Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Accuracy assessment of the PGM17 global geopotential model: a case study of Egypt and Northeast Africa

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Global geopotential models play a fundamental role in height transformation to convert the Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS)-based ellipsoidal heights into orthometric heights in several geosciences applications. The U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) is preparing to release the Earth Geopotential Model 2020 (EGM2020) in the near future. Prior to that official release, two primary geopotential models (PGM17 and PGM18) will be distributed to selective members for assessment in different regions worldwide. Within the activities of that working group, the new PGM17 geopotential model has been obtained and judged over a regional scale in northeast Africa, and over a national basis of Egypt. The assessment has been carried out using terrestrial gravity and GPS/leveling datasets within a GIS environment. The utilized dataset consists of 231 terrestrial gravity points in northeast Africa, 247 measured gravity points in Egypt, and 978 GNSS/leveling stations in Egypt. Three other GGMs have been included in the comparison stage, namely GECO, EIGEN-6C4, and EGM2008. For each model, grids of gravity anomalies and geoidal undulations have been computed and, then, compared against the corresponding values at known terrestrial data. Next, statistical measures of mean, range, and standard deviations of the discrepancies have been analyzed. For northeast Africa area, the accomplished results indicated that the PGM17 attains 100% improvements over the old EGM2008, while the GECO, and EIGEN-6C4 models resulted in improvements of 11%, and 1% respectively. Accordingly, it can be concluded that PGM17 represents the gravitational field over northeast Africa in a more enhanced manner. On a national scale, the GGMs assessment has been performed, over Egypt, in two steps: using gravity data, and using GNSS/leveling data. The findings emphasize that PGM17 noticeably enhance the performance of EGM2008, when compared against terrestrial gravity stations in Egypt, by almost 55%. Furthermore, the assessment over GPS/leveling stations concluded that the overall improvements of PGM17 are approximately 54%. Other GGMs did not produce a comparable improvement level in both case studies. Thus, it can be concluded that PGM17 is significantly precise than the other investigated GGMs in representing the gravitational field over Egypt in particular and northeast Africa in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Allah A (2015) Assessment of GOCE models in Egypt, Master thesis, Faculty of engineering, Cairo University, Egypt

  • Abd-Elmotaal H (2015) Egyptian geoid using best estimated response of the Earth’s crust due to the topographic loads. Presented at the International Association of Geodesy Symposium, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/1345_2015_194

    Google Scholar 

  • Abd-Elmtaal H (2015) Validation of GOCE models in Africa. Newton’s Bulletin No. 5, pp 149–162

  • Ahmed R, Singh R (2016) Seismic hazard assessment of Syria using seismicity, DEM, slope, active faults and GIS. Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment (RSASE). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Karagy E, Doma M, Dawod G (2014) Towards an accurate discrimination of the local geoid model in Egypt using GPS/levelling data: A case study at Rosetta area. The International Journal of Innovative Science and Modern Engineering (IJISME) 2(11):10–15

  • Al-Krargy E (2016) Development of a national geoid for Egypt using recent surveying data, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, Minufiya university, Egypt

  • Al-Krargy E, Hosny M, Dawod G (2015) Investigating the precision of recent global geoid models and global digital elevation models for geoid modelling in Egypt, Regional Conference on Surveying and Development, Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, Oct. 3–6

  • Alnaggar D (1986) Determination of the geoid in Egypt using heterogeneous geodetic data, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt

  • Ashry M (2016) Towards optimal combination of gravity field wavelengths in geoid determination for Egypt, Master thesis, Faculty of engineering, Minia university, Egypt

  • Barzaghi R, Carrion D, Pepe M, Prezioso G (2016) Computing the deflection of the vertical for improving aerial surveys: a comparison between EGM2008 and ITALGEO05 estimates. Sensors 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/s16081168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berber M, Wright W (2016) Online kinematic GNSS data processing for small hydrographic surveys. Ocean Eng 112:335–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BGI (International Gravimetric Bureau) (2018) http://bgi.omp.obs-mip.fr/data-products/Gravity-Databases/Land-Gravity-data. Accessed Jan. 2018

  • Casula G (2016) Geodynamics of the Calabrian Arc area (Italy) inferred from a dense GNSS network observations. Geodesy and Geodynamics 7(1):76–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2016.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawod G (1998) A national gravity standardization network for Egypt. PhD dissertation, Faculty of Engineering at Shoubra, Zagazig University, Egypt

  • Dawod G, Hosny M (2017) Toward a centimeter-geoid model for engineering surveying in Egypt: status and undergoing activities. J Sci Eng Res 4(10):312–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawod G, Mandoer M (2016) Optimum sites for solar energy harvesting in Egypt based on multi-criteria GIS, the first Future University international conference on new energy and environmental engineering, April 11–14, Cairo, Egypt, pp 450–456

  • Dawod G, Mohamed H, Ismail S (2010) Evaluation and adaptation of the EGM2008 geopotential model along the northern Nile Valley, Egypt: case study, ASCE. J Surv Eng, V 136(1):36–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng X, Hua X, You Y (2013) Transfer of height datum across seas using GPS leveling, gravimetric geoid and corrections based on a polynomial surface. Comput Geosci 51:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Ashquer M (2016) An improved hybrid local geoid model for Egypt, PhD dissertation, Faculty of Engineering, Zagazig University, Egypt

  • Fazilova D (2017) The review and development of a modern GNSS network and datum in Uzbekistan. Geodesy and Geodynamics 8(2):187–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Förste C, Bruinsma S, Abrikosov O, Lemoine J, Marty J, Charles F, Frank B, Barthelmes F, Biancale R (2014) EIGEN-6C4: the latest combined global gravity field model including GOCE data up to degree and order 2190 of GFZ Potsdam and GRGS Toulouse, presented in the 5th GOCE user workshop, Paris, France, Nov. 25-28. https://doi.org/10.5880/ICGEM.2015.1

  • Ghoniem I, Mousa A, El-Fiky G (2017) Distribution of the GNSS-LEO occultation events over Egypt. NRIAG J Astron Geophys 6:97–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/lj.nrjag.2017.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilardoni M, Reguzzoni M, Sampietro D (2016) GECO: a global gravity model by locally combining GOCE data and EGM2008. Stud Geophys Geod 60:228–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godah W, Krynski J (2013) Evaluation of recent GOCE geopotential models over the area of Poland. Acta Geodyn Geomater 10(3):379–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomez M, Perdomo R, Cogliano D (2017) Validation of recent geopotential models in Tierra Del Fuego. Acta Geophys 65:931–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassouna R, Asal F (2016) Using GIS-based digital raster analysis for improving harmonic modelsderived geoidal heights. Appl Geomat 8:151–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-016-0173-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2005) Physical geodesy. SpringerWien, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Wangm J, Li M, Fei M, Dong J (2017) Modeling the influence of urbanization on urban pluvial flooding: a scenario-based case study in Shanghai, China. Nat Hazards 87:1035–1055

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICGEM (The International Center for Global Earth Model) (2018) http://icgem.gfz-potsdam.de/tom_longtime. Accessed Jun. 2018

  • Karpik A, Kanushin V, Ganagina I, Goldobin D, Kosarev N, Kosareva A (2016) Evaluation of recent Earth’s global gravity field models with terrestrial gravity data. Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy 46(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1515/congeo-2016-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya E, Agca M, Adiguzel F, Cetin M (2018). Spatial data analysis with R programming for environment. Journal of Human and Ecological Risk Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807039.2018.1470896

  • Li H, Fang J (2017) Crustal and upper mantle density structure beneath the Qinghai-Tibet plateau and surrounding areas derived from EGM2008 geoid anomalies. ISPRS Int J Geo-Inf 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi6010004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahapatra M, Ratheesh R, Rajawat A (2017) Storm surge vulnerability assessment of Saurashtra coast, Gujarat, using GIS techniques. Nat Hazards 86:821–831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud S (2012) Assessment of the gravitational global models in Egypt, Master thesis, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt

  • Mohamed A, Radwan A, Sharaf M, Hamimi Z, Hegazy E, Aly N, Gomaa M (2016) Evaluation of the deformation parameters of the northern part of Egypt using global navigation satellite system (GNSS). NRIAG J Astron Geophys 5:65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odera P, Fukuda Y (2017) Evaluation of GOCE-based global gravity field models over Japan after the full mission using free-air gravity anomalies and geoid undulations. Earth Planets Space 69. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40623-017-0716-1

  • Pavlis NK, Holmes SA, Kenyon SC, Factor JK (2008) An earth gravitational model to degree 2160: EGM2008, presented in the EGU general assembly, Vienna, Austria, April 13-18

  • QZSS (2018) http://qzss.go.jp/en/technical/satellites/index.html. Accessed June 19, 2018

  • Rabiu B (2015) State of GNSS in Africa: applications, observational infrastructures, research implications and prospects, presented in the space weather workshop, April 13–17, Boulder, Colorado, USA

  • Sreejith K, Rajesh S, Majumdar T, Rao G, Radhakrishna M, Krishna K, Rajawat A (2013) High-resolution residual geoid and gravity anomaly data of the northern Indian Ocean - an input to geological understanding. J Asian Earth Sci 62:616–626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava P, Singh R (2016) GIS based integrated modelling framework for agricultural canal system simulation and management in Indo-Gangetic plains of India. Agric Water Manag 163:37–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stal C, Poppe H, Vandenbulcke A, Wulf A (2016) Study of post-processed GNSS measurements for tidal analysis in the Belgian North Sea. Ocean Eng 118:165–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Q, Kang J, Li S, Zhen J, Li H (2015) GNSS positioning by CORS and EGM2008 in Jilin province, China. Sensors 15:30419–30428. https://doi.org/10.3390/s151229806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yakubu C, Ferreira V, Asante C (2017) Towards the selection of an optimal global geopotential model for the computation of the long-wavelength contribution: a case study of Ghana. Geosciences 7:113. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences7040113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yılmaz M, Turgut B, Güllü M, Yılmaz I (2017) The evaluation of high-degree geopotential models for regional geoid determination in Turkey. AKÜ J Sci Eng (17):147–153. https://doi.org/10.5578/fmbd.50706

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the truthful cooperation of the U.S. National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA), the U.S National Geodetic Survey (NGS), and Dr. Srinivas Bettadpur, the head of Center of Space Research, University of Texas at Austin, and the chair of the EGM2020 Evaluation Working Group. Also, the authors express honest gratitude to the International Gravimetric Bureau (BGI) for providing the gravity datasets of Northeast Africa.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Survey Research Institute, National Water Research Center, Giza, Egypt

    Gomaa M. Dawod, Hoda F. Mohamed & Essam M. Al-Krargy

Authors
  1. Gomaa M. Dawod
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hoda F. Mohamed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Essam M. Al-Krargy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gomaa M. Dawod.

Additional information

Editorial handling: Abdullah M. Al-Amri

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dawod, G.M., Mohamed, H.F. & Al-Krargy, E.M. Accuracy assessment of the PGM17 global geopotential model: a case study of Egypt and Northeast Africa. Arab J Geosci 12, 246 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4418-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4418-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation