Skip to main content
Log in

Der Faktore ug beiDrosophila Melanogaster: Lokalisation, Frequenzänderungen in Massenzuchten und Lebensleistungen Seiner Träger im Vergleich mit einem Wildstamm

  • Published:
Genetica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A factor causing dark pigmentation of the abdomen in females ofD. melanogaster has been located on the third chromosome, at locus69,8±0,4 morgans.

Among 19,050 flies no crossing over was found to occur between this factor (derived from a wild population) and the geneebony. These results and those of segregation experiments point toward an allelism of the dark factor withebony. For the dark factor the symbole ug is used.

The compounde ug /e is phenotypically indistinguishable from dark individuals of genotypee ug/e ug.

In 12 mass cultures, thee ug allele formed a balanced polymorphism with the wild type allele. Up to the end of the experiments lasting eight months, the heterozygotes (e ug/+) were present in excess. The frequencies ofe ug/e ug-flies sank to the lowest value in the course of 8 weeks and thereafter remained (after a brief rise) at an almost constant level. In no case dide ug disappear from the populations. Varying experimental temperatures (20°, 25°, 28°C) had no effect whatever upon the selective processes, with the exception of an increase of dark females at 20°C.

The imagos of genotypese ug/e ug,e ug/+ and +/+ were compared with reference to fecundity, hatchability, viability of larvae and pupae, drought resistance, imaginal age attained, and sterility. The homozygous dark animals consistently show reduced vitality. Regarding fecundity, drought resistance, and imaginal age attained, heterosis effects could be demonstrated. The balanced polymorphism is explained by the relatively higher fitness of the heterozygotes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  • Alexander, M. L., (1953). Mutation rates at specific autosomal loci in the mature and immature germ cells ofD. melanogaster.Genetics 39: 409–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridges, C. B. & K. Brehme (1944). The mutants ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. of Wash. Publ. No. 552, 252 pp.

  • Bridges, C. B. & T. H. Morgan (1923). The third-chromosome group, of mutant characters ofDrosophila melanogaster. Carnegie Inst. of Wash. Publ. No. 327, 249 pp.

  • Burla, H. (1954). Distinction, between four species of themelanogaster-group,D. séguyi, D. montium, D. kikkawai andD. auraria.Rev. Brasil., Biol. 14: 41–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buzzati-Traverso A. A. (1952). Heterosis in population genetics. Heterosis ed. by John W. Gowen. Jowa State college press, chapter 9: 149–160.

  • Buzzati-Traverso, A. A. (1955). Evolutionary changes in components of fitness and other polygenic traits inDrosophila melanogaster populations.Heredity 9: 153–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha, A. B. (1946). Polymorphism in natural populations of a species ofDrosophila.Journ. of Heredity 37: 253–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Da Cunha, A. B. (1949). Genetic analysis of the polymorphism of color pattern inDrosophila polymorpha.Evolution 3: 239–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire-Maia, N. (1953). Frequencies of the two color forms, of the BrazilianD. montium in natural populations.Drosophila Information Service 27: 90–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire-Maia, N. (1954). TheHardy-Weinberg law in Brazilian natural populations ofD. kikkawai.Drosophila Information Service 28: 119–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freire-Maia, N. &A. Freire-Maia (1955). Race differentiation in a domestic species,-the case ofD. kikkawai.Drosophila Information Service 29: 118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, H. B. (1939).ebony 39g Drosophila Information Service 12: 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greuter, M. (1963). Vergleich der Ausbreitungsaktivitäten vonDrosophila subobscura undDrosophila obscura, Diss., im Druck.

  • Hadorn, E. &H. Zeller (1943). Fertilitätsstudien anDrosophila melanogaster.Wilhelm roux' Arch. für Entwicklungsmechanik 142: 276–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hexter, W. M. (1955). A population analysis of heterozygote frequencies inDrosophila.Genetics 40: 444–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalmus, H. (1945). Adaptative and selective responses of a population ofDrosophila melanogaster containinge ande + to differences in temperature, humidity and to selection for developmental speed.,Journal of Genetics 47: 58–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, G. H. (1954). Visible and lethal mutations inDrosophila.The American Naturalist 88: 241–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moree, R. &J. R. King (1961). Experimental studies on relative viability inDrosophila melanogaster.Genetics 46: 1735–1752.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki, D., T. Okada &H. Kurokowa (1952). Two types ofD. auraria.Drosophila Information Service 26: 112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oshima, C. (1952). Genetic analysis of the dimorphism of color pattern inD. rufa.Drosophila Information Service 26: 116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttunen, V. &H. Salmi (1956a). The responses ofDrosophila melanogaster to the relative humidity of the air.Ann. Entomol. Fennici 22: 36–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perttunen, V. &H. Salmi (1956b). The effect of age on the humidity reaction ofDrosophila melanogaster.Ann. Entomol. Fennici 22: 63–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosin, S. (1948). Die Anwendung der Methode des “maximum likelihood” (R. A. Fisher) bei der Genlokalisation.Arch. Julius Klaus Stiff. 23: 559–562.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalker, H. (1953). Taxonomy and hybridisation in thecardini-group ofDrosophila.Ann. Entomol., Soc. Amer. 46: 343–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, C. (1926). Eine Kreuzungsanalyse von Körperfärbungen vonD. melanogaster verbunden mit drei neuen Allelomorphen des Faktors “ebenholz”.Z. ind. Abst. Vererbl. 41: 198–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tantawy, A. O. &G. S. Mallah (1961). Studies on natural populations ofDrosophila. I. Heat resistance and geographical variation inDrosophila melanogaster andD. simulans.Evolution 15: 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teissier, M. G. (1947a). Variation de la fréquence du gènesepia dans une population stationnaire de Drosophiles,C. R. Acad. sci. 224: 676–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teissier, M. G. (1947b). Variation de la fréquence du gèneebony dans une population stationnaire de Drosophiles.C. R. Acad. Sci. 224: 1788–1789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villee, C. (1941).e st.Drosophila Information Service 14: 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Waerden, B. L. (1957). Mathematische Statistik. Berlin, Springer-Verlag. 360 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, R. E. (1921). Humidity control by means of sulfuric acid and solutions with critical compilation, of vapor pressure data.J. of Industr. and Engin. Chemistry 13: 326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, W. C. &H. H. Plough (1926). On the sterilisation ofDrosophila by high temperature.Biol. Bulletin Woods Hole 51: 189–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürcher, C. (1958). Ein Farbpolymorphismus beiDrosophila melanogaster.Arch. Jul. Klaus Stiff. 33: 75–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zürcher, C. (1960). A factor for dark abdomen present in a wild strain ofD. melanogaster.Drosophila Information Service 34: 112.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zürcher, C. Der Faktore ug beiDrosophila Melanogaster: Lokalisation, Frequenzänderungen in Massenzuchten und Lebensleistungen Seiner Träger im Vergleich mit einem Wildstamm. Genetica 34, 1–33 (1964). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664176

Navigation