Skip to main content
Log in

Pollution, abatement and balanced growth

  • Published:
Environmental and Resource Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The analysis of endogenous growth models with pollution often concentrates on steady state trajectories, under the assumption that the steady state is in some sense stable. In the present note we provide examples showing that this issue should be dealt with carefully. We use the Rebelo “Ak” model augmented with a stock of pollutants causing a negative externality. It is found that optimal growth is not necessarily balanced (contrary to the outcome of the standard Rebelo model). Moreover, the existence of the externality may affect long run optimal growth rates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barro, J. (1990), ‘Government Spending in a Simple Model of Endogenous Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 98(5), S103-S125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bovenberg, A. and S. Smulders (1993), ‘Environmental Quality and Pollution Saving Technological Change: A Two-Sector Endogenous Growth Model’, mimeo, Tilburg University.

  • Brock, W. and J. Scheinkman (1976), ‘Global Asymptotic Stability of Optimal Control Systems with Applications to the Theory of Economic Growth’,Journal of Economic Theory 12, 164–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forster, B. (1973), ‘Optimal Capital Accumulation in a Polluted Environment’,Southern Economic Journal 39, 544–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottinger, H. (1993), Two essays in energy economics: long run investment and technical progress in dynamic and vintage models.

  • Gradus, R. and S. Smulders (1993), ‘The Trade-off between Environmental Care and Long-Term Growth-Pollution in Three Prototype Growth Models’,Journal of Economics 58, 25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofkes, M. (1993), ‘Some Notes on the Concept of Sustainable Development in Endogenous Growth Models’, mimeo, Free University, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huijberts, H. and C. Withagen (1992), ‘Local Asymptotic Stability of Optimal Steady States’,Economics Letters 40, 7–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, E., M. Spencer, and R. Zeckhauser (1971), ‘The Optimal Control of Pollution’,Journal of Economic Theory 4, 19–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. E. (1988), ‘On the Mechanics of Economic Development’,Journal of Monetary Economics 22, 3–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marrewijk, Ch., C. de Vries, and C. Withagen (1992), ‘Optimal Localized Production Experience and Schooling’,International Economic Review 33, 91–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michel, P. and G. Rotillon (1993), ‘Pollution's Disutility and Endogenous Growth’, mimeo, Université de Paris.

  • Ploeg, F. v.d. and C. Withagen (1991), ‘Pollution Control and the Ramsey Problem’,Environmental and Resource Economics 1, 215–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ploeg, F. van der, J. Verbeek, and C. van Marrewijk (1993), ‘Pollution, Abatement and Endogenous Growth’, mimeo, Erasmus University, Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebelo, S. (1991), ‘Long Run Policy Analysis and Long Run Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 99, 500–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, P. M. (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long Run Growth’,Journal of Political Economy 94, 1002–1037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smulders, S. and R. Gradus (1993), ‘Pollution Abatement and Long-Term Growth’, mimeo, Tilburg University.

  • Vellinga, N. (1993), ‘Endogenous Growth and the Environment: Increasing Returns to Scale and Human Capital’, mimeo, Eindhoven University of Technology.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The author is grateful to an anonymous referee for comments. All remaining errors are the author's sole responsibility.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Withagen, C. Pollution, abatement and balanced growth. Environ Resource Econ 5, 1–8 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691906

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00691906

Key words

Navigation