Abstract
The evolution of ribonucleic acid (RNA) molecules in the test tube provides a possible way to study evolutionary optimization and adaptation to the environment on time scales accessible to human observers. Diversity of genotypes, however, is prohibitive for a complete experimental recording of the process at the molecular level. The number of RNA sequences and structures is too large to be determined by means of currently available techniques. Computer simulation, on the other hand, is able to handle large numbers of individual sequences and has no major problem with data retrieval. However, it can deal only with simplified relations between genotypes and phenotypes, i.e., RNA sequences and structures, respectively. Based on a coarse-grained notion of structure, as represented by RNA secondary structures, for example, a comprehensive model of evolution has been developed that allows as to follow optimization at full molecular resolution. This model describes the course of in vitro selection experiments, and provides a straightforward explanation for the occurrence of steps observed in evolution. It initiated the development of new mathematical concepts which analyse evolution as a complex process viewed simultaneously in concentration space, sequence space, and shape space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Spiegelman S (1971) An approach to the experimental analysis of precellular evolution. Q Rev Biophys 4:213–253
Strunk G, Ederhof T (1997) Machines for automated evolution experiments in vitro based on the serial-transfer concept. Biophys Chem 66:193–202
Ellington AD (1994) Aptamers achieve desired recognition. Curr Biol 4:427–429
Zhang B, Cech TR (1997) Peptide bond formation by in vitro selected ribozymes, Nature 390:96–100.
Eigen M (1971) Self-organization of matter and the evolution of biological macromolecules. Naturwissenschaften 58:465–523
Eigen M, Schuster P (1977) The hypercycle. A principle of natural self-organization. Part A. Emergence of the hypercycle. Naturwissenschaften 64:541–565
Eigen M, McCaskill J, Schuster P (1989) The molecular quasispecies. Adv Chem Phys 75:149–263
Domingo E, Escarmis C, Sevilla N et al. (1996) Basic concepts in RNA virus evolution. FASEB J 10:859–864
Brakmann S (1997) On the generation of information as motive power for molecular evolution. Biophys Chem 66:133–143
Fontana W, Schuster P (1998) Shaping space. The possible and the attainable in RNA genotype-phenotype mapping. J Theor Biol 194:491–515
Schuster P (1995) Artificial life and molecular evolutionary biology. In: Morán F, Moreno A, Merelo JJ, Chacón P (eds) Advances in Artificial Life. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol 929, pp 3–19 Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Schuster P (1996) How does complexity arise in evolution? Complexity 2(1):22–30
Schuster P (1997) Landscapes and molecular evolution. Physica D 107:351–365
Schuster P (1997) Genotypes with phenotypes. Adventures in an RNA toy world. Biophys Chem 66:75–110
Reidys C, Stadler PF, Schuster P (1997) Generic properties of combinatory maps. Neutral networks of RNA secondary structures. Bull Math Biol 59:339–397
Grüner W, Giegerich R, Strothmann D et al. (1996) Analysis of RNA sequence structure maps by exhaustive enumeration. Monatsh Chem 27:355–389
Fontana W, Konings DAM, Stadler PF, Schuster P (1993) Statistics of RNA secondary structures. Biopolymers 33:1389–1404
Schuster P, Fontana W, Stadler PF et al. (1994) From sequences to shapes and back. A case study in RNA secondary structures. Proc R Soc (London) B 255:279–284
Huynen MA, Stadler PF, Fontana W (1996) Smoothness within ruggedness. The role of neutrality in adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93:397–401
Schuster P (1995) How to search for RNA structures. Theoretical concepts in evolutionary biotechnology. J Biotechnol 41:239–257
Fontana W, Schuster P (1987) A computer model of evolutionary optimization. Biophys Chem 26:123–147
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Schuster, P. Molecular insights into evolution. Artif Life Robotics 3, 19–23 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481482
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02481482