Skip to main content
Log in

Employee-initiated defamation lawsuits: Organizational responses and dilemmas

  • Published:
Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The fast-growing category of defamation lawsuits in the United States involves actions by employees against their employers. Over the last decade, the courts have increasingly ruled in favor of the employee plaintiffs, thus creating an employee's right to reputation. This article identifies a variety of responses undertaken by organizations to reduce their legal liability and lessen the likelihood of employee defamation lawsuits. We argue that while organizational actions to reduce their legal liability may appear “rational,” such responses may also be creating situations in which employers, employees, and the public may be the unintended victims of a “law without justice.” The article concludes with a discussion of balancing the freedom necessary for managers to communicate about employees and the fairness of that communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bies, R. J. (1992).The manager as intuitive politician: Blame management in the delivery of bad news. Manuscript under review.

  • Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. S. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In Lewicki, R. J., Sheppard, B. H., & Bazerman, M. H. (Eds.),Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1, 53–55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bies, R. J., & Tyler, T. R. (1993). The “litigation mentality” in organizations: A test of alternative psychological explanations.Organization Science, 4, 352–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J., & Greenberg, J. (1990). The impact of layoffs on survivors: An organizational justice perspective. In Carroll, J. (Ed.),Applied social psychology and organizational settings (45–75). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buffolino v. L. I. Savings Bank, 2 IER Cases 895 (1987).

  • Cassin, R. L. (1985), December). Careless whispers: When communication is defamation.Management World, 14, 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Catagnera-Cain, J. (1987). Defamation and invasion of privacy actions in typical employee relations situations.Lincoln Law Review, 13, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis v. Ross, 754 F. 2d 80 (2. Circ. 1985).

  • Dun & Bradstreet v Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 105 S. Ct. 2939 (1985).

  • Eades, R. W. (1986). The school counselor or psychologist and problems of defamation.Journal of Law & Education, 15, 117–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Folger, R., & Bies, R. J. (1989). Managerial responsibilities and procedural justice.Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 2, 79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. M., & Reibstein, R. J. (1988).Negligent Hiring, Fraud, Defamation, and Other Areas of Employer Liability, Washington, DC: Bureau of National Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall v. Buck, 678 S. W. 2d 612 (1984).

  • Hamilton, A. J., & Usry, M. L. (1990), October–December). Small business alert: New development in defamation law.Business, 40, 25–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R. B. (1989). Defamation and negligence in the workplace.Labor Law Journal, 40, 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lammers, T. (1989, June). By the numbers: The new arithmetic of reference giving.Inc., 11, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, C. W., & Galle, W. P. (1989, August). “... And what was the reason for your departure?”Personnel Administrator, 34, 632–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langvardt, A. W. (1990, September/October). Defamation in the business setting: Basics and practical perspectives.Business Horizons, 33, 66–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, R. J. (1987). Defamation in the workplace: Employers beware.Hofstra labor Law Journal, 5, 45–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J. B., Ottley, B. L., & Mersol, G. V. (1989). Defamation and the workplace: A survery of the law and proposals for reform.Missouri Law Review, 54, 797–870.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States, 389 N. W. 2d 876 (Minn. 1986).

  • McClandless, S. R., & Lofholm, D. (1987, Summer). False and defamatory.The Brief, 12–15+.

  • Marshall v. Brown, 190 Cal. Rptr 392 (Cal. 1983).

  • Martin, D. C., & Bartol, K. M. (1987). Potential libel and slander issues involving discharged employees.Employee Relations Law Journal, 13, 43–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzberg, H. (1973).The Nature of Managerial Work. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, B. S., Barlow, W. E., & Hutch, D. D. (1991, September). Job reference liability of employers.Personnel Journal, 22.

  • Nobile, R. J. (1990, October). Termination and defamation.Personnel, 67, 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Novit, M. S. (1982, April-June). Defamation: Management's new predicament.Business, 2–7.O'Brien v. Papa Gino's, 1 IER Cases 459 (1986).

  • Ottley, B. L. (1987, November 11). Workplace growing source of suits.Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, 133, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozgar, G. D. (1986, January).On the grapevine.Health Care Supervisor, 4, 39–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prentice, R. A., & Winslett, B. J. (1987). Employee references: Will a “no comment” policy protect employers against liability for defamation?American Business Law Journal, 25, 207–239.Second Restatement of Torts. (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, A. M., & Lasek, M. (1991). Negligent hiring and defamation: Areas of liability related to pre-employment inquiries.Personnel Psychology, 44, 293–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sack, S. M. (1987, February). Defamation: A sales force liability.Small Business Report, 12, 78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shearer, R. A. (1990). The self-publication doctrine: Expanding employer defamation liability.Employee Relations Law Journal, 16, 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siefert v. El Paso Natural Gas Co., 567 S. W. 2d 77 (1978).

  • Sitkin, S. B., & Bies, R. J. (1993). The legalistic organization: Definitions, dimensions, and dilemmas.Organization Science, 4, 345–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E. (1983). Constitutional privilege and the college tenure committee.American Business Law Journal, 21, 351–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, G. E. (1984). Negligent misrepresentation in employee counseling.Employee Relations Law Journal, 10, 276–285.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stricharchuk, G. (1986, October 2). Fired employees turn the reason for dismissal into a legal weapon.The Wall Street Journal, 33.

  • Tidwell, J. A. (1986). Educator's liability for negative letters of recommendation.Journal of Law & Education, 15, 479–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • True v. Ladner, 513 A. 2d 257 (Me. App. 1986).

  • Turner, R. (1988). Compelled self-publication: How discharge begets defamation.Employee Relations Law Journal, 14, 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wagner v. Caprock Beefpackers Company, 540 S.W. 2d 303 (1976).

  • White, C. S., & Kleiman, L. S. (1991, August). The cost of candid comments,HR Magazine, 36, 54–56.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bies, R.J., Tripp, T.M. Employee-initiated defamation lawsuits: Organizational responses and dilemmas. Employ Respons Rights J 6, 313–324 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385020

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01385020

Key Words

Navigation