Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Soil properties and earthworm populations associated with bauxite residue rehabilitation strategies

  • Earthworm and Soil Pollution
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is recognised that the establishment and function of soil biota is critical for successful mine residue rehabilitation. Bauxite residues are alkaline, saline and sodic and, whilst methods for establishing vegetation are well studied, little is known about key soil fauna such as earthworms. At a bauxite residue disposal area in Ireland, a 12-year-old rehabilitated residue was examined for evidence of earthworm populations. Five species of earthworm, dominated by Allolobophora chlorotica, were recorded in the rehabilitated residue representing the endogeic, epigeic and epi-anecic ecological groups. To further understand the potential for rehabilitated residues to support earthworm communities, a series of exposure tests was conducted. Whilst unamended residues (pH 10.2, EC 0.629 mS cm−1, ESP 54) was hostile to A. chlorotica survival, 100% survival was observed after 90 days for gypsum and organic-amended residue at salinity of up to 2.9 mS cm−1, possibly due to calcium becoming the dominant cation. Survival of earthworms at salinities higher than anticipated tolerance levels suggests that specific ion dominance plays a role in earthworm survival in saline soils. Percent mass change was negatively correlated with pH, EC and sodium content of the residues. Residue from the 12-year-old site also supported the anecic species Aporrectodea longa over 100 days. Percent mass change in residue samples retrieved from the 12-year-old site was significantly greater (p < 0.05) to that observed for a control soil. Capability of the rehabilitated residue to support earthworm populations indicates the development of a functioning soil system in rehabilitated residues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker GH, Brown G, Butt K, Curry JP, Scullion J (2006) Introduced earthworms in agricultural and reclaimed land: their ecology and influences on soil properties, plant production and other soil biota. In: Biological invasions belowground: earthworms as invasive species. Springer, Netherlands, pp 101–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Biederman LA, Boutton TW, Whisenant SG (2008) Nematode community development early in ecological restoration: the role of organic amendments. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2366–2374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bouché MB (1972) Lombriciens de France: écologie et systématique. INRA, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer S, Wratten SD (2010) The potential of earthworms to restore ecosystem services after opencast mining—a review. Basic Appl Ecol 11:196–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckerfield JC, Doube BM (1993) Responses of native and introduced earthworm species to limed soil. In: Workshop on tillage systems, rotations and associated root Diseases, pp 68–69

  • Butt KR (2008) Earthworms in soil restoration: lessons learned from United Kingdom case studies of land reclamation. Restor Ecol 16:637–641

    Google Scholar 

  • Butt KR, Briones MJ (2017) Earthworms and mesofauna from an isolated, alkaline chemical waste site in Northwest England. Eur J Soil Biol 78:43–44

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Butt KR, Lowe CN, Frederickson J, Moffat AJ (2004) The development of sustainable earthworm populations at Calvert landfill site, UK. Land Degrad Dev 15:27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney R, Harrington T (2012) Growth and nutrition of Holcus lanatus in bauxite residue amended with combinations of spent mushroom compost and gypsum. Land Degrad Dev 23:144–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney R, Mullen G (2009) Use of germination and seedling performance bioassays for assessing revegetation strategies on bauxite residue. Water Air Soil Pollut 197:15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Courtney RG, Timpson JP (2005) Nutrient status of vegetation grown in alkaline bauxite processing residue amended with gypsum and thermally dried sewage sludge—a two year field study. Plant Soil 266:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney R, Mullen G, Harrington T (2009) An evaluation of revegetation success on bauxite residue. Restor Ecol 17:350–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney R, Keith AM, Harrington T (2011) Nematode assemblages in bauxite residue with different restoration histories. Restor Ecol 19:758–764

    Google Scholar 

  • Courtney R, Harrington T, Byrne KA (2013) Indicators of soil formation in restored bauxite residues. Ecol Eng 58:63–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Curry JP, Cotton DCF (1983) Earthworms and land reclamation. In: Satchell JE (ed) Earthworm ecology: from Darwin to vermiculture. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 215–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunger W (1989) The return of soil fauna to coal mined areas in the German Democratic Republic. In: Majer JD (ed) Animals in primary succession—the role of fauna in reclaimed lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 307–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ (1996) Biology and ecology of earthworms, 3rd edn. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijsackers H (2010) Earthworms as colonisers: primary colonisation of contaminated land, and sediment and soil waste deposits. Sci Total Environ 408:1759–1769

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Eijsackers H, Lourijsen N, Mentink J (1983) Effects of fly ash on soil fauna. In: Lebrun P (ed) New trends in soil biology. Dieu-Brichart, Louvain-la-Neuve, pp 680–681

    Google Scholar 

  • Eijsackers H, Bruggeman J, Harmsen J, de Kort T, Schakel A (2009) Colonization of PAH-contaminated dredged sediment by earthworms. Appl Soil Ecol 43:216–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Finnegan G, O’ Grady A, Courtney R (2018) Plant assays and avoidance tests with collembola and earthworms demonstrate rehabilitation success in bauxite residue. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(3):2157–2166

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Elhottová D, Kuráž V, Šourková M (2006) Effects of soil macrofauna on other soil biota and soil formation in reclaimed and unreclaimed post mining sites: results of a field microcosm experiment. Appl Soil Ecol 33:308–320

    Google Scholar 

  • Frouz J, Hrčková K, Lána J, Krištůfek V, Mudrák O, Lukešová A, Mihaljevič M (2011) Can laboratory toxicity tests explain the pattern of field communities of algae, plants, and invertebrates along a toxicity gradient of post-mining sites? Appl Soil Ecol 51:114–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Gräfe M, Klauber C (2011) Bauxite residue issues: IV. Old obstacles and new pathways for in situ residue bioremediation. Hydrometallurgy 108:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamdy MK, Williams FS (2001) Bacterial amelioration of bauxite residue waste of industrial alumina plants. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 27:228–233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes RJ (2014) Nature of the belowground ecosystem and its development during pedogenesis. Adv Agron 127:43–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins D, Curtin T, Pawlett M, Courtney R (2016) The potential for constructed wetlands to treat alkaline bauxite-residue leachate: Phragmites australis growth. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23:24305–24315

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Homan C, Beier C, McCay T, Lawrence G (2016) Application of lime (CaCO3) to promote forest recovery from severe acidification increases potential for earthworm invasion. For Ecol Manag 368:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones BE, Haynes RJ, Phillips IR (2011) Influence of organic waste and residue mud additions on chemical, physical and microbial properties of bauxite residue sand. Environ Sci Pollut Res 18:199–211

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones BE, Haynes RJ, Phillips IR (2012) Addition of an organic amendment and/or residue mud to bauxite residue sand in order to improve its properties as a growth medium. J Environ Manag 95:29–38

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jouquet P, Blanchart E, Capowiez Y (2014) Utilization of earthworms and termites for the restoration of ecosystem functioning. Appl Soil Ecol 73:34–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Judd KW, Mason CF (1995) Earthworm populations of a restored landfill site. Pedobiologia 39:107–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Kardol P, Wardle DA (2010) How understanding aboveground–belowground linkages can assist restoration ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 25:670–679

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawakami T, Makoto K (2017) Does an earthworm species acclimatize and/or adapt to soil calcium conditions? The consequences of soil nitrogen mineralization in forest soil. Ecol Res 32:603–610

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keith AM, Boots B, Hazard C, Niechoj R, Arroyo J, Bending GD, Bolger T, Breen J, Clipson N, Doohan FM, Griffin CT, Schmidt O (2012) Cross-taxa congruence, indicators and environmental drivers in soils under agricultural and extensive land management. Eur J Soil Biol 49:55–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinraide TB (1999) Interactions among Ca2+, Na+ and K+ in salinity toxicity: quantitative resolution of multiple toxic and ameliorative effects. J Exp Bot 50:1495–1505

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lowe CN, Butt KR (2005) Culture techniques for soil dwelling earthworms: a review. Pedobiologia 49:401–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Ma WC, Eijsackers H (1989) The influence of substrate toxicity on soil macrofauna return in reclaimed land. In: Majer JD (ed) Animals in primary succession: the role of fauna in reclaimed lands. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 223–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Majer JD, Brennan KE, Moir ML (2007) Invertebrates and the restoration of a forest ecosystem: 30 years of research following bauxite mining in Western Australia. Restor Ecol 15:S104–S115

    Google Scholar 

  • Marashi AR, Scullion J (2003) Earthworm casts form stable aggregates in physically degraded soils. Biol Fertil Soils 37:375–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudrák O, Uteseny K, Frouz J (2012) Earthworms drive succession of both plant and Collembola communities in post-mining sites. Appl Soil Ecol 62:170–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Nirola R, Megharaj M, Venkateswarlu K, Aryal R, Correll R, Naidu R (2016) Assessment of metal toxicity and bioavailability in metallophyte leaf litters and metalliferous soils using Eisenia fetida in a microcosm study. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 129:264–272

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owojori OJ, Reinecke AJ (2009) Avoidance behaviour of two eco-physiologically different earthworms (Eisenia fetida and Aporrectodea caliginosa) in natural and artificial saline soils. Chemosphere 75:279–283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Owojori OJ, Reinecke AJ (2014) Differences in ionic properties of salts affect saline toxicity to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Appl Soil Ecol 83:247–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Owojori OJ, Reinecke AJ, Rozanov AB (2008) Effects of salinity on partitioning, uptake and toxicity of zinc in the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Soil Biol Biochem 40:2385–2393

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira CS, Lopes I, Sousa JP, Chelinho S (2015) Effects of NaCl and seawater induced salinity on survival and reproduction of three soil invertebrate species. Chemosphere 135:116–122

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piearce TG, Piearce B (1979) Responses of Lumbricidae to saline inundation. J Appl Ecol 16: 461–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Pižl V (2001) Earthworm succession in afforested colliery spoil heaps in the Sokolov region, Czech Republic. Restor Ecol 9:359–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Qadir M, Schubert S (2002) Degradation processes and nutrient constraints in sodic soils. Land Degradation & Development 13(4):275–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietz DN, Haynes RJ (2003) Effects of irrigation-induced salinity and sodicity on soil microbial activity. Soil Biol Biochem 35:845–854

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roubíčková A, Mudrák O, Frouz J (2009) Effect of earthworm on growth of late succession plant species in postmining sites under laboratory and field conditions. Biol Fertil Soils 45:769–774

    Google Scholar 

  • Satchell J, Stone DA (1972) Earthworm activity in pulverised fuel ash sites restored to agriculture. Report to Central Electricity Generating Board.

  • Scullion J (1994). Earthworms and soil rehabilitation after opencast mining for coal. Institution of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, 49–51

  • Scullion J, Malik A (2000) Earthworm activity affecting organic matter, aggregation and microbial activity in soils restored after opencast mining for coal. Soil Biol Biochem 32:119–126

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Scullion J, Mohammed ARA, Ramshaw GA (1988) Changes in earthworm populations following cultivation of undisturbed and former opencast coal-mining land. Agric Ecosyst Environ 20:289–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (2012) Toxicity of major cations and anions (Na+, K+, Ca2+, Cl−, and SO42−) to a macrophyte and an alga. Environ Toxicol Chem 31:1370–1374

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Southwell LT, Majer JD (1982) The survival and growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetida (Lumbricidae: Oligochaeta) in alkaline residues associated with the bauxite refining process. Pedobiologia 23:42–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Spurgeon DJ, Tomlin MA, Hopkin SP (1997) Influence of temperature on the toxicity of zinc to the earthworm Eisenia fetida. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 58:283–290

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamis WLM, Udo De Haes H (1995) Recovery of earthworm communities (Lumbricidae) in some thermally and biologically cleaned soils. Pedobiologia 39:351–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas GW (1982) Exchangeable cations. In: Page AL (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties. American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, p 159–165

  • Tordoff GM, Baker AJM, Willis AJ (2000) Current approaches to the revegetation and reclamation of metalliferous mine wastes. Chemosphere 41:219–228

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vimmerstedt JP (1983) Earthworm ecology in reclaimed opencast coal mining sites in Ohio. In: Earthworm ecology, from Darwin to vermiculture, pp 229–240

  • Xue S, Zhu F, Kong X, Wu C, Huang L, Huang N, Hartley W (2016) A review of the characterization and revegetation of bauxite residues (Red mud). Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1120–1132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu F, Hou J, Xue S, Wu C, Wang, Hartley W (2017) Vermicompost and gypsum amendments improve aggregate formation in bauxite residue. Land Degrad Dev 28:2109–2120

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the SFI Career Development Award 17/CDA/4778.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biological Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Ronan Courtney & Elisa Di Carlo

  2. The Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland

    Ronan Courtney & Elisa Di Carlo

  3. UCD School of Agriculture & Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland

    Olaf Schmidt

Authors
  1. Ronan Courtney
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elisa Di Carlo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Olaf Schmidt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronan Courtney.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Zhihong Xu

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Courtney, R., Di Carlo, E. & Schmidt, O. Soil properties and earthworm populations associated with bauxite residue rehabilitation strategies. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27, 33401–33409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3973-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3973-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation