Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Yield and soil nutrient balance of a sugarcane plant–ratoon system with conventional and organic nutrient management in sub-tropical India

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A 3-year field trial of sugarcane, comprising 11 treatment combinations of different organic manures with and without Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus (Gd), NPK and an absolute control, on an inceptisol was conducted to assess the effect of these treatments on sugarcane total and economic yield, the benefit:cost ratio, nutrient balance and soil quality in a sugarcane plant–ratoon system. The highest cane yield (78.6 t ha−1) was recorded in the plant crop given vermicompost + Gd, whereas ratoon yields (first and second) were highest (80.8 and 74.9 t/ha−1, respectively) with sulphitation press mud cake (SPMC) + Gd. In both plant and ratoon crops, a number of different organic manures produced the highest cane yield that was also statistically similar to those obtained with using the recommended NPK levels (76.1, 78.2 and 71.7 t/ha for plant crop and subsequent two ratoons, respectively). The highest benefit:cost (B:C) ratio in the plant and two ratoon crops (1.28, 2.36, 2.03 respectively) were obtained with the addition of SPMC + Gd. The nutrient balance for NPK in the soil was highest in the SPMC + Gd treatment. The highest increase in organic C (94%) and total N (87%), in comparison to the initial level, and soil microbial biomass C (113%) and soil microbial biomass N (229%), in comparison to the control treatment, was recorded with the addition of SPMC + Gd. The maximum decrease in soil bulk density (BD) (12%) with an increase in soil aggregate (17%) and water infiltration rate (35%) was obtained with the addition of SPMC. Overall, the sugarcane crop responded well to different organic manures in a multiple ratooning system with a better economic output and improved soil quality. Strategic planning in terms of an integrated application of these manures with inorganic chemicals will not only sustain our soils but will also be beneficial for our farmers in terms of reducing their dependence and expenditure on chemical fertilizers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson TH, Domsch KH (1989) Ratios of microbial biomass carbon to total organic carbon in arable soils. Soil Biol Biochem 21:471–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldani IJ, Reis VM, Baldani VLD, Dobereiner J (2002) A brief story of nitrogen fixation in sugarcane- reasons for success in Brazil. Funct Plant Biol 29:417–423

    Google Scholar 

  • Cavalcante VA, Dobereiner J (1988) A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 108:23–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Dee MB, Haynes RJ, Graham MH (2003) Changes in soil acidity and the size and activity of the microbial biomass in response to the addition of sugar mill wastes. Biol Fertility Soils 37:47–54

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Doran JW, Parkin TB (1994) Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran JW (ed) Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publ 35. SSSA, Madison, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Garside AL (1997) Yield decline research in the Australian sugar industry. Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 71:3–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Guisquiani PL, Paghai M, Gighoth G, Businelli D, Benetti A (1995) Urban waste compost: effects on physical, chemical, and biochemical soil properties. J Environ Qual 24:75–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ, Hamilton CS (1999) Effects of sugarcane production on soil quality: a synthesis of world literature. Proc S Afr Sugar Technol Assoc 73:45–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson ML (1973) Soil chemical analysis. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • James EK, Reis VM, Olivares F, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J (1994) Infection of sugarcane by the nitrogen fixing bacterium I Acetobacter diazotrophicus. J Exp Bot 45:757–766

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Ladd JN (1981) Microbial biomass in soil: measurement and turnover. In: Paul EA, Ladd JN (eds) Soil biochemistry, vol 5. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 415–471

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkinson DS, Powlson DS (1976) The effects of biocidal treatment on metabolism in soil: I. Fumigation with chloroform. Soil Biol Biochem 8:167–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Chen Z (2004) Soil microbial biomass C and N along a climatic transect in the Mongolian steppe. Biol Fertility Soils 39:344–351

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mader P, Fliebach A, Dubois D, Gunst L, Fried P, Niggli U (2002) Soil fertility and biodiversity in organic farming. Science 296:1694–1697

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Lakshminarasimhan C (1999) Influence of N fertilisation on the isolation of Acetobacter diazotrophicus and Herbaspirillum spp. from Indian sugarcane varieties. Biol Fertility Soils 29:157–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukumarasamy R, Revathi G, Loganathan P (2002) Effect of inorganic N on the population, in vitro colonization and morphology of Acetobacter diazotrophicus (syn. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus). Plant Soil 243: 91–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira ALM, Urquiaga S, Döbereiner J, Baldani JI (2002) The effect of inoculating endophytic N2-fixing bacteria on micropropagated sugarcane plants. Plant Soil 242:205–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Page AL, Miller RH, Keeney DR (eds) (1982) Methods of soil analysis, part 2: chemical and microbiological properties. American Society of Agronomy, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Parham JA, Deng SP, Raun WR, Johnson GV (2002) Long-term cattle manure application in soil. 1. Effect on soil phosphorus levels. Microbial biomass C and dehydrogenase and phosphatase activities. Boil Fertility Soils 35:328–337

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piper CS (1966) Soil and plant analysis. University of Adelaide, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai MM (1995) Physical properties of soils. Principles of soil science, 3rd edn. Macmillan, India

  • Saviozzi A, Bufalino P, Levi-Minzi R, Riffaldi R (2002) Biochemical activities in a degraded soil restored by two amendments: a laboratory study. Biol Fertility Soils 35:96–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sevilla M, Burris RH, Gunapala N, Kennedy C (2001) Comparison of benefit to sugarcane plant growth and 15N2 incorporation following inoculation of sterile plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus wild-type and nif mutant strains. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 14:358–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Snedecor GW, Cochran WG (1967) Statistical methods. Oxford/IBH Publ, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparling GP (1992) Ratio of microbial biomass carbon to soil organic carbon as a sensitive indicator of changes in soil organic matter. Aust J Soil Res 30:195–207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Speir TW, Horswell J, Mclaren RG, Fietje G, VanSchalk AP (2004) Composted biosolids enhance fertility of a sandy loam soil under dairy pasture. Biol Fertility Soils 40:349–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staben ML, Bezdicek DF, Smith JL, Fauci MF (1997) Assessment of soil quality in conservation research program and wheat-fallow soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:124–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suman A, Solomon S, Yadav DV, Gaur A, Singh M (2000) Post harvest loss in sugarcane quality due to endophytic microorganisms. Sugar Technol 2:21–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Suman A, Shasany AK, Singh M, Shahi HN, Gaur A, Khanuja SPS (2001) Molecular assessment of diversity among endophytic diazotrophs isolated from subtropical Indian sugarcane. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 17:39–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suman A, Gaur A, Shrivastava AK, Yadav RL (2005) Improving sugarcane growth and nutrient uptake by inoculating Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus. Plant Growth Regul 47:155–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suman A, Lal Menhi, Singh AK, Gaur A (2006) Microbial biomass turnover in Indian subtropical soils under different sugarcane intercropping systems. Agron J 98:698–704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardle DA (1992) A comparative assessment of factors which influence microbial biomass carbon and nitrogen levels in soil. Biol Rev Cambridge Philos Soc 67:321–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Yadav RL, Prasad SR (1992) Conserving the organic matter content of the soil to sustain sugarcane yield. Exp Agric 28:57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yodor RF (1936) A direct method of aggregate analysis of soil and study of physical nature of erosion losses. J Am Soc Agron 28:337–357

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Archna Suman.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Singh, K.P., Suman, A., Singh, P.N. et al. Yield and soil nutrient balance of a sugarcane plant–ratoon system with conventional and organic nutrient management in sub-tropical India. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 79, 209–219 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9108-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9108-4

Keywords

Navigation