Summary
The effects of single oral doses of three antihistamine compounds on histamine-induced itch and flare reactions were studied in 24 healthy volunteers by a double-blind balanced design. Central sedative effects were concurrently analyzed using a set of computerized neuropsychological tests and analogue ratings. Hydroxyzine 20 mg had a more pronounced inhibitory effect on the cutaneous response than 3 mg clemastine or 3 mg azatadine. Clemastine tended to cause more sedation than the other two drugs. A compound score, reflecting the balance between peripheral and CNS effects, showed hydroxyzine to have relatively more peripheral antihistamine effect and less sedative effect than the other two drugs. The independence of peripheral and CNS antihistamine effects was also suggested by correlation analysis. Subjects displayed individual sensitivity to the peripheral antihistamine effect of the three drugs; a marked antihistamine effect of one drug predicted a marked effect of the other two drugs. This was not the case for CNS sedation. The independence of peripheral and CNS effects should encourage development of new and more specific antihistamine compounds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alvan G, Ericsson Ö, Levander S, Lindgren JE (1974) Plasma concentration and effects of the hypnotic methaqualone after single and multiple oral doses in man. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 7: 419–424
Borland RG, Nicholson AN (1974) Human performance after a barbiturate (heptabarbitone). Br J Clin Pharmacol 1: 209–215
Day ES, Jones S, Stewart-Jones J, Turner P (1972) Clemastine on eye-hand coordination and visual function. J Clin Pharmacol 12: 240–246
Fjellner B, Hägermark Ö (1981) Studies on pruritogenic and histamine-releasing effects of some putative peptide neurotransmitters. Acta Derm Venereol (Stockh) 61: 245–250
Green DM, Swets JA (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics. Wiley, New York
Hedges A, Hills M, Maclay WP, Newman-Taylor AJ, Turner (1971) Some central and peripheral effects of clemastine, a new antihistamine drug, in man. J Clin Pharmacol 11: 112–119
Hays WL (1969) Statistics. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London
Hillas JL, Somerfield SD, Wilson JD, Aman MG (1980) Azatadine maleate in perennial allergic rhinitis: effects on clinical symptoms and choice reaction time. Br J Clin Pharmacol 10: 573–577
Landauer AA, Milner G (1971) Antihistamines, alone and together with alcohol in relation to driving safety. J Forens Med 18: 127–139
Levander S, Bartfai A, Schalling D (1985) Regional cortical dysfunction in schizophrenic patients studied by computerized neuropsychological methods. Percept Mot Skills (in press)
Mueser K, Waller D, Levander S, Schalling D (1984) Smoking and pain — A method of limits and sensory decision theory analysis. Scand J Psychol 25: 289–296
Nicholson AN, Stone BM (1982) Performance studies with the H1-histamine receptor antagonists, astemizole and terfenadine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 13: 199–202
Peck AW, Fowler ASE, Bye C (1975) A comparison of triprolidine and clemastine on histamine antagonism and performance tests in man: implications for the mechanism of drug induced drowsiness. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 8: 455–463
Swets JA (1977) Signal detection theory applied to vigilance. In: RR Mackie (ed) Vigilance: theory, operational performance and physiological correlates. Plenum, New York
Uzan A, LeFur G, Malgouris C (1979) Are antihistamines sedative via a blockade of brain H1 receptors? J Pharm Pharmacol 31: 701–702
Weiner M (1982) Sedation and antihistaminics. Arzneimittelforsch/Drug Res 32: 1193–1195
Winer BJ (1979) Statistical principles in experimental design. McGraw-Hill, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Levander, S., Hägermark, Ö. & Ståhle, M. Peripheral antihistamine and central sedative effects of three H1-receptor antagonists. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 28, 523–529 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544062
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00544062