Skip to main content
Log in

Unrewarding experiences and their effect on foraging in the parasitic waspLeptopilina heterotoma (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae)

  • Published:
Journal of Insect Behavior Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The host-foraging behavior of female entomophagous parasitoids is commonly modified by positive associative learning. Typically, a rewarding experience (e.g., successful oviposition in a host) increases a female's foraging effort in a host microhabitat of the type associated with that experience. Less well understood are the effects of unrewarding experiences (i.e., unsuccessful foraging). The influence of unrewarding experience on microhabitat choice and residence time within a microhabitat was examined for the eucoilid parasitoid,Leptopilina heterotoma, in laboratory and greenhouse assays. As determined previously, females which oviposited successfully in either of two microhabitat types (fermenting apple or decaying mushroom) strongly preferred to forage subsequently on that microhabitat type. However, failure to find hosts in the formerly rewarding microhabitat caused females to reverse their preference in favor of a novel microhabitat type. The effect, though striking, was transient: within 1–2 h, the original learned preference was nearly fully restored. Similar effects of unrewarding experiences were observed with respect to the length of time spent foraging in a microhabitat. As determined previously, oviposition experience in a particular microhabitat type increased the time spent foraging in a patch of that microhabitat type. However, failure to find hosts in the patch caused the time a wasp spent in the next unoccupied patch of that type to decrease to almost nothing. In addition, there was a tendency for an unrewarding experience on a formerly rewarding microhabitat type to extend the time spent in a patch of a novel type. The function of the observed effects of unrewarding experiences is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abramson, C. I. (1986). Aversive conditioning in honey bees (Apis mellifera).J. Comp. Psychol. 100: 108–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernays, E. A. (1993). Aversion learning and feeding. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicke, M., van Lenteren, J. C., Boskamp, G. J. F., and van Voorst, R. (1985). Intensification and prolongation of host searching inLeptopilina heterotoma (Thomson) (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae) through a kairomone produced byDrosophila melanogaster.J. Chem. Ecol. 11: 125–136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Heinrich, B. (1979). “Majoring” and “minoring” by foraging bumble bees,Bombus vagans: An experimental analysis.Ecology 60: 245–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. (1988). Host detection by chemically mediated associative learning in a parasitic wasp.Nature 331: 257–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangel, M. (1993). Motivation, learning and motivated learning. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 158–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R. (1983). Neurobiology of learning and memory: The honeybee as a model system.Naturwissenschaften 70: 504–511.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, R., Greggers, U., and Hammer, M. (1993). Functional organization of appetitive learning and memory in a generalist pollinator, the honey bee. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 79–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaj, D. R. (1986). Conditioning of leaf-shape discrimination by chemical cues in the butterfly,Battus philenor. Anim. Behav. 34: 1281–1288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaj, D. R. (1990). Interference with learning in pipevine swallowtail butterflies: Behavioural constraint or possible adaptation?Symp. Biol. Hung. 39: 89–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papaj, D. R., and Vet, L. E. M. (1990). Odor learning and foraging success in the parasitoid,Leptopilina heterotoma.J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3137–3150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rausher, M. D. (1978). Search image for leaf shape in a butterfly.Science 200: 1071–1073.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Real, L. (1991). Animal choice behavior and the evolution of cognitive architecture.Science 253: 980–986.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS. (1991).SAS/STAT User's Guide, Release 6.03 Edition, SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. H., Abramson, C. I., and Tobin, T. R. (1991). Conditional withholding of proboscis extension in honey bees (Apis mellifera) during discriminative punishment.J. Comp. Psychol. 105: 345–356.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Staddon, J. E. R. (1983).Adaptive Behavior and Learning, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tumlinson, J. H., Lewis, W. J., and Vet, L. E. M. (1993). How parasitic wasps find their hosts.Sci. Am. 266: 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlings, T. C. J., Tumlinson, J. H., Lewis, W. J., and Vet, L. E. M. (1989). Beneficial arthropod behavior mediated by airborne semiochemicals. VIII. Learning of host-related odors induced by a brief contact experience with host by-products inCotesia marginiventris (Cresson), a generalist larval parasitoid.J. Insect Behav. 2: 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turlings, T. C. J., Wäckers, F. L., Vet, L. E. M., Lewis, W. J., and Tumlinson, J. H. (1993). Learning of host-finding cues by hymenopterous parasitoids. In Papaj, D. R., and Lewis, A. C. (eds.),Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives, Chapman and Hall, New York, pp. 51–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M. (1988). The influence of learning on habitat location and acceptance by parasitoids.Les Coll. l'INRA 48: 29–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., and Dicke, M. (1992). Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context.Annu. Rev. Entomol. 37: 141–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., and Groenewold, L. (1990). Learning in insect parasitoids: The role of kairomones.J. Chem. Ecol. 16: 3119–3136.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vet, L. E. M., and Schoonman, G. (1988). The influence of previous foraging experience in microhabitat acceptance inLeptopilina heterotoma.J. Insect Behav. 1: 387–392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, M. E., van Alphen, J. J. M., and Nell, H. W. (1990). Adaptive superparasitism and patch time allocation in solitary parasitoids: The influence of the number of parasitoids depleting a patch.Behaviour 114: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waage, J. K. (1978). Foraging for patchily distributed hosts by the parasitoidNemeritis canescens.J. Anim. Ecol. 48: 353–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wcislo, W. T. (1993). Attraction and learning in mate-finding by solitary bees,Lasioglossum (Dialictus) figueresi Wcislo andNomia triangulifera Vachal (Hymenoptera: Halictidae).Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 31: 139–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Papaj, D.R., Snellen, H., Swaans, K. et al. Unrewarding experiences and their effect on foraging in the parasitic waspLeptopilina heterotoma (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae). J Insect Behav 7, 465–481 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025444

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02025444

Key words

Navigation