Skip to main content
Log in

Pulsing Interial Oscillation, Supercell Storms, and Surface Mesonetwork Data

  • Published:
Journal of Engineering Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pulsing inertial oscillation (PIO) model is a nonlinear, time-dependent, translating vortex solution of the inviscid, compressible fluid dynamic equations in the middle troposphere. The translation of this vortex during a pulse is strikingly similar to that of a supercell storm – a rotating thunderstorm that can generate tornadoes and hail. Two studies were performed to test the hypothesis that some supercell storms are manifestations of a PIO pulse. The first study applied the model to an intense interior draft whose buoyancy was bounded by a temperature excess of ± 12 K. The peak updraft speed achieved was 41·5 m s−1 and the peak Rossby number was 92·9. The study also pointed to an advanced concept for attaining higher values. The second study applied the PIO model to a supercell storm as a whole and succeeded in replicating its bulk properties, such as mesocylonic circulation, net mass and moisture influxes, and time track. This study also identified a critical feature of the PIO model that could be tested against storm data: The average vertical draft is downward before the turn in the storm track and upward afterwards. In the conventional theory, the average vertical draft is upward from storm inception until dissipation. These differing draft predictions were compared with the best available data, which are surface mesonetwork data. These data were found to support the PIO model. However, surface data alone are not conclusive, and further measurements are warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. T. Fujita and H. Grandoso, Split of a thunderstorm into anticyclonic and cyclonic storms and their motion as determined from numerical model experiments. J. Atmos. Sci.25 (1968) 416-439.

    Google Scholar 

  2. W. Ferrel, A Popular Treatise on the Winds. New York: John Wiley (1889) 505 pp.

  3. J. M. Wallace and P. V. Hobbs, Atmospheric Science, An Introductory Survey. New York: Academic Press (1977) 467 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  4. B. R. Morton, Geophysical vortices. Progress in Aeronautical Sciences, Vol. 7, (D. Kuchemann, ed.). Pergamon Press (1966) 145-194.

  5. J. R. Holton, An Introduction to Dynamic Meteorology.Third edition. New York: Academic Press (1992) 511 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. P. Davies-Jones, Tornado dynamics. Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics. Second Edition. (E. Kessler, ed.) vol. 2. Thunderstorms: A Social, Scientific, and Technological Documentary. Univ. of Oklahoma Press. London (1986) 197-236.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Bengtsson and J. Lighthill (eds.), Intense Atmospheric Vortices. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (1982) 326 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  8. E. Kessler (ed.), Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics. Second edition. Vol. 2. Thunderstorms: A Social, Scientific, and Technological Documentary. Univ. of Oklahoma Press. London (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  9. P. S. Ray (ed.), Mesoscale Meteorology and Forecasting. Amer. Meteor. Soc. (1986) 793 pp.

  10. J. B. Klemp, Dynamics of tornadic thunderstorms. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech.19 (1987) 369-402.

    Google Scholar 

  11. C. Church, D. Burgess, C. Doswell, and R. Davies-Jones (eds.), The Tornado: Its Structure, Dynamics, Prediction, and Hazards. Geophysical Monograph 79. American Geophysical Union (1993) 637 pp.

  12. R. E. Schlesinger, A three-dimensional numerical model of an isolated deep thunderstorm. Part II: Dynamics of updraft splitting and mesovortex couplet evolution. J. Atmos. Sci. 37 (1980) 395-420.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. A. Brown, Initiation and evolution of updraft rotation within an incipient supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci. 49 (1992) 1997-2014.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. A. Maddox, An evaluation of tornado proximity wind and stability data. Mon. Wea. Rev.104 (1976) 133-142.

    Google Scholar 

  15. J. B. Klemp and R. B. Wilhelmson, Simulations of right-and left-moving storms produced through storm splitting. J. Atmos. Sci. 35 (1978) 1097-1110.

    Google Scholar 

  16. D. K. Lilly, The development and maintenance of rotation in convective storms. In: L. Bengtsson and J. Lighthill (eds.), Intense Atmospheric Vortices. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag (1982) 149-160.

    Google Scholar 

  17. L. J. Wicker and R. B. Wilhelmson, Simulation and analysis of tornado development and decay within a three-dimensional supercell thunderstorm. J. Atmos. Sci. 52 (1995) 2675-2703.

    Google Scholar 

  18. R. C. Costen and L. V. Stock, Inertial oscillation of a vertical rotating draft with application to a supercell storm. NASA TP-3230 (1992) 47 pp. with 8-minute video supplement available.

  19. G. B. Foote and J. C. Fankhauser, Airflow and moisture budget beneath a northeast Colorado hailstorm. J. Appl. Meteor. 12 (1973) 1330-1353.

    Google Scholar 

  20. J. C. Fankhauser, G. M. Barnes, L. J. Miller, and P. M. Roskowski, Photographic documentation of some distinctive cloud forms observed beneath a large cumulonimbus. Bull. Amer.Meteor. Soc. 64 (1983) 450-462.

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. A. Knight (ed.), The cooperative convective precipitation experiment (CCOPE), 18 May-7 August 1981. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc. 63 (1982) 386-398.

    Google Scholar 

  22. C. G. Wade, A quality control program for surface mesometeorological data. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 4 (1987) 435-453.

    Google Scholar 

  23. L. J. Miller, J. D. Tuttle, and C. A. Knight, Airflow and hail growth in a severe northern high plains supercell. J. Atmos. Sci. 45 (1988) 736-762.

    Google Scholar 

  24. R. Rotunno and J. B. Klemp, The influence of the shear-induced pressure gradient on thunderstorm motion. Mon. Wea. Rev.110 (1982) 136-151.

    Google Scholar 

  25. D. K. Lilly, The structure, energetics and propagation of rotating convective storms. Part II: Helicity and storm stabilization. J. Atmos. Sci. 43 (1986) 126-140.

    Google Scholar 

  26. W. Menke and D. Abbott, Geophysical Theory. New York: Columbia Univ. Press (1990) 458 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  27. G. J. Haltiner and F. L. Martin, Dynamical and Physical Meteorology. New York: McGraw-Hill (1957) 470 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. A. Brandes, Finestructure of the Del City-Edmond tornadic mesocirculation. Mon. Wea. Rev.109 (1981) 635-647.

    Google Scholar 

  29. G. L. Darkow, Basic thunderstorm energetics and thermodynamics. In: E. Kessler (ed.), Thunderstorm Morphology and Dynamics. Second edition. vol. 2. Thunderstorms: A Social, Scientific, and Technological Documentary. London: Univ. of Oklahoma Press (1986) 59-73.

    Google Scholar 

  30. M. Urabe, Nonlinear Autonomous Oscillations. New York: Academic Press (1967) 330 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  31. C. W. Newton and H. R. Newton, Dynamical interactions between large convective clouds and environment with vertical shear. J. Meteor. 16 (1959) 483-496.

    Google Scholar 

  32. R. Davies-Jones, Useful formulas for computing divergence, vorticity, and their errors from three or more stations. Mon. Wea. Rev.121 (1993) 713-725.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Costen, R.C., Miller, L.J. Pulsing Interial Oscillation, Supercell Storms, and Surface Mesonetwork Data. Journal of Engineering Mathematics 34, 277–300 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004319330013

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004319330013

Navigation