Abstract
The Sax-Markov binary eurejoining/misrejoining (SMBE) model is a stochastic representation of Sax’s breakage-and-reunion mechanism of misrejoining DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). In this model, to approximate DSB misrejoining probabilities that decrease with increasing distance, the nucleus is treated as a collection ofη isolated nuclear subvolumes called sites; DSB free ends within the same site interact with a probability that is independent of distance, and DSB free ends within different sites never interact. In our previous work, SMBE steady-state solutions were used to estimateη from a combination of high-dose PFGE (pulsed-field gel electrophoresis) data and moderate-dose chromosomal aberration data. Here, analytic SMBE transient solutions (i.e., time courses of DSBs and misrejoinings) are derived and used to estimateη from various sets of misrejoining DSB kinetic data. The time courses are multiexponentials with rate constantsκ, 6κ, 15κ, ... j(2j–1)κ corresponding to different nuclear site states and not different types of DSBs. For example, theκ component corresponds to nuclear sites with two DSB free ends and thus only one possible rejoining interaction, and the 6κ component corresponds to sites with four DSB free ends and thus six (four choose two) potential rejoining interactions – four of these six potential interactions lead to a final state of two misrejoinings and the other two of six lead to a final state of correct repair (unrejoinable DSBs are not represented in the SMBE model). The SMBE time course solutions provide site number estimates that fall in the range ofη≈10–100 for premature chromosome condensation (PCC) data andη≈1000 for PFGE data.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Received: 23 December 1999 / Accepted: 1 July 2000
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Radivoyevitch, T. Time course solutions of the Sax-Markov binary eurejoining/misrejoining model of DNA double-strand breaks. Radiat Environ Biophys 39, 265–273 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110000067
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004110000067