Skip to main content
Log in

Integrated Assessment: an emerging methodology for complex issues

  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over recent years Integrated Assessment (IA) has been presented as a new and innovative approach to modern decision making. In this paper we explore some of the key features that we consider characterise IA; we present IA as a framework that allows a flexible approach to uncertainty in decision making and to which a broad palette of expertise can contribute. The example of the development of an international agreement to reduce acidic deposition is used to illustrate the current practical status of an IA. The scientific process leading to this agreement has previously been described as IA but we argue that, although it marks a change from traditional approaches, further progress is still required to satisfy the requirements for a successful and durable IA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Alcamo, R. Shaw and L. Hordijk, eds., The RAINS Model of Acidification, Science and Strategies in Europe (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  2. M. Amann, OPTIONS IIASA (Winter, 1993).

  3. H.M. ApSimon, R. Warren and J.J.N. Wilson, The abatement strategies assessment model - ASAM; applications to reductions of sulphur dioxide emissions across Europe, Atmospheric Environment 28 (1994) 649.

    Google Scholar 

  4. M.B.A. van Asselt, H.W. Beusen and H.B.M. Hilderink, Uncertainty in integrated assessment: a social scientific perspective, Environ. Mod. Assess. 1 (1996) 71.

    Google Scholar 

  5. M.B.A. van Asselt and J. Rotmans, Uncertainty in perspective, Glob. Environ. Change 6(2) (1996) 121.

    Google Scholar 

  6. P. Bailey, Emissions and abatement costs of nitrogen oxides for use in IAMs, Report to Task Force on Integrated Assessment Modeling, LRTAP Convention, UNECE, Stockholm Environment Institute at York, York (1996).

  7. P.D. Bailey, C.A. Gough, M.J. Chadwick and G. McGranahan, Methods for Integrated Environmental Assessment: Research Directions for the European Union (Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  8. P.D. Bailey, C.A. Gough and K. Millock, Prospects for the joint implementation of sulphur emission reductions in Europe, Energy Policy 24(6) (1996) 507.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Boehmer-Christiansen, Reflections on scientific advice and EC transboundary pollution policy, Science and Public Policy 22(3) (1995) 195.

    Google Scholar 

  10. K.R. Bull, Critical loads - possibilities and constraints, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85(1) (1995) 201.

    Google Scholar 

  11. N. Castells and S. Funtowicz, The use of scientific inputs for environmental policy-making: the RAINS model and the sulphur protocols, International Journal of Environment and Pollution, Special issue: Decision Making and the Environment 7(3) (1997).

  12. N. Castells and G. Munda, International environmental issues: Towards a new integrated assessment approach, in: Ecologie, Soci´éé, Economie, Universit´e de Versailles-St. Quentin, Centre d'Economie et d'Ethique pour l'Environnement et le D´eveloppement, Paris, France (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. N. Castells and P. Nijkamp, The first-comers/late-comers distributional dilemma in international environmental agreements, Research Memorandum 1996–28, Vrije Universteit, Amsterdam (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  14. CLAG, Critical loads of acidity in the United Kingdom, Report by the Department of the Environment's Critical Loads Advisory Group (1994).

  15. R.J. Downing, J.-P. Hettelingh and P.A.M. de Smet, Calculation and mapping of critical loads in Europe: Status report 1993, RIVM Report No. 259101003, RIVM, Co-ordination Centre for Effects, Bilthoven, The Netherlands (1993).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Elliasen, Ø. Hov, T. Iversen, J. Saltbones and D. Simpson, Estimates of airborne transboundary transport of sulphur and nitrogen over Europe, EMEP/MSC-W Report 1/88, The Norwegian Meteorological Institute, MSC-W of EMEP, Oslo (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  17. J.H. Ellis, Mulitobjective mathematical programming models for acid rain control, European Journal of Operational Research 35 (1988) 365.

    Google Scholar 

  18. S. Funtowicz, G. Munda and M. Paruccini, The aggregation of environmental data using multicriteria methods, Environmetrics 1(4) (1990) 353.

    Google Scholar 

  19. S. Funtowicz and J. Ravetz, Uncertainty and Quality in Science for Policy (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  20. S. Funtowicz and J. Ravetz, in: Ecological Economics. The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. R. Costanza (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991) p. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  21. S. Funtowicz and J. Ravetz, Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science, Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13(12) (1994) 1881.

    Google Scholar 

  22. O. Godard, Integrating scientific expertise into regulatory decision making: social decision making under conditions of scientific controversy, expertise and the precautionary principle, Working Paper RSC No. 96/6, European University Institute, Florence (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  23. C. Gough, Users' needs and views of integrated environmental assessment, in: Prospects for Integrated Environmental Assessment: Lessons Learnt from the Case of Climate Change, European Commission DGXII, Toulouse, France (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  24. C.A. Gough, P.D. Bailey, B. Biewald, J.C.I. Kuylenstierna and M.J. Chadwick, Environmentally targeted objectives for reducing acidification in Europe, Energy Policy 22(12) (1994) 1055.

    Google Scholar 

  25. C. Gough, J. Kuylenstierna, P. Bailey and M.J. Chadwick, in: Acid Rain Research: Do We Have Enough Answers, eds. G.J. Heij and J.W. Erisman (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1995) p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  26. J. Gupta, Cooperation on climate change: towards more compliance and less-non decisions, WP/96/25, Institute for Environmental Studies, Amsterdam (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  27. J. Hannigan, Environmental Sociology: A Social Constructionist Perspective (Routledge, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  28. A. Heritier, in: Convergence of Diversity? Internationalization and Economic Policy Response, eds. B. Unger and F. van Waarden (Avebury, Aldershot, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  29. C. Herrick and D. Jamieson, The social construction of acid rain: some implications for science/policy assessment, Glob. Environ. Change 5(2) (1995) 105.

    Google Scholar 

  30. L. Hordijk, An Integrated Assessment Model for Acidification in Europe (Free University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, 1991).

    Google Scholar 

  31. L. Hordijk, Integrated assessment models as a basis for air pollution negotiations, Water, Air and Soil Pollution 85 (1995) 249.

    Google Scholar 

  32. T. Horlick-Jones and B. De Marchi, The crisis of scientific expertise in fin de siècle Europe, Science and Public Policy 22(3) (1995) 139.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Irwin, Citizen Science. A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development (Routledge, London, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  34. A. Irwin and B. Wynne, in: Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, eds. A. Irwin and B. Wynne (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996) p. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  35. T. Jackson, Joint implementation and cost-effectiveness under the Framework Convention on Climate Change, Energy Policy 23(2) (1995) 117.

    Google Scholar 

  36. G. Klaassen, Trading Sulphur Emission Reduction Commitments in Europe: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis (Free University, Amsterdam, 1995).

    Google Scholar 

  37. M.A. Levy, in: Institutions for the Earth. Sources of Effective Environmental Decision Making, eds. P.M. Haas, R.O. Keohane and M.A. Levy (The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1993) p. 75.

    Google Scholar 

  38. G. Mills, Optimisation in Economic Analysis (George Allen and Unwin, London, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. Nilsson and P. Grennfelt, eds., Critical Loads for Sulphur and Nitrogen (Nordic Council of Ministers, Copenhagen, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  40. O. Renn, Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework, Science and Public Policy 22(3) (1995) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  41. J. Risbey, M. Kandlikar and A. Patwardhan, Assessing integrated assessments, Climatic Change 34(3/4) (1996) 369.

    Google Scholar 

  42. RISK Newsletter 7(3) (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  43. J. Robinson, Risks, predictions and other optical illusions: rethinking the use of science in social decision making, Policy Sciences 25(3) (1992) 237.

    Google Scholar 

  44. N. Röling, in: The Future of the Land: Mobilising and Integrating Knowledge for Land Use Options, eds. L.O. Fresco et al. (Wiley, New York, 1994).

    Google Scholar 

  45. L. Salter, Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  46. R.A. Skeffington, in: Acid Rain and its Impact: The Critical Loads Debate, ed. R.W. Battarbee (Ensis, London, 1995) p. 91.

    Google Scholar 

  47. J. van der Sluijs, Integrated assessment models and the management of uncertainties, WP–96-119, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  48. M. Thompson, R. Ellis and A. Wildavsky, Cultural Theory (Westview Press, Boulder, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  49. UNECE, Impacts of Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Air Pollution Studies, Vol. 8, ECE/EB.AIR/31, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva (1992).

    Google Scholar 

  50. UNECE, Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air Pollution on Further Reduction of Sulphur Emissions, ECE/EB.AIR/40, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva (1994).

    Google Scholar 

  51. UNECE, Strategies and Policies for Air Pollution Abatement - 1994 Major Review, ECE/EB.AIR/44, United Nations, Geneva (1995).

  52. G.R. Walsh, An Introduction to Linear Programming (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  53. J. Wettestad, Acid lessons? Assessing and explaining LRTAP implementation and effectiveness, WP/96/18, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  54. H. Wüster, in: Acidification Research: Evaluation and Policy Applications, ed. T. Schneider (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1992) p. 221.

  55. B. Wynne, in: Social Theory and the Global Environment, eds. M. Redclift and T. Benton (Routledge, New York, 1994) p. 169.

    Google Scholar 

  56. S. Yearley, in: Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology, eds. A. Irwin and B. Wynne (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996) p. 172.

    Google Scholar 

  57. T. Zylicz, in: Ecological Economics. The Science and Management of Sustainability, ed. R. Costanza (Columbia University Press, New York, 1991) p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gough, C., Castells, N. & Funtowicz, S. Integrated Assessment: an emerging methodology for complex issues. Environmental Modeling & Assessment 3, 19–29 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019042201713

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019042201713

Navigation