Abstract
Societies have always benefited from nature’s processes and been harmed by its massive perturbations, such as floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc. Population growth as a consequence of scientific advances is presently putting far greater numbers of people in harm’s way. Technological development is not only creating new possibilities, such as nuclear energy and novel techniques of extraction of fossil fuels, but also unleashing new risks, for example nuclear meltdown and global warming resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. The interaction between social constructions and those of nature is intensifying. To explore the possibilities and difficulties of a sociological investigation of the interaction between social and biophysical dynamics instead of sociology being limited to one side of that divide, this paper scrutinizes in depth the work of an outstanding American sociologist who did cutting-edge research along these lines, namely William Freudenburg. It begins by describing the social and intellectual context of his work. It then shows the value of his concepts and methodology. His approach is particularly innovative for the discipline, documenting that even meanings and technology are conjointly constituted by social constructions and nature’s dynamics. The paper demonstrates the potential of his framework for future research and suggests an extension of his concepts and methodology for the analysis of one of the environmental problems that contemporary societies are having the most difficulty dealing with, namely global warming.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The incorporation of the physical is present in nearly all of Freudenburg’s research. Only a small portion of his publications will be examined here because of the division of labor for this symposium. In many places we refer only to Freudenburg so that the writing does not become too heavy, but that is a short form intending to refer also to his research associates, particularly Robert Gramling—who has been Freudenburg’s most consistent collaborator.
Their approach provides valuable insights for sociological contributions to the growing body of work on “coupled social and ecological systems” (Liu et al. 2007).
Anthropology has typically been more inclusive in this sense than sociology.
References
Benton T (1994) Biology and social theory in the environmental debate. In: Redclift M, Benton T (eds) Social theory and the global environment. Routledge, London, pp 28–50
Benton T (2001) Why are sociologists naturephobes? In: Lopes J, Potter G (eds) After postmodernism. Athlone, London
Burningham K, Cooper G (1999) Being constructive: social constructionism and the environment. Sociology 33:297–316
CAPP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (2007) Oil sands, benefits to Alberta and Canada, today and tomorrow, through a fair, stable, and competitive fiscal regime. CAPP, Calgary. http://www.capp.ca/getdoc.aspx?DocId=121342&DT=NTV. Accessed 26 Oct 2011
Catton WR Jr (1980) Overshoot: the ecological basis of revolutionary change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana
Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Am Sociol 13:41–49
Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1980) A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. Am Behav Sci 24:15–48
Collins H (1981) Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Soc Stud Sci 11:3–10
Dickens P (2001) Linking the social and natural sciences. Sociology 35:93–110
Dickens P (2004) Society and nature. Polity Press, Cambridge
Dryzek JS, Holmes L (2002) Post-communist democratization: political discourses across thirteen countries. Cambridge University Press (Institutional Design series), Cambridge
Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D, Hernes H-K (2003) Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Dunlap RE (1983) Ecologist versus exemptionalist: the Ehrlich–Simon debate. Soc Sci Q 64:200–203
Dunlap RE (2010) The maturation and diversification of environmental sociology: from constructivism and realisim to agnosticism and pragmatism. In: Redclift MR, Woodgate G (eds) International handbook of environmental sociology, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 15–32
Dunlap RE, Catton WR Jr (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: the rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Sociol 25:5–30
Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) Oxford handbook of climate change and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 144–160
Durkheim E ([1895] 1982) The rules of sociological method. Free Press, New York
Eder K (1996) The social construction of nature. Sage, London
Evernden N (1993) The social creation of nature. Yale University Press, New Haven
Fisher DR (2004) National governance and the global climate change regime. Rowman-Littlefield, Lanham, MD
Freudenburg WR (2008) Thirty years of scholarship and science on environment-society relationships. Organ Environ 21:449–459
Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (1993) Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: understanding opposition and support for offshore oil. Sociol Forum 8:341–364
Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (1994) Oil in troubled waters: perceptions, politics and the battle over offshore drilling. SUNY Press, Albany
Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (2010) Blowout in the gulf: the BP oil spill disaster and the future of energy in America. MIT Press, Cambridge MA
Freudenburg WR, Frickel S, Gramling R (1995) Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think about a mountain. Sociol Forum 10:361–392
Gramling R, Freudenburg WR (1996) Crude, coppertone, and the coast: developmental channelization and the constraint of alternative development opportunities. Soc Nat Resour 9:483–506
Grundmann R (1991a) The ecological challenge to Marxism. New Left Rev 187:103–120
Grundmann R (1991b) Marxism and ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory Culture Soc 27:233–253
Legatum Institute (2010). The 2010 Legatum Prosperity Index. Legatum Institute, London. http://www.prosperity.com/summary.aspx. Accessed 25 Oct 2011
Liu J et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516
Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Lomborg B (2007) Cool it. Knopf, New York
Mitchell RC (1990) Public opinion and the green lobby. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy in the 1990s. CQ Press, Washington, pp 81–99
Molotch H (1970) Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America. Sociol Inq 49:131–144
Molotch H, Freudenburg W, Paulsen KE (2000) History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. Am Sociol Rev 65:791–823
Murphy R (1994) The social construction of science without nature. Sociology 28:957–974
Murphy R (1995) Sociology as if nature did not matter: an ecological critique. Br J Sociol 46:688–707
Murphy R (1997) Sociology and nature: social action in context. Westview, Boulder, CO
Murphy R (2009) Leadership in disaster: learning for a future with global climate change. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal
Murphy R (2011) The challenge of anthropogenic climate change for the social sciences. Int Rev Soc Res 1(3):167–181
Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic, New York
Perrow C (2007) The next catastrophe: reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Sayer A (1997) Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond. Sociol Rev 45:453–487
Schmidt V (2001) Oversocialised epistemology: a critical appraisal of constructivism. Sociology 35:135–157
Schreurs M (2010–2011). Federalism and the climate: Canada and the European Union. International Journal 66: 91–108.
Simon J (1981) The ultimate resource. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Spector M, Kitsuse J (1977) Constructing social problems. Cummings, Menlo Park
Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability. Res Organ Behav 21
Yale University (2010) Environmental Performance Index 2010. http://epi.yale.edu. Accessed 22 July 2011
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, R., Dunlap, R.E. Beyond the society/nature divide: building on the sociology of William Freudenburg. J Environ Stud Sci 2, 7–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0057-5
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0057-5