Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Placing barriers to industrial energy efficiency in a social context: a discussion of lifestyle categorisation

  • Published:
Energy Efficiency Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper compares how analyses of energy use and efficiency have developed in households and industrial small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). I focus on earlier studies that use lifestyle categories in examining household energy use, comparing them with studies of mainly Swedish industrial SMEs using the barrier concept in understanding energy efficiency. The main question is how the use of lifestyle categories in household research can be adapted to industrial SMEs. The rationale for using doing this is to find a new way to approach industrial energy use that can give new insight or raise new questions. Lifestyle categories capture the energy culture of a company, including how energy is perceived and what habits and routines are like. Lifestyle categorisation complements barrier analysis, deepening our understanding of how and why companies improve energy efficiency. Using lifestyle categories in an analysis can help policy makers, who can then direct specific policies to particular segments of companies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aune, M. (1998). Nöktern eller Nytene. Energiforbuk og Inverdagsliv i norske husholdninger. Norway: Trondheim (Report no 34. Senter for teknologi og samfunn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Aune, M. (2007). Energy comes home. Energy Policy, 35, 5457–5465. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2007.05.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aune, M., Berker, T., & Sørensen, K. H. (2002). Needs, roles and participation: A review of social science studies of users in technological design. Trondheim, Norway: NTNU, Department of Interdisciplinary Studies of Culture.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson-Kanyama, A., & Lindén, A. (2002). Hushållens energianvändning: Värderingar, beteenden, livsstilar och teknik—en litteraturöversikt. Lund, Sweden: Lund University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen, L.-B., Larsen, A., & Togeby, M. (2006). Empirical analysis of energy management in Danish industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14, 516–526. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2005.03.017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edén, M. (1991). Starta energihushållning i småindustriområden: Hur företagare påverkas av energirådgivning. Gävle, Sweden: BFR (Byggforskningsrådet report no. R41:1991).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebremedhin, A., & Palm, J. (2005). Energianalys Borås. Eskilstuna, Sweden: SEA (Report no. ER2005:28).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallin, P.-O., & Petersson, B. Å. (1986). De glömda aktörerna. Stockholm: Energiforskningsnämnden (Efn/AES report 1986:1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindén, A.-L. (2004). Miljömedvetna medborgare och grön politik. Stockholm: Formas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persson, A. (1990). Nyttiga lärdomar: Erfarenheter av industriell energirådgivning. Stockholm: SIND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohdin, P., & Thollander, P. (2006). Barriers to and driving forces for energy efficiency in the non-energy intensive manufacturing industry in Sweden. Energy, 31, 1836–1844. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2005.10.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohdin, P., Thollander, P., & Solding, P. (2007). Barriers to and drivers for energy efficiency in the Swedish foundry industry. Energy Policy, 35, 672–677. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.01.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, C. (2006). Energy management pathfinding: understanding manufacturers’ ability and desire to implement energy efficiency. Strategic Planning for Energy and the Environment, 25, 20–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandberg, P. (2004). Optimization and co-operative perspectives in industrial energy systems. Doctoral dissertation. Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden. SEA—Swedish Energy Agency (2004) Energiläget 2004 (Eskilstuna: SEA).

  • Shove, E. (1998). Gaps, barriers and conceptual chasms: theories of technology transfer and energy in buildings. Energy Policy, 26, 1105–1112. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(98)00065-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., Lutzenhiser, L., Guy, S., Hackett, B., & Wilhite, H. (1998). Energy and social systems. In S. Rayner, & E. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change (pp. 291–326). Columbus, OH: Battelle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sorell, S., Schleich, J., Scott, S., O’Malley, E., Trace, F., Boede, U. (2000). Reducing barriers to energy efficiency in public and private organizations. Brighton, UK: SPRU-Science and Technology Policy Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thollander, P. (2008). Towards increased energy efficiency in Swedish industry: Barriers, driving forces & policies. Doctoral dissertation. Linköping Institute of Technology, Linköping, Sweden.

  • Weber, L. (1997). Some reflections on barriers to the efficient use of energy. Energy Policy, 25, 833–835. doi:10.1016/S0301-4215(97)00084-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The research for this paper forms part of the research programme ‘Energy choices in households—a platform for change’, funded by the Swedish Energy Agency. I also wish to thank my blind reviewers for their valuable comments on the first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jenny Palm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Palm, J. Placing barriers to industrial energy efficiency in a social context: a discussion of lifestyle categorisation. Energy Efficiency 2, 263–270 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9042-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-009-9042-1

Keywords

Navigation