Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Context- and density-dependent effects of introduced oysters on biodiversity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pacific oysters, Crassostrea gigas, have been introduced throughout much of the world, become invasive in many locations and can alter native assemblage structure, biodiversity and the distribution and abundance of other species. It is not known, however, to what extent their effects on biodiversity change as their cover increases, and how these effects may differ depending on the environmental context. Experimental plots with increasing cover of oysters were established within two estuaries in two different habitats commonly inhabited by C. gigas, (mussel-beds and mud-flats) and were sampled after 4 and 15 months. Within mud-flat habitats, macroscopic species living on or in the substratum increased in richness, Shannon–Wiener diversity and number of individuals with oyster cover. In mussel-bed habitats, however, these indices were unaffected by the cover of oysters except at one estuary after 15 months when species richness was significantly lower in plots with the greatest cover of oysters. Assemblage structure differed with oyster cover in mud-flats but not in mussel-beds, except at 100 % cover in one location and at one time. Within mud-flats at one location and time (of four total tests), assemblages became more homogenous with increasing cover of oysters leading to a significant decrease in β-diversity. These responses were primarily underpinned by the facilitation of several taxa including a grazing gastropod (Littorina littorea), an invasive barnacle (Austrominius modestus) and a primary producer (Fucus vesiculosus) with increasing cover of oysters. Although there were consistent positive effects of C. gigas on mud-flat biodiversity, effects were weak or negative at higher cover on mussel-beds. This highlights the need for the impacts of invasive species to be investigated at a range of invader abundances within different environmental contexts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal AA, Ackerly DD, Adler F, Arnold E, Cáceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Strauss S, Turner MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aldridge DC, Elliott P, Moggridge GD (2004) The recent and rapid spread of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha) in Great Britain. Biol Conserv 119:253–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen BM, Power AM, O’Riordan RM, Myers AA, McGrath D (2006) Increases in the abundance of the invasive barnacle Austrominius modestus Darwin in Ireland. Biol Environ: Proc R Ir Acad 106:155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri AH, van Wesenbeeck BK, Bertness MD, Silliman BR (2010) Facilitation cascade drives positive relationship between native biodiversity and invasion success. Ecology 91:1269–1275

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2001) A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecol 26:32–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ (2006) Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions. Biometrics 62:245–253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Ellingsen KE, McArdle BH (2006) Multivariate dispersion as a measure of beta diversity. Ecol Lett 9:683–693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson MJ, Crist TO, Chase JM, Vellend M, Inouye BD, Freestone AL, Sanders NJ, Cornell HV, Comita LS, Davies KF, Harrison SP, Kraft NJB, Stegen JC, Swenson NG (2011) Navigating the multiple meanings of beta diversity: a roadmap for the practicing ecologist. Ecol Lett 14:19–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barshaw DE, Lavalli KL (1988) Predation upon postlarval lobsters Homarus americanus by Cunners Tautogolabrus adspersus and mud crabs Neopanope sayi on 3 different substrates – eelgrass, mud and rocks. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 48:119–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bray JR, Curtis JT (1957) An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr 27:326–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buschbaum C (2000) Direct and indirect effects of Littorina littorea (L.) on barnacles growing on mussel-beds in the Wadden Sea. Hydrobiologia 440:119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callier MD, Richard M, McKindsey CW, Archambault P, Desrosiers G (2009) Responses of benthic macrofauna and biogeochemical fluxes to various levels of mussel biodeposition: an in situ “benthocosm” experiment. Mar Pollut Bull 58:1544–1553

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Castel J, Labourg PJ, Escaravage V, Auby I, Garcia ME (1989) Influence of seagrass beds and oyster parks on the abundance and biomass patterns of meiobenthos and macrobenthos in tidal flats. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 28:71–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christensen PB, Glud RN, Dalsgaard T, Gillespie P (2003) Impacts of longline mussel farming on oxygen and nitrogen dynamics and biological communities of coastal sediments. Aquaculture 218:567–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke KR (1993) Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community structure. Aust J Ecol 18:117–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks JA (2002) Characterizing ecosystem-level consequences of biological invasions: the role of ecosystem engineers. Oikos 97:153–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crooks JA, Khim HS (1999) Architectural vs. biological effects of a habitat-altering, exotic mussel, Musculista senhousia. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 240:53–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF, Zingmark RG, Haskin E (1984) Oyster reefs as processors of estuarine materials. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 83:239–247

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dame RF, Wolaver TG, Libes SM (1985) The summer uptake and release of nitrogen by an intertidal oyster reef. Neth J Sea Res 19:265–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dayton PK (1975) Experimental evaluation of ecological dominance in a rocky intertidal algal community. Ecol Monogr 45:137–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diederich S (2005) Differential recruitment of introduced Pacific oysters and native mussels at the North Sea coast: coexistence possible? J Sea Res 53:269–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubois S, Commito JA, Olivier F, Retiere C (2006) Effects of epibionts on Sabellaria alveolata (L.) biogenic reefs and their associated fauna in the Bay of Mont Saint-Michel. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 68:635–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escapa M, Isacch JP, Daleo P, Alberti J, Iribarne O, Borges M, Dos Santos EP, Gagliardini DA, Lasta M (2004) The distribution and ecological effects of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg, 1793) in northern Patagonia. J Shellfish Res 23:765–772

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro SP, Cole FA (2011) Ecological periodic tables for benthic macrofaunal usage of estuarine habitats in the US Pacific Northwest. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 94:36–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fey F, Dankers N, Steenbergen J, Goudswaard K (2010) Development and distribution of the non-indigenous Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in the Dutch Wadden Sea. Aquac Int 18:45–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gee JM, Warwick RM (1994) Metazoan community structure in relation to the fractal dimensions of marine macroalgae. Mar Ecol-Prog Ser 103:141–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabowski JH (2004) Habitat complexity disrupts predator-prey interactions but not the tropic cascade on oyster reefs. Ecology 85:995–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant WS (1977) High intertidal community organization on a rocky headland in Maine, USA. Mar Biol 44:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DS, Crowe TP (2013) Physical and biological effects of introduced oysters on biodiversity in an intertidal boulder field. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 482:119–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green DS, Boots B, Crowe TP (2012) Effects of non-indigenous oysters on microbial diversity and ecosystem functioning. PLoS ONE 7(10):e48410. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0048410

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Green DS, Rocha C, Crowe TP (2013) Effects of non-indigenous oysters on ecosystem processes vary with abundance and context. Ecosystems doi:10.1007/s10021-013-9659-y

  • Groffman P, Baron J, Blett T, Gold A, Goodman I, Gunderson L, Levinson B, Palmer M, Paerl H, Peterson G, Poff N, Rejeski D, Reynolds J, Turner M, Weathers K, Wiens J (2006) Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1–13

  • Hayakawa Y, Kobayashi M, Izawa M (2001) Sedimentation flux from mariculture of oyster (Crassostrea gigas) in Ofunato estuary, Japan. ICES J Mar Sci 58:435–444

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hosack G (2003) Effects of Zostera marina and Crassostrea gigas culture on the intertidal communities of Willapa. Bay, Washington. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Washington

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kiirikki M (1996) Experimental evidence that Fucus vesiculosus (Phaeophyta) controls filamentous algae by means of the whiplash effect. Eur J Phycol 31:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochmann J, Buschbaum C, Volkenborn N, Reise K (2008) Shift from native mussels to alien oysters: differential effects of ecosystem engineers. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 364:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krassoi FR, Brown KR, Bishop MJ, Kelaher BP, Summerhayes S (2008) Condition-specific competition allows coexistence of competitively superior exotic oysters with native oysters. J Anim Ecol 77:5–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lejart M, Hily C (2011) Differential response of benthic macrofauna to the formation of novel oyster reefs (Crassostrea gigas, Thunberg) on soft and rocky substrate in the intertidal of the Bay of Brest, France. J Sea Res 65:84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA (1992) The problem of pattern and scale in ecology. Ecology 73:1943–1967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little C, Morritt D, Stirling P (1992) Changes in the shore fauna and flora of Lough Hyne. Ir Nat J 24:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Markert A, Wehrmann A, Kroncke I (2010) Recently established Crassostrea-reefs versus native Mytilus-beds: differences in ecosystem engineering affects the macrofaunal communities (Wadden Sea of Lower Saxony, southern German Bight). Biol Invasions 12:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mascaro M, Seed R (2001) Choice of prey size and species in Carcinus maenas (L.) feeding on four bivalves of contrasting shell morphology. Hydrobiologia 449:159–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy ED, Bell SS (1991) Habitat structure: the evolution and diversification of a complex topic. In: Bell SS, McCoy ED, Mushinsky HR (eds) Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 3–27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney ML, Lockwood JL (1999) Biotic homogenization: a few winners replacing many losers in the next mass extinction. Trends Ecol Evol 14:450–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morrisey DJ, Howitt L, Underwood AJ, Stark JS (1992) Spatial variation in soft-sediment benthos. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 81:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin FY, Guizien K, Thouzeau G, Chapalain G, Mulleners K, Bourg C (2007) Impact of an invasive species, Crepidula fornicata, on the hydrodynamics and transport properties of the benthic boundary layer. Aquat Living Resour 20:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Rooney TP (2006) On defining and quantifying biotic homogenization. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 15:113–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olden JD, Kennard MJ, Pusey BJ (2008) Species invasions and the changing biogeography of Australian freshwater fishes. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 17:25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla DK (2010) Context-dependent impacts of a non-native ecosystem engineer, the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas. Integr Comp Biol 50:213–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope KL, Garwood JM, Welsh HH, Lawler SP (2008) Evidence of indirect impacts of introduced trout on native amphibians via facilitation of a shared predator. Biol Conserv 141:1321–1331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Queirόs AD, Hiddink JG, Johnson G, Cabral HN, Kaiser MJ (2011) Context dependence of marine ecosystem engineer invasion impacts on benthic ecosystem functioning. Biol Invasions 13:1059–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2002) Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez LF (2006) Can invasive species facilitate native species? Evidence of how, when, and why these impacts occur. Biol Invasions 8:927–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruesink JL, Lenihan HS, Trimble AC, Heiman KW, Micheli F, Byers JE, Kay MC (2005) Introduction of non-native oysters: ecosystem effects and restoration implications. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 36:643–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D, Von Holle B (1999) Positive interactions of nonindigenous species: invasional meltdown? Biol Invasions 1:21–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sousa R, Gutierrez JL, Aldridge DC (2009) Non-indigenous invasive bivalves as ecosystem engineers. Biol Invasions 11:2367–2385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen MS (2010) Experimental evidence for positive effects of invasive seaweed on native invertebrates via habitat-formation in a seagrass bed. Aquat Invasions 5:341–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen MS, Wernberg T, Olden JD, Griffin JN, Silliman BR (2011) A framework to study the context-dependent impacts of marine invasions. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 400:322–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolhurst TJ, Chapman MG (2007) Patterns in biogeochemical properties of sediments and benthic animals among different habitats in mangrove forests. Austral Ecol 32:775–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble AC, Ruesink JL, Dumbauld BR (2009) Factors preventing the recovery of a historically overexploited shellfish species, Ostrea lurida Carpenter 1864. J Shellfish Res 28:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Troost K (2010) Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries. J Sea Res 64:145–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1996) Scales of spatial patterns of distribution of intertidal invertebrates. Oecologia 107:212–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Underwood AJ (1997) Experiments in ecology: their logical design and interpretation using analysis of variance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK

  • Underwood AJ, Chapman MG (1998) Spatial analyses of intertidal assemblages on sheltered rocky shores. Aust J Ecol 23:138–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner EL, Ruesink JL, Dumbauld BR, Hacker SD, Wisehart LM (2012) Density-dependent effects of an introduced oyster, Crassostrea gigas, on native intertidal eelgrass, Zostera marina. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 468:149–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White LF, Shurin JB (2011) Density dependent effects of an exotic marine macroalga on native community diversity. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 405:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White EM, Wilson JC, Clarke AR (2006) Biotic indirect effects: a neglected concept in invasion biology. Divers Distrib 12:443–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrange AL, Valero J, Harkestad LS, Strand O, Lindegarth S, Christensen HT, Dolmer P, Kristensen PS, Mortensen S (2010) Massive settlements of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas, in Scandinavia. Biol Invasions 12:1145–1152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright S (2011) Invasive species and the loss of beta diversity. Ethics Environ 16:75–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yokomizo H, Possingham HP, Thomas MB, Buckley YM (2009) Managing the impact of invasive species: the value of knowing the density-impact curve. Ecol Appl 19:376–386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the project SIMBIOSYS (2007-B-CD-1-S1) as part of the Science, Technology, Research and Innovation for the Environment (STRIVE) Programme, financed by the Irish Government under the National Development Plan 2007–2013, administered on behalf of the Department of the Environment, Heritage and Local Government by the Irish Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). We would also like to thank Bas Boots, the editor Jennifer Ruesink and two anonymous reviewers for helpful comments that helped to improve this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dannielle S. Green.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Species list detailing all of the taxa found throughout the experiment

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Green, D.S., Crowe, T.P. Context- and density-dependent effects of introduced oysters on biodiversity. Biol Invasions 16, 1145–1163 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0569-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-013-0569-x

Keywords

Navigation