Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of different promoter-sequences on transient expression of gus reporter gene in cultured barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cells

  • Published:
Plant Cell Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The cauliflower mosaic virus 35S (35S) and the enhanced 35S (E35S) promoters fused with maize alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) intron1 or maize shrunken locus (sh1) intronl along with maize Adh1 and rice actin (Act1) promoters fused to their respective first introns were tested for transient expression of the E.coli β-glucuronidase (gus) reporter gene in cultured barley (Hordeum vulgare L) cells. The plasmids, carrying the respective promoterintron combinations to drive the gus fused to nopaline synthase (nos) terminator, were introduced into cultured barley cells using a particle gun. The rice Act1 promoter with its first intron gave the highest expression of all promoter intron combinations studied. This was followed by the E35S promoter and no significant differences were observed between the other two promoters tested. The rice actin promoter is now being used to drive selectable marker genes to obtain stably transformed cereal cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bekkaoui F, Datla RSS, Pilon M, Tautorus TE, Crosby WL, Dunstan DI (1990) Theor Appl Genet 79: 353–359

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) Anal Biochem 72: 248–257

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callis J, Fromm ME, Walbot V (1987) Genes Dev 1: 1183–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Chibbar RN, Kartha KK, Leung N, Qureshi J, Caswell K (1989) Genome 34: 453–460

    Google Scholar 

  • Christou P, Ford TL, Kofron M (1991) Bio/Technology 9: 957–962

    Google Scholar 

  • Datla RSS, Hammerlindl JK, Pelcher LE, Crosby WL, Selvaraj G: (1991) Gene 101: 239–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchesne LC, Charest PJ (1992) Can J Bot 70: 175–180

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang R-X, Nagy F, Sivasubramaniam S, Chua N-H (1989) Plant Cell 1: 141–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Fromm ME, Morrish F, Armstrong C, Williams R, Thomas J, Klein TM (1990) Bio/Technology 8: 833–839

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon-Kamm WJ, Spencer TM, Mangano ML, Adams TR, Daines RJ, Start WJ, O'Brien JV, Chambers SA, Adams WR Jr, Wilets NG, Rice TB, Mackey CJ, Krueger RW, Kausch AP, Lemaux PG (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guilley H, Dudley RK, Jonard G, Balazas E, Richards KE (1982) Cell 30: 763–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauptmann RM, Ashraf M, Vasil V, Hannah LC, Vasil IK, Ferl R (1988) Plant Physiol. 88: 1063–1066

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu C-y, Chee PP, Chesney RH, Zhou JH, Miller PD, O'Brien WT (1990) Plant Cell Reports 9: 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson RA (1987) Plant Mol. Biol. Rep. 5: 387–405

    Google Scholar 

  • Kartha KK, Chibbar RN, Georges F, Leung N, Caswell K, Kendall E, Qureshi JA (1989) Plant Cell Reports 8: 429–432

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay R, Chan A, Daly M, McPherson J (1987) Science 236: 1299–1302

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Wolf ED, Wu R, Sanford JC (1987) Nature 327: 70–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein TM, Gradziel T, Fromm ME, Sanford JC (1988) Bio/Technology 6: 559–563

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeri PA, Brettschneider R, Lührs R, Lörz H (1991) Theor Appl Genet 81: 437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy D, Zhang W, Cao J, Wu R (1990) Plant Cell 2: 163–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McElroy D, Blowers AD, Jenes B, Wu R (1991) Mol Gen Genet 231: 150–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendel RR, Clauss E, Hellmund R, Schulze J, Steinbiβ HH, Tewes A (1990) In: Nijkamp HJJ, van der Plas LHW, van Aatrijk J (eds) Progress in Plant Cellular and Molecular Biology Kluwer Academic Press Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp 73–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Odell GT, Nagy F, Chua N-H (1985) Nature 313: 810–812

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Clancy M, Ferl RJ, Vasil IK, Hannah LC (1989) Plant Physiol 91: 1575–1579

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Brown SM, Re D, Fromm ME, Vasil. IK (1991) Bio/Technology 9: 743–747

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasil V, Castillo AM, Fromm ME, Vasil IK (1992) Bio/ Technology 10: 667–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Wu R (1988) Theor Appl Genet 76: 835–840

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by F. Constabel

NRCC No. 36482

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chibbar, R.N., Kartha, K.K., Datla, R.S.S. et al. The effect of different promoter-sequences on transient expression of gus reporter gene in cultured barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cells. Plant Cell Reports 12, 506–509 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236096

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00236096

Key words

Navigation