Skip to main content
Log in

Using threshold models to explain international relations

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outcome of political opposition or revolution is a public good, which suggests that free riding will diminish the effectiveness of these forms of collective action. The private gains from contributing to collective goals are increased, however, if individuals place some value on ideological conformity or group identity. Nevertheless, some external stimulus is often needed to set in motion a tendency toward social motivation that is strong enough to outweigh the free rider incentive. This paper investigates the extent to which international pressure and demonstration effects can serve to signal support for the objectives of domestic groups in a target country and thereby mobilize collective action in pursuit of their goals. It is of interest to know not only the extent to which inherent barriers to effective collective action are overcome by outside support, but also to show how foreign economic policy can have an impact on political processes in the target country even when that policy itself has minimal economic effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baldwin, R.E. (1989). The political economy of trade policy.Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (Fall): 119–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayard, T.O., Pelzman, J. and Perez-Lopez, J. (1983). Stakes and risks in economic sanctions.The World Economy 6 (March): 73–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, L., Kaempfer, W.H. and Lowenberg, A.D. (1990).Economic sanctions and strikes by black workers in South Africa. Working paper, University of Colorado.

  • Daoudi, M.S. and Dajani, M.S. (1983).Economic sanctions: Ideals and experience. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzau, A.T. and Munger, M.C. (1986). Legislators and interest groups: How unorganized interests get represented.American Political Science Review 80 (March): 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P. (1988). Group identities and individual influence: Reconstructing the theory of interest groups.British Journal of Political Science 18 (January): 21–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 5 May 1990: 56; 14 July 1990: 44.

  • Elster, J. (1982). Marxism, functionalism, and game theory: The case for methodological individualism.Theory and Society 11 (July): 453–482.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1984a).International political economics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. (1984b). The public choice view of international political economy.International Organization 38 (Winter): 199–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, B.S. and Gygi, B. (forthcoming 1991). International organizations from the constitutional point of view. In R. Vaubel and T.D. Willett (Eds.),The political economy of international organizations: A public choice approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, R. (1987).The political economy of international relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goetze, D. and Galderisi, P. (1989). Explaining collective action with rational models.Public Choice 62 (July): 25–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior.American Journal of Sociology 83 (May): 1420–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckathorn, D.D. (1989). Collective action and the second-order free-rider problem.Rationality and Society 1 (July): 78–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, R. (1987).Crisis and Leviathan: Critical episodes in the growth of American government. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.L. (1989).The political economy of protection. Chur, Switzerland: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G.C. and Schott, J.J. (1985).Economic sanctions reconsidered: History and current policy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hufbauer, G.C., Schott, J.J. and Elliott, K.A. (1990).Untitled manuscript. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempfer, W.H. and Lowenberg, A.D. (1988). The theory of international economic sanctions: A public choice approach.American Economic Review 78 (September): 786–793.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempfer, W.H. and Lowenberg, A.D. (1989). The theory of international economic sanctions — a public choice approach: Reply.American Economic Review 79 (December): 1304–1306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempfer, W.H. and Lowenberg, A.D. (1990). Analyzing economic sanctions: Toward a public choice framework. In J.S. Odell and T.D. Willett (Eds.),International trade policies: Gains from exchange between economics and political science. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaempfer, W.H. and Willett, T.D. (1989). Combining rent-seeking and public choice theory in the analysis of tariffs versus quotas.Public Choice 63 (October): 79–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987a). Preference falsification, policy continuity and collective conservatism.Economic Journal 97 (September): 642–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1987b). Chameleon voters and public choice.Public Choice 53 (1): 53–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T. (1989). Sparks and prairie fires: A theory of unanticipated political revolution.Public Choice 61 (April): 41–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D.R. (1989). Ideology and the economic role of government. In W.J. Samuels (Ed.),Fundamentals of the economic role of government, Westport: Greenwood Press, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J.Y. (1989). An economic theory of institutional change: Induced and imposed change.Cato Journal 9 (Spring/Summer): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipton, M. (1988).Sanctions and South Africa: The dynamics of economic isolation (Special Report No. 1119). London: The Economist Intelligence Unit.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1990, March).A note on social equilibrium. Working paper, University of Chicago, Graduate School of Public Policy Studies.

  • North, D.C. (1981).Structure and change in economic history. New York: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965).The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1990). Why autocracies collapse so quickly.Wall Street Journal (28 February): A12.

  • Peltzman, S. (1984). Constituent interest and congressional voting.Journal of Law and Economics 27 (April): 181–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J.E. (1988). Rationalizing revolutionary ideology: A tale of Lenin and the tsar. In M. Taylor (Ed.),Rationality and revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegenthaler, H. (1989). Organization, ideology and the free rider problem.Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 145 (March): 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R.T. (forthcoming 1991). A public choice perspective of the International Energy Program. In R. Vaubel and T.D. Willett (Eds.),The political economy of international organizations: A public choice approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollison, R.D. (1989). Chicago political economy.Public Choice 63 (December): 293–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1971). The paradox of revolution.Public Choice 11 (Fall): 89–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, C.J. (1989). ‘Relational goods’ and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action.Public Choice 62 (September): 253–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel, R. (1986). A public choice approach to international organization.Public Choice 51(1): 39–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaubel, R. (forthcoming, 1991). The political economy of the International Monetary Fund: A public choice analysis. In R. Vaubel and T.D. Willett (Eds.),The political economy of international organizations: A public choice approach. Boulder: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willett, T.D. (1980).Some aspects of the public choice approach to international economic relations. Working paper, Claremont Center for Economic Policy Studies.

  • Witt, U. (1989). The evolution of economic institutions as a propagation process.Public Choice 62 (August): 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall Street Journal. 21 May 1990: A11.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This paper benefited from discussion with John Chilton, Ronald Wintrobe, Robert Young, and other participants in a session of the 1990 Public Choice Society Meetings. We are also grateful to Lynne Bennett and Thomas Willett for insightful comments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaempfer, W.H., Lowenberg, A.D. Using threshold models to explain international relations. Public Choice 73, 419–443 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01789560

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01789560

Keywords

Navigation