Abstract
Implementation of the Kyoto Protocol will require theestablishment of procedures for monitoring,verification and certification of carbon offsetprojects. In this paper, the steps required forindependent certification of forestry-based carbonoffset projects are reviewed, based on the proceduresused by the international certification companySociété Générale de Surveillance.Firstly, a project must be evaluated for itssuitability in relation to eligibility criteria of theKyoto Protocol. These eligibility criteria areclassified under four headings: (a) acceptability tohost country parties and international agreements; (b)additionality, in terms of demonstrated positivegreenhouse gas effects additional to the`business-as-usual' case; (c) externalities orunwanted side effects; and, (d) capacity to implementproject's activities. Secondly, the scientificmethodology for calculating the carbon offsets and themethodology for data collection and statisticalanalysis must be evaluated. Additionally, the amountof carbon offsets quantified must be adjusted toreflect the uncertainty associated with themethodology and data used. Only when these steps havebeen completed can carbon offsets be certified.Finally, the paper discusses the importance ofstandardization of methods and procedures used forproject monitoring and verification, and the need foraccreditation to ensure that the activities ofcertifiers are regulated.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baumert, K.A.: 1998, The Clean Development Mechanism: Understanding Additionality, Draft Working Papers, CSDA, FIELD,World Resources Institute, pp. 23–31.
Brown, P., Cabarle, B. and Livernash, R.: 1997, Carbon Counts: Estimating Climate Change Mitigation in Forestry Projects, Washington DC, World Resources Institute.
Brown, S., Burnham, M., Delaney, M., Vaca, R., Powell, M. and Moreno, A.: 2000, 'Issues and challenges for forest-based carbon-offset projects: a case study of the Noel Kempff climate action project in Bolivia', Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 99–121 (this issue).
Carter, L.: 1997, 'Modalities for the Operationalization of Additionality', Paper presented at the UNEP/German Federal Ministry of Environment Workshop on AIJ, Leipzig.
Faeth, P., Cort, C. and Livernah, R.: 1994, Evaluating the Carbon Sequestration Benefits of Forestry Projects in Developing Countries, Washington DC, World Resources Institute.
Greenhouse Challenge Office: 1998, Greenhouse Challenge Carbon Sinks Workbook, Canberra, Australia, Greenhouse Challenge Office, Australian Greenhouse Office.
Hargrave, T., Helme, N. and Puhl, I.: 1999, Options for Simplifying Baseline Setting for Joint Implementation and Clean Development Mechanism Projects, Unpublished paper, Washington DC, Center for Clean Air Policy.
Higman, S., Bass, S., Judd, N., Mayers, J. and Nussbaum, R.: 1999, The Sustainable Forestry Handbook, London, Earthscan.
IPCC: 1995, Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Paris, OECD.
JIRC (Joint Implementation Registration Centre of the Netherlands): 1997, Joint Implementation, Registration and Certification Procedure, Ministry of Environment of the Netherlands, the Hague, the Netherlands.
MacDicken, K.: 1996, A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Sequestration in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects, Working paper 96/04, USA, Winrock International Institute for Agricultural Development.
Moura-Costa, P.H.: 1993, 'Large scale enrichment planting with dipterocarps. Methods and preliminary results', in K. Suzuki, S. Sakurai and K. Ishii (eds.), Proceedings of the Yogyakarta Workshop, BIO-REFOR/IUFRO/SPDC: Bio-reforestation in Asia-Pacific Region, Tokyo, BIO-REFOR, pp. 72–77.
Moura-Costa, P.H. and Stuart, M.D.: 1998, 'Forestry-based greenhouse gas mitigation: a short story of market evolution', Commonwealth Forestry Review 77, 191–202.
Moura-Costa, P.H., Stuart, M.D. and Trines, E.: 1997, 'SGS forestry's carbon offset verification service', in P.W.F. Riermer, A.Y. Smith and K.V. Thambimuthu (eds.), Greenhouse gas mitigation. Technologies for activities implemented jointly. Proceedings of Technologies for AIJ Conference, Vancouver, Oxford, Elsevier, pp. 409–414.
Moura-Costa, P. and Wilson, C.: 2000, 'An equivalence factor between CO2 avoided emissions and sequestration-Description and applications in forestry', Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 51–60 (this issue).
Putz, F.E. and Pinard, M.A.: 1993, 'Reduced impact logging as a carbon-offset method', Conservation Biology 7, 755–757.
SGS (Société Générale de Surveillance): 1998, Final Report of the Assessment of Project Design and Schedule of Emission Reduction Units for the Protected Areas Project of the Costa Rican Office for Joint Implementation, Oxford, SGS, 133 pp.
Tattenbach, F.: 1996, 'Certifiable, tradeable offsets in Costa Rica', Joint Implementation Quarterly, 2, No. 2.
Tipper, R. and de Jong, B.H.: 1998, 'Quantification and regulation of carbon offsets from forestry: comparison of alternative methodologies, with special reference to Chiapas, Mexico', Commonwealth Forestry Review 77, 219–228.
Trines, E.: 1998, 'SGS's Carbon offset verification service', Commonwealth Forestry Review 77, 209–213.
Upton, C. and Bass, S.: 1995, The Forest Certification Handbook, London, Earthscan.
USIJI: 1994, The United States Initiative on Joint Implementation, Internal Document, US Department of Energy, Washington DC, US Department of Energy.
Verweij, J.: 1994, 'Forests absorbing carbon dioxide emissions (Face). One of the response strategies of the Dutch electricity generating companies towards global warming', in Proceedings of the Symposium on Joint Implementation of Environmental Projects, Groningen, the Netherlands, 5 pp.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moura Costa, P., Stuart, M., Pinard, M. et al. Elements of a certification system for forestry-based carbon offset projects. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 5, 39–50 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009656501414
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009656501414