Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond the society/nature divide: building on the sociology of William Freudenburg

  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Societies have always benefited from nature’s processes and been harmed by its massive perturbations, such as floods, earthquakes, hurricanes, etc. Population growth as a consequence of scientific advances is presently putting far greater numbers of people in harm’s way. Technological development is not only creating new possibilities, such as nuclear energy and novel techniques of extraction of fossil fuels, but also unleashing new risks, for example nuclear meltdown and global warming resulting from the combustion of fossil fuels. The interaction between social constructions and those of nature is intensifying. To explore the possibilities and difficulties of a sociological investigation of the interaction between social and biophysical dynamics instead of sociology being limited to one side of that divide, this paper scrutinizes in depth the work of an outstanding American sociologist who did cutting-edge research along these lines, namely William Freudenburg. It begins by describing the social and intellectual context of his work. It then shows the value of his concepts and methodology. His approach is particularly innovative for the discipline, documenting that even meanings and technology are conjointly constituted by social constructions and nature’s dynamics. The paper demonstrates the potential of his framework for future research and suggests an extension of his concepts and methodology for the analysis of one of the environmental problems that contemporary societies are having the most difficulty dealing with, namely global warming.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The incorporation of the physical is present in nearly all of Freudenburg’s research. Only a small portion of his publications will be examined here because of the division of labor for this symposium. In many places we refer only to Freudenburg so that the writing does not become too heavy, but that is a short form intending to refer also to his research associates, particularly Robert Gramling—who has been Freudenburg’s most consistent collaborator.

  2. Their approach provides valuable insights for sociological contributions to the growing body of work on “coupled social and ecological systems” (Liu et al. 2007).

  3. Anthropology has typically been more inclusive in this sense than sociology.

References

  • Benton T (1994) Biology and social theory in the environmental debate. In: Redclift M, Benton T (eds) Social theory and the global environment. Routledge, London, pp 28–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton T (2001) Why are sociologists naturephobes? In: Lopes J, Potter G (eds) After postmodernism. Athlone, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Burningham K, Cooper G (1999) Being constructive: social constructionism and the environment. Sociology 33:297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CAPP Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers (2007) Oil sands, benefits to Alberta and Canada, today and tomorrow, through a fair, stable, and competitive fiscal regime. CAPP, Calgary. http://www.capp.ca/getdoc.aspx?DocId=121342&DT=NTV. Accessed 26 Oct 2011

  • Catton WR Jr (1980) Overshoot: the ecological basis of revolutionary change. University of Illinois Press, Urbana

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1978) Environmental sociology: a new paradigm. Am Sociol 13:41–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Catton WR Jr, Dunlap RE (1980) A new ecological paradigm for post-exuberant sociology. Am Behav Sci 24:15–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins H (1981) Stages in the empirical programme of relativism. Soc Stud Sci 11:3–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens P (2001) Linking the social and natural sciences. Sociology 35:93–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickens P (2004) Society and nature. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS, Holmes L (2002) Post-communist democratization: political discourses across thirteen countries. Cambridge University Press (Institutional Design series), Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dryzek JS, Downes D, Hunold C, Schlosberg D, Hernes H-K (2003) Green states and social movements: environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE (1983) Ecologist versus exemptionalist: the Ehrlich–Simon debate. Soc Sci Q 64:200–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE (2010) The maturation and diversification of environmental sociology: from constructivism and realisim to agnosticism and pragmatism. In: Redclift MR, Woodgate G (eds) International handbook of environmental sociology, 2nd edn. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, Catton WR Jr (1994) Struggling with human exemptionalism: the rise, decline and revitalization of environmental sociology. Am Sociol 25:5–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap RE, McCright AM (2011) Organized climate change denial. In: Dryzek JS, Norgaard RB, Schlosberg D (eds) Oxford handbook of climate change and Society. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 144–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim E ([1895] 1982) The rules of sociological method. Free Press, New York

  • Eder K (1996) The social construction of nature. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Evernden N (1993) The social creation of nature. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher DR (2004) National governance and the global climate change regime. Rowman-Littlefield, Lanham, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg WR (2008) Thirty years of scholarship and science on environment-society relationships. Organ Environ 21:449–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (1993) Socioenvironmental factors and development policy: understanding opposition and support for offshore oil. Sociol Forum 8:341–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (1994) Oil in troubled waters: perceptions, politics and the battle over offshore drilling. SUNY Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg WR, Gramling R (2010) Blowout in the gulf: the BP oil spill disaster and the future of energy in America. MIT Press, Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenburg WR, Frickel S, Gramling R (1995) Beyond the nature/society divide: learning to think about a mountain. Sociol Forum 10:361–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramling R, Freudenburg WR (1996) Crude, coppertone, and the coast: developmental channelization and the constraint of alternative development opportunities. Soc Nat Resour 9:483–506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann R (1991a) The ecological challenge to Marxism. New Left Rev 187:103–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundmann R (1991b) Marxism and ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasanoff S (2010) A new climate for society. Theory Culture Soc 27:233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legatum Institute (2010). The 2010 Legatum Prosperity Index. Legatum Institute, London. http://www.prosperity.com/summary.aspx. Accessed 25 Oct 2011

  • Liu J et al (2007) Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 317:1513–1516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg B (2001) The skeptical environmentalist. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomborg B (2007) Cool it. Knopf, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC (1990) Public opinion and the green lobby. In: Vig NJ, Kraft ME (eds) Environmental policy in the 1990s. CQ Press, Washington, pp 81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Molotch H (1970) Oil in Santa Barbara and power in America. Sociol Inq 49:131–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molotch H, Freudenburg W, Paulsen KE (2000) History repeats itself, but how? City character, urban tradition, and the accomplishment of place. Am Sociol Rev 65:791–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (1994) The social construction of science without nature. Sociology 28:957–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (1995) Sociology as if nature did not matter: an ecological critique. Br J Sociol 46:688–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (1997) Sociology and nature: social action in context. Westview, Boulder, CO

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (2009) Leadership in disaster: learning for a future with global climate change. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy R (2011) The challenge of anthropogenic climate change for the social sciences. Int Rev Soc Res 1(3):167–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Norgaard KM (2011) Living in denial: climate change, emotions, and everyday life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (1984) Normal accidents. Basic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow C (2007) The next catastrophe: reducing our vulnerabilities to natural, industrial, and terrorist disasters. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer A (1997) Essentialism, social constructionism, and beyond. Sociol Rev 45:453–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt V (2001) Oversocialised epistemology: a critical appraisal of constructivism. Sociology 35:135–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreurs M (2010–2011). Federalism and the climate: Canada and the European Union. International Journal 66: 91–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon J (1981) The ultimate resource. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector M, Kitsuse J (1977) Constructing social problems. Cummings, Menlo Park

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick KE, Sutcliffe K, Obstfeld D (1999) Organizing for high reliability. Res Organ Behav 21

  • Yale University (2010) Environmental Performance Index 2010. http://epi.yale.edu. Accessed 22 July 2011

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riley E. Dunlap.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Murphy, R., Dunlap, R.E. Beyond the society/nature divide: building on the sociology of William Freudenburg. J Environ Stud Sci 2, 7–17 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0057-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-011-0057-5

Keywords

Navigation