Skip to main content
Log in

Minor and trace element partitioning between immiscible ocelli-matrix pairs from lamprophyre dikes and sills, Monteregian Hills petrographic province, Quebec

  • Published:
Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many lamprophyre dike and sill rocks in the Monteregian Hills petrographic province of southwestern Quebec contain felsic segregations (ocelli) which have been interpreted as globules of immiscible liquid (Philpotts 1976). Ocelli and matrix material were separated from a number of these rocks and analyzed for major and trace elements. The major element data, when plotted on a Greig diagram, outline a field of possible silicate-liquid immiscibility at higher alumina+alkali content than that previously mapped in iron-rich experimental systems. The trace element data support a liquid immiscibility hypothesis for the formation of these ocelli since high-charge density cations are preferentially concentrated in the matrix (mafic) material, a result which is consistent with theoretical and experimental studies.

The distribution of minor and trace elements between ocelli and matrix indicates that several factors control the partitioning of these elements between immiscible felsic and mafic liquids. These factors include the difference in relative polymerization (as measured by the Si∶O ratio) of the two liquids, with an increase in this difference favoring partitioning of the high-charge density cations into the mafic liquid; the concentration of P2O5 in the mafic liquid which favors the partitioning of high-charge density cations into this liquid; the presence of a CO2 vapor (?) phase which favors the partitioning of high-charge density cations into the CO2 enriched phase; and the presence of solid phases at the onset of immiscibility. These observations indicate that the chemical compositions of two possibly immiscible melts should be known if minor and trace element data are to be used as evidence for silicate-liquid immiscibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernas B (1968) A new method for decomposition and comprehensive analysis of silicates by atomic absorption spectrometry. Anal Chem 40:1682–1686

    Google Scholar 

  • Eby GN (1979) Mount Johnson, Quebec-an example of silicate liquid immiscibility? Geology 7:491–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson J, Currie KL (1971) Evidence of liquid immiscibility in alkaline ultrabasic rocks at Callander Bay, Ontario. J Petrol 12:561–585

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone IC (1978) Liquid immiscibility in alkali-rich magmas. Chem Geol 23:115–123

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzberg CT (1979) The solubility of olivine in basaltic liquids: an ionic model. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 43:1241–1251

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess PC, Rutherford MJ (1974) Element fractionation between immiscible melts (abstr). Lunar Sci 5:328–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Irvine TN (1975) The silica immiscibility effect in magmas. Carnegie Inst Washington Yearb 74:484–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts AR (1971) Immiscibility between feldspathic and gabbroic magmas. Nature (London), Phys Sci 229:107–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts AR (1972) Density, surface tension and viscosity of the immiscible phase in a basic alkaline magma. Lithos 5:1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts AR (1976) Silicate liquid immiscibility: its probable extent and petrogenetic significance. Am J Sci 276:1147–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts AR, Hodgson CJ (1968) Role of liquid immiscibility in alkaline rock genesis. 23rd Int Geol Congress, Prague 2:175–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpotts JA, Schnetzler CC, Philpotts AR (1970) Monteregian mixed rocks. Geol Soc Am Abstr Prog 2:652–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Roedder E (1951) Low temperature liquid immiscibility in the system K2O-FeO-Al2O3-SiO2. Am Mineral 36:282–286

    Google Scholar 

  • Roedder E (1979) Silicate liquid immiscibility in magmas. In: HS Yoder Jr (ed) The Evolution of the Igneous Rocks. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 15–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryerson FJ, Hess PC (1978) Implication of liquid-liquid distribution coefficients to mineral-liquid partitioning. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:921–932

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson EB (1976) Two liquid partition coefficients: experimental data and geochemical implications. Contrib Mineral Petrol 56:119–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson EB (1977) Partitioning of manganese between forsterite and silicate liquid. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 41:1363–1374

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendlandt RF, Harrison WJ (1979) Rare earth partitioning between immiscible carbonate and silicate liquids and CO2 vapor: results and implications for the formation of light rare earth-enriched rocks. Contrib Mineral Petrol 69:409–419

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson AD (1955) A new method for the determination of ferrous iron in rocks and minerals. Bull Geol Surv GB 9:56–58

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Eby, G.N. Minor and trace element partitioning between immiscible ocelli-matrix pairs from lamprophyre dikes and sills, Monteregian Hills petrographic province, Quebec. Contr. Mineral. and Petrol. 75, 269–278 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01166767

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01166767

Keywords

Navigation