Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetrics and gynecology: progress and limitations

  • Invited Papers
  • Published:
Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The introduction of phase-array coils, fast spin echo, and certain other pulse sequences together with use of contrast agents has refined the application of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in pelvic disease. It makes management decisions in a number of benign conditions including uterine anomalies, adenomyosis, and leiomyomas of the uterus and endometriosis, especially in the context of infertility; it facilitates identification and characterisation of adnexal masses. In uterine malignancy, the multiplanar capability and excellent soft tissue contrast permit accurate assessment of depth of tumor invasion, tumor volume, and extension to adjacent structures. Its precise role in the management of primary and recurrent ovarian cancer remains to be decided. In pelvic malignancy, contrast facilitates identification of viable tumor but does not improve tissue specificity. In obstetrics, MRI is an attractive alternative to X-ray pelvimetry and assists in the evaluation of associated uterine and pelvic pathology. The use of echo-planar imaging eliminates movement artifact and has the potential to complement ultrasound in the assessment of fetal abnormalities and provide a method of identifying growth retardation from volume measurements of body organs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Milestone B, Schnall MD, Lenkinski RE, Kressell H (1991) Cervical carcinoma; MR imaging with an endorectal surface coil.Radiology 180 91–95.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pellerito JS, McCarthy SM, Doyle MD et al. (1992) Diagnosis of uterine anomalies: relative accuracy of MR imaging; endovaginal sonography and hysterosalpingog-raphy.Radiology 183 795–800.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Yamashita Y, Torashima M, Takahashi M et al. (1993) Hyperintense uterine leiomyomata at T2 weighted imaging: differentiation with dynamic enhanced MR imaging.Radiology 189 721–725.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Asher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH et al. (1994) Adenomyosis: prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography.Radiology 190 803–806.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell A, Worthington BS, Powell MC, Symonds EM (1993) The role of MRI in the evaluation of endometriosis.Br J Radiol 66 41–42.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Powell MC, Womack C, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) Pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging of stage I endometrial carcinoma.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93 353–360.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sironi S, Colombo E, Villa G (1992) Myometrial invasion by endometrial carcinoma: assessment with plain and Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging.Radiology 185 207–212.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell MC, Worthington BS, Sokal M et al. (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging: its application to cervical carcinoma.Br J Obstet Gynaecol 93 1276–1285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Sironi S, De Cobelli F, Scarfone G et al. (1993) Carcinoma of the cervix: value of plain and Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging in assessing degree of invasiveness.Radiology 188 797–801.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yamashita Y, Takahashi M, Sawada T (1992) Carcinoma of the cervix: dynamic MR imaging.Radiology 182 643–648.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kim SH, Kim SC, Choi BI et al. (1994) Uterine cervical carcinoma: evaluation of pelvic node metastasis with MR imaging.Radiology 190 807–811.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stevens S, Hricak H, Stern JL (1991) Ovarian lesions: detection and characterization with Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging.Radiology 181 481–488.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Amindola MA (1985) The role of CT in the evaluation of ovarian malignancy.Crit Rev Diagnost Imaging 24 329–368.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hanley P, Worthington BS, Powell MC, Symonds EM (1989) An assessment of the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and staging of suspected primary ovarian carcinoma.Br J Radiol 62 585.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kerslake RW, Worthington BS, Powell MC et al. (1990) A prospective comparison of MRI and immunoscintigraphy with Ocl25 in detecting recurrent ovarian carcinoma. Radiology177: (P)242.

  16. Worthington BS, Powell MC, Buckley J, Symonds EM (1985) The assessment of placental site and geometry by magnetic resonance imaging. Radiology157: (P)323.

  17. Kier R, McCarthy SM, Scoutt LM et al. (1990) Pelvic masses in pregnancy: MR imaging.Radiology 176 709–713.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hricak H, Chang YC, Cann CE, Paner JT (1990) Cervical incompetence: preliminary evaluation with MR imaging.Radiology 174 821–826.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Powell MC, Buckley J, Worthington BS, Symonds EM (1986) Magnetic resonance imaging and hydatidiform mole.Br J Radiol 59 561–564.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson IR, Stehling MK, Blamire AM et al. (1990) A study of the internal structure of the human fetus in-utero by echo planar magnetic resonance imaging.Am J Obstet Gynaecol 163 601–607.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baker PN, Johnson IR, Gowland P et al. (1994) Accurate in-utero weight estimation using echo planar imaging.Lancet 343 644–645.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Worthington, B.S. Magnetic resonance imaging in obstetrics and gynecology: progress and limitations. MAGMA 2, 247–251 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705248

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01705248

Keywords

Navigation