Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Peripheral antihistamine and central sedative effects of three H1-receptor antagonists

  • Originals
  • Published:
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The effects of single oral doses of three antihistamine compounds on histamine-induced itch and flare reactions were studied in 24 healthy volunteers by a double-blind balanced design. Central sedative effects were concurrently analyzed using a set of computerized neuropsychological tests and analogue ratings. Hydroxyzine 20 mg had a more pronounced inhibitory effect on the cutaneous response than 3 mg clemastine or 3 mg azatadine. Clemastine tended to cause more sedation than the other two drugs. A compound score, reflecting the balance between peripheral and CNS effects, showed hydroxyzine to have relatively more peripheral antihistamine effect and less sedative effect than the other two drugs. The independence of peripheral and CNS antihistamine effects was also suggested by correlation analysis. Subjects displayed individual sensitivity to the peripheral antihistamine effect of the three drugs; a marked antihistamine effect of one drug predicted a marked effect of the other two drugs. This was not the case for CNS sedation. The independence of peripheral and CNS effects should encourage development of new and more specific antihistamine compounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alvan G, Ericsson Ö, Levander S, Lindgren JE (1974) Plasma concentration and effects of the hypnotic methaqualone after single and multiple oral doses in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 7: 419–424

    Google Scholar 

  2. Borland RG, Nicholson AN (1974) Human performance after a barbiturate (heptabarbitone). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1: 209–215

    Google Scholar 

  3. Day ES, Jones S, Stewart-Jones J, Turner P (1972) Clemastine on eye-hand coordination and visual function. J Clin Pharmacol 12: 240–246

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fjellner B, Hägermark Ö (1981) Studies on pruritogenic and histamine-releasing effects of some putative peptide neurotransmitters. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 61: 245–250

    Google Scholar 

  5. Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hedges A, Hills M, Maclay WP, Newman-Taylor AJ, Turner (1971) Some central and peripheral effects of clemastine, a new antihistamine drug, in man. J Clin Pharmacol 11: 112–119

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hays WL (1969) Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hillas JL, Somerfield SD, Wilson JD, Aman MG (1980) Azatadine maleate in perennial allergic rhinitis: effects on clinical symptoms and choice reaction time. Br J Clin Pharmacol 10: 573–577

    Google Scholar 

  9. Landauer AA, Milner G (1971) Antihistamines, alone and together with alcohol in relation to driving safety. J Forens Med 18: 127–139

    Google Scholar 

  10. Levander S, Bartfai A, Schalling D (1985) Regional cortical dysfunction in schizophrenic patients studied by computerized neuropsychological methods. Percept Mot Skills (in press)

  11. Mueser K, Waller D, Levander S, Schalling D (1984) Smoking and pain — A method of limits and sensory decision theory analysis. Scand J Psychol 25: 289–296

    Google Scholar 

  12. Nicholson AN, Stone BM (1982) Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 199–202

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peck AW, Fowler ASE, Bye C (1975) A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 455–463

    Google Scholar 

  14. Swets JA (1977) Signal detection theory applied to vigilance. In: RR Mackie (ed) Vigilance: theory, operational performance and physiological correlates. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uzan A, LeFur G, Malgouris C (1979) Are antihistamines sedative via a blockade of brain H1 receptors? J Pharm Pharmacol 31: 701–702

    Google Scholar 

  16. Weiner M (1982) Sedation and antihistaminics. Arzneimittelforsch/Drug Res 32: 1193–1195

    Google Scholar 

  17. Winer BJ (1979) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Dermatology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm

    S. Levander, Ö. Hägermark & M. Ståhle

  2. Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm

    S. Levander, Ö. Hägermark & M. Ståhle

Authors
  1. S. Levander
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ö. Hägermark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Ståhle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levander, S., Hägermark, Ö. & Ståhle, M. Peripheral antihistamine and central sedative effects of three H1-receptor antagonists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28, 523–529 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544062

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544062

Key words

Search

Navigation