Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Purification and concentration of gluconic acid from an integrated fermentation and membrane process using response surface optimized conditions

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A response surface method was used to optimize the purification and concentration of gluconic acid from fermentation broth using an integrated membrane system. Gluconobacter oxydans was used for the bioconversion of the glucose in sugarcane juice to gluconic acid (concentration 45 g∙L–1) with a yield of 0.9 g∙g–1. The optimum operating conditions, such as trans-membrane pressure (TMP), pH, cross-flow rate (CFR) and initial gluconic acid concentration, were determined using response surface methodology. Five different types of polyamide nanofiltration membranes were screened and the best performing one was then used for downstream purification of gluconic acid in a flat sheet cross-flow membrane module. Under the optimum conditions (TMP = 12 bar and CFR = 400 L∙h–1), this membrane retained more than 85% of the unconverted glucose from the fermentation broth and had a gluconic acid permeation rate of 88% with a flux of 161 L∙m–2∙h–1. Using response surface methods to optimize this green nanofiltration process is an effective way of controlling the production of gluconic acid so that an efficient separation with high flux is obtained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pal P, Kumar R, Nayak J, Banerjee S. Fermentative production of gluconic acid in membrane-integrated hybrid reactor system: Analysis of process intensification. Chemical Engineering & Processing, 2017, 122: 258–268

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ramachandran S, Fontanille P, Pandey A, Larroche C. Gluconic acid: Properties, applications and microbial production. Food Technology and Biotechnology, 2006, 44: 185–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. El-Enshasy H A. Production of gluconic acid by free and immobilized cells of recombinant Aspergillus niger in batch culture. Egyptian Journal of Biotechnology, 2003, 13: 187–201

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Food Chemicals Codex. Seventh ed. Maryland: United Book Press Inc., 2010, 523

  5. Deller K, Krause H, Peldszus E, Despeyroux B. US Patent, 5132452, 1992

  6. Singh O V, Kumar R. Biotechnological production of gluconic acid: Future implications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2007, 75(4): 713–722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Shang W, Wang D, Wang X. Modeling of the separation performance of nanofiltration membranes and its role in the applications of nanofiltration technology in product separation processes. Frontiers of Chemical Engineering in China, 2007, 1(2): 208–215

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Pal P, Kumar R, Banerjee S. Manufacture of gluconic acid: A review towards process intensification for green production. Chemical Engineering & Processing, 2016, 104: 160–171

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rehr B, Wilhelm C, Sahm H. Production of sorbitol and gluconic acid by permeabilized cells of Zymomonas mobilis. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1991, 35(2): 144–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Stephanopoulos G, Reklaitis G V. Process systems engineering: From Solvay to modern bio-and nanotechnology: A history of development, successes and prospects for the future. Chemical Engineering Science, 2011, 66(19): 4272–4306

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Abels C, Carstensen F, Wessling M. Membrane processes in biorefinery applications. Journal of Membrane Science, 2013, 444: 285–317

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pal P, Dekonda V C, Kumar R. Fermentative production of glutamic acid from renewable carbon source: Process intensification through membrane-integrated hybrid bio-reactor system. Chemical Engineering & Processing, 2015, 92: 7–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dey P, Pal P. Direct production of L (+) lactic acid in a continuous and fully membrane-integrated hybrid reactor system under nonneutralizing conditions. Journal of Membrane Science, 2012, 389: 355–362

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Morthensen S T, Zeuner B, Meyer A S, Jørgensen H, Pinelo M. Membrane separation of enzyme-converted biomass compounds: Recovery of xylose and production of gluconic acid as a valueadded product. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 194: 73–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Panpae K, Jaturonrusmee W, Mingvanish W, Nuntiwattanawong C, Chunwiset S, Santudrob K, Triphanpitak S. Minimization of sucrose losses in sugar industry by pH and temperature optimization. Malaysian Journal of Analytical Sciences, 2008, 12: 513–519

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dey P, Linnanen L, Pal P. Separation of lactic acid from fermentation broth by cross flow nanofiltration: Membrane characterization and transport modelling. Desalination, 2012, 288: 47–57

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Chakrabortty S, Roy M, Pal P. Removal of fluoride from contaminated groundwater by cross flow nanofiltration: Transport modeling and economic evaluation. Desalination, 2013, 313: 115–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Boczek L A, Rice E W, Johnson C H. Total viable counts pour plate technique. In: Carl A B, Mary T, eds. Encyclopedia of Food Microbiology. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Academic Press, 2014, 625–629

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Robinson J P, Tarleton E S, Millington C R, Nijmeijer A. Solvent flux through dense polymeric nanofiltration membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2004, 230(1-2): 29–37

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanninen J, Manttari M, Nystrom M. Effect of salt mixture concentration on fractionation with NF membranes. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 283(1–2): 57–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Xu G Q, Chu J,Wang Y, Zhuang Y, Zhang S, Peng H. Development of a continuous cell-recycle fermentation system for production of lactic acid by Lactobacillus paracasei. Process Biochemistry, 2006, 41(12): 2458–2463

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Tsibranska I H, Tylkowski B. Concentration of ethanolic extracts from Sideritis ssp. L. by nanofiltration: Comparison of dead-end and cross-flow modes. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2013, 91(2): 169–174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Balyan U, Sarkar B. Integrated membrane process for purification and concentration of aqueous Syzygium cumini (L.) seed extract. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2016, 98: 29–43

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Morthensen S T, Luo J, Meyer A S, Jørgensen H, Pinelo M. High performance separation of xylose and glucose by enzyme assisted nanofiltration. Journal of Membrane Science, 2015, 492: 107–115

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Pal P, Chakrabortty S, Nayak J, Senapati S. A flux-enhancing forward osmosis-nanofiltration integrated treatment system for the tannery wastewater reclamation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International, 2017, 24(18): 15768–15780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Werner A, Rieger A, Mosch M, Haseneder R, Repke J U. Nanofiltration of indium and germanium ions in aqueous solutions: Influence of pH and charge on retention and membrane flux. Separation and Purification Technology, 2018, 194: 319–328

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Xu Y, Lebrun R E. Investigation of the solute separation by charged nanofiltration membrane: Effect of pH, ionic strength and solute type. Journal of Membrane Science, 1999, 158(1-2): 93–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Choi J H, Fukushi K, Yamamoto K. A study on the removal of organic acids from wastewaters using nanofiltration membranes. Separation and Purification Technology, 2008, 59(1): 17–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Mänttäri M, Pihlajamäki A, Nyström M. Effect of pH on hydrophilicity and charge and their effect on the filtration efficiency of NF membranes at different pH. Journal of Membrane Science, 2006, 280(1-2): 311–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu L, Du L S, He J. Effects of operating conditions on membrane charge property and nanofiltration. Frontiers of Chemical Science and Engineering, 2011, 5(4): 492–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ma Z, Wang M, Gao X, Gao C. Charge and separation characteristics of nanofiltration membrane embracing dissociated functional groups. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2014, 8(5): 650–658

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Srivastava P K, Kapoor M. Extracellular endo-mannanase from Bacillus sp. CFR1601: Economical production using response surface methodology and downstream processing using aqueous two phase system. Food and Bioproducts Processing, 2013, 91(4): 672–681

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Sankpal N V, Kulkarni B D. Optimization of fermentation conditions for gluconic acid production using Aspergillus niger immobilized on cellulose microfibrils. Process Biochemistry, 2002, 37(12): 1343–1350

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Bezerra M A, Santelli R E, Oliveira E P, Villar L S, Escaleira´ L A. Response surface methodology (RSM) as a tool for optimization in analytical chemistry. Talanta, 2008, 76(5): 965–977

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Myers R H, Montgomery D C, Anderson-Cook C M. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. 3rd ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons publishers, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  36. Trinh T K, Kang L S. Response surface methodological approach to optimize the coagulation-flocculation process in drinking water treatment. Chemical Engineering Research & Design, 2011, 89(7): 1126–1135

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Braghetta A, DiGiano F A, Ball W P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 1997, 123(7): 628–641

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India (DST) for the grants under the DST-FIST Program and the University Grant Commission, Government of India for financial assistance under the Dr. D.S. Kothari Post-Doctoral Fellowship (No.F.4-2/2006 (BSR)/EN/16-17/0001).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environment and Membrane Technology Laboratory, Chemical Engineering Department, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal, 713209, India

    Parimal Pal & Subhamay Banerjee

  2. Department of Chemistry, The University of Burdwan, Burdwan, West Bengal, 713104, India

    Ramesh Kumar

Authors
  1. Parimal Pal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ramesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Subhamay Banerjee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parimal Pal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pal, P., Kumar, R. & Banerjee, S. Purification and concentration of gluconic acid from an integrated fermentation and membrane process using response surface optimized conditions. Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 13, 152–163 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1721-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-018-1721-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation