Skip to main content
Log in

Reply to “interpreting and testing compositional data” by Alex Woronow, Karen M. Love, and John C. Butler

  • Letter To The Editor
  • Published:
Mathematical Geology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Aitchison, J., 1986a, The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London, 416 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aitchison, J., 1986b, CODA, A Microcomputer Package for the Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data: Chapman and Hall, London, 84 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, P. F., 1981, Distinction Between Permian and Post-Permian Igneous Rocks in the Southern Sydney Basin, New South Wales, on the Basis of Major-Element Geochemistry: Math. Geol., v. 13, p. 193–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chayes, F. and Kruskal, W., 1966, An Approximate Statistical Test for Correlations between Proportions: J. Geol., v. 74, p. 692–702.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woronow, A., 1987, Review of The Statistical Analysis of Compositional Data (J. Aitchison): Math. Geol., v. 19, p. 579–591.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aitchison, J. Reply to “interpreting and testing compositional data” by Alex Woronow, Karen M. Love, and John C. Butler. Math Geol 21, 65–71 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897241

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00897241

Keywords

Navigation