Skip to main content
Log in

Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-Innovators?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper considers the relative performance [along a number of parameters] of a sample of 228 small manufacturing firms categorised by level of innovation. Whilst innovators appear no more likely to have experienced some form of sales or employment growth, they are significantly more likely to have grown more. In other words, the innovators' growth rate distributions are highly negatively skewed. With regards to export intensities, profitability and productivity levels, the findings are less clear. On the whole, the results reported here are similar to those of other small firm studies, yet vary markedly from large firm equivalents; suggesting that the nature of the returns to innovation may be contingent, at least in part, upon firm size. Moreover, the high levels of variation in firm performance should caution us against proffering innovative imperatives. If we are to counsel firms to "innovate at all costs", we must be clear about, and clearly demonstrate, the nature of the returns they may reasonably expect and the processes through which these may be optimised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Audretsch, D., 1995, ‘Innovation, Growth and Survival’, International Journal of Industrial Organisation 13, 441–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer, E., A. Kleinknecht and J. O. N. Reijnen, 1993, ‘Employment Growth and Innovation at the Firm Level’, Journal of Evolutionary Economics 3, 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cesaratto, S. and A. Stirati, 1996, The Economic Consequences of Innovation in Italian Manufacturing Firms: Theory and Results from the Community Innovation Survey, WP 40, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D., 1989, ‘Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D’, The Economic Journal 99, 569–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. and Levinthal, D., 1990, ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly 35, 128–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosh, A., Hughes, A. and Wood, E., 1996, Innovation in UK SMEs: Causes and the Consequences for Firm Failure and Acquisition, WP 48, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

  • Delmar, F., 1997, ‘Measuring Growth: Methodological Considerations and Empirical Results’, in R. Donckels and A. Miettinen (eds.), Entrepreneurship and SME Research: On the Way to the Next Millennium, Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, G., 1988, ‘Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’, Journal of Economic Literature 26, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1994a, ‘Innovation and Growth’, in M. Dodgson and R. Rothwell (eds.), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C., 1994b, ‘The Economics of Technical Change’, Cambridge Journal of Economics 18, 463–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, C. And L. Soete, 1997, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd ed., London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geroski, P. and S. Machin, 1992, ‘Do Innovating Firms Outperform Non-innovators?’, Business Strategy Review, Summer, 79–90.

  • Geroski, P. and S. Machin, 1993, ‘Innovation, Profitability and Growth Over the Business Cycle’, Empirica 20, 35–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, A. and P. Kelly, 1997, West Midlands Regional Innovation Strategy: Review Phase Report, unpublished report, WMG, University of Warwick.

  • Goffin, 1998, ‘The Benefits of Effective Product Innovation’, Manufacturing Excellence 5, September.

  • Griliches, Z., 1995, ‘R&D and Productivity: Econometric Results and Measurement Issues’, in P. Stoneman (ed.), Handbook of the Economics of Innovation and Technical Change, Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, P., 1994, Innovation, Economics and Evolution, Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heunks, F., 1998, ‘Innovation, Creativity and Success’, Small Business Economics 10, 263–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, K., P. Milady, J. Bessant and L. Perren, 1998, ‘Small Firms, R & D, Technology and Innovation in the UK: A Literature Review’, Technovation 18(1), 39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalantaridis, C. and J. Pheby, 1999, ‘Processes of Innovation Among Manufacturing SMEs: The Experience of Bedfordshire’, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development 11(1), 57–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, E., L. Lefebvre and M. Bourgault, 1998, ‘R & D-Related Capabilities as Determinants of Export Performance’, Small Business Economics 10, 365–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinthal, D., 1996, ‘Learning and Schumpterian Dynamics’, in G. Dosi and F. Malerba (eds.), Organization and Strategy in the Evolution of Enterprise, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansfield, E., 1962, ‘Entry, Gibrat's Law, Innovation and the Growth of Firms’, American Economic Review 52, 1023–1051.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, B., 1995, What Differentiates Innovative Small Firms?, Innovation Initiative Paper No. 4, ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

  • Oakey, R., 1991, ‘High Technology Small Firms: Their Potential for Rapid Industrial Growth’, International Small Business Journal 9(4), 30–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oakey, R., 1995, High-Technology Small Firms: Variable Barriers to Growth, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD, 1998, Technology, Productivity and Job Creation, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oughton, C. and L. De Propris, 1997, West Midlands Regional Innovation Strategy: Sector and Regional Analysis, unpublished report, RCIS, University of Birmingham.

  • Pavitt, K., 1984, ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’, Research Policy 13(6), 343–374.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., 1997, ‘Product Innovation and Small Business Growth: A Comparison of the Strategies of German, UK and Irish Companies’, Small Business Economics 9(6), 523–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roper, S., J. Love, S. Dunlop, B. Ashcroft, H. Hofmann and K. Vogler-Ludwig, 1996, Product Innovation and Development in UK, German and Irish Manufacturing, Norther Ireland Economic Research Centre, Queens University.

  • Rothwell, R., 1983, ‘Innovation and Firm Size: A Case for Dynamic Complementarity; or is Small Really Beautiful?’, Journal of General Management 8(3), 5–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1984, ‘The Role of Small Firms in the Emergence of New Technologies’, Omega 12(1), 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothwell, R., 1987, ‘Small Firms, Innovation and Industrial Change’, Small Business Economics 1(1), 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • SBRC, 1992, The State of British Enterprise, Department of Applied Economics, University of Cambridge.

  • Sriram, V., S. Neelankavil and R. Moore, 1989, ‘Export Policy and Strategic Implications for Small-to Medium-sized Firms’, Journal of Global Marketing 3(2), 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Standeven, P., 1993, ‘Financing the Early Stage Technology Firm in the 1990s: An International Perspective’, Six Countries Programme: unpublished Discussion Paper.

  • Storey, D., 1994, Understanding the Small Business Sector, London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Storey, D. and N. Sykes, 1996, ‘Uncertainty, Innovation and Management’, in P. Burns and J. Dewhurst (eds.), Small Business and Entrepreneurship, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. and S. Massini, 1998, ‘Employment Creation in Small Technological and Design Innovators in the UK During the 1980s’, Small Business Economics 11(4), 353–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tether, B. S., 1997, ‘Growth Diversity Amongst Innovative and Technology-based New and Small Firms: An Interpretation’, New Technology, Work and Employment 12(2), 91–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakelin, K., 1997, Productivity Growth and R & D Expenditure in UK Manufacturing Firms, MERIT, 2/97-018.

  • Westhead, P. and M. Cowling, 1995, ‘Employment Change in Independent Owner-managed High Technology Firms in Great Britain’, Small Business Economics 7(2), 111–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynarczyk, P. and A. Thwaites, 1996, ‘The Financial Performance of Innovative Small Firms in the UK’, in R. Oakey (ed.), New Technology Based Firms in the 1990s: Volume II, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynarczyk, P. and A. Thwaites, 1997, ‘The Economic Performance, Survival and Non-Survival of Innovative Small Firms’, in R. Oakey and S. Mukhtar (eds.), New Technology Based Firms in the 1990s: Volume III, London: Paul Chapman.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Freel, M.S. Do Small Innovating Firms Outperform Non-Innovators?. Small Business Economics 14, 195–210 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008100206266

Navigation