Skip to main content
Log in

Flexible technology and firm size

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides the first empirical examination of the relationship between the application of flexible technologies and the firm-size distribution. In particular, we test the hypothesis that implementation of flexible technologies has tended to promote small firms more than large firms. Based on a sample of 36 engineering industries and using two distinct time periods between 1976 and 1986 and two different measures of what constitutes a small firm, we find that the application of certain flexible technologies, such as numerically controlled machines, has led to an increased presence of small firms, while the use of other flexible technologies, such as programmable robots, is associated with a decreased presence of small firms over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1987, ‘Innovation, Market Structure, and Firm size’,Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 567–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1988, ‘Innovation in Large and Small Firms: An Empirical Analysis’,American Economic Review 78, 678–690.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acz, Zoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1989a, ‘Entrepreneurial Strategy and the Presence of Small Firms’,Small Business Economics 1(3), 193–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Acs, Zoltan J. and David B.Audretsch, 1989b, ‘Small-Firm Entry in U.S. Manufacturing’,Economica 55, 225–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock, William A. and David S.Evans, 1989, ‘Small Business Economics’,Small Business Economics 1(1), 7–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, Duncan C., 1988, ‘Technology, Flexibility of Manufacturing, and Industrial Relations: A Cross-National Review of Literature’, Wharton School, Industrial Research Unit, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1984, ‘The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo. 1987, ‘Manufacturing Technology and U.S. Trade Performance’, paper presented at the European Association for Research in Industrial Economics (EARIE) Conference, Madrid.

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1989a, ‘The Evolution of Manufacturing Technology and Its Impact on Industrial Structure: An International Study’Small Business Economics 1, 21–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, Bo, 1989b, ‘Flexibility in the Theory of the Firm’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 7(2), 179–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha, 1986, ‘The Theory of Technological Competition’, in J. E.Stiglitz and G. F.Mathewson (eds.),New Developments in the Analysis of Market Structure, Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, Partha and JosephStiglitz, 1980, ‘Industrial Structure and the Nature of Innovative Activity’,The Economic Journal 80, 266–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodgson, Mark, 1985,Advanced Manufacturing Technology in the Small Firm, London: The Technology Change Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dosi, Giovanni, 1988, ‘Sources, Procedures, and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation’,Journal of Economic Literature XXVI, 1120–1171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, David, 1987, ‘Tests of Alternative Theories of Firm Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 95, 657–674.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highfield, Richard and RobertSmiley, 1987, ‘New Business Starts and Economic Activity: An Empirical Investigation’,International Journal of Industrial Organization 5, 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judge, George G., E.Griffiths, R.Carter-Hill and Tsoung-Chao-Lee, 1980,The Theory and Practice of Econometrics, New York: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mensch, Gerhard, 1979,Stalemate in Technology, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills, David E. and LaurenceSchumann, 1985, ‘Industry Structure with Fluctuating Demand’,American Economic review 75, 758–767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J., 1980, ‘Technological Foundations of Dualism and Discontinuity’, in SuzanneBerger and Michael J.Piore (eds.),Dualism and Discontinuity in Industrial Societies, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J., 1986, ‘The Decline of Mass Production and Union Survival in the USA’,Industrial Relations Journal 17, 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J. and Charles F.Sabel, 1983, ‘Italian Small Business Development: Lessons for U.S. Industrial Policy’, in JohnZysman and LauraTyson (eds.),American Industry in International Competition, Ithaca NY: Cornell University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, Michael J. and Charles F.Sabel, 1984,The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, William G., 1982, ‘Causes of Increased Competition in the U.S. Economy, 1939–1980’,Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solo, Robert, 1985, ‘Across the Industrial Divide: A Review Article’,Journal of Economic Issues 19, 829–837.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, Lawrence J., 1982, ‘The Determinants of the Relative Importance of Small Business’,Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Acs, Z.J., Audretsch, D.B. & Carlsson, B. Flexible technology and firm size. Small Bus Econ 3, 307–319 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840612

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840612

Keywords

Navigation