Skip to main content
Log in

Antioxidant alteration ofGlycine max (Fabaceae) defensive chemistry: Analogy to herbivory elicitation

  • Research papers
  • Published:
CHEMOECOLOGY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The water-soluble antioxidant, L-ascorbic acid (vitamin C), proved elicitory to alterable anti-herbivory inGlycine max againstTrichoplusia ni larvae. Elicitation by vitamin C was influenced especially by dose, time after elicitation and space in the plant. Results allow an analogy between antioxidant and herbivory elicitation. Elicitation apparently involves a sulfhydryl-protein-dependent redox mechanism which can be significantly affected by antioxidants. Findings would also support a proposed common redox-based mechanism, involving the plasma membrane, for communication between plant and animal cells and their environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akazawa T, Uritani I, Kubota H (1960) Isolation of ipomeamarone and two coumarin derivatives from sweet potato roots injured by the weevil,Cylas formicaris elegantulus. Arch Biochem Biophys 88:150–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Apostol I, Heinstein PF, Low PS (1989) Rapid stimulation of an oxidative burst during elicitation of cultured plant cells: role in defense and signal transduction. Plant Physiol 90:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell EA (1981) The physiological role(s) of secondary (natural) products. Pp 1–19in Conn EE (ed.) The Biochemistry of Plants: A Comprehensive Treatise. Vol 7, Secondary Plant Products. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiang HS, Norris DM, Ciepiela A, Shapiro P, Oosterwyk A (1987) Inducible versus constitutive PI 227687 soybean resistance to Mexican bean beetle,Epilachna varivestis. J Chem Ecol 13:741–749

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruickshank IAM, Perrin DR (1965) Studies on phytoalexins. VIII. The effect of some further factors on the formation, stability and localization of pisatinin vivo. Austral J Biol Sci 18:817–828

    Google Scholar 

  • Darvill AG, Albersheim P (1984) Phytoalexins and their elicitors — a defense against microbial infection in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 35:243–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon RA, Lamb CJ (1990) Molecular communication in interactions between plants and microbial pathogens. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 41:339–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr WR, Caviness CE (1977) Stages of soybean development. Special Report 80. Cooperative Extension Service Agriculture and Home Economics, Home Economics Experiment Station. Iowa State University, Ames, IA

    Google Scholar 

  • Haanstad JO, Norris DM (1992) Altered elm resistance to smaller European elm bark beetle (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) and forest tent caterpillar (Lepidoptera: Lasiocampidae). J Econ Entomol 85:172–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer PA, Tibbitts TW, Laughans RW and McFarlane JC (1978) Baseline growth studies of ‘Grand Rapid’ lettuce in controlled environments. J Am Soc Hort Sci 103:649–655

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinrichs EA (ed) (1988) Plant Stress-Insect Interactions. New York: J Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Kogan M, Paxton J (1983) Natural inducers of plant resistance to insects. Pp 153–171in Hedin PA (ed) Plant Resistance to Insects. Washington, DC: Amer Chem Society

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitt J (1980) Responses of Plants to Environmental Stresses. Water, Radiation, Salt and Other Stress, Vol 2. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu SH, Norris DM (1992) Sulfhydryl-protein receptor in soybean plasma membrane for a chemical elicitor of insect antifeedants and antibiotics. Plant Physiol: submitted

  • Neupane FP, Norris DM (1990) Iodoacetic acid alteration of soybean resistance to the cabbage looper (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Environ Entomol 19:215–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane F, Norris DM (1991a) Sulfhydryl-reagent alteration of soybean resistance to the cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni. Entomol exp appl 60:239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Neupane FP, Norris DM (1991b)α-Tocopherol alteration of soybean antiherbivory toTrichoplusia ni larvae. J Chem Ecol 17:1941–1951

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1969) Energy transduction mechanism in olfaction and gustation. Nature 222:1263–1264

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1970) Quinol stimulation and quinone deterrency of gustation byScolytus multistriatus. Ann Entomol Soc Am 63:476–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1976) How certain insects take the bitter with the sweet. Bull Entomol Soc Am 22:27–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1981) Possible unifying principles in energy transduction in the chemical senses. Pp 289–306in Norris DM (ed.) Perception of Behavioral Chemicals. Amsterdam: Elsevier/North-Holland Biomedical Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1985) Electrochemical parameters of energy transduction between repellent naphthoquinones and lipoprotein receptors in insect neurons. Bioelectrochem Bioenerget 14:449–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1986) Anti-feeding compounds. Pp 97–146in Haug G, Hoffman G (eds) Chemistry of Plant Protection, Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1988a) Sensitivity of insect-damaged plants to environmental stresses. Pp 341–361in Heinrichs EA (ed) Plant Stress-Insect Interactions. New York: J Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1988b)Periplaneta americana perception of phytochemical naphthoquinones as allelochemicals. J Chem Ecol 14:1807–1819

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM (1992) Information exchange among animals, plants, and their environments. Washington State and University Centennial Anniversary Celebration Distinguished Lecture Series 1988–90. Washington State University, Pullman (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM 1979 Chemoreception proteins. Pp 59–77in Narahashi T (ed.) Neurotoxicology of Insecticides and Pheromones. New York: Plenum Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris DM, Ferkovich SM, Baker JE, Rozental JM, Borg TK (1970) Energy transduction: inhibition of cockroach feeding by naphthoquinones. Science 170:754–755

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozental JM, Norris DM (1973) Chemosensory mechanism in American cockroach olfaction and gustation. Nature 244:370–371

    Google Scholar 

  • Rozental JM, Norris DM (1975) Genetically variable olfactory receptor sensitivity inPeriplaneta americana. Life Sci 17:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan CA (1983) Insect-induced chemical signals regulating natural plant protection responses. Pp 43–60in Denno RF, McClure MS (eds) Variable Plants and Herbivores in Natural and Managed Systems. New York: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schottens-Toma IMJ, de Wit PJGM (1988) Purification and primary structure of a necrosis-inducing peptide from the apoplastic fluids of tomato infected withCladosporium fulvum (symFulvia fulva). Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 33:59–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Sequeira L (1983) Mechanisms of induced resistance in plants. Annu Rev Microbiol 37:51–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma HC, Norris DM (1991) Chemical basis of resistance in soya bean to cabbage looper,Trichoplusia ni. J Sci Food Agric 55:353–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Shorey MM, Hale RL (1965) Mass rearing of the larvae of nine noctuid species on a simple artificial medium. J Econ Entomol 58:522–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Templeton MD, Lamb CJ (1988) Elicitors and defense gene activation. Plant, Cell and Environ 11:395–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Wingate VPM, Lawton MA, Lamb CJ (1988) Glutathione causes a massive and selective induction of plant defense genes. Plant Physiol 87:206–210

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neupane, F.P., Norris, D.M. Antioxidant alteration ofGlycine max (Fabaceae) defensive chemistry: Analogy to herbivory elicitation. Chemoecology 3, 25–32 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261453

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01261453

Key words

Navigation