Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs

  • Original Papers
  • Published:
Oecologia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Terrestrial oviposition with free-living aquatic larvae is a common reproductive mode used by amphibians within the central Amazonian rainforest. We investigated the factors presently associated with diversity of microhabitats (waterbodies) that may be maintaining the diversity of reproductive modes. In particular, desiccation, predation by fish, competition with other anurans and water quality were examined in 11 waterbodies as possible forces leading to the evolution of terrestrial oviposition. Predation experiments demonstrated that fish generally do not eat anuran eggs, and that predacious tadpoles and dytiscid beetle larvae are voracious predators of anuran eggs. The percentage of species with terrestrial oviposition was only weakly correlated with the occurrence of pond drying, pH and oxygen concentration, suggesting that anurans in this tropical community are able to use the range of water quality available for egg development. There was a tendency for terrestrial oviposition to be associated with the number of species of tadpoles using the waterbody, but we consider this to be spurious as there was no obvious competitive mechanism that could result in this relationship. The percentage of species with terrestrial oviposition was significantly positively related to our index of egg predation pressure, and negatively related to our index of fish biomass. Egg predation pressure was also negatively related to the index of fish biomass. These results allow us to discount as improbable the hypothesis that predation by fish on anuran eggs was an important selective pressure leading to terrestrial oviposition in this community. The strong positive relationship between terrestrial oviposition and our index of egg predation pressure indicates that these predators have exerted, and are exerting, a significant selective pressure for terrestrial oviposition. The strong negative relationship between the occurrence of fish and the egg predators suggests the surprising conclusion that the presence of fish actually protects aquatic anuran eggs from predation in this tropical system, and allows aquatic oviposition to dominate only in those waterbodies with moderate to high densities of fish. Our results suggest that terrestrial oviposition is a “fixed predator avoidance” trait.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcala AC (1962) Breeding behavior and early development of frogs of Negros, Philippine Islands. Copeia 1962:679–726

  • Alford RA (1989) Variation in predator phenology affects predator performance and prey community composition. Ecology 70:206–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD (1978) Trout predation and the size composition of stream drift. Limnol Oceonogr 23:1231–1237

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldauf R (1947) Desmognathus f. fuscus eating eggs of its own species. Copeia 1947:66

  • Bogart JP (1981) How many times has terrestrial breeding evolved in anuran amphibians? Monitore Zool Ital XV:23–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Brodie ED Jr, Formanowicz DR Jr, Brodie ED III (1978) The development of noxiousness of Bufo americanus tadpoles to aquatic insect predators. Herpetologica 34:302–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Cargo DG (1960) Predation of eggs of the spotted salamander, Ambystoma maculatum, by the leech, Acrobdella decora. Chesapeake Sci 1:119–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe M (1974) Observations on the ecology and breeding biology of the genus Chiromantis (Amphibia, Rhacophoridae). J Zool Lond 172:13–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1975) Some mechanisms producing structure in natural communities: a model and evidence from field experiments. In: Cody ML, Diamond JM (eds) Ecology and evolution of communities. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, Mass., pp 460–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1980) Diversity and the coevolution of competitors, or the ghost of competition past. Oikos 35:131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • CoryL, MarionJJ (1953) Predation on eggs of the wood frog, Rana sylvatica by leeches. Copeia 1953:66

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump ML (1974) Reproductive strategies in a tropical anuran community. Univ Kansas Mus Nat Hist Misc Publ 61:1–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Crump ML (1982) Amphibian reproductive ecology on the community level. In: Scott NJJr (ed) Herpetological communities. Wildl Res Rept No 13, pp 21–36

  • Crump ML (1983) Opportunistic cannibalism by amphibian larvae in temporary aquatic environments. Am Nat 121:281–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple GH (1970) Caddis fli larvae feeding upon eggs of Ambystoma t. tigrinum. Herpetologica 26:128–129

    Google Scholar 

  • Downie JR (1988) Functions of the foam in the foam-nesting Leptodactylid Physalaemus pustulosus. Herp J 1:302–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. McGraw-Hill, New York Dunn ER (1926) The frogs of Jamaica. Proc Boston Soc Nat Hist 38:111–130

    Google Scholar 

  • DunnER (1937) The amphibian and reptilian fauna of bromeliads in Costa Rica and Panama. Copeia 1937:163–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz DR Jr (1986) Anuran tadpole/aquatic insect predator prey interactions: tadpole size and predator capture success. Herpetologica 42:367–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Formanowicz DR Jr, Brodie ED Jr (1982) Relative palatabilities of members of a larval amphibian community. Copeia 1982:91–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Goin CJ (1959) Amphibians, pioneers of terrestrial breeding habits. Annual Smithsonian Report 1959:427–445

    Google Scholar 

  • Goin OB, Goin CJ (1962) Amphibian eggs and the montane environment. Evolution 16:364–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosner KL (1960) A simplified table for staging anuran embryos and larvae with notes on identification. Herpetologica 16:183–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb JC (1972) Differential predation by Gambusia affinus on the eggs of seven species of Anuran amphibians. Am Midl Nat 88:102–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Guillaumet J-L (1987) Some structural and floristic aspects of the forest. Experientia 43:241–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Hero J-M (1990). An illustrated key to tadpoles occurring in the central Amazon rainforest, Manaus, Amazonas Brasil. Amazoniana 11(2) (in press)

  • Hero J-M, Galatti U (1990) Characteristics distinguishing Leptodactylus pentadactylus and L. knudseni in Central Amazon rainforest. J Herpetol 24(2):226–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Heusser H (1970) Laich-Fressen durch Kaulquappen als mogliche Ursache spezifischer Biotoppraferenzen und kurzer Laichzeiten bei europaischen Frochlurchen (Amphibia, Anura). Oecologia 4:83–88

    Google Scholar 

  • Heusser H (1971) Differenzierendes Kaulquappen-Fressen durch Molche. Experientia 27:475

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR (1969) The adaptive ecology of the species groups of the genus Leptodactylus (Amphibia, Leptodactylidae). Evolution 23:421–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR (1975) A preliminary analysis of the intergeneric relationships of the frog family Leptodactylidae. Smithson Contrib Zool 199:1–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyer WR, McDiarmid RW, Weigmann DL (1975) Tadpoles, predation and pond habitats in the tropics. Biotropica 7:100–111

    Google Scholar 

  • Kats LB, Petranka JW, Sih A (1988) Antipredator defenses and the persistence of amphibian larvae with fishes. Ecology 69:1865–1870

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluge AG (1980) The life history, social organisation, and parental behavior of Hyla rosenbergi Boulenger, a nest-building gladiator frog. Misc Pub Mus Zool Univ Michigan 160:1–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Laessle AM (1961) A micro-limnological study of Jamaican bromeliads. Ecology 42:499–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee AK (1967) Studies in Australian amphibia. II Taxonomy, ecology and evolution of the genus Helioporus Gray (Anura: Leptodactylidae). Aust J Zool 15:367–439

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1968) Unpalatability and toxicity of toad eggs. Herpetologica 24:93–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Licht LE (1969) Palatability of Rana and Hyla eggs. Am Midl Nat 82:296–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz B (1948) Ontogenetic evolution in frogs. Evolution 2:29–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Lynch JD (1973) The transition from archaic to advanced frogs. In: Vial JL (ed) Evolutionary biology of the anurans. Contemporary research on major problems. University of Missouri Press, Columbia, Missouri, pp 133–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Macan TT (1974) Freshwater ecology. London, Longmans

    Google Scholar 

  • Marques Filho AM, Nazare Goes Ribeiro, Menezes dos Santos H, Marden dos Santos J (1981) Estudos climatologicos da Reserva Floresta Ducke- Manaus-.Amazonas. IV Precipitacao. Acta Amazonica 11:759–768

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin AA (1967) Australian life histories: Some evolutionary and ecological aspects. In: Weatherly AH (ed) Australian inland waters and their fauna. Canberra Nat. Univ. Press, Canberra, pp 175–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin TE (1988) Processes organizing open-nesting bird assemblages: competition or nest predation? Evol. Ecol. 2:37–50

    Google Scholar 

  • McDiarmid RW (1978) Evolution of parental care in frogs. In: Burghardt G, Bekoff M (eds) The development of behavior. Garland, New York, pp 127–147

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA (1990) Determination of species composition in the Enallagma Damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71:83–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1983) Predation, competition, and the composition of larval anuran guilds. Ecol Monogr 53:119–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1986) Interactions between intraspecific competition and predation in an amphibian predator-prey system. Ecology 67:713–720

    Google Scholar 

  • Morin PJ (1987) Predation, breeding asynchrony, and the outcome of competition among treefrog tadpoles. Ecology 68:675–683

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble BG (1927) The value of life history data in the study of the evolution of the amphibian. Ann NY Acad Sci 30:31–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1966) Food web complexity and species diversity. Am Nat 100:65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranka JW (1983) Fish predation: a factor affecting the distribution of a stream-breeding salamander. Copeia 1983:624–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Polis GA, Myers CA (1985) A survey of intraspecific predation among reptiles and amphibians. J Herpetol 19:99–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Poynton JC (1964) Relationships between habitat and terrestrial breeding in amphibians. Evolution 18:131

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritchard G (1965) Prey capture by dragonfly larvae (Odonata; Anisoptera). Can J Zool 43:271–289

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage RM (1961) The ecology and life history of the common frog (Rana temporaria temporaria). Pitman and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott NJ, Limerick S (1983) Reptiles and amphibians, In: Janzen DH (ed) Costa Rican natural history. Univ Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 351–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Seale DB (1980) Physical factors influencing oviposition by the wood frog Rana sylvatica in Pennsylvania. Copeia 1982:627–635

    Google Scholar 

  • Semlitsch RD (1987) Interactions between fish and salamander larvae. Costs of predator avoidance or competition. Oecologia 72:481–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1986) Antipredator responses and the perception of danger by mosquito larvae. Ecology 67:434–441

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A (1987) Predator and prey lifestyles: an evolutionary and ecological overview. In: Kerfoot WC, Sih A (eds) Predation: direct and indirect effects on aquatic communities. Univ. Press of New England, Hanover, NH, pp 203–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Crowley P, McPeek M, Petranka J, Strohmeier K (1985) Predation, competition, and prey communities: a review of field experiments. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 16:269–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor EH (1954) Frog-eating tadpoles of Anotheca coronata (Steineger) (Salienta, Hylidae). Univ Kansas Sci Bull 36:589–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Tihen JA (1960) Comments on the origin of the amniote egg. Evolution 14:528–531

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman B (1982) Sibling association among schooling toad tadpoles: field evidence and implications. Anim Behav 30:700–713

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters B (1975) Studies of interspecific predation within an amphibian community. J Herpetdl 9:267–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Werschkul DF, Christensen MT (1977) Differential predation by Lepomis machrochirus on the eggs and tadpoles of Rana. Herpetologica 33:237–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 11:67–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilbur HM (1987) Regulation of structure in complex systems: experimental temporary pond communities. Ecology 68:1437–1452

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson L (1986) SYSTAT: The system for statistics. SYSTAT Inc., Evanston IL

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jean-Marc Hero

    Present address: Department of Zoology, The University of Melbourne, 3052, Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituto National de Pesquisas da Amazonia (INPA), Alameda, Cosme Ferreira 1756. Aleixo, 69083, Manaus, AM, Brasil

    William E. Magnusson & Jean-Marc Hero

  2. Division of Australian Environmental Studies, Griffith University, Nathan, 4111, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia

    Jean-Marc Hero

Authors
  1. William E. Magnusson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jean-Marc Hero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Magnusson, W.E., Hero, JM. Predation and the evolution of complex oviposition behaviour in Amazon rainforest frogs. Oecologia 86, 310–318 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317595

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00317595

Key words

Search

Navigation