Abstract
We develop a model in which two regional governments compete for a mobile oligopolistic firm by providing local public inputs. The central mechanism of our model is the interaction of an agglomeration advantage (partial nonrivalness of the local public inputs) and an agglomeration disadvantage (costs associated with the change of location of firms). We show that a central government of both regions induces an interregionally optimal allocation of firms by providing the optimal levels of local public inputs. The decentralized provision of local public inputs by regional governments, however, leads in most cases to a (interregionally) suboptimal allocation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aschauer, D. (1989). “Is Public Expenditure Productive?” Journal of Monetary Economics 24, 177–200.
Brander, J., and B. Spencer. (1985). “Export Subsidies and International Market Share Rivalry”. Journal of International Economics 18, 83–100.
Dixit, A. (1986). “Comparative Statics for Oligopoly”. International Economic Review 27(1), 107–122.
Eaton, J., and G.M. Grossman. (1986). “Optimal Trade and Industrial Policy Under Oligopoly”. Quarterly Journal of Economics 102, 383–406.
Helpman, E., and P.R. Krugman. (1989). Trade Policy and Market Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Horstmann, I.J., and J.R. Markusen. (1992). “Endogenous Market Structure in International Trade”. Journal of International Economics 32, 109–129.
Janeba, E. (1995). “Corporate Income Tax Competition, Double Taxation Treaties, and Foreign Investment”. Journal of Public Economics 56, 311–325.
Markusen, J.R., E.R. Morey, and N.D. Olewiler. (1993). “Environmental Policy When Market Structure and Plant Locations are Endogenous”. Journal of Environmental Economics and Mangement 24, 69–86.
Markusen, J.R., E.R. Morey, and N.D. Olewiler. (1994). “Noncooperative Equilibria in Regional Environmental Policies When Plant Locations are Endogenous”. Journal of Public Economics 56, 55–77.
Motta, M., and J.-F. Thisse. (1994). “Does Environmental Dumping Lead to Delocation?” European Economic Review 38, 563–576.
Oates, W.E., and R.M. Schwab. (1991). “The Allocative and Distributive Implications of Local Fiscal Competition”. In D.A. Kenyon and J. Kincaid (eds.), Competition Among States and Local Governments (pp. 129–145). Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press.
Richter, W.F., and D. Wellisch. (1996). “The Provision of Local Public Goods and Factors in the Presence of Firm and Household Mobility”. Journal of Public Economics (forthcoming).
Walz, U., and D. Wellisch. (1994). “Strategic Public Provision of Local Inputs with Endogenous Locational Decisions of Oligopolistic Firms”. Discussion paper, University of Mannheim.
Wildasin, D.E. (1986). Urban Public Finance. New York: Harwood.
Wildasin, D.E. (1988). “Nash Equilibrium in Models of Fiscal Competition”. Journal of Public Economics 35, 229–240.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walz, U., Wellisch, D. Strategic provision of local public inputs for oligopolistic firms in the presence of endogenous location choice. Int Tax Public Finan 3, 175–189 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399909
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00399909