Skip to main content
Log in

Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defences in Daphnia pulex: a sensitivity analysis

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Summary

We examined the demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defensive spine structures in Daphnia pulex. Our aim was to assess the role of resource limitation and the interaction effects of limiting food level and antipredator structures on fitness of D. pulex and to pinpoint those life stages that are most sensitive to changes in the defence regime. Chaoborus-induced and typical morphotypes of D. pulex were reared at high and low food concentrations. Instar-based matrix population models were used to quantify the effects of predator-induction, food and their interaction on fitness of D. pulex. Predator-induction caused a statistically significant reduction in fitness at low food levels, but not at high food levels. Sensitivity analyses revealed that the fitness effects were primarily due to changes in the growth rate in instars 1–5, and secondarily to small reductions in the fertility of instars 5–10. The interaction between Chaoborus exposure and low food concentration was negative, and mediated through growth and fertility components. Both these components were reduced more in the Chaoborus-exposed, low food treatment than would be expected in the absence of interaction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler FR, Harvell CD (1990) Inducible defenses, phenotypic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol Evol 5:407–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Black AR, Dodson SI (1990) Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced phenotypic plasticity in Daphnia pulex. Oecologia 83:117–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1982) Stable population structure and reproductive value for populations with complex life cycles. Ecology 63:1223–1231

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1988) Approaching size and age in matrix population models. In: Ebenman B, Persson L (eds) Size-structured populations. Springer, Berlin, pp 85–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1989a) The analysis of life table response experiments I. Decomposition of treatment effects on population growth rate. Ecological Modelling 46:221–237

    Google Scholar 

  • Caswell H (1989b) Matrix population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Charlesworth B (1980) Evolution in age structured populations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Coley PD, Bryant JP, Chapin FS III (1985) Resource availability and plant antiherbivore defense. Science 230:895–899

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodson SI (1989) The ecological role of chemical stimuli for the zooplankton: predator-induced morphology in Daphnia. Oecologia 78:361–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgington ES (1987) Randomization tests. Second edition. Marcel Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert JJ, Stemberger RS (1984) Asplanchna-induced polymorphism in the rotifer Keratella slacki. Limnol Oceanogr 29:1309–1316

    Google Scholar 

  • Gulmon SL, Mooney HA (1986) Costs of defense and their effects on plant productivity. In: Givnish TJ (ed) On the economy of plant form and function. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 681–698

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defense in a marine bryozoan. Science 224:1357–1359

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1986) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses in a marine bryozoan: cues, costs, and consequences. Am Nat 128:810–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Quart Rev Biol 65:323–340

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel JE (1985) Cyclomorphosis of Daphnia pulex spined morphs. Limnol Oceanogr 30:853–861

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel JE (1987) Predator-induced defenses: a review. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, Hanover, pp 263–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel JE, Dodson SI (1984) Chaoborus predation on typical and spined morphs of Daphnia pulex: behavioral observations. Limnol Oceanogr 29:487–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Havel JE, Dodson SI (1987) Reproductive costs of Chaoborus-induced polymorphism in Daphnia pulex. Hydrobiologia 150:273–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrbáčková_esslová M (1963) The development of three species of Daphnia in the surface water of the Slapy Reservoir. Int Rev Gesamten Hydrobiol 48:325–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Ketola M, Vuorinen I (1989) Modification of life-history parameters of Daphnia pulex Leydig and D. magna Straus by the presence of Chaoborus sp. Hydrobiologia 179:149–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger DA, Dodson SI (1981) Embryological induction and predation ecology of Daphnia pulex. Limnol Occeanogr 26:219–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Lande R (1982) A quantitative genetic theory of life history evolution. Ecology 63:607–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin LA, Caswell H, DePatra KD and Creed EL (1987) The life table consequences of larval development mode: an intraspecific comparison of planktotrophy and lecithotrophy. Ecology 68:1877–1886

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively CM (1986) Competition, comparative life histories, and maintenance of shell dimorphism in a barnacle. Ecology 67:858–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer JS, Ingersoll CG, McDonald LL, Boyce MS (1986) Estimating uncertainty in population growth rates: jackknife vs. bootstrap techniques. Ecology 67:1156–1166

    Google Scholar 

  • Neill WE (1978) Experimental studies on factors limiting colonization by Daphnia pulex Leydig of coastal montane lakes in British Columbia. Can J Zool 56:2498–2507

    Google Scholar 

  • Noreen EW (1989) Computer-intensive methods for testing hypotheses. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Parejko K, Dodson S (1990) Progress towards characterization of a predator/prey kairomone: Daphnia pulex and Chaoborus americanus. Hydrobiologia 198:51–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Riessen HP, Sprules WG (1990) Demographic costs of antipredator defenses in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 71:1536–1546

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz JC (1988) Plant responses induced by herbivores. Trends Ecol Evol 3:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms EL, Rausher MD (1987) Costs and benefits of plant resistance to herbivory. Am Nat 130:570–581

    Google Scholar 

  • Spitze K (1985) Functional response of an ambush predator: Chaoborus americanus predation on Daphnia pulex. Ecology 66:938–949

    Google Scholar 

  • Stemberger RS (1988) Reproductive costs and hydrodynamic benefits of chemically induced defenses in Keratella testudo. Limnol Oceanogr 33:593–606

    Google Scholar 

  • Vuorinen I, Ketola M, Walls M (1989) Defensive spine formation in Daphnia pulex Leydig and induction by Chaoborus crystallinus De Geer. Limnol Oceanogr 34:245–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls M, Ketola M (1989) Effects of predator-induced spines on individual fitness in Daphnia pulex. Limnol Oceanogr 34:390–396

    Google Scholar 

  • Waris H (1953) The significance for algae of chelating substances in the nutrient solution. Physiol Plant 6:538–543

    Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis, second edition. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Walls, M., Caswell, H. & Ketola, M. Demographic costs of Chaoborus-induced defences in Daphnia pulex: a sensitivity analysis. Oecologia 87, 43–50 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323778

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00323778

Key words

Navigation