Skip to main content
Log in

Incubating superphosphate in ‘dry’soil can reduce its effectiveness

  • Published:
Fertilizer research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Single superphosphate was incubated for six months at 25°C in soil which had been subject to one of three moisture treatments. These were: dried in a glasshouse, dried at a constant temperature of 25°C, or moist soil. Phosphorus (P) effectiveness was then compared with effectiveness of P from freshly-applied superphosphate using yields of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and triticale (×Triticosecale) tops in pot experiments.

Incubation in soil which had been dried at 25°C did not decrease the effectiveness of the P. Incubation in moist soil decreased it to about 20% of the effectiveness of freshly-applied P in one case and to about 50% in the other case. Incubation in soil which had been dried in a glasshouse also decreased its effectiveness. The decrease varied with conditions, but in two cases the P was 70% as effective as freshly-applied P, and in one case only 45% as effective. Presumably sufficient moisture was present in the soil dried in the glasshouse to enable water-soluble P present in the fertilizer to react with the soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AOAC (1975) Official Methods of Analysis, 12 edn. Association of Official Analytical Chemists Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ (1974) The slow reactions between soils and anions: 1. Effects of time, temperature, and water content of a soil on the decrease in effectiveness of phosphate for plant growth. Soil Sci 118; 380–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow N J (1983) A mechanistic model for describing the sorption and desorption of phosphate by soil. J Soil Sci 34: 733–750

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ Campbell NA (1972) Methods of measuring residual value of fertilizers. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 12: 502–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ & Mendoza RE (1990) Equations for describing sigmoid yield responses and their application to some phosphate responses by lupins and by subterranean clover. Fert Res 22: 181–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow NJ & Shaw TC (1976) Sodium bicarbonate as an extractant for soil phosphate. III. Effects of the buffering capacity of the soil for phosphate. Geoderma 16: 273–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA & Baker MJ (1987) Increases in soil water content decreases the residual value of superphosphate. Aust J Exp Agric 27: 571–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Bowden JW, D'Antuono MF & Gilkes RJ (1984) The current and residual value of superphosphate, Christmas Island C-grade ore, and Calciphos as fertilizers for subterranean clover pasture. Fert Res 5: 335–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolland MDA, Gilkes RJ & Allen DG (1988) The residual value of superphosphate and rock phosphates for lateritic soils and its evaluation using three soil phosphate tests. Fert Res 15: 253–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley R VG, Barrow NJ & Shaw TC (1992) The reaction between phosphate and dry soil.I. The effect of time, temperature and dryness. J Soil Sci 43: 749–758

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramley R GV & Barrow NJ (1992) The reaction between phosphate and dry soil.II. The effect of time, temperature and moisture status during incubation on the amount of plant available P. J Soil Sci 43: 759–766

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell JD (1963) The estimation of phosphorus fertilizer requirements of wheat in southern New South Wales by soil analysis. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 3: 190–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Day PR (1965) Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. In Black CA (ed) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1. Agronomy Monograph No. 9. Am Soc Agron, Madison, WI, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton K & Vomocil JA (1954) The dissolution and migration of phosphorus from granular superphosphate in some Michigan soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 18: 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehr JR, Brown WE & Brown EH (1959) Chemical behaviour of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23: 3–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay WL & Stephenson HF (1959) Nature of the reactions of monocalcium phosphate monohydrate in soils. I. The solutions that reacts with the soil. Soil Sci Soc Am Proc 23: 12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • McArthur WM & Bettenay E (1960) The development and distribution of the soils of the Swan Coastal Plain, Western Australia. CSIRO Division of Soils, Soils Publication No. 16

  • Northcote (1979) A Factual Key for the Recognition of Australian Soils' 4th edn. Rellim Tech Public, Glenside, South Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozanne PG & Shaw TC (1967) Phosphate sorption by soils as a measure of the phosphate requirement for pasture growth. Aust J Agric Res 29: 225–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd CL & Barrow NJ (1973) The effectiveness of several methods of applying superphosphate on yield response by wheat. Aust J Exp Agric Anim Husb 13: 430–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (1975) Soil Taxonomy: a basic system of Soil Classification for Making and Interpretmg Soil Surveys. US Dept Agric Handbook No. 436 Govt Printing Office, Washington DC, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkley A & Black IA (1934) An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci 34: 29–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver DM Ritchie GSP & Gilkes RJ (1992) Phosphorus sorption by gavels in lateritic soils. Aust J Soil Res 30: 319–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams CH (1969) Moisture uptake by surface-applied superphosphate and movement of the phosphate and sulphate into the soil. Aust J Soil Res 7: 307–316

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bolland, M.D.A., Barrow, N.J. Incubating superphosphate in ‘dry’soil can reduce its effectiveness. Fertilizer Research 44, 205–215 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750927

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00750927

Key words

Navigation