Abstract
This study investigates how lack of perceived organizational integrity (POI) by managers negatively affects bottom-up improvement-oriented behaviors at lower hierarchical levels (supervisors, employees). It is expected that expressions of tyrannical leadership by the manager, a self-serving type of leadership, will mediate the relation between POI and job improvement behaviors. Further, this study investigates the role of mimicry of manager behaviors (e.g., supervisor tyrannical leadership) and of other supervisor’s responses (e.g., intent to quit, improvement-oriented behaviors) to understand how manager tyrannical leadership effect is carried through to the lowest level. Our initial postulate is that non-mimicry provides complex social cues for employees. Following social information processing theory, we expect that incoherent cues increase the salience and negative effects of managers’ tyrannical leadership on job improvement. A three-level study was conducted following a questionnaire survey in a large public safety organization. Participants included 34 managers (level 3), 129 supervisors (level 2), and 620 employees (level 1). Results of multilevel analyses revealed that lack of perceived integrity and tyrannical leadership at the managerial level have far-reaching effects on job improvement at the lowest level. Further, it indicates that the supervisors’ responses at the intermediate level are important mechanisms to understand how the negative effects from the managerial level are transmitted to the employee level.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aguinis, H. (2004). Regression analysis for categorical moderators. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Ashforth, B. E. (1994). Petty tyranny in organizations. Human Relations, 47, 755–778. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679404700701.
Ashforth, B. E. (1997). Petty tyranny in organizations: A preliminary examination of antecedents and consequences. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 14, 126–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1936-4490.1997.tb00124.x.
Ashford, S. J., Suttcliff, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out: The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. In J. Greenberg & M. S. Edwards (Eds.), Voice and silence in organizations (pp. 175–202). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
Bandura, A. (1971). Social learning theory. New York, NY: General Learning Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191.
Bentein, K., Vandenberghe, C., Vandenberg, R., & Stinglhamber, F. (2005). The role of change in the relationship between commitment and turnover: A latent growth modeling approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 468–482. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.468.
Blau, P. (1964). Power and exchange in social life. New York: Wiley.
Boudrias, J.-S., Aubé, C., Rousseau, V., Savoie, A., Duguay, G., & Morin, E. M. (2010). L’habilitation comportementale au travail: Structure factorielle et convergence/distinction avec l’habilitation psychologique [Behavioral empowerment : Factor stucture and convergence/distinction with psychological empowerment]. Revue Québécoise de Psychologie, 31, 173–199.
Burris, E. R., Detert, J. R., & Chiaburu, D. S. (2008). Quitting before leaving: The mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 912–922. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.912.
Cacciatore, G. A. (2015). Petty tyranny as a form of destructive leadership: Results of studies based on a French-Canadian measure (Doctoral dissertation, Université du Québec à Montréal).
Chen, Y., Wang, L., Liu, X., Chen, H., Hu, Y., & Yang, H. (2018). The trickle-down effect of leaders’ pro-social rule breaking: Joint moderating role of empowering leadership and courage. Frontiers in Psychology. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02647.
Chun, J. S., Shin, Y., Choi, J. N., & Kim, M. S. (2013). How does corporate ethics contribute to firm financial performance? The mediating role of collective organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Management, 39, 853–877. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206311419662.
Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21, 249–270. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1080.0405.
Falk, C. F., & Biesanz, J. C. (2016). Two cross-platform programs for inferences and interval estimation about indirect effects in mediational models. SAGE Open. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015625445.
Fast, N. J., Burris, E. R., & Bartel, C. A. (2014). Managing to stay in the dark: Managerial self-efficacy, ego defensiveness, and the aversion to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1013–1034. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0393.
Funder, D. C. (2012). Accurate personality judgment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 21, 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412445309.
Grosser, T. J., Obstfeld, D., Choi, E. W., Woehler, M., Lopez-Kidwell, V., Labianca, G., et al. (2018). A sociopolitical perspective on employee innovativeness and job performance: The role of political skill and network structure. Organization Science, 29, 612–632. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1201.
Hassan, S. (2015). The importance of ethical leadership and personal control in promoting improvement-centered voice among government employees. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25, 697–719. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muu055.
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Glasø, L., Skogstad, A., Notelaers, G., & Einarsen, S. (2018). Leadership, affect and outcomes: Symmetrical and asymmetrical relationships. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39, 51–65. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-08-2016-0194.
Greenbaum, R. L., Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., & Priesemuth, M. (2013). To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employees reactions to supervisor abuse and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Human Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713482992.
Krasikova, D. V., Green, S. G., & LeBreton, J. M. (2013). Destructive leadership: A theoretical review, integration, and future research agenda. Journal of Management, 39, 1308–1338. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312471388.
Lee, F., Edmondson, A. C., Thomke, S., & Worline, M. (2004). The mixed effects of inconsistency on experimentation in organizations. Organization Science, 15, 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0076.
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2011). Does power distance exacerbate or mitigate the effects of abusive supervision? It depends on the outcome. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97, 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024610.
Lin, S.-H., Ma, J., & Johnson, R. E. (2016). When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: How ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101, 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000098.
Little, T. D., Rhemtulla, M., Gibson, K., & Shoemann, A. M. (2013). Why the items versus parcels controversy needn’t be one. Psychological Methods, 18, 285–300. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033266.
Liu, D., Liao, H., & Loi, R. (2012). The dark side of leadership: A three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1187–1212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0400.
Liu, W., Zhang, P., Liao, J., Hao, P., & Mao, J. (2016). Abusive supervision and employee creativity: The mediating role of psychological safety and organizational identification. Management Decision, 54, 130–147. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2013-0443.
Mawritz, M. B., Mayer, D. M., Hoobler, J. M., Wayne, S. J., & Marinova, S. V. (2012). A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Personnel Psychology, 65, 325–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01246.x.
Mayer, D. M., Kuenzi, M., Greenbaum, R., Bardes, M., & Salvador, R. B. (2009). How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2008.04.002.
Milliken, F. J., Morrison, E. W., & Hewlin, P. F. (2003). An exploratory study of employee silence: Issues that employees don’t communicate upward and why. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1453–1476. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6486.00387.
Naseer, S., Raja, U., Syed, F., Donia, M. B., & Darr, W. (2016). Perils of being close to a bad leader in a bad environment: Exploring the combined effects of despotic leadership, leader member exchange, and perceived organizational politics on behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 27, 14–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.005.
Park, J., & Hassan, S. (2018). Does the influence of empowering leadership trickle down? Evidence from law enforcement organizations. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28, 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux047.
Peng, J., Wang, Z., & Chen, X. (2018). Does self-serving leadership hinder team creativity? A moderated dual-path model. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3799-0.
Peng, H., & Wei, F. (2018). Trickle-down effects of perceived leader integrity on employee creativity: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3226-3.
Pigeon, M., Longpré, P., & Boudrias, J. S. (2015). L’habilitation comportementale se différencie-t-elle des concepts d’innovation, de citoyenneté organisationnelle et d’autogestion? [Is behavioral empowerment different from innovation, organizational citizenship behaviors and self-management?]. Psychologie du Travail et des Organisations, 21, 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1420-2530(16)30016-4.
Pigeon, M., Montani, F., & Boudrias, J. S. (2017). How do empowering conditions lead to empowered behaviors? Test of a mediation model. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 32, 357–372. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-09-2016-0292.
Preacher, K. J., Curran, P. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2006). Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437–448. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986031004437.
Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15, 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141.
Priesemuth, M., Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Folger, R. (2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57, 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237.
Rego, A., & Simpson, A. V. (2018). The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-3008-3.
Salancik, G. R., & Pfeffer, J. (1978). A social information processing approach to job attitudes and task design. Administrative Science Quarterly, 23, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392563.
Schaubroeck, J. M., Hannah, S. T., Avolio, B. J., Kozlowski, S. W., Lord, R. G., Treviño, L. K., et al. (2012). Embedding ethical leadership within and across organization levels. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 1053–1078. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0064.
Shin, Y., Sung, S. Y., Choi, J. N., & Kim, M. S. (2015). Top management ethical leadership and firm performance: Mediating role of ethical and procedural justice climate. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2144-5.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 178–190. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556375.
Tepper, B. J. (2007). Abusive supervision in work organizations: Review, synthesis, and research agenda. Journal of Management, 33, 261–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307300812.
Tepper, B. J., Simon, L., & Park, H. M. (2017). Abusive supervision. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 123–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539.
Treviño, L. K., Butterfield, K. B., & McCabe, D. L. (1998). The ethical context in organizations: Influences on employee attitudes and behaviors. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 447–476. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857431.
Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Brown, M. E. (2008). It’s lovely at the top: Hierarchical levels, identities, and perceptions of organizational ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1052150X00010952.
Vigoda, E. (2000). Internal politics in public administration systems: An empirical examination of its relationship with job congruence, organizational citizenship behavior, and in-role performance. Public Personnel Management, 29, 185–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/009102600002900203.
Vigoda-Gadot, E., & Beeri, I. (2012). Change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior in public administration: The power of leadership and the cost of organizational politics. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22, 573–596. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur036.
Wang, R., & Jiang, J. (2015). How abusive supervisors influence employees’ voice and silence: The effects of interactional justice and organizational attribution. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 204–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2014.990410.
Wang, Z., Xu, H., & Liu, Y. (2016). How does ethical leadership trickle down? Test of an integrative dual-process model. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3361-x.
Wang, Z., Xu, H., & Liu, Y. (2018). Servant leadership as a driver of employee service performance: Test of a trickle-down model and its boundary conditions. Human Relations, 71, 1179–1203. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726717738320.
Wo, D. X., Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2015). What drives trickle-down effects? A test of multiple mediation processes. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1848–1868. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.0670.
Wu, W. L., & Lee, Y. C. (2016). Do employees share knowledge when encountering abusive supervision? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 31, 154–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-12-2013-0410.
Wo, D. X., Schminke, M., & Ambrose, M. L. (2019). Trickle-down, trickle-out, trickle-up, trickle-in, and trickle-around effects: An integrative perspective on indirect social influence phenomena. Journal of Management, 45, 2263–2292. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318812951.
Zellars, K. L., Tepper, B. J., & Duffy, M. K. (2002). Abusive supervision and subordinates' organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 1068–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037//0021-9010.87.6.1068.
Zhang, Y., & Bednall, T. C. (2015). Antecedents of abusive supervision: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Business Ethics, 139, 455–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2657-6.
Funding
This study was made possible by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council (SSHRC 435-2012-1086).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boudrias, JS., Rousseau, V. & Lajoie, D. How Lack of Integrity and Tyrannical Leadership of Managers Influence Employee Improvement-Oriented Behaviors. J Bus Ethics 172, 487–502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04494-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04494-5