Skip to main content
Log in

First U-Pb age of detrital zircons from sandstones of the Upper Emsian Takaty formation of the Western Urals with regard to the problem of primary sources of the Uralian diamond placers

  • Geology
  • Published:
Doklady Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several alternative points of view currently exist on the origin of the primary sources of diamonds from the Cenozoic Western Urals placers. Some researchers suppose that their economic diamond resource potential is related to diamonds from tuffisitic facies of the mantle kimberlites-lamproites or impact structures. Other researchers suggest that diamonds originated from the eroded sandstones of the Upper Emsian Takaty Formation of the Lower Devonian, which represents ancient (fossil) placers or intermediate reservoirs. It is assumed that these reservoirs collected diamonds from worn kimberlite bodies, which were located in the Urals or on the East European platform (EEP). This paper presents the first U-Pb (LA-ICP-MS) age of detrital zircons from quartz sandstones of the Takaty Formation, which spans a range from 1857.5 ± 53.8 to 3054.0 ± 48.0 Ma. The absence of detrital zircons younger than 1.86 Ga excludes that the structural complexes of the Uralian, Fennoscandian, and Sarmatian EEP parts were the provenance areas that supplied the clastic material to the sedimentary basin, which accumulated the Takaty Formation. The similar age of our zircons and ancient crystalline complexes of the Volga-Uralian EEP part allows consideration that it was a single provenance area. If we assume that the diamond resource potential of the Western Urals is completely or partly related to the ancient diamond placers from the Takaty Formation, then the intermediate diamond reservoirs from its structure originated due to redeposition of destruction products of primary diamond-bearing rocks of the Volga-Uralia area. Thus, within the Volga-Uralian part of the EEP basement, we may expect identification of a previously unknown stage of kimberlite formation, which is significantly older than that responsible for the diamond resource potential of the Arkhangel’sk province.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I. I. Chaikovskii, Litosfera, No. 5, 164 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  2. T. M. Rybal’chenko, Vest. Perm. Univ. Geol., No. 4, 43 (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  3. L. I. Kamentsev, in Proceeding of Scientific Conference of Institute of Geology of Komi Scientific Center of Russian Academy of Sciences on Structure, Matter, and Evolution of Lithosphere of the Timan-North Urals Segment (Geoprint, Syktyvkar, 2000), pp. 62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  4. V. N. Anfilogov, Yu. D. Krainev, and G. G. Korablev, Litosfera, No. 5, 151 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. A. Shcherbakov, V. I. Durnikin, O. V. Sokolov, et al., Takaty Formation of the Vishera-Chusovaya Part of the Urals and Its Diamond Resource Potential (PGU, Perm, 1994) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  6. F. Laiginhas, D. G. Pearson, D. Phillips, et al., Lithos 112, 714 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. G. Ivanushkin, O. V. Bogoyavlenskaya, G. G. Zenkova, et al., Litosfera, No. 1, 3 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. B. Kuznetsov, L.M. Natapov, E. A. Belousova, et al., Gondwana Res. 17,Is. 2–3, 583 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. A. V. Maslov, Mem. Geol. Soc. London, 30, 19–35 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. B. Kuznetsov, Cambrian Collision of Baltic and Arktide-Initial Stage of Accretion of the Northern Part of the Late Paleozoic-Early Mesozoic Pangea, Bull. MOIP, Otd. Geol. 84(1), pp. 1–18 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. V. Bogdanova, B. Bingen, R. Gorbatchev, et al., Precambr. Res. 160, 23 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yu. G. Leonov, Yu. A. Volozh, M. P. Antipov, et al., Consolidated Crust of the Caspian Region: Experience of Zoning., Tr. GIN RAS, Vyp. 593 (GEOS, Moscow, 2010) [in Russian].

    Google Scholar 

  13. B. Bingen and A. Solli, Norw. J. Geol. 89 267 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. S. V. Bogdanova, I. K. Pashkevich, and V. B. Buryanov, Tectonophysics 381, 5 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. A. M. Nikishin, P. A. Ziegler, R. A. Stephenson, et al., Tectonophysics 268, 23 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to N. B. Kuznetsov.

Additional information

Original Russian Text © N.B. Kuznetsov, T.V. Romanyuk, A.V. Shatsillo, S.Yu. Orlov, V.M. Gorozhanin, E.N. Gorozhanina, E.S. Seregina, N.S. Ivanova, J. Meert, 2014, published in Doklady Akademii Nauk, 2014, Vol. 455, No. 4, pp. 427–432.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsov, N.B., Romanyuk, T.V., Shatsillo, A.V. et al. First U-Pb age of detrital zircons from sandstones of the Upper Emsian Takaty formation of the Western Urals with regard to the problem of primary sources of the Uralian diamond placers. Dokl. Earth Sc. 455, 370–375 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X14040084

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X14040084

Keywords

Navigation