Skip to main content
Log in

Improving the computational efficiency of the ambiguity function algorithm

  • Published:
Journal of Geodesy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Techniques are described in this paper for improving the Ambiguity Function Method (AFM) for differential GPS positioning using phase observations, (a) that take advantage of optimal dual-frequency observable combinations to improve thereliability of the AFM, and (b) that significantly shorten the computation time necessary for the AFM. The procedure can be used for kinematic positioning applications if a Kalman filter predicted position is accurate enough as an initial position for the suggested AFM searching procedure, or pseudokinematic mode using say a triple-difference solution as an initial position for static positioning if the baseline length is short (typically <5km).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abidin HZ (1993) Computational and Geometrical Aspects of ‘On The Fly’ Ambiguity Resolution. Technical Report No. 164, Department of Surveying Engineering, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, N.B., Canada.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocard M, Geiger A (1992) Systematic Search for all Possible Widelanes. In: Proceedings of The Sixth International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, March 17–20, Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 312–318.

  • Counselman CC, Gourevitch SA (1981) Miniature Interferometer Terminals for Earth Surveying: Ambiguity and Multipath with the Global Positioning System. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, Vol. GE-19, No. 4, pp 244–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han SW (1994a) Equivalence between the Ambiguity Function Method and the Least Squares Method with GPS Carrier Phase Observables and The Improved Ambiguity Function Method. ACTA GEODAETICA et CARTOGRAPHICA SINICA, Vol. 23, No. 4, pp 282–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han SW (1994b) Ambiguity Function Method with Constrained Conditions and its Application in GPS Kinematic Positioning. Journal of Wuhan Technical University of Surveying and Mapping, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (1992) GPS Theory and Practice. Springer-Verlag Wien New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lachapelle G, Cannon ME, Erickson C, Falkenberg W (1992) High Precision C/A Code Technology for Rapid Static DGPS Surveys. In: Proceedings of The Sixth International Geodetic Symposium on Satellite Positioning, March 17–20, Columbus, Ohio, USA, pp 165–173.

  • Mader GL (1990) Ambiguity Function Techniques for GPS Phase Initialization and Kinematic Solutions. In: Proceedings of Second International Symposium on Precise Positioning with the Global Positioning System, Ottawa, Canada, September 3–7, pp 1233–1247.

  • Mader GL (1992) Rapid Static and Kinematic Global Positioning System Solutions Using the Ambiguity Function Technique. Journal of Geophysical Research, Vol. 97, No. B3, pp 3271–3283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondi BW (1984) Using the Global Positioning System (GPS) Phase Observable for Relative Geodesy: Modeling, Processing and Results. Doctoral Dissertation, Center for Space Research, University of Texas at Austin.

  • Remondi BW (1989) Pseudo-kinematic GPS Results Using the Ambiguity Function Method. Journal of The Institute of Navigation, Vol. 38, No. 1, pp 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Remondi BW, Hilla SA (1993) Pseudo-kinematic Surveying Based Upon Full-wavelength Dualfrequency GPS Observations. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NGS-56, November.

  • Seeber G (1993) Satellite Geodesy Foundations, Methods, and Applications. Walter de Gruyter.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Han, S., Rizos, C. Improving the computational efficiency of the ambiguity function algorithm. Journal of Geodesy 70, 330–341 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868185

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868185

Keywords

Navigation