Skip to main content
Log in

Rent-seeking and pesticide legislation

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a test of the Appelbaum and Katz (1987) rent-seeking model, in which rents are endogenous. The Appelbaum-Katz model is theoretically modified to correspond to our empirical application, in which rent-seeking and rent-avoiding coalitions are attempting to influence legislators' votes on pesticide regulations. Probit estimations are used to analyze the legislators' votes on two bills to amend pesticide legislation (a proxy for rent). Empirical results generally support the rent-seeking determinants identified in the model. Tobit estimation is used to investigate campaign contributions by the coalitions to the legislators. These contributions are a proxy for rent-seeking activities. Again, the model is supported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abler, D.G. (1991). Campaign contributions and House voting on sugar and dairy legislation.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (February): 11–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Almanac of American Politics. (1986). Washington, DC: National Journal.

  • Amemiya, T. (1984). Tobit models: A survey.Journal of Econometrics 24 (January/February): 3–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Farm Bureau Federation. (1988). Membership data by state.

  • Appelbaum, E. and Katz, E. (1986). Transfer seeking and avoidance: On the full costs of rent seeking.Public Choice 48(2): 175–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, E. and Katz, E. (1987). Seeking rents by setting rents: The political economy of rent seeking.Economic Journal 97 (September): 685–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosso, C. (1987).Pesticides and politics: The life cycle of a public issue. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, H. (1979).The economics of campaign finance: An empirical study. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, H. (1981). Conflict of interest and congressional voting: A note.Public Choice 37 (2): 331–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chappell, H. (1982). Campaign contributions and congressional voting: A simultaneous probittobit model.Review of Economics and Statistics 64 (February): 77–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Quarterly. (1986).Almanac: 99th Congress, 2nd Session, 1986, Volume 42. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gianessi, L. (1986).A national pesticide usage database. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersch, P.L. and MacDougall, G.S. (1988). Voting for “sin” in Kansas.Public Choice 57 (May): 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger, A.O. (1974). The political economy of the rent-seeking society.American Economic Review 64 (June): 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1987). Why pesticides received extensive use in America: A political economy of agricultural pest management to 1970.Natural Resources Journal 27 (Summer): 533–578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddala, G.S. (1983).Limited dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pindyck, D.S. and Rubinfeld, D.L. (1981).Econometric models and economic forecasts. Second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, R.A. (1975). The social costs of monopoly and regulation.Journal of Political Economy 83 (August): 807–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra Club. (1988). Membership data by state.

  • Tullock, G. (1967). The welfare costs of tariffs; monopolies, and theft.Western Economic Journal 5 (June): 224–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tullock, G. (1980). Efficient rent seeking. In J.M. Buchanan, R.D. Tollison, and G. Tullock (Eds.),Toward a theory of the rent-seeking society, 97–112. College Station: Texas A & M.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1980).1980 Census of population. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1987a).Census of agriculture. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1987b).Local area personal income. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Commerce. (1987c).Statistical abstract of the United States. Washington, DC: Bureau of the Census.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Federal Election Commission. (1985/1986). Campaign contributions data.

  • Wise, S. and Johnson, S.R. (1991). A comparative analysis of state regulation for use of agricultural chemicals. In R.E. Just and N. Bockstael (Eds.),Commodity and resource policies in agricultural systems, 46–71. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wise, S.J. (1991). Rent-seeking in pesticide policy. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We have profited from comments provided by an anonymous referee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wise, S.J., Sandler, T. Rent-seeking and pesticide legislation. Public Choice 78, 329–350 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047762

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01047762

Keywords

Navigation