Skip to main content
Log in

Organic Materials Differ in Ability to Remove Protons, Iron and Aluminium from Acid Sulfate Soil Drainage Water

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Drainage water from acid sulfate soils with sulfuric material has high concentrations of protons and dissolved metals which can have detrimental effects on the surrounding ecosystems. Liming is expensive; therefore, alternative methods are needed. Organic materials such as plant residues, compost or biochars can bind protons and metals but have not been evaluated with respect to remediation of acid drainage water from acid sulfate soils. In this study, eight organic materials (compost, two straws and five biochars differing in feed stock and production temperature) were placed in small PVC cores at 1.5 g C/core and synthetic acid drainage water (pH 3, 28 mg Fe/l and 2 mg Al/l, properties based on long-term averages of drainage water from sulfuric acid sulfate soils) was applied in four leaching events. Mallee biochar produced at 550 °C and wheat biochar produced at 450 °C had high retention capacity for protons, Fe and Al. Retention was low in compost and wheat straw. Retention of protons was positively correlated with organic C concentration of the materials. Retention of Fe and Al was correlated with percentage alkyl, aryl and ketone groups. Other properties such as release of native Fe and Al and amount of material per core could explain differences in ability of organic materials to retain protons, Fe and Al. We conclude that some organic materials such as mallee biochar produced at 550 °C and wheat biochar produced at 450 °C could be used to remediate acidic drainage water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahern, C. R., McElnea, A. E., & Sullivan, L. A. (2004). Acid neutralising capacity, carbonate and alkali cation methods. In C. R. Ahern, A. E. McElnea, & L. A. Sullivan (Eds.), Acid sulfate soils laboratory methods guidelines. Queensland, Australia: Department of Natural Resources, Nines and Energy, Indooroopilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arcibar-Orozco, J., Rangel-Mendez, J., & Diaz-Flores, P. (2014). Simultaneous adsorption of Pb(II)-Cd(II), Pb(II)-phenol, and Cd(II)-phenol by activated carbon cloth in aqueous solution. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 226(1), 1–10.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Astrom, M. (1998). Mobility of Al, Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni and V in sulphide-bearing fine-grained sediments exposed to atmospheric O-2: an experimental study. Environmental Geology, 36, 219–226.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Astrom, M., & Bjorklund, A. (1996). Hydrogeochemistry of a stream draining sulfide-bearing postglacial sediments in Finland. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 89, 233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attanandana, T., & Vacharotayan, S. (1986). Acid sulfate soils: their characteristics, genesis, amelioration and utilization. Southeast Asia Studies, 24(2), 154–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. S. (2009). Knowledge needs to minimise adverse water quality events in the Edward-Wakool river system. Consultancy report for New South Wales office of Water. Murray-Darling Freswater Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beesley, L., Inneh, O. S., Norton, G. J., Moreno-Jimenez, E., Pardo, T., Clemente, R., et al. (2014). Assessing the influence of compost and biochar amendments on the mobility and toxicity of metals and arsenic in a naturally contaminated mine soil. Environmental Pollution, 186, 195–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, A., & Sillanpää, M. (2010). Utilization of agro-industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment—a review. Chemical Engineering Journal, 157(2–3), 277–296.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brunauer, S., Emmett, P. H., & Teller, E. (1938). Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 60(2), 309–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaberek, S., & Martell, A. E. (1959). Organic sequestering agents: a discussion of the chemical behavior and applications of metal chelate compounds in aqueous systems. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, S.-J., Lee, B.-T., Kim, J.-Y., & Kim, K.-W. (2013). Study on adsorption/desorption of As by mine sludge depending on pH and natural organic matter. Geosystem Engineering, 16(3), 191–199.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clemente, R., Almela, C., & Bernal, M. P. (2006). A remediation strategy based on active phytoremediation followed by natural attenuation in a soil contaminated by pyrite waste. Environmental Pollution, 143(3), 397–406.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, C., Palumbo, G., He, J. Z., Pinton, R., & Cesco, S. (2014). Review on iron availability in soil: interaction of Fe minerals, plants, and microbes. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 14, 538–548.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dent, D. (1986). Acid sulphate soils: a baseline for research and development: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement/ILRI, Wageningen.

  • Dent, D., & Pons, L. (1995). A world perspective on acid sulphate soils. Geoderma, 67(3–4), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DERM. (2011). Indentifying acid sulfate soils (Fact sheet L61).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias, A. C. B., Pavan, M. A., Miyazawa, M., & Zocoler, D. C. (2003). Plant residues: short term effect on sulphate, borate, zinc and copper adsorption by an acid oxisol. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 46(2), 199–202.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • EPHC and NRMMC. (2011). National guidancee for the management of acid sulfate soils in inland aquatic ecosystems. Canbera: ACT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fellet, G., Marchiol, L., Delle Vedove, G., & Peressotti, A. (2011). Application of biochar on mine tailings: effects and perspectives for land reclamation. Chemosphere, 83(9), 1262–1267.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fest, E. P. M. J., Temminghoff, E. J. M., Comans, R. N. J., & van Riemsdijk, W. H. (2008). Partitioning of organic matter and heavy metals in a sandy soil: effects of extracting solution, solid to liquid ratio and pH. Geoderma, 146(1–2), 66–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R. W. (2003). Overview of acid sulfate soil properties, environmental hazards, risk mapping and policy development in Asutralia. Paper presented at the Advances in Regolith, Bentley.

  • Fitzpatrick, R., & Shand, P. (2008). Chapter 1: inland acid sulfate soils in Australia: overview and conceptual models. In R. Fitzpatrick & P. Shand (Eds.), Inland acid sulfate soil systems across Australia (CRC LEME Open File Report 249, pp. 6–74). Perth: CRC LEME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, R., Shand, P., & Merry, R. (2009). Chapter 3. Acid sulfate soils. In J. Jennings (Ed.), Natural History of the Riverland and Murraylands (pp. 65–111). Adelaide, South Australia: Royal Society of South Australia (Inc.).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen, P., & Steinnes, E. (2003). Influence of pH and TOC concentration on Cu, Zn, Cd, and Al speciation in rivers. Water Research, 37, 307–318.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He, Y., Zhai, Y., Li, C., Yang, F., Chen, L., Fan, X., et al. (2010). The fate of Cu, Zn, Pb and Cd during the pyrolysis of sewage sludge at different temperatures. Environmental Technology, 31(5), 567–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Henze, M., & Comeau, Y. (2008). Wastewater characterization. In M. Henze, M. C. M. van Loosdrecht, G. A. Ekama, & D. Drdjanovic (Eds.), Biological wastewater treatment: principles, modelling and design (pp. 33–52). London: IWA Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houben, D., Evrard, L., & Sonnet, P. (2013). Beneficial effects of biochar application to contaminated soils on the bioavailability of Cd, Pb and Zn and the biomass production of rapeseed (Brassica napus L.). Biomass and Bioenergy, 57, 196–204.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T., & Gray, N. F. (2013). Removal of metals and acidity from acid mine drainage using municipal wastewater and activated sludge. Mine Water and the Environment, 32(3), 170–184.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, T., Gray, N. F., & Sánchez Guillamón, O. (2013). Removal of metals and acidity from acid mine drainage using liquid and dried digested sewage sludge and cattle slurry. Mine Water and the Environment, 32(2), 108–120.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, B., Nierop, K. G., & Verstraten, J. M. (2002). Influence of pH and metal/carbon ratios on soluble organic complexation of Fe (II), Fe (III) and Al (III) in soil solutions determined by diffusive gradients in thin films. Analytica Chimica Acta, 454(2), 259–270.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeen, S.-W., Bain, J. G., & Blowes, D. W. (2014). Evaluation of mixtures of peat, zero-valent iron and alkalinity amendments for treatment of acid rock drainage. Applied Geochemistry, 43, 66–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karami, N., Clemente, R., Moreno-Jiménez, E., Lepp, N. W., & Beesley, L. (2011). Efficiency of green waste compost and biochar soil amendments for reducing lead and copper mobility and uptake to ryegrass. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 191(1–3), 41–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kerndorff, H., & Schnitzer, M. (1980). Sorption of metals on humic acid. Geochimica Et Cosmochimica Acta, 44, 1701–1708.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kijjanapanich, P., Pakdeerattanamint, K., Lens, P. N. L., & Annachhatre, A. P. (2012). Organic substrates as electron donors in permeable reactive barriers for removal of heavy metals from acid mine drainage. Environmental Technology, 33(23), 2635–2644.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kołodyńska, D., Wnętrzak, R., Leahy, J. J., Hayes, M. H. B., Kwapiński, W., & Hubicki, Z. (2012). Kinetic and adsorptive characterization of biochar in metal ions removal. Chemical Engineering Journal, 197, 295–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, G., Bigham, J. M., & Faure, G. (2002). Removal of trace metals by coprecipitation with Fe, Al and Mn from natural waters contaminated with acid mine drainage in the Ducktown Mining District, Tennessee. Applied Geochemistry, 17(5), 569–581.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ljung, K., Maley, F., Cook, A., & Weinstein, P. (2009). Acid sulfate soils and human health—a Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Environment International, 35(8), 1234–1242. doi.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McBeath, A. V., Smernik, R. J., Krull, E. S., & Lehmann, J. (2014). The influence of feedstock and production temperature on biochar carbon chemistry: a solid-state 13C NMR study. Biomass and Bioenergy, 60, 121–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, L., Fitzpatrick, R., Palmer, D., Leyden, E., & Shand, P. (2014a). Changes in acidity and metal geochemistry in soils, groundwater, drain and river water in the Lower Murray River after a severe drought. Science of the Total Environment, 485–486, 281–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, L., Palmer, D., Leyden, E., Cook, F., Zammit, B., Shand, P., et al. (2014b). Acidification of floodplains due to river level decline during drought. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 161, 10–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mosley, L., Zammit, B., Jolley, A. M., & Barnett, L. (2014c). Acidification of lake water due to drought. Journal of Hydrology, 511, 484–493.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nystrand, M. I., & Österholm, P. (2013). Metal species in a Boreal river system affected by acid sulfate soils. Applied Geochemistry, 31, 133–141.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osterholm, P., Yli-Halla, M., & Edén, P. (2012). 7th International Acid Sulfate Soil Conference, Vaasa, Finland 2012 Towards Harmony between Land Use and the Environment. Vaasa, Finland: Geological Survey of Findland, Guide 56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. H., Lamb, D., Paneerselvam, P., Choppala, G., Bolan, N., & Chung, J.-W. (2011). Role of organic amendments on enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal(loid) contaminated soils. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 185(2–3), 549–574.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pedra, F., Plaza, C., García-Gil, J. C., & Polo, A. (2008). Effects of municipal waste compost and sewage sludge on proton binding behavior of humic acids from Portuguese sandy and clay loam soils. Bioresource Technology, 99(7), 2141–2147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pons, L. J. (1973). Outline of the genesis, characteristics, classification and improvement of acid sulphate soils. In H. Dost (Ed.), Acid sulphate soils: proceedings of the International Symposium on Acid Sulphate Soils, 13–20 August 1972, Wageningen, the Netherlands (Vol. v. 1). Wageningen: International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement.

  • Qian, L., & Chen, B. (2013a). Dual role of biochars as adsorbents for aluminum: the effects of oxygen-containing organic components and the scattering of silicate particles. Environmental Science & Technology, 47(15), 8759–8768.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, L., & Chen, B. (2013b). Interactions of aluminum with biochars and oxidized biochars: implications for the biochar aging process. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62(2), 373–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabenhorst, M. C., & Fanning, D. S. (2002). Acid sulfate soils: problems. In R. Lal (Ed.), Encyclopedia of soil science (2nd ed., pp. 29–32). New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayment, G. E., & Lysons, D. J. (2011). Soil chemical methods-Australia (Vol. 3). Victoria: CSIRO publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, G. (1989). The chemical behavior of aluminum, hydrogen and manganese in acid soils. In A. D. Robson (Ed.), Soil Acidity and Plant Growth (pp. 1–60). Sydney: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., Fitzpatrick, R., Shand, P., Angel, B., Spadaro, D., Merry, R., et al. (2008a). Acid, metal and nutrient mobilisation following rewetting of acid sulfate soils in the Lower Murray (CSIRO Land and Water report number CLW27/08 Prepared for the South Australian Environmental Protection Agency).

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S., Fitzpatrick, R., Shand, P., Angel, B., Spadaro, D., Merry, R., et al. (2008b). Chapter 3: acid and metal mobilisation following rewetting of acid sulfate soils from the River Murray, South Australia: a rapid laboratory method. In F. R., & S. P. (Eds.), Inland acid sulfate soil systems across Australia (pp. 90–97, Vol. CRC LEME Open File Report No. 249 (Thematic Volume)). Perth: CRC LEME.

  • Simpson, S., Vardanega, C. R., Jarolimek, C., Jolley, D. F., Angel, B. M., & Mosley, L. M. (2014). Metal speciation and potential bioavailability changes during discharge and neutralisation of acidic drainage water. Chemosphere, 103, 172–180.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smernik, R. J., & Oades, J. M. (2000). The use of spin counting for determining quantitation in solid state 13C NMR spectra of natural organic matter: 1. Model systems and the effects of paramagnetic impurities. Geoderma, 96(1–2), 101–129.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spiteri, C., Regnier, P., Slomp, C. P., & Charette, M. A. (2006). pH-dependent iron oxide precipitation in a subterranean estuary. Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 88(1), 399–403.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sracek, O., Choquette, M., Gélinas, P., Lefebvre, R., & Nicholson, R. V. (2004). Geochemical characterization of acid mine drainage from a waste rock pile, Mine Doyon, Quebec, Canada. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology, 69(1), 45–71.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, L. (2004). Preface: sustainable management of acid sulfate soil. Soil Research, 42(6), I-I.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trakal, L., Bingöl, D., Pohořelý, M., Hruška, M., & Komárek, M. (2014). Geochemical and spectroscopic investigations of Cd and Pb sorption mechanisms on contrasting biochars: engineering implications. Bioresource Technology, 171, 442–451.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Uchimiya, M., Bannon, D. I., & Wartelle, L. H. (2012). Retention of heavy metals by carboxyl functional groups of biochars in small arms range soil. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 60(7), 1798–1809.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker, D. J., Clemente, R., & Bernal, M. P. (2004). Contrasting effects of manure and compost on soil pH, heavy metal availability and growth of Chenopodium album L. in a soil contaminated by pyritic mine waste. Chemosphere, 57(3), 215–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wan Ngah, W. S., & Hanafiah, M. A. K. M. (2008). Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater by chemically modified plant wastes as adsorbents: a review. Bioresource Technology, 99(10), 3935–3948.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J. M., Tang, C., & Chen, Z. L. (2006). The role of plant residues in pH change of acid soils differing in initial pH. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38(4), 709–719.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zarcinas, B. A., Mclaughlin, M. J., & Smart, M. K. (1996). The effect of acid digestion technique on the performance of nebulization systems used in inductively coupled plasma spectrometry. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 27(5–8), 1331–1354.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, M., & Wang, H. (2014). Organic wastes as carbon sources to promote sulfate reducing bacterial activity for biological remediation of acid mine drainage. Minerals Engineering, 69, 81–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y. -F., & Haynes, R. J. (2010). Sorption of heavy metals by inorganic and organic components of solid wastes: significance to use of wastes as low-cost adsorbents and immobilizing agents. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology, 40, 909–977.

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tan Dang is grateful to the Vietnam International Education Development (VIED) for providing the postgraduate scholarship.

We thank Lynne Macdonald for providing the biochars, Seyed Hadi Madani for analysing surface area, Ron Smernik for NMR analysis and Bogumila Tomczak for measuring Al and Fe by ICP-MS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Petra Marschner.

Additional file

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

Table S1: leachate volume in four leaching events after addition of 45 ml synthetic drainage water to different organic materials. Table S2: Proton retention over four leaching events and cumulative leaching after passage of synthetic drainage water through different organic materials. Values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P≤ 0.05). Table S3: Fe retention over four leaching events and cumulative leaching after passage of synthetic drainage water through different organic materials. Values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P≤ 0.05). Table S4: Al retention over four leaching events and cumulative leaching after passage of synthetic drainage water through different organic materials. Values in a column followed by different letters are significantly different (P≤ 0.05). Table S5: Correlation between proton retention in the first leaching event and cumulative retention of first and second leaching events in organic materials and their properties. Table S6: Correlation between Fe retention in the first and second leaching event and cumulative retention of first and second leaching events in organic materials and their properties. Table S7: Correlation between Al retention in the first and second leaching event and cumulative retention of first and second leaching events in organic materials and their properties. (DOCX 41.1 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dang, T., Mosley, L.M., Fitzpatrick, R. et al. Organic Materials Differ in Ability to Remove Protons, Iron and Aluminium from Acid Sulfate Soil Drainage Water. Water Air Soil Pollut 226, 357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2595-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-015-2595-z

Keywords

Navigation