Abnormal signature inversion and multiple alignments in doubly odd 126I

Y. Zheng (郑云), L. H. Zhu (竺礼华), X. G. Wu (吴晓光), Z. C. Gao (高早春), C. Y. He (贺创业), G. S. Li (李广生), L. L. Wang (王烈林), Y. S. Chen (陈永寿), Y. Sun (孙扬), X. Hao (郝昕), Y. Liu (刘颖), X. Q. Li (李雪琴), B. Pan (潘波), Y. J. Ma (马英君), Z. Y. Li (李忠宇), and H. B. Ding (丁怀博)
Phys. Rev. C 86, 014320 – Published 18 July 2012

Abstract

High-spin states in 126I have been investigated by using in-beam γ-ray spectroscopy with the 124Sn(7Li,5n)126I reaction at a beam energy of 48 MeV. The level scheme of 126I has been extended and modified considerably by adding about 80 new γ rays and establishing five new bands. The configurations have been tentatively assigned for the yrast, yrare, and other excited bands with the help of triaxial projected shell-model (TPSM) and cranked shell-model calculations. The first band crossing in the yrast band is found due to alignments of a pair of (h11/2)2 neutrons. The first and the second band crossings in the yrare band are caused by the alignments of a pair of (d5/2)2 protons and a pair of (h11/2)2 neutrons, respectively. Due to the successive excitations of two, four, and six quasiparticles, the alignments in the yrare band present a gigantic rising feature. The yrast band exhibits a signature inversion at low spins and becomes normal after a reversion spin of Irev=14. The yrare band exhibits an abnormal signature inversion in which the signature inversion phase persists up to the highest spin. The signature inversions in 126I are well reproduced and successfully interpreted by the TPSM calculations. Some features of chirality are found for the four-quasiparticle (4qp) part of the yrast band and the 4qp excited band 2.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 19 April 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.014320

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Y. Zheng (郑云)1, L. H. Zhu (竺礼华)2,3,*, X. G. Wu (吴晓光)1,†, Z. C. Gao (高早春)1, C. Y. He (贺创业)1, G. S. Li (李广生)1, L. L. Wang (王烈林)1,4, Y. S. Chen (陈永寿)1, Y. Sun (孙扬)5,6, X. Hao (郝昕)1,3, Y. Liu (刘颖)1, X. Q. Li (李雪琴)1, B. Pan (潘波)1, Y. J. Ma (马英君)4, Z. Y. Li (李忠宇)7, and H. B. Ding (丁怀博)8

  • 1China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, People's Republic of China
  • 2School of Physics and Nuclear Energy Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, People's Republic of China
  • 3Faculty of Science, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, People's Republic of China
  • 4Department of Physics, Jilin University, Changchun 130023, People's Republic of China
  • 5Department of Physics, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, People's Republic of China
  • 6Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
  • 7School of Physics, Peking University, Beijing 100871, People's Republic of China
  • 8Department of Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, People's Republic of China

  • *Corresponding author: zhulh@buaa.edu.cn
  • Corresponding author: wxg@ciae.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 1 — July 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×