and closed NPD networks to explain differences in innovation performance for SMEs in the medical devices sector. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(6), 917–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Racela*, O. C. (2015). Viable strategy configurations and new product development capability and performance: Evidence from Thailand. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 27(2), 249–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragatz*, G. L., Handfield, R. B., & Scannell, T. V. (1997). Success factors for integrating suppliers into new product development. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 190–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramesh*, B., & Tiwana, A. (1999). Supporting collaborative process knowledge management in new product development teams. Decision Support Systems, 27(1), 213–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbar*, M. (2013). A branch-and-bound algorithm for scheduling of new product development projects. International Transactions in Operational Research, 20(2), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, V. R. (1997). Resources for research and pedagogy on new product development processes. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reidenbach*, R. E., & Moak, D. L. (1986). Exploring retail bank performance and new product development: A profile of industry practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 3(3), 187–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reilly*, R. R., Lynn, G. S., & Aronson, Z. H. (2002). The role of personality in new product development team performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 19(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rijsdijk*, S. A., & van den Ende, J. (2011). Control Combinations in New Product Development Projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 868–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rochford*, L., & Rudelius, W. (1997). New product development process: Stages and successes in the medical products industry. Industrial Marketing Management, 26(1), 67–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers*, H., Ghauri, P., & Pawar, K. S. (2005). Measuring international NPD projects: An evaluation process. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 20(2), 79–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roper*, S., Micheli, P., Love, J. H., & Vahter, P. (2015). The roles and effectiveness of design in new product development: A study of Irish manufacturers. Research Policy, 45(1), 319–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruy*, M., & Alliprandini, D. H. (2008). Organisational learning in the new product development process: Findings from three case studies in Brazilian manufacturing companies. International Journal of Technology Management, 44(3–4), 461–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahay*, A., & Riley, D. (2003). The role of resource access, market considerations, and the nature of innovation in pursuit of standards in the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 20(5), 338–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomo*, S., Steinhoff, F., & Trommsdorff, V. (2003). Customer orientation in innovation projects and new product development success-the moderating effect of product innovativeness. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(5–6), 442–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomo*, S., Weise, J., & Gemünden, H. G. (2007). NPD planning activities and innovation performance: The mediating role of process management and the moderating effect of product innovativeness. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(4), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandvik*, I. L., Arnett, D. B., & Sandvik, K. (2011). The effects of new product development proficiency on product advantage and tourism business performance evidence from the Norwegian hotel industry. Journal of Travel Research, 50(6), 641–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarin*, S., & McDermott, C. (2003). The effect of team leader characteristics on learning, knowledge application, and performance of cross-functional new product development teams. Decision Sciences, 34(4), 707–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleimer*, S. C., & Shulman, A. D. (2011). A comparison of new service versus new product development: Configurations of collaborative intensity as predictors of performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(4), 521–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt*, J. B., & Calantone, R. J. (1998). Are really new product development projects harder to shut down? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(2), 111–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt*, J. B., Montoya-Weiss, M. M., & Massey, A. P. (2001). New product development decision-making effectiveness: Comparing individuals, face-to-face teams, and virtual teams. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 575–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt*, J. B., Sarangee, K. R., & Montoya, M. M. (2009). Exploring new product development project review practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26(5), 520–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenherr*, T., Griffith, D. A., & Chandra, A. (2014). Intangible capital, knowledge and new product development competence in supply chains: Process, interaction and contingency effects among SMEs. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4916–4929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulze*, A., & Hoegl, M. (2006). Knowledge creation in new product development projects. Journal of Management, 32(2), 210–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherman*, D. J., Berkowitz, D., & Souder, W. E. (2005). New product development performance and the interaction of cross-functional integration and knowledge management. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 22(5), 399–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicotte*, H., & Bourgault, M. (2008). Dimensions of uncertainty and their moderating effect on new product development project performance. R&D Management, 38(5), 468–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sicotte*, H., Prefontaine, L., Ricard, L., & Bourgault, M. (2004). New product development: Customers’ and suppliers’ assessment of the same project. International Journal of Technology Management, 27(2–3), 176–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon*, F., & Tellier, A. (2011). How do actors shape social networks during the process of new product development? European Management Journal, 29(5), 414–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, R. (1995). Levers of control: How managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siu*, W., Lin, T., Fang, W., & Liu, Z. C. (2006). An institutional analysis of the new product development process of small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in China, Hong Kong and Taiwan. Industrial Marketing Management, 35(3), 323–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sivasubramaniam*, N., Liebowitz, S. J., & Lackman, C. L. (2012). Determinants of new product development team performance: A meta-analytic Review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(5), 803–820.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeds*, R., Haho, P., & Alvesalo, J. (2003). Bottom-up or top-down? Evolutionary change management in NPD processes. International Journal of Technology Management, 26(8), 887–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smits*, A., & Kok, R. (2012). The interplay between outbound team strategy and market information processing in the course of ‘really new’ NPD projects. Industrial Marketing Management, 41(5), 759–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song*, M., & di Benedetto, C. A. (2008). Supplier’s involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures. Journal of Operations Management, 26(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song*, M., & Swink, M. (2009). Marketing-manufacturing integration across stages of new product development: Effects on the success of high-and low-innovativeness products. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 56(1), 31–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song*, W., Ming, X., & Xu, Z. (2013). Risk evaluation of customer integration in new product development under uncertainty. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 65(3), 402–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song*, X. M., Neeley, S. M., & Zhao, Y. (1996). Managing R&D-marketing integration in the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 25(6), 545–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song*, X. M., & Perry, M. E. (1997). A cross-national comparative study of new product development processes: Japan and the United States. The Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa*, M. E., Gargiulo, M., & Rowles, C. (2015). Can informal communication networks disrupt coordination in new product development projects? Organization Science, 26(4), 1059–1078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder*, W. E. (1988). Managing relations between R&D and marketing in new product development projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1(5), 6–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder*, W. E., Buisson, D., & Garrett, T. (1997). Success through customer-driven new product development: A comparison of US and New Zealand small entrepreneurial high technology firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(6), 459–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Souder*, W. E., Sherman, J. D., & Davies-Cooper, R. (1998). Environmental uncertainty, organizational integration, and new product development effectiveness: A test of contingency theory. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(6), 520–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spivey*, W. A., Munson, J. M., & Wolcott, J. H. (1997). Improving the new product development process: A fractal paradigm for high-technology products. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 14(3), 203–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock*, R. M. (2014). How should customers be integrated for effective interorganizational NPD teams? An input-process-output perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3), 535–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Storey, C., & Easingwood, C. (1993). The impact of the new product development project on the success of financial services. Service Industries Journal, 13(3), 40–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strang*, D. K. (2011). Leadership substitutes and personality impact on time and quality in virtual new product development projects. Project Management Journal, 42(1), 73–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramaniam*, M., Rosenthal, S. R., & Hatten, K. J. (1998). Global new product development processes: Preliminary findings and research propositions. Journal of Management Studies, 35(6), 773–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun*, H., & Wing, W. C. (2005). Critical success factors for new product development in the Hong Kong toy industry. Technovation, 25(3), 293–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun*, W., Xu, A., & Shang, Y. (2014). Transformational leadership, team climate, and team performance within the NPD team: Evidence from China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 127–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink*, M. (2003). Completing projects on-time: How project acceleration affects new product development. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(4), 319–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swink*, M., Talluri, S., & Pandejpong, T. (2006). Faster, better, cheaper: A study of NPD project efficiency and performance tradeoffs. Journal of Operations Management, 24(5), 542–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takayama*, M., Watanabe, C., & Griffy-Brown, C. (2002). Alliance strategy as a competitive strategy for successively creative new product development: The proof of the co-evolution of creativity and efficiency in the Japanese pharmaceutical industry. Technovation, 22(10), 607–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tavani*, S. N., Sharifi, H., Soleimanof, S., & Najmi, M. (2013). An empirical study of firm’s absorptive capacity dimensions, supplier involvement and new product development performance. International Journal of Production Research, 51(11), 3385–3403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor*, P., & Lowe, J. (1997). Are functional assets or knowledge assets the basis of new product development performance? Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 9(4), 473–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thieme*, R. J., Song, M., & Calantone, R. J. (2000). Artificial neural network decision support systems for new product development project selection. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(4), 499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas*, E. (2013). Supplier integration in new product development: Computer mediated communication, knowledge exchange and buyer performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 42(6), 890–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thwaites*, D. (1992). Organizational influences on the new product development process in financial services. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(4), 303–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation; integrating technological, market and organizational change. Chichester, GB: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tidd*, J., & Bodley, K. (2002). The influence of project novelty on the new product development process. R&D Management, 32(2), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tighe*, G. (1998). From experience: Securing sponsors and funding for new product development projects - The human side of enterprise. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(1), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomes*, A., Armstrong, P., & Clark, M. (1996). User groups in action: The management of user inputs in the NPD process. Technovation, 16(10), 541–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranekjer*, T. L., & Søndergaard, H. A. (2013). Sources of innovation, their combinations and strengths-benefits at the NPD project level. International Journal of Technology Management, 61(3–4), 205–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranfield, D. R., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai*, F. S., Baugh, G. S., Fang, S. C., & Lin, J. L. (2014). Contingent contingency: Knowledge heterogeneity and new product development performance revisited. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(1), 149–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzokas*, N., Hultink, E. J., & Hart, S. (2004). Navigating the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 619–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Panne, G., van Beers, C., & Kleinknecht, A. (2003). Success and failure of innovation: A literature review. International Journal of Innovation Management, 7(3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Oorschot*, K. E., Akkermans, H., Sengupta, K., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2013). Anatomy of a decision trap in complex new product development projects. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 285–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Oorschot*, K. E., Langerak, F., & Sengupta, K. (2011). Escalation, de-escalation, or reformulation: Effective interventions in delayed NPD projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(6), 848–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varela*, J., & Benito, L. (2005). New product development process in Spanish firms: Typology, antecedents and technical/marketing activities. Technovation, 25(4), 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varma*, V. A., Uzsoy, R., Pekny, J., & Blau, G. (2007). Lagrangian heuristics for scheduling new product development projects in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Heuristics, 13(5), 403–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldhuizen*, E., Hultink, E. J., & Griffin, A. (2006). Modeling market information processing in new product development: An empirical analysis. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verworn*, B. (2009). A structural equation model of the impact of the fuzzy front end on the success of new product development. Research Policy, 38(10), 1571–1581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verworn*, B., Herstatt, C., & Nagahira, A. (2008). The fuzzy front end of Japanese new product development projects: Impact on success and differences between incremental and radical projects. R&D Management, 38(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veryzer*, R. W. (1998). Discontinuous innovation and the new product development process. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 15(4), 304–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • vom Brocke, J., Simons, A., Niehaves, B., Riemer, K., Plattfaut, R., & Cleven, A. (2009). Reconstructing the giant: On the importance of rigour in documenting the literature search process. In Paper presented at the 17th European Conference on Information Systems, Verona (pp. 2206–2217).

  • Wang*, J., & Lin, Y. I. (2009). An overlapping process model to assess schedule risk for new product development. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57(2), 460–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang*, Y., & Li-Ying, J. (2014). When does inward technology licensing facilitate firms’ NPD performance? A contingency perspective. Technovation, 34(1), 44–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watkins*, T. (1984). The practice of product testing in the new product development process: The role of model-based approaches. European Journal of Marketing, 18(6–7), 14–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wind, Y., & Mahajan, V. (1988). New product development process: A perspective for reexamination. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 5(4), 304–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters*, M., Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Wynstra, F. (2009). Improving sourcing decisions in NPD projects: Monetary quantification of points of difference. Journal of Operations Management, 27(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynstra*, F., Anderson, J. C., Narus, J. A., & Wouters, M. (2012). Supplier development responsibility and NPD project outcomes: The roles of monetary quantification of differences and supporting-detail gathering. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(S1), 103–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan*, T., & Dooley, K. (2014). Buyer-supplier collaboration quality in new product development projects. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(2), 59–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang*, L. R. (2012). Implementation of project strategy to improve new product development performance. International Journal of Project Management, 30(7), 760–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeh*, T. M., Pai, F. Y., & Yang, C. C. (2010). Performance improvement in new product development with effective tools and techniques adoption for high-tech industries. Quality & Quantity, 44(1), 131–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeniyurt*, S., Henke, J. W., & Yalcinkaya, G. (2014). A longitudinal analysis of supplier involvement in buyers’ new product development: Working relations, inter-dependence, co-innovation, and performance outcomes. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(3), 291–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu*, B., Hao, S., Ahlstrom, D., Si, S., & Liang, D. (2014). Entrepreneurial firms’ network competence, technological capability, and new product development performance. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3), 687–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahay*, D., Griffin, A., & Fredericks, E. (2004). Sources, uses, and forms of data in the new product development process. Industrial Marketing Management, 33(7), 657–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolghadri*, M., Amrani, A., Zouggar, S., & Girard, P. (2011a). Power assessment as a high-level partner selection criterion for new product development projects. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 24(4), 312–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zolghadri*, M., Girard, P., Baron, C., & Aldanondo, M. (2011b). A general framework for new product development projects. International Journal of Technology Management, 55(3–4), 250–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments. Further, we thank Florian Müller for his strong support during data collection. This research is part of the first author’s dissertation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benedikt Müller-Stewens.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 2.

Table 2 Assignment of keywords to articles

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Müller-Stewens, B., Möller, K. Performance in new product development: a comprehensive framework, current trends, and research directions. J Manag Control 28, 157–201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0243-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00187-016-0243-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation