Skip to main content
Log in

Some history of heredity-vs-environment, genetic inferiority at Harvard(?), andThe (incredible)Bell Curve

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article discusses some historical and intellectual roots of American behaviorism in psychology and its antiheredity, environmentalist bias, as well as the early ‘justification’ for pure line theory in genetics and some interrelations between the two fields. Next, I discuss the heritability concept, its promotion, its critique and the importance of distinguishing it from, rather than confusing or conflating it with, the heredity concept. Then, briefly I consider some of the history and problems associated with the intelligence concept, as well as the capital importance of biological controls in studies of human heredity. And finally, I document the incredibility ofThe Bell Curve and the appalling inadequacy of its reception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bouchard, T.J. Jr., 1995. Breaking the last taboo [Review of The Bell Curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life by R. J. Herrnstein and C. Murray]. Contemporary Psychology 40: 415–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L., P. Menozzi & A. Piazza, 1996. The History and Geography of Human Genes. Abridged paperback edition. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. & F. Cavalli-Sforza, 1995. The great human diasporas: The History of Diversity and Evolution (first published 1993 in Italy by Arnoldo Mondadori Editore Spa, Milano asChi Siamo: La Storia della Diversita Umana, translated into English by Sarah Thorne, English Postscript 1995 by Luigi Luca Cavalli-Sforza). Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Menlo Park CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronbach, L., 1981. In Hirsch 1993.

  • Crouse, J. & D. Trusheim, 1988. The Case against the SAT. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crow, J.F., 1988. Eugenics: Must it be a dirty word? [Review of In the name of eugenics; Genetics and the uses of human heredity, by D.J. Keeles]. Contemporary Psychology 33: 10–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeFries, J.C. 1967. Quantitative genetics and behavior: overview and perspective, pp. 322–339 in Behavior-Genetic Analysis edited by Jerry Hirsch. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorfman, D.D., 1982, November. IQ and the media [Letter to the editor]. The Atlantic, pp. 6, 12–14.

  • Dorfman, D.D., 1995. Soft science with a neoconservative agenda. [Review of The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life by R.J. Herrnstein and C. Murray]. Contemporary Psychology 40: 418–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Falconer, D.S., 1960. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, R.A., 1951. Limits to intensive production in animals. British Agricultural Bulletin 4: 217–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L., 1992. The irrelevance of factor analysis for the study of group differences. Multivariate Behavioral Research 27: 175–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, J.B.S., 1996. The negative heritability of neonatal jaundice. Ann. Hum. Genet. 60: 3–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Handler, P., 1980. Editorial. Public doubts about science. Science 208: 1093.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartigan, J.A. & A.K. Wigdor (Eds.), 1989. Fairness in Employment Testing: Validity Generalization, Minority Issues, and the General Aptitude Test Battery. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R.J., 1973. IQ in The Meritocracy. Little Brown, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R.J., 1975. Herrnstein replies. Contemporary Psychology 20: 436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrnstein, R.J. & C.A. Murray, 1994. The Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life. Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1963. Behavior genetics and individuality understood: Behaviorism's counterfactual dogma blinded the behavioral sciences to the significance of meiosis. Science 142: 1436–1442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1967a. Behavior-genetic, or ‘experimental’, analysis: The challenge of science versus the lure of technology. Am. Psychologist. 22: 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1967b. (Ed.). Behavior-Genetic Analysis. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1975. Hirsch on Herrnstein and Jensen. Contemporary Psychology 20: 436.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1976a. Jensenism: The bankruptcy of ‘science’ without scholarship. United States Congressional Record, Vol. 122: No. 73, E2671-2; No. 74, E2693-5; No. 75, E2703-5, E2716-8, E2721-2, 1976. (Originally published in Educational Theory, 1975, 25: 3–27, 102).

  • Hirsch, J., 1976b. Review of sociobiology by E.O. Wilson. Animal Behaviour 24: 707–709.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1990. A nemesis for heritability estimation. [Comment on ‘Insensity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction’]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 137–138. (For an uncensored version that Editor Harnad refused to allow me to publish see J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives No. 15/19/22).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., 1993. Terman's questionable evidence. [Comments on review by V.R. Davine of Terman's kids: The groundbreaking study of how the gifted grow up.] Contemporary Psychology 38: 1135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. & L. Erlenmeyer-Kimling, 1961. Sign of taxis as a property of genotypes. Science 134: 835–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J., T.R. McGuire & A. Vetta, 1980. Concepts of behavior genetics and misapplications to humans. In J.S. Lockard (Ed.), The Evolution of Human Social Behavior, pp. 215–238, Elsevier, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, L., 1975a. Letter of 11/25/75 to Dr. Robert Maurer, Sigma Xi. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Humphreys, L., 1975b. Letter of 12/19/75 to Prof. Robert McL. Whitney, Sigma Xi. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Humphreys, L.G., 1993. Deposition of Lloyd G. Humphreys in Jerry Hirsch, Plaintiff vs. Roger Pearson, Lloyd G. Humphreys, and Scott-Townsend Publishers, jointly and severally, Defendants: No. 92-L-1244 In the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit Champaign County, Illinois. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Humphreys, L., 1996. Signed statement of 6/19/96. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Jacquard, A., 1983. Heritability: One word, three concepts. Biometrics 39: 465–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquard, A., 1997. RACE, GÈNES ET QI. La Recherche, No. 297, Avril, p. 6.

  • Jensen, A.R., 1992. Preface pp. 1–3 in Shockley on Eugenics and Race: The Application of Science to the Solution of Human Problems, edited by R. Pearson, Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R.P., 1974. Phenotypic variation, fingerprints, and human behavior: An application of the family-pedigree paradigm (Doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois, 1974). Dissertation Abstracts International 35(1): 546-B.

  • Kamin, L.J., 1974. The Science and Politics of IQ. Lawrence Erlbaum, Potomac, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., 1978. A BIOMETRICS INVITED PAPER: Logical, epistemological and statistical aspects of nature-nurture data interpretation. Biometrics 34: 1–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., 1990. How does one apply statistical analysis to our understanding of the development of human relationships. [Comments on “Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction”]. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 138–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kempthorne, O., 1997. Heritability: Uses and abuses. [Paper presented at the University of Illinois, 22 April 1993]. Genetica 99: 109–112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, H.H., 8 March 1924. [Statement with Appendixes of Dr. Harry H. Laughlin to The Committee on Immigration and Naturalization House of Representatives, 68th Congress, First Session] pp. 1231–1437 in U.S. House Hearings: Immigration, Serial 5A. Washington Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R.C., 1976. Review of the book, Race Differences in Intelligence by J.C. Loehlin, G. Lindzey & J.N. Spuhler. The American Journal of Human Genetics 28: 92–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindzey, G., J. Loehlin, M. Manosevitz, & D. Thiessen, 1971. Behavioral Genetics. Annual Review of Psychology 22: 39–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, J., 1997 in press. Review of Dysgenics: Genetic Deterioration in Modern Populations by Richard Lynn. Reports of the National Center for Science Education 17(2).

  • McGuire, T.R. & J. Hirsch, 1977. General intelligence (g) and heritability (H2, h2), pp. 25–72 in The structuring of experience, edited by I.C. Uzgiris & F. Weizmann, J. McV. Hunt Festschrift, New York, Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehler, B., 1997. Beyondism: Raymond B. Cattell and the new eugenics. Genetica 99: 153–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A., 1994.ACADEMIA'S DIRTY SECRET: Professors of HATE — THEIR TWIN OBSESSION ARE INTELLIGENCE AND GENETICS. MANY WOULD CALL THEIR RESEARCH RACIST, AND THEY TAKE MONEY FROM AN ORGANIZATION WITH A TERRIBLE PAST. Rolling Stone 20 October, No. 693, 106–114.

  • Mitchell, P., 1976. Introductory comments on the article, Jensenism: The bankruptcy of “science” without scholarship. United States Congressional Record, Vol. 122: No. 75, E2703.

  • Murray, C.A., August 1995. An Exchange: IQ, Race, and Heredity. Commentary 15–25.

  • Pearson, K., 1934. Professor Karl Pearson's Reply, pp. 19–24, 23, in Speeches delivered at a dinner held in University College, London in Honour of Professor Karl Pearson. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R., 1991. Race, Intelligence and Bias in Academe. Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R. (Ed.), 1992. Shockley on Eugenics and Race: The Application of Science to the Solution of Human Problems, Scott-Townsend Publishers, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, R., 1994. Deposition of Roger Pearson in Jerry Hirsch, Plaintiff vs. Roger Pearson, Lloyd G. Humphreys, and Scott-Townsend Publishers, jointly and severally, Defendents: No. 92-L-1244 In the Circuit Court for the Sixth Judicial Circuit Champaign County, Illinois. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Pearson, R., 1996. Signed statement of 5/28/96. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Philipp, E.E., 1973. Discussion in Law and Ethics of AID and Embryo Transfer, p. 66, Ciba Foundation Symposium 17 (new series). Elsevier, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, North-Holland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pins, K., 1995. Iowa native behind “Bell Curve” debate.Des Moines Sunday Register, 9 April, pp. 1A, 8A, 9A.

  • Platt, S.A. & M. Bach, 1997. Uses and misinterpretations of genetics in psychology. Genetica 99: 135–143.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Provine, W.B., 1971. The Origins of Theoretical Population Genetics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samelson, F., 1992. Rescuing the reputation of Sir Cyril [Burt] [Essay review of The Burt Affair by Robert B. Joynson and Science, Ideology, and the Media: The Cyril Burt Scandal by Ronald Fletcher]. Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences 28: 221–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, J., 1996. Diversity, '50s style, did us well.Largo Times, An Edition of St. Petersburg Times, 3 December, p. 1. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Scarr, S., 1978. From evolution to Larry P., or what shall we do about IQ tests? Intelligence 2: 325–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P.H., 1985. On artificial intelligence. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 8: 241–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönemann, P.H., 1992. Extension of Guttman's result fromg to PC1. Multivariate Behavioral Research 27: 219–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schonemann, P.H., 1995. 37 page fax of 6/22/95. In J. Hirsch Papers, University of Illinois Archives, No. 15/19/22.

  • Seagoe, M.V., 1975. Terman and the Gifted. W. Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitz, E., M. Carlier, M. Vacher-Lavenu, T. Reed, R. Moutier, M. Busnel & P.L. Roubertoux, 1996. Long-term effect of prenatal heterogeneity among monozygotes. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive 15: 283–308.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, S., 1996. The International Dictionary of Psychology. second edition. Crossroad, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E.C., 1924. The inheritance of maze-learning ability in rats. Journal of Comparative Psychology 4: 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tryon, R.C., 1940. XIII. Genetic differences in maze-learning ability in rats, pp. 111–119 in National Society for the Study of Education, the 39th yearbook, edited by G.M. Whipple. Public School Publishing Company, Bloomington, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turkheimer, E., O. Goldsmith & I. Gottesman, 1995. May–June. Some conceptual deficiencies in ‘developmental’ behavior genetics: Comment. Human Development 38: 143–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetta, A., 1976. Dysgenic trend in intelligence: Comment on Cattell's ‘Differential fertility and normal selection for I.Q.: some required conditions in their investigations. Social Biology 23: 265–267.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D., 1981. Review of The IQ Game by Howard F. Taylor. Behaviorists for Social Action Journal 3: 33–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahlsten, D., 1990. Insensitivity of the analysis of variance to heredity-environment interaction. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 13: 109–120. (Target article)

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B., 1914. Behavior: An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. Holt, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B., 1936. John Broadus Watson, pp. 271–281 in A History of Psychology in Autobiography Volume III edited by C. Murchison. Clark University Press, Worcester, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J.B., 1959. Behaviorism. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O., 1971. Competitive and aggressive behavior. In Man and Beast: Comparative Social Behavior, Smithsonian Annual III, Papers delivered at the Smithsonian Institution Annual Symposium, 14–16 May 1969, Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E.O., 1975. Sociobiology: The New Synthesis. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodrow, J.C., 1996. Comments on J.B.S. Haldane: The negative heritability of neonatal jaundice. Ann. Hum. Genet. 60: 7–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirsch, J. Some history of heredity-vs-environment, genetic inferiority at Harvard(?), andThe (incredible)Bell Curve . Genetica 99, 207–224 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259524

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02259524

Key words

Navigation