Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

What has Philosophy to Offer to Chemistry?

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper asks about the reasons for the neglect of chemistry in modern philosophy of science and investigates in how far this science can be the object of an autonomous philosophical reflection. It is argued that from a culturalistic point of view chemistry indeed offers a field of interesting questions ranging from the reconstruction of its epistemological objects to the elucidation of the semantic functions of terms like "atom" or "molecule". It is further argued that the philosophical reflection upon chemistry has important consequences for the didactic, the history and even the ethics of this science, making thus philosophy to a partner of chemistry in fulfilling its purposes in human society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • R. Carnap (1974), Der logische Aufbau der Welt', Frankfurt, Berlin, Wien.

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Carrier (1986), ‘Die begriffliche Entwicklung der Affinitätstheorie’ im 18. Jahrhundert. Newtons Traum und was daraus wurde, Arch. Hist. Ex. Sci. (1986) 36: 327–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • S. Dittus and M. Mayer (1991), ‘Bibliographie Chemie und Geisteswissenschaften’, in: J. Mittelstrass und G. Stock (Hrsg.) Chemie und Geisteswissenschaften, Berlin 1992, S. 217–333.

  • D. Hartmann (1990), Konstruktive Fragelogik, Mannheim (a.o.).

  • D. Hartmann (1993), Naturwissenschaftliche Theorien, Mannheim (a.o.).

  • D. Hartmann and P. Janich (1996), ‘Methodischer Kulturalismus’, in: D. Hartmann and P. Janich (eds.), Methodischer Kulturalismus. Zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, Frankfurt.

  • P. Janich (1985), ‘Die Eindeutigkeit der Massenmessung und die Definition der Trägheit’, Philosophia Naturalis 22: 87–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Janich (1987), ‘Voluntarismus, Operationalismus, Konstruktivismus. Zur pragmatischen Begründung der Naturwissenschaften’, in: H. Stachowiak (ed.), Pragmatik. Handbuch pragmatischen Denkens Vol. II: 233–256, Hamburg.

  • P. Janich (1989), Euklids Erbe — Ist der Raum dreidimensional?, München.

  • P. Janich (1992), Grenzen der Naturwissenschaft, München.

  • P. Janich (1994), ‘Protochemie’, J. Gen. Philos. Sci. 25: 71–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G. Keil (1993), Kritik des Naturalismus, Berlin and New York.

  • P. Kitcher (1992), ‘The naturalists return’, Philos. Rev. 101: 53–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U. Klein. ‘Do we need a philosophy of chemistry?’, in: N. Psarros and K. Gavrogloy (eds.), Ars mutandi — Issues in Philosophy and History of Chemistry, Würzburg, forthcom.

  • D. Koppelberg (1995), ‘Naturalismus, Pragmatismus, Pluralismus. Grundströmungen in der analytischen Erkenntnis-und Wissenschaftstheorie seit W.V. Quine’, in: H. Stachowiak (ed.), Pragmatik. Handbuch pragmatischen Denkens Vol. II: 144–178, Hamburg.

  • P. Lorenzen (1969), Normative Logic and Ethics. Mannheim and Zürich.

  • P. Lorenzen (1987), Lehrbuch der konstruktiven Wissenschaftstheorie, Mannheim (a.o.).

  • Nola (1994), ‘There are more things in heaven and earth Horatio, than are dreamt of in your philosophy: A dialogue on Realism and Constructivism’, Studies in Hist. and Philos. of Science 25: 689–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K.R. Popper (1989), Logik der Forschung, Tübingen.

  • N. Psarros (1995), ‘The constructive approach to the philosophy of chemistry’. Epistemologia XVIII: 27–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Psarros (1996), ‘De:Die Chemie als kulturelle Errungenschaft —berlegungen zu einer methodischen Chemiegeschichtsschreibung’, in: D. Hartmann and P. Janich (eds.), Methodischer Kulturalismus — Zwischen Naturalismus und Postmoderne, Frankfurt.

  • N. Psarros. ‘The tiniest parts of... — The concept of atom and molecule in chemistry, physics, and biology’, in: P. Janich and N. Psarros (eds.), The Autonomy of Chemistry, Würzburg, forthcom.

  • W. V. O. Quine (1980), From a logical point of view, Cambridge, Mass. And London.

  • K. Ruthenberg and N. Psarros (1994), ‘Frantisek Wald und die phänomenologische Chemie’, Mitteilungen der Fachgrappe Geschichle der Chemie der GDCh 10/1994: 17–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Scerri (1997), ‘Bibliography on philosophy of chemistry’, Synthese 111: 305–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. van Brakel (1996), ‘Uber die Vernachlässigung der Philosophie der Chemie’, in: N. Psarros, K. Ruthenberg and J. Schummer (eds.), Philosophie der Chemie — Bestandsaufnahme und Ausblick, Würzburg.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Philipps-Universität Marburg Fachbereich 03 Institut für Philosophie, D-35032, Marburg, Germany

    Nikos Psarros

Authors
  1. Nikos Psarros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Psarros, N. What has Philosophy to Offer to Chemistry?. Foundations of Science 3, 183–202 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009611009965

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009611009965

Search

Navigation