Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of a gene probe with classical methods for detecting 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-biodegrading bacteria in natural waters

  • Published:
Current Microbiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Colony hybridizations with a gene probe for enumeration of 2,4-dichlorophenoxy-acetic acid (2,4-D)-degrading bacteria were compared with classical enrichment and radiolabel most-probable-number (MPN) assay methods. Two natural water samples (rivers) and raw sewage were tested by each method. UV scans of enrichment cultures revealed 2,4-D degradation with raw sewage occurred in 4–11 days, 4–>22 days with Mary's River water, and 5–>22 days with Willamette River water. [14C]-2,4-D MPN analysis, measuring release of14CO2, yielded estimates of bacteria per milliliter able to degrade 2,4-D. Raw sewage estimates were 1.4 × 105 2,4-D degraders/ml, Mary's River >1.6 × 105/ml, and Willamette River water 1.6 × 104/ml. Activities noted by UV scan enrichment data supported these results.

Autoradiograms of colony blots were also used to estimate numbers of 2,4-D-degrading bacteria. These estimates were also supported by the UV scan data from enrichment cultures. Raw sewage gave counts between 5 × 104 and 2.9 × 105 2,4-D-degrading bacteria/ml, which correlates well with the estimates obtained by14C-MPN analyses. River waters, both much lower in total bacterial counts and organic carbon than raw sewage, yielded fewer 2,4-D-degrading bacteria than estimated by14C-MPN. Media composition and cometabolism may account for discrepancies in estimates for 2,4-D-degrading bacteria observed when colony blot and14C-MPN analyses were compared.

Replica plating made it possible to test for 2,4-D biodegradation from colonies reactive in autoradiograms. Five of 12 (42%) colonies reacting in the colony hybridization exhibited biodegradation activities. Nonreactive colonies failed to degrade 2,4-D.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  1. Aaronson S (1970) Experimental microbial ecology. New York: Academic Press, pp 91–92

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alexander M (1969) Microbial degradation and biological effects of pesticides in soil. Soil Biol Rev Res Nat Resour Res (UNESCO) 9:209–240

    Google Scholar 

  3. Amy PS, Schulke JW, Frazier LM, Seidler RJ (1985) Characterization of aquatic bacteria and cloning of genes specifying partial degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1237–1245

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bell GR (1957) Some morphological and biochemical characteristics of a soil bacterium which decomposes 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Can J Microbiol 3:821–840

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Don RH, Pemberton JM (1981) Properties of six pesticide degradation plasmids isolated fromAlcaligenes paradoxus andAlcaligenes eutrophus. J Bacteriol 145:681–686

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Evans WC, Smith BWS, Fernley HN, Davies JI (1971) Bacterial metabolism of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid. Biochem J 122:543–551

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fisher PR, Appleton J, Pemberton JM (1978) Isolation and characterization of the pesticide-degrading plasmid pJP1 fromAlcaligens aradoxus. J Bacteriol 135:798–804

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghosal D, You IS, Chatterjee DK, Chakrabarty AM (1985) Microbial degradation of halogenated compounds. Science 228:135–142

    Google Scholar 

  9. Karns JS, Dilbane JJ, Chatterjee DK, Chakrabarty (1984) Microbial biodegradation of 2,4,5-trichlorophenoxyacetic acid and chlorophenols. In: Omenn GS, Hollaender A (eds), Genetic control of environmental pollutants. New York: Plenum Press, pp 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kaufman DD, Kearney PC (1976) Microbial transformations in the soil. In: Audus LJ (ed), Herbicides, physiology, biochemistry, and ecology. London: Academic Press Inc., pp 29–64

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lehmicke LG, Williams RT, Crawford RL (1979)14CO2-most-probable-number method for enumeration of active heterotrophic microorganisms in natural water. Appl Environ Microbiol 38:644–649

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pemberton JM (1981) Genetic engineering and biological detoxification of environmental pollutants. Residue Rev 78:1–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE (1985) A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rodina AG (1972) Methods in aquatic microbiology. Baltimore: University Park Press, p 179

    Google Scholar 

  16. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, water, 16th edition. (1985) Washington, DC: American Public Health Assoc

  17. Steenson TI, Walker N (1957) The pathway of breakdown of 2,4-dichloro-and 4-chloro-2 methylphenoxyacetic acid by bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 16:146

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tiedje JM, Alexander M (1969) Enzymatic cleavage of the ether bond of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetate. J Agric Food Chem 17:1080–1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tiedje JM, Duxburry MM, Alexander M, Dawson JE (1969) 2,4-D metabolism: pathway of degradation of chlorocatechols byArthrobacter sp. J Agric Food Chem 17:1021–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Amy, P.S., Staudaher, M.V. & Seidler, R.J. Comparison of a gene probe with classical methods for detecting 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D)-biodegrading bacteria in natural waters. Current Microbiology 21, 95–101 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02091826

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02091826

Keywords

Navigation