• Editors' Suggestion

Low-loss electron energy loss spectroscopy: An atomic-resolution complement to optical spectroscopies and application to graphene

Myron D. Kapetanakis, Wu Zhou, Mark P. Oxley, Jaekwang Lee, Micah P. Prange, Stephen J. Pennycook, Juan Carlos Idrobo, and Sokrates T. Pantelides
Phys. Rev. B 92, 125147 – Published 25 September 2015

Abstract

Photon-based spectroscopies have played a central role in exploring the electronic properties of crystalline solids and thin films. Though they remain a powerful tool for probing the electronic properties of nanostructures, they are limited by lack of spatial resolution. On the other hand, electron-based spectroscopies, e.g., electron energy loss spectroscopy (EELS), are now capable of subangstrom spatial resolution. Core-loss EELS, a spatially resolved analog of x-ray absorption, has been used extensively in the study of inhomogeneous complex systems. In this paper, we demonstrate that low-loss EELS in an aberration-corrected scanning transmission electron microscope, which probes low-energy excitations, combined with a theoretical framework for simulating and analyzing the spectra, is a powerful tool to probe low-energy electron excitations with atomic-scale resolution. The theoretical component of the method combines density functional theory–based calculations of the excitations with dynamical scattering theory for the electron beam. We apply the method to monolayer graphene in order to demonstrate that atomic-scale contrast is inherent in low-loss EELS even in a perfectly periodic structure. The method is a complement to optical spectroscopy as it probes transitions entailing momentum transfer. The theoretical analysis identifies the spatial and orbital origins of excitations, holding the promise of ultimately becoming a powerful probe of the structure and electronic properties of individual point and extended defects in both crystals and inhomogeneous complex nanostructures. The method can be extended to probe magnetic and vibrational properties with atomic resolution.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 12 July 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.125147

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Myron D. Kapetanakis1,2, Wu Zhou2, Mark P. Oxley1,2, Jaekwang Lee3, Micah P. Prange4, Stephen J. Pennycook5, Juan Carlos Idrobo6, and Sokrates T. Pantelides1,2

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA
  • 2Materials Science and Technology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Pusan National University, Busan 609-735, Korea
  • 4Fundamental and Computational Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA
  • 5Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576 Singapore
  • 6Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 12 — 15 September 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×