ALBERT

Notes: SUMMARY. Three methods of mapping macrophytes on short sections of river are described and compared. All methods involve setting up a 1-m grid system over the site using permanent stakes to locate a series of temporary strings. The first method (detailed mapping), which generates a map, uses the grid system to locate accurately the position of macrophytes and substrata on the river bed. It is very time consuming and objectivity in mapping is difficult to achieve. The second method (points method) involves recording the macrophytes and substratum below each intersection of the 1-m grid system covering the study site. This method is fast, capable of giving estimates of percentage cover for the different substrata and macrophytes but does not produce a map. The third method (rectangles method) is regarded as both the most efficient and also the most objective of the three mapping procedures. The substratum or macrophyte dominating each 50 × 100 cm rectangle of river bed is recorded together with additional substrata and macrophytes present. The procedure is rapid to use in the field, provides a simplified map of the study site and is more amenable to detailed analysis than the two previous methods. All three mapping methods are best suited to rivers less than 20 m wide where safe wading and good visibility can be guaranteed.

Notes: SUMMARY. The growth and recession of the macrophytes on an unshaded section of the R. Lambourn was documented by a mapping procedure from March 1971 to December 1976. The seasonal patterns were determined mainly by the dominant macrophytes. Ranunculus penicillatus var. calcareus and Ranunculus peltatus. Ranunculus grew rapidly in spring and early summer, mainly colonizing areas of gravel and reached a summer maximum. The greatest loss of plants was in August and September but losses continued through the winter to give minimum cover in March. Berula and Callitriche did not show regular seasonal growth patterns but their growth was largely confined to times when there was little growth of Ranunculus. Increase in area of Ranunculus in the spring was positively correlated with the mean discharge at that time. The growth of Ranunculus appeared to be restricted when shading was caused by turbid water due to dredging or by accumulation of epiphytic algae on the surface of the plants in years when discharge was low. Discharge also influenced the substrata underlying Ranunculus and the area of silt under Ranunculus beds was negatively correlated with discharge. The factors thought to influence growth of Ranunculus were used to develop a conceptual model of growth.

Notes: 1. Temporal changes in a series of habitats and their macroinvertebrate assemblages were examined on a 50-m section of a chalk stream in Berkshire, England between June 1975–79 and June 1997–2001.2. The site was part of a trout fishery in 1975–79, when river management included instream weed cutting together with control of bankside trees and riparian vegetation. Management ceased in the 1980s and by 1997–2001, the site was heavily shaded by trees and riparian vegetation.3. The mean area of instream macrophytes decreased by 50% between the first and second sampling period. In contrast, gravel and silt increased and invading marginal vegetation formed a new habitat.4. Changes in macroinvertebrate family richness between sampling periods were scale dependant. Although there were, on average, significantly more families in individual replicates in 1975–79 than in 1997–2001, total family richness for the site in each year did not differ significantly between sampling periods.5. Sixty families of macroinvertebrates were recorded during the study, 50 in both sampling periods, 53 in 1975–79 and 57 in 1997–2001. This small increase in site family richness may be due to the invading marginal plants.6. Total macroinvertebrate abundance was significantly lower in the second sampling period. A major drought in 1976 resulted in significantly higher densities of macroinvertebrates, partly through the exploitation of epiphytic diatoms by chironomid larvae. A drought in 1997 failed to elicit a similar response because of the limited macrophytes and diatoms under heavy shading by trees and marginal vegetation.7. Significant increases in important shredders and decreases in some scrapers between the early and later sampling years largely reflected changes in available food resources.8. Whereas macroinvertebrate family richness has been conserved under the recent ‘no management’ regime, the site is now less attractive as a fishery because of poor access and lower densities of some macroinvertebrates taken by brown trout.

Notes: SUMMARY. 1. Prior to 1975 Dugesia tigrina, an Americati immigrant triclad, was known from only a few flowing water sites in Great Britain. Since then it has been found in a large number of lowland rivers and canals in England and Wales, and in 1985 it was reported from the lower reaches of the River Tweed in Scotland.2. This note gives the recorded distribution of D. tigrina up to the end of 1985 (115 10 km squares now occupied) and summarizes the environmental conditions at a subset of twenty-five sites where D. tigrina occurs.3. Information on the native triclads at sites recently colonized by D. tigrina is used as a basis for speculating on the rivers most vulnerable to the future spread of this species.4. Possible methods of dispersal of D. tigrina and the features which make it a successful colonist are discussed.

Notes: SUMMARY. A new sampler is described combining the advantages of both box and Surber samplers. The sample area is 200 × 250 mm (0.05 m2) and the device has been used to sample the benthos of rivers to a depth of c. 60 mm where the substratum consists of particles with diameters of 50 mm or less. The basic design may be used in water up to 0.5 m in depth, but with an optional top unit this depth may be increased to 1 m. Aquatic macrophytes can also be sampled either on their own or together with the underlying substratum. Results from sampling programmes designed to estimate macrophyte biomass, the biomass of the macroinvertebrate community and the density of Gammarus pulex are given as examples of the flexibility of the sampler on a variety of biotopes.

Notes: SUMMARY. 1. Macro-invertebrate species lists were obtained for 268 sites on forty-one river systems throughout Great Britain by qualitative sampling in spring, summer and autumn. Information on twenty-eight environmental variables was also collated for each site. The sites were ordinated on the basis of their species content using detrended correspondence analysis (DCA) and classified by two-way indicator species analysis (TWINSPAN). Correlation coefficients between ordination scores and single environmental variables indicated that Axis 1 distinguished between types of rivers and Axis 2 reflected variation along the length of rivers. A preliminary classification of sites into sixteen groups has been proposed, together with a key which allows new sites to be classified. Information on the species and environmental features which characterize each group is also presented.2. Multiple discriminant analysis (MDA) was employed to predict the group membership of the 268 sites using the twenty-eight environmental variables. 76.1% of sites were classified correctly. An independent assessment of predictive ability using forty test sites yielded a 50% success rate. Predictive ability was higher for the classification presented in this paper than in fifteen additional classifications produced using data from single seasons and/or different taxonomic treatments.3. TWINSPAN and MDA were found to be useful approaches to the classification of running-water sites by their macro-invertebrate fauna and the prediction of community type (as indicated by the occurrence of species in the sites comprising the group) using environmental variables. Extension of the scope of the classification, coupled with the use of additional environmental variables to increase predictive ability, is now in progress.

Notes: SUMMARY. 1. Macro-invertebrate samples were collected from 268 running-water sites in Great Britain in each of three seasons (spring, summer and autumn). A combined seasons’treatment was generated by amalgamating the individual seasons’data. These four seasonal options were each subjected to four distinct taxonomic analyses differing in level of identification and whether the data were quantitative or qualitative. Thus sixteen data-sets were available for analysis. Environmental data on physical and chemical variables, macrophyte cover and date of sampling were also recorded for each site.2. All sixteen data-sets were ordinated by detrended correspondence analysis and classified by two-way indicator species analysis. There were strong correlations between the sixteen ordinations and significant concordance between classifications.3. The relationships between ordination scores and single environmental variables were investigated. Muhiple discriminant analysis was used to fit environmental data to eight selected classifications covering the full range of seasonal and taxonomic treatments. The environmental variables most useful in distinguishing between rivers were substratum characteristics, alkalinity and total oxidized nitrogen. Within-river differences were often highly correlated with discharge, distance from source, width and depth. Slope and altitude contributed strongly to both between-river and within-river distinctions.4. Between-site variation (beta diversity), eigenvalues of ordination, the reliability of classifications, the proportion of sites correctly assigned to their biological group using environmental data and the standardized similarity between observed and predicted fauna were all higher when identifications were taken to species level, rather than one of three family treatments. Qualitative data on a reduced list of families gave comparable or better results than more detailed family treatments.5. Combined seasons’data enabled better categorization and prediction than single season's.6. The values of the Czekanowski Index of Similarity between the observed and predicted fauna of test sites were close to realistic maximum values.7. Recommendations are made concerning potential usages of the various classifications. The species level classification has uses in the field of conservation and in the prediction of biological response to environmental change. The family level classifications have value in developing local site inventories and in the interpretation of pollution surveillance programmes.

Notes: SUMMARY 1. The EC Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC) recognises the need for biological monitoring. Indices derived from standard samples of macroinvertebrates are frequently used for the appraisal of the ecological quality of rivers. However, information on the errors or chance variation that can influence the value of an index is also important.2. This paper describes a study to quantify the observed sampling variation in three ecological indices based on the Biological Monitoring Working Party (BMWP) score system across a wide range of river types and qualities. The indices are number of BMWP taxa, BMWP score and Average Score Per Taxon (ASPT).3. The study sites were selected to encompass the four major groups within the River InVertebrate Prediction And Classification System (RIVPACS) site classification for Britain. Within each group, four sites which differed in ecological quality grade were chosen (total of 16 sites). At each site three standard RIVPACS samples were taken in each of spring, summer and autumn by trained staff. In each season, two samples were taken by one biologist and the third by a different individual to allow for within and between-operator variation.4. The effects of sampling variation within a season on the number of taxa, BMWP score and ASPT across all sites, irrespective of operator, could be represented by some simple parameters. We found that the sampling SD of the square root of the number of taxa, square root of BMWP score and the untransformed ASPT were roughly constant in each case, irrespective of site type or quality. For each index, SD for two and three seasons combined samples were smaller than for single season samples.5. Inter-operator influences on sample values were negligible (4–12% of total sampling SD) in this study. This underlines the importance of adequate training for all staff involved in extensive monitoring programmes which use standard procedures from one year to the next, but may involve different staff.6. Indices for number of taxa, BMWP score and ASPT were all estimated with greater precision from combined season samples than from the averages of two or three seasons' samples.7. This study enables us to estimate confidence intervals for the values of the number of taxa, BMWP score and ASPT based on single season, two or three season combined samples collected using standard RIVPACS procedures for any river site in Britain. The results can also be used in simulation models which incorporate the effects of sampling variation into assessments of the ecological quality of river sites based on the ratio of observed to RIVPACS expected values of these BMWP indices.