Skip to main content
Log in

Technological capabilities and international competitiveness in the engineering industries

  • Published:
Review of Industrial Organization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

While it has often been argued that the machine tool industry is a ‘nodal’ industry as supplier of technology to other industries, this relationship has never been tested empirically. In this paper we analyze and find empirical support for the following two hypotheses: 1) The U.S. engineering industries have been negatively affected by the relative decline in the technological capabilities of the U.S. machine tool industry in the last decade. 2) The use of flexible manufacturing technologies has become one of the most influential factors for competitiveness in the last decade as a result of recent changes in the world economy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AM (1983a)13th American Machinist Inventory of Metalworking Equipment: Market Potentials Report.

  • AM (1983b) ‘13th American Machinist Inventory of Metalworking Equipment 1983’,American Machinist 127, 113–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashburn, A. (1980) ‘Machine Tool Technology’,American Machinist 124, 105–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beercheck, R. (1979) ‘Machine Tools: Cutting Edge of Technology’,Machine Design 51, 18–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Branson, W. H. and Monoyios, N. (1977) ‘Factor Inputs in US Trade’,Journal of International Economics 7, 111–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (1984) ‘The Development and Use of Machine Tools in Historical Perspective’,Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 5, 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (1989) ‘Small-Scale Industry at a Crossroads: U.S. Machine Tools in Historical Perspective’,Small Business Economics 1, 245–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. (1991) ‘Flexible Manufacturing and U.S. Trade Performance’,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 127, 300–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B., Audretsch, D. and Acs, Z. (1990) ‘Flexibility, Plant Size, and Industrial Restructuring’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),The Economics of Small Firms: European Challenge. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. (1991a) ‘What Makes the Automation Industry Strategic?’,Economics of Innovation and New Technology 1, 257–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. and Jacobsson, S. (1991b) ‘Technological Systems and Economic Performance: The Diffusion of Factory Automation in Sweden’, in D. Foray and C. Freeman (eds.),Technology and Competitiveness: The Dynamics of Created Advantages. Paris: OECD (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, B. and Taymaz, E. (1991) ‘Flexible Technology and Industrial Structure in the U.S.’, working paper, Case Western Reserve University and Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.

  • Chudnovsky, D. (1988) ‘The Diffusion and Production of Numerically Controlled Machine Tools with Special Reference to Argentina’,World Development 16, 723–732.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff, A. V. (1984) ‘Testing Trade Theories and Predicting Trade Flows’, in R. W. Jones and P. B. Kenen (eds.),Handbook of International Economics, Vol.1. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers, 467–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dertouzos, M., Lester, R. and Solow, R. (1989)Made in America. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J. H. (1981) ‘Explaining the International Direct Investment Position of Countries: Towards a Dynamic or Developmental Approach’,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 117, 30–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edquist, C. and Jacobsson, S. (1988)Flexible Automation: The Global Diffusion of New Technology in the Engineering Industry. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ehrnberg, E. and Jacobsson, S. (1991) ‘Technological Discontinuities, Industry Structure and Firm — Strategy — The Cases of Machine Tools and Flexible Manufacturing Systems’, working paper, Chalmers University of Technology.

  • Eliasson, G., Sharefkin, M. and Ysander, B.-C. (1983)Policy Making in a Disorderly World Economy. Stockholm: Industrial Institute for Economic and Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fransman, M. (1986b) ‘International Competitiveness, Technical Change, and the State: The Machine Tool Industry in Taiwan and Japan’,World Development 14, 1375–1396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, M. (1989)When the Machine Stopped: A Cautionary Tale from Industrial America. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S. (1986)Electronics and Industrial Policy: The Case of Computer Controlled Lathes. London: Allen & Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. T. (1983) ‘Machine Tools: Technical Change and the Japanese Challenge‘, Mimeo, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex.

  • Lipsey, R. E. and Weiss, M. Y. (1981) ‘Foreign Production and Exports in Manufacturing Industries’,Review of Economics and Statistics 63, pp. 488–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (1985)Product Innovation and User-Producer Interaction. Aalborg: Aalborg University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundvall, B.-A. (1988) ‘Innovation as an Interactive Process: From User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation’, in G. Dosi, C. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Silverberg, and L. Soete (eds.),Technical Change and Economic Theory. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • MEM (1988) ‘VRA Hamstrings Automakers’ Effort to Shift Local Production',Metalworking Engineering and Marketing, July, 33–37.

  • National Academy of Engineering (1983)The Competitive Status of the U.S. Machine Tool Industry: A Study of the Influences of Technology in Determining International Industrial Competitive Advantage. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, D. F. (1979) ‘Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools’, in A. Zimbalist (ed.),Case Studies on the Labor Process. New York: Monthly Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norusis, M. J. (1988)SPSS/PC + Advanced Statistics. Chicago: SPSS Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Brien, P. (1987) ‘Machine Tools: Growing Internationalisation in a Small Firm Industry,’Multinational Business 4, 23–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (1970)NC Machine Tools: Their Introduction in the Engineering Industries. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavitt, K. (1984) ‘Sectoral Patterns of Technical Change: Towards a Taxonomy and a Theory’,Research Policy 13, 343–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piore, M. and Sabel, C. (1984)The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1963) ‘Technological Change in the Machine Tool Industry, 1840–1910’,Journal of Economic History 23, 414–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, N. (1982)Inside the Black Box: Technology and Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, F. M. (1982) ‘Inter-Industry Technology Flows and Productivity Growth’,Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 627–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciberras, E. and Payne, B. (1985)The UK Machine Tool Industry: Recommendations for Industrial Policy. London: The Technical Change Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd, W. G. (1982) ‘Causes of Increased Competition in the U.S. Economy, 1939–1980’,Review of Economics and Statistics 64, pp. 613–626.

    Google Scholar 

  • Succar, P. (1988) ‘Learning by Doing and Factor Specificity’, Economics Department, University of Maryland, unpublished paper.

  • Taymaz, E. (1989) ‘Technological Capabilities and International Competitiveness: A Study on the Machine Tool Industry’, Ph.D. Thesis, Case Western Reserve University.

  • UN ECLA (1969) ‘Methodological and Operational Aspects of Machine Tool Studies in Developing Countries’, inDevelopment of Metalworking Industries in Developing Countries. New York: U.N.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (1974)The Machine Tool Industry. New York: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNIDO (1984)World Non-electrical Machinery. New York: UNIDO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Hippel, E. (1988)The Sources of Innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J., Jones, D. and Roos, D. (1990)The Machine That Changed the World. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamawaki H. and Audretsch, D. (1988) ‘Import Share under International Oligopoly with Differentiated Products: Japanese Imports in U.S. Manufacturing’,Review of Economics and Statistics 70, 569–579.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The authors would like to thank two anonymous referees for helpful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors and omissions are the responsibility of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carlsson, B., Taymaz, E. Technological capabilities and international competitiveness in the engineering industries. Rev Ind Organ 8, 293–313 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024236

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01024236

Key words

Navigation