Skip to main content
Log in

Oviposition stimulants and deterrents control acceptance ofAlliaria petiolata byPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea

  • Research papers
  • Published:
CHEMOECOLOGY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Differential acceptance of garlic mustard,Alliaria petiolata byPieris rapae L. andP. napi oleracea is explained by their differential sensitivities to oviposition stimulants and deterrents in the plant. Fractions containing the stimulants and deterrents were isolated by solvent partitioning between water and n-butanol and by open-column chromatography followed by HPLC.P. napi oleracea showed no preference when offered a choice ofA. petiolata or cabbage, but was strongly stimulated to oviposit by post-butanol water extracts ofA. petiolata. The most abundant glucosinolate in this extract was identified as sinigrin, which could explain the high degree of stimulatory activity.P. rapae preferred cabbage plants overA. petiolata, and the relatively low stimulatory activity was also associated with the glucosinolate-containing aqueous extract. However, this species was strongly stimulated by a fraction that contained small amounts of glucotropaeolin along with unknown compounds. Deterrents to both species were found in the butanol extract fromA. petiolata, andP. napi oleracea was more sensitive thanP. rapae to these deterrents. Some HPLC fractions from the BuOH extract were strongly deterrent toP. napi oleracea, but were inactive toP. rapae. The ecological significance of these behavioral differences between the twoPieris species is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernays EA (1993) Aversion learning and feeding. Pp 1–17in Papaj DR, Lewis AC (eds) Insect Learning: Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives. New York: Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernays EA, Chapman RF (1994) Host-plant selection by phytophagous insects. New York: Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden SR (1971) American white butterflies (Pieridae) and English food-plants. J Lepidopterists' Soc 25:6–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1975) Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. I. The relative quality of available resources. Oecologia 20:117–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1977a) Coevolution of pierid butterflies and their cruciferous foodplants. II. The distribution of eggs on potential foodplants. Evolution 31:568–579

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1977b) The effects of introduced mustards (Cruciferae) on some native north American cabbage butterflies (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Atala J Xerces Soc 5:13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1981) Coexistence and local extinction in twoPieris butterflies. Am Nat 118:655–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS (1988) Biological effects of glucosinolates. Pp 155–181in Cutler HG (ed.) Biologically Active Natural Products: Potential Use in Agriculture. ACS Symp Series 380. Washington DC: American Chemical Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS, Goodwillie C, Milburn NS (1989) Larval responses of twoPieris butterflies to naturalized Cruciferae. Am Zool 29:167A

    Google Scholar 

  • Chew FS, Renwick JAA (1995) Host plant choice inPieris butterflies. Pp 214–238in Cardé RT, Bell WJ (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects II. New York: Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Courant AV, Holbrook AE, van der Reijden ED, Chew FS (1994) Native pierine butterfly (Pieridae) adapting to naturalized crucifer? J Lepidopterists' Soc 48:168–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Daxenbichler ME, Spencer GF, Carlson DG, Rose GB, Brinker AM, Powell RG (1991) Glucosinolate composition of seeds from 297 species of wild plants. Phytochemistry 30:2623–2638

    Google Scholar 

  • Dethier VG (1982) Mechanisms of host-plant recognition. Entomol exp appl 31:49–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Feeny P, Rosenberry L (1982) Seasonal variation in the glucosinolate content ofBrassica nigra and threeDentaria species in central New York State. Biochem Syst Ecol 10:23–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA (1993) Differential selection of host plants by twoPieris species: the role of oviposition stimulants and deterrents. Entomol exp appl 68:59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA (1994a) Relative activities of glucosinolates as oviposition stimulants forPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 20:1025–1037

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA (1994b) Cardenolides as oviposition deterrents to twoPieris species: structure-activity relationships. J Chem Ecol 20:1039–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA, Sachdev-Gupta K (1993a) A chemical basis for differential acceptance ofErysimum cheiranthoides by twoPieris species. J Chem Ecol 19:195–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA, Sachdev-Gupta K (1993b) Oviposition stimulants and deterrents regulating differential acceptance ofIberis amara byPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea. J Chem Ecol 19:1645–1663

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang XP, Renwick JAA, Sachdev-Gupta K (1994) Oviposition stimulants inBarbarea vulgaris forPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea: isolation, identification and differential activity. J Chem Ecol 20:423–438

    Google Scholar 

  • Jermy T, Szentesi A (1978) The role of inhibitory stimuli in the choice of oviposition site by phytophagous insects. Entomol exp appl 24:258–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaenike J (1990) Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 21:243–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Kjaer A (1960) Naturally derivedisothiocyanates (mustard oils) and their parent glucosides. Fortschr Chem Org Naturst 18:122–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Metcalf RL, Metcalf ER (1992) Plant Kairomones in Insect Ecology and Control. New York: Chapman & Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller JR, Strickler KL (1994) Finding and accepting host plants. Pp. 127–157in Bell WJ, Cardé RT (eds) Chemical Ecology of Insects. Sunderland/MA: Sinauer Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Minchinton I, Sang J, Burke D, Truscott RJW (1982) Separation of desulfoglucosinolates by reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr 247:141–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JK, Dalgaard L, Larsen LM, Sørensen H (1979) Host plant selection of the horse-radish flea beetlePhyllotreta armoraciae (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae): feeding responses to glucosinolates from several crucifers. Entomol exp appl 25:227–239

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen JK, Kirkeby-Thomsen AH, Petersen MK (1989) Host plant recognition in monophagous weevils: specificity in feeding responses ofCeutorhynchus constrictus and the variable effect of sinigrin. Entomol exp appl 53:157–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter A (1994) Implications of introduced garlic mustard (Alliaria petiolata) in the habitat ofPieris virginiensis (Pieridae). J Lepidopterists' Soc 48:171–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA (1989) Chemical ecology of oviposition in phytophagous insects. Experientia 45:223–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Chew FS (1994) Oviposition in Lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 39:377–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Radke CD (1983) Chemical recognition of host plants for oviposition by the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae). Environ Entomol 12:446–450

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Radke CD (1988) Sensory cues in host selection for oviposition by the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. J Insect Physiol 34:251–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Renwick JAA, Radke CD, Sachdev-Gupta K, Städler E (1992) Leaf surface chemicals stimulating oviposition byPieris rapae (Lepidoptera: Pieridae) on cabbage. Chemoecology 3:33–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards OW (1940) The biology of the small white butterfly (Pieris rapae), with special reference to the factors controlling its abundance. J Anim Ecol 9:243–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodman JE, Chew FS (1980) Phytochemical correlates of herbivory in a community of native and naturalized Cruciferae. Biochem Syst Ecol 8:43–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachdev-Gupta K, Radke CD, Renwick JAA (1992) Chemical recognition of diverse hosts byPieris rapae butterflies. Pp 136–138in Menken SBJ, Visser JH, Harrewijn P (eds) Proc 8th Int Symp Plant-Insect Relationships. NL-Dordrecht: Kluwer Acad Publ

    Google Scholar 

  • Szentesi Á (1990) Controversial components of plant apparency inAlliaria petiolata Carava & Grande (Cruciferae). Symp Biol Hung 39:237–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Traynier RMM (1984) Associative learning in the ovipositional behaviour of the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. Physiol Entomol 9:465–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Traynier RMM (1986) Visual learning in assays of sinigrin solution as an oviposition releaser for the cabbage butterfly,Pieris rapae. Entomol exp appl 40:25–33

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loon JJA, Blaakmeer A, Griepink FC, van Beek TA, Schoonhoven LM, De Groot A (1992) Leaf surface compound fromBrassica oleracea induces oviposition byPieris brassicae. Chemoecology 3:39–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschaffelt E (1910) The cause determining the selection of food in some herbivorous insects. Proc Acad Sci Wet (Amsterdam) 13:536–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Zennie TM, Ogzewalla CD (1977) Ascorbic acid and vitamin A content of edible wild plants of Ohio and Kentucky. Econ Bot 31:76–79

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Huang, X.P., Renwick, J.A.A. & Chew, F.S. Oviposition stimulants and deterrents control acceptance ofAlliaria petiolata byPieris rapae andP. napi oleracea . Chemoecology 5, 79–87 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259436

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01259436

Key words

Navigation