Published since January 1, 2008

Law and Development Review

ISSN: 1943-3867

Editor-in-chief: Y. S. Lee

Submit manuscript

About this journal

Objective
The Law and Development Review (LDR) is distinguished from other law and economics journals in that its primary focus is the development aspects of international and domestic legal orders. Economic development concerns not only the interests of developing countries but also the economic future and the security of developed countries.

The journal helps exchange views globally on this important subject, particularly on the gap between the developed and developing worlds. LDR helps facilitate future global negotiations concerning the economic development of developing countries and sets out future directions for law and development studies.

The journal seeks top-quality articles on law and development issues broadly, particularly from the developing world as well as from the developed world. LDR’s editorial board includes top scholars and professionals from all parts of the developed and developing worlds.

The LDR is sponsored by the Law and Development Institute. For more information please visit the Institute's website.

News
The Editor of the LDR, Prof. Y.S. Lee, published the new edition of the treatise on law and development entitled, "Law and Development: Theory and Practice (Second Edition)". Please follow the link for more information: https://www.routledge.com/Law-and-Development-Theory-and-Practice/Lee/p/book/9780367546854.

The Law and Development Institute and the National University of Singapore Center for Asian Legal Studies co-host the 2023 Law and Development Conference on Dec. 8-9 in Singapore. The Conference addresses a broad range of law and development issues post the pandemic. The conference program and registration information is available online at https://lawanddevelopment.net/2023-conference/.

The Editor of LDR, Prof. Y.S. Lee published a new book, Sustainable Peace in Northeast Asia (Anthem Press, 2023). The book examines the political, economic, and historical causes of constant tensions in Northeast Asia and explores a lasting solution from the perspective of each constituent country in the region. Please follow the link for more information: https://anthempress.com/sustainable-peace-in-northeast-asia-hb.

Topics

Law and development
Developing and developed countries
International and domestic legal orders
Economy
Security

Article formats
Scholarly articles, comments and reviews

Your Benefits

Free Access Available!

Interested readers can access LDR full content for free: Simply go to https://www.degruyter.com/accessLink/ACCESSLDR (ACCESSLDR). You will then have free access to all articles. Note: you will need to register or have a registered user account with De Gruyter to access free access token link.

Similar links are provided on select De Gruyter titles so that you can enjoy access to a number of De Gruyter law and economics journals.

Further benefits:

Special attention to development aspects of international and domestic legal orders
Globally important subject
Top international reviewers

Abstracting and Indexing

Law and Development Review is covered by the following services:

Baidu Scholar
Cabells Journalytics
CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
CNPIEC - cnpLINKer
Dimensions
EBSCO (relevant databases)
EBSCO Discovery Service
EconBiz
ECONIS
ERIH PLUS (European Reference Index for the Humanities and Social Sciences)
Genamics JournalSeek
Google Scholar
Hein Online
IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
J-Gate
JournalGuide
JournalTOCs
KESLI-NDSL (Korean National Discovery for Science Leaders)
MyScienceWork
Naver Academic
Naviga (Softweco)
Primo Central (ExLibris)
ProQuest (relevant databases)
Publons
QOAM (Quality Open Access Market)
ReadCube
RePEc (Research Papers in Economics): IDEAS, EconPapers
Scilit
SCImago (SJR)
SCOPUS
Semantic Scholar
Sherpa/RoMEO
Summon (ProQuest)
TDNet
Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
WanFang Data
Web of Science - Emerging Sources Citation Index
WorldCat (OCLC)
X-MOL
Yewno Discover

Supplementary Materials

Topics

External Links

Online Submission of Manuscripts

Volume 17 Issue 1

February 2024

Publicly Available February 7, 2024

Frontmatter

Page range: i-iv

Download PDF

Articles

March 30, 2023

An Empirical Study of Regulatory Capture in Kenya’s Maize Seed Sector

Lodewijk Guido K. Van Dycke, Harriet Mawia, Pieter Rutsaert, Jason Donovan

Page range: 1-45

Abstract

In sub-Saharan Africa, public sector breeding programs depend on local seed companies to deliver new maize varieties to farmers. Such varieties are needed to adapt cropping systems to climate change. While dozens of small and medium seed companies have emerged in the last two decades, the maize seed market in Kenya remains dominated by the parastatal seed company Kenya Seed Company, with multinational seed companies making major inroads. We assess whether parastatal and multinational seed companies have captured Kenya’s seed laws to the detriment of local small and medium seed companies (‘regulatory capture’), negatively effecting competition and the capacity of local companies to introduce new varieties in the hybrid maize seed market. We conducted in-depth interviews based on legal clauses with maize seed companies active in Kenya, as well as interviews with regulators and stakeholders. Results show that local companies do not feel disadvantaged compared to their multinational counterparts or the parastatal. However, all of them are wary of the entry of new actors. Moreover, through excessive procedures, the Kenyan government keeps a sovereign grasp over the seed sector. Despite frustrations with some of these excessive procedures, seed companies felt comfortable in the protective environment of the Kenyan seed market and were generally happy with the technical aspects of Kenya’s seed laws, which are based on international norms. We suggest some improvements to make Kenyan seed laws more conducive to varietal turnover, in line with seed companies’ suggestions and taking into account the political sensitivities of the Kenyan government.

Publicly Available April 3, 2023

Leveraging the Belt and Road Initiative for Green Investments: The Case of Bangladesh

Zaker Ahmad, Sanjana Hoque

Page range: 47-91

More Download PDF

Abstract

Despite there being a well-documented need, as well as opportunity, to enhance foreign direct investment (‘FDI’) inflow to climate-friendly (‘green’) economic activities in Bangladesh, the reality portrays a stark contrast. Nowhere is it more obvious than the evolving investment relationship between China and Bangladesh under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Originally under the rubric of the Bangladesh-China-India-Myanmar (BCIM) economic corridor, and later under the garb of the BRI, Chinese investments in Bangladesh have predominantly ended up in fossil fuel-based sectors. Even after the advent and expansion of the ‘green BRI’ initiative, reality has not changed much. This article offers an assessment of investment inflows from China to Bangladesh under the BRI umbrella against the backdrop of a growing green investment trend and the existing applicable legal framework. It finds that key legal and policy challenges that prevent leveraging of the BRI for green investment into Bangladesh include: an uncoordinated approach from the government, a disregard for the role of economic policy instruments for climate action, and politically motivated, as well as path-dependent decision-making with respect to investment promotion. This paper suggests that ambitious climate commitments combining economic policy tools, along with a more integrative and holistic domestic approach to climate action and investment promotion, can help shift the status quo.

April 24, 2023

Repeating the Mistakes of the Law and Development Movement in Afghanistan

Nandini Ramanujam, Alexander Agnello

Page range: 93-116

Abstract

The rapid collapse of the Afghan state did not come as a surprise to those who are well-versed in the chequered history of the Law and Development Movement. While the Movement’s one-size-fits-all modernization project has been largely rejected, such misguided efforts continue under the aims of “building the Rule of Law” or “improving governance.” The fallout from the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan is a stark reminder for states and multilateral organizations not to overlook the lessons of the Movement that may have been obscured by the different banners under which state- and market-building efforts have been pursued. From the Movement’s sincere yet naïve efforts of state-building between the 1950s and 70s, to its swing to build and support markets under the Washington Consensus paradigm in the 80s and 90s, and a later emphasis on good governance through state institutions from the 2000s onwards, it is clear that top-down state-building efforts have had limited success. The paper argues that the failure of the Afghanistan mission may have been avoided if the U.S. had turned to the lessons learned from the law-and-institutions-building enterprises of the past 70 years. Instead, the failure to heed these lessons led to the building of a state akin to a house of cards. By overlooking the importance of embedded cultural institutions, the legitimacy of the state as perceived by its people, and the dynamic interaction between formal and informal institutions, the state-building project in Afghanistan was bound to fail. Following the takeover by the Taliban, the small gains made in Afghanistan over the past two decades on the issues of hunger, poverty, health, and education have seen rapid deceleration and require urgent attention. The critiques outlined in this paper, informed by the experience of the Law and Development Movement, are meant to inform, not discourage, global engagement in advancing the human development agenda in Afghanistan and other fragile contexts.

June 5, 2023

Differential Treatment and Inequalities under the Sustainable Development Goals: Beyond Preferential Market Access

Johanna Aleria P. Lorenzo

Page range: 117-154

Abstract

Reducing inequality in its multiple dimensions is key to sustainability. Under the United Nations 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, one way to meet the goal of narrowing gaps between and within countries is by implementing the special and differential treatment (SDT) principle. The most concrete and well-established implementation of this principle within international trade law is through the Enabling Clause, which authorizes wealthy States to grant, under specified conditions, preferential market access to select developing countries. Yet commentators, consisting primarily of economists and developing-country representatives, argue that tariff preferences are often inadequate to grow the economies of many in the Global South, much less to reduce inequalities. A legal perspective that could bolster this argument remains sparse. This article fills said gap by explaining that while international trade law operationalizes the SDT principle with a heavy emphasis on tariff preferences, the principle is additionally expressed in several other provisions under the other World Trade Organization (WTO) covered agreements: Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade; Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures; Agreement on Trade Facilitation. These under-studied provisions demonstrate crucial but overlooked aspects of the SDT principle, namely, capacity-building and international assistance and cooperation. Therefore, critically analyzing these provisions is important to ascertain whether and how implementation of the SDT principle can reduce inequalities and support sustainable development. This legal analysis contributes in two ways to the broader inquiry about the role of international trade law in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). First, on a practical level, the article suggests legal bases or sources for additional indicators needed to better measure and monitor progress in reaching the target. Second, the analysis reveals a necessity to revisit and further scrutinize assumptions underlying the legal mechanisms within the trade regime that States and other relevant actors are using to pursue valuable global objectives.

June 26, 2023

Indonesian Job Creation Law: Neoliberal Legality, Authoritarianism and Executive Aggrandizement Under Joko Widodo

Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara, Syahriza Alkohir Anggoro, Imam Koeswahyono

Page range: 155-197

Abstract

On October 5, 2020, President Joko Widodo (Jokowi) passed Law no. 11/2020 on Job Creation (Job Creation Law/JCL) designed to improve Indonesia’s private investment climate. The law changed various legal landscapes that were identified as obstacles to accelerated development and economic growth. However, the Law has sparked widespread protests because it can potentially encourage environmental damage, exacerbate workers’ vulnerability and increase socioeconomic inequality. Describing JCL as a neoliberal legality project, this paper explores the elected executive’s role in mobilizing authoritarian state practices through disciplinary measures that undermine democratic accountabilities. It is argued that the configuration between the pre-existing illiberal democracy and Jokowi’s autocratic tendencies offers predatory business alliances an adequate legal and institutional platform to formulate a neoliberal legal breakthrough while eliminating resistance to them. Through a socio-legal analysis of the three areas targeted by the JCL amendments, we further argue that Jokowi’s success in advocating for his preferred neoliberal agenda hinges on what is called an executive aggrandizement strategy. This is characterized by interventions designed to safeguard the neoliberal legality preferences promoted by the elected executive from the disruption of meaningful checks and balances in the future, thereby deepening the features of authoritarian statecraft. This paper contributes to an advanced understanding of the bleak picture of Indonesian democracy over the past few years by proposing neoliberal legality as one of the ingrained legal characteristics of Jokowi’s authoritarian regime.

December 28, 2023

Oil Transnational Corporations and the Legacy of Corporate-Community Conflicts: The Case of SEEPCO in Nigeria

Martin-Joe Ezeudu

Page range: 199-232

Abstract

This paper examines the nature, impact, ramifications, and root causes of the corporate-community resource conflict in Anambra’s oil-bearing communities. It approaches this objective from the standpoint that such a conflict may be appropriately termed “a legacy of oil transnational corporations” in Nigeria, given their antecedents in the Niger Delta region. Unlike the existing literature that blames such conflicts for the most part on environmental, socio-economic, and political factors, with limited emphasis on the legal factors, this paper takes the position that an unhealthy legal apparatus of the Nigerian state and regulatory gaps in Nigeria’s oil industry provide the enabling environment that makes the conflict inevitable. Essentially, this paper tweaks the “resource curse” theory as espoused by mainstream political economists by demonstrating that, apart from greed and grievance, the “curse” is equally underpinned by inept legal structures and regulatory gaps that show little regard for good governance and the well-being of the local people in host communities. But two possible solutions are proffered. One is the institutionalization of a statutory scheme for consultation with the local communities before appropriation of their lands for oil production projects, and the other is encouraging the participation of indigenous peoples or indigenous entities in the development of their natural resources, following the example of Orient Petroleum Resources Plc.

January 17, 2024

The Constitutional Relevance of the ECHR in Domestic Law: The Kosovo Perspective

Përparim Gruda, Mentor Borovci

Page range: 233-261

Abstract

This article examines the status and importance of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) and European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) Jurisprudence in the national legal system of the Republic of Kosovo. This will be accomplished by pursuing two main paths: first, by a doctrinal analysis of the constitutional status of the ECHR and the Jurisprudence of the ECtHR in Kosovo and, second, through a closer examination and analysis of specific cases as to the level of their (non) implementation by the Constitutional Court and regular courts of Kosovo. Even though Kosovo is not a member of the Council of Europe and has not ratified the ECHR, the ECHR has a specific and privileged place in the legal system of Kosovo and is part of its constitution. This makes Kosovo a very special case regarding the technique chosen for the incorporation of international instruments for human rights in its internal legal order. Public authorities in Kosovo agree to the obligation that the scope and meaning of fundamental rights should always be determined based on the standards established in Strasbourg. However, implementing these Strasbourg-derived standards is not simple or easy. Some of the elements identified for the application of these standards in internal judicial practice include the degree and measure of implementation, the methodology of choosing cases, the methods of interpretation, and local legal culture. This article, explains these elements by analyzing statistical data and specific court cases.

Notes

June 29, 2023

Double Impact: A Macroeconomic Study of the Crossed Influences Between Climate Change and Business Tourism

Mohamed Kayal

Page range: 263-295

Abstract

International tourism is a main sector of economy that witnesses continuous and tremendous growth in developed and developing countries and expresses destabilization by several factors including climate change. Being considered as a sensitive sector to climate, tourism shows, through several criteria such as number of arrivals and receipts, an influence by environmental and socioeconomic modifications. This article will outline the interrelationships between climate change phenomenon and the business component of the international tourism. Three focal elements that were developed through literature on the effects of climate change for tourism will be critically reviewed: climate change and temporal shifts in tourism demand, climate-inducted change and destination competitiveness within the major market segment of business tourism, and future tourist mobility. The review will develop the differential weakness of tourism destinations and the consequence in competitiveness that will transform some international markets. This will be relevant to explain why destinations will need to adapt to the risks and opportunities posed by climate change. Despite several elements illustrating progress in the past years, an important gap of knowledge in each of the major impact areas needs to be looked into in order to indicate to the concerned tourist the necessity for a well preparation toward challenges of climate change.

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Ahead of Print / Just Accepted

Volume 17 (2024)

Issue 1

Volume 16 (2023)

Volume 15 (2022)

Volume 14 (2021)

Volume 13 (2020)

Volume 12 (2019)

Volume 11 (2018)

Volume 10 (2017)

Volume 9 (2016)

Volume 8 (2015)

Volume 7 (2014)

Volume 6 (2013)

Volume 5 (2012)

Volume 4 (2011)

Volume 3 (2010)

Volume 2 (2009)

Issue 1

Volume 1 (2008)

Issue 1 Special Inaugural Issue (2008)

CiteScore	0.9	2022, Scopus (Elsevier B.V., 2023)

More information about journal rankings

Submit

Submission
Online Submission of Manuscripts

Your benefits of publishing with us

Top peer-reviewed journal with worldwide circulation and readership
Wide abstracting and indexing
Broad topics
Top academic reviewers
Every article easily discoverable because of Search Engine Optimization (SEO) and comprehensive abstracting and indexing services
Secure archiving by De Gruyter and the independent archiving service Portico
Professional sales and marketing activities

Submission process
Submit your paper via our Online Submission Tool according to LDR Information for Authors

Double-anonymous peer review process
Timely decision on your paper
Technical or editorial assistance will be provided on request

Please note

All submissions to the LDR should be in English and of the quality expected in a scholarly English-language journal
Footnotes should follow LDR Citation Guidelines
Before submitting your article, carefully read our Publication Ethics Statement
Initial submissions may be checked for plagiarism via Crossref Similarity Check
Our repository policy allows you to distribute 30 PDF copies of your published article to colleagues (the PDF has to include the information that it is an author's copy). Please also feel free to distribute the link to the online abstract (the DOI)
If you have any general questions please visit our FAQ page for authors

Editorial

Editor-In-Chief
Y. S. Lee, The Law and Development Institute, USA

Editorial Board Members
William Alford, Harvard Law School, USA
Douglas Arner, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law, Hong Kong
Tomer Broude, Faculty of Law and Department of International Relations, Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Julien Chaisse, City University of Hong Kong School of Law, Hong Kong
Ha-Joon Chang, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge, U.K.
Won-Mok Choi, College of Law, Ewha Womans University, South Korea
Robert Cooter, University of California at Berkeley School of Law, USA
Diogo Coutinho, University of São Paulo, Brazil
Philipp Dann, Humboldt University Faculty of Law, Germany
Simon Deakin, University of Cambridge Faculty of Law, U.K.
Melaku Desta, University of Leicester School of Law, U.K.
Jan Erk, University of Pretoria, South Africa
Salim Farrar, University of Sydney Law School, Australia
James Gathii, Loyola University Chicago School of Law, USA
Gary Horlick, former head of U.S. Department of Commerce Import Administration, USA
William Hubbard, University of Chicago Law School
David Kennedy, European Law Research Center, Harvard Law School, USA
Andrew Lang, School of Law, Edinburgh University, U.K.
Chang Hee Lee, School of Law, Seoul National University, South Korea
Jai S. Mah, Graduate School of International Studies, Ewha Womans University, South Korea
Mitsuo Matsushita, University of Tokyo Faculty of Law, and former member of the WTO Appellate Body, Japan
Petros Mavroidis, Columbia Law School, University of Neuchatel, and CEPR, USA
Bryan Mercurio, Chinese University of Hong Kong School of Law, Hong Kong
Junji Nakagawa, Institute of Social Science, University of Tokyo, Japan
Andreas Neef, University of Auckland, Development Studies, Australia
Colin Picker, University of Wollongong Faculty of Law, Australia
Balakrishnan Rajagopal, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, International Development Group, USA
Dani Rodrik, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, USA
Susan Rose-Ackerman, Law School and Department of Political Science, Yale University, USA
Alvaro Santos, Georgetown University Law Center, USA
Alan O. Sykes, Stanford Law School, USA
Yasuhei Taniguchi, Kyoto University, and former member of the WTO Appellate Body, Japan
Veronica Taylor, Australian National University, Australia
Joel Trachtman, The Fletcher School, Tufts University, USA
Michael Trebilcock, University of Toronto Law School, Canada
Edwin Vermulst, Partner, Vermulst, Verhaeghe, and Graafsma and Editor-in-Chief, Journal of World Trade, Brussels
Jiangyu Wang, City University of Hong Kong, School of Law, Hong Kong
Klaus Ziegert, University of Sydney Law School, Australia

(Deutsch)

Online ISSN: 1943-3867
Print ISSN: 2194-6523
Type: Journal
Language: English
Publisher: De Gruyter
First published: January 1, 2008
Publication Frequency: 2 Issues per Year
Audience: Scholars, policy makers, practitioners, students interested in law and development broadly