ALBERT

Description: Introduction: Patients (pts) infected with HIV have a 6-8 fold increased risk of classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL). Incidence may have increased with the implementation of combined anti-retroviral therapy (cART) in the mid 1990s. Frontline therapy for HIV-associated cHL (HIV-cHL) using, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) in the pre-cART era showed a 2 year overall survival (OS) of 48%, but outcomes are currently similar to the non-HIV population. Pts with advanced disease have a 30% chance of relapse with ABVD. Brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 an antibody drug conjugate that selectively induces apoptosis of CD30+ cells with a complete response of 34% in patients with relapsed/refractory cHL. An international trial of BV with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (AVD) vs. ABVD is ongoing. Here we present the phase I portion of the first trial using BV with AVD in the upfront treatment of HIV-cHL. The Phase II portion is actively accruing in both the United States and France as part of an AIDS Malignancy Consortium (AMC)/Lymphoma Study Association (LYSA) collaboration. Methods: The Phase I was a 3+3 dose de-escalation design evaluating 3 dose levels of BV (1.2 mg/kg, 0.9 mg/kg, and 0.6 mg/kg) every 2 weeks combined with standard, fixed doses of doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 (AVD) in a 28 day cycle. Eligibility: HIV+ pts diagnosed with untreated cHL stage II-IV with CD4 counts ≥50 cells/mm3 were required to take cART regimens for at least 1 week before treatment. Ritonavir, zidovidine, and cobisistat were excluded. Baseline, cycle 2, and post treatment PET/CT scans were required. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined during cycle 1. Results: Sixpts (5 men and 1 woman) were treated in the phase I portion from 3/2013-5/2015. Staging: II (n=1), III (n=1) IV (n=4). Pathology: mixed cellularity (n=2), nodular sclerosis (n=3), and lymphocyte depleted/mixed cellularity (n=1) HIV-cHL. The median CD4 T cell count at lymphoma diagnosis was 499 cells/mm3 (range 86-784) and the median viral load was 44 copies/ml (range 20-77). No cycle 1 DLTs were identified in the first 6 eligible patients and only 3 grade 3 adverse events in later cycles were noted, pneumonia, n=1, and neuropathy n=2, and neutropenia, n=1. In 2 pts, toxicity required delays in therapy of over 3 weeks (after c5d1 and after c6d1) resulting in subject removal from further protocol therapy. One pt had a decrease in the diffusion lung capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) to 65% after cycle 2, and BV was withheld while AVD continued as per protocol. Two pts were later deemed ineligible, and excluded from any analysis, due to the concomitant use of ritonavir-based cART at enrollment. Both developed febrile neutropenia and one developed a grade 3 pancreatitis during cycle 1, emphasizing the importance of not treating patients with BV + AVD with concurrent CYP3A4 inhibitors. Five of the 6 pts achieved cycle 2 PET/CT negativity as defined by a Deauville score 1-3. The PET/CT positive patient ultimately had a negative post-therapy scan. The 5 pts who completed therapy achieved CR post-therapy, and one patient has yet to complete treatment. Phase II is enrolling at BV 1.2 mg/kg in combination with AVD. Conclusions: AVD-BV in stage II-IV HIV-cHL was well-tolerated therapy as no DLT were identified. Five of the 6 patients achieved a negative C2 PET/CT and 5/5 of the patients who completed therapy thus far achieved a CR. The recommended Phase II dose is 1.2 mg/kg +AVD every other week. The phase II portion (51 subjects) is actively accruing in both the USA and France, in an AMC/LYSA collaboration, clinicaltrials.gov NCT01771107. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Description: First relapse of B-ALL in children and AYAs is a vexing clinical problem with high rates of subsequent relapse and death using conventional treatment approaches. This is especially true in patients with early relapse [high risk (HR), defined as marrow relapse

Description: Background: Blinatumomab, a CD19/CD3 bispecific T cell engager antibody construct, leads to improved outcomes in patients with R/R CD19+ ALL compared to standard chemotherapy. However, most adults fail to achieve complete remission (CR) with blinatumomab, and the median duration of remission is only 7.3 months. Preclinical studies have shown significantly increased PD-L1 expression on leukemic blasts in patients who are refractory to or relapse after response to blinatumomab. Additionally, expression of the exhaustion markers PD-1 and TIM-3 on bone marrow (BM) CD3+ T cells is significantly higher among ALL patients than controls. The addition of PD-1 blockade +/- CTLA-4 blockade to blinatumomab and ALL blasts in vitro leads to increased T cell proliferation and enhanced blinatumomab-mediated cytotoxicity (Feucht et al, Oncotarget 2016). Thus, blockade of co-inhibitory pathways represents a viable strategy to enhance blinatumomab efficacy. We describe early results of a multi-center phase I study combining blinatumomab with monoclonal antibodies targeting PD-1 (nivolumab) +/- CTLA-4 (ipilimumab) in R/R CD19+ ALL. Methods: This phase I dose-escalation study evaluates the safety and tolerability (MTD) of blinatumomab in combination with nivolumab +/- ipilimumab using a 3+3 design. Patients ≥16 years-old with R/R CD19+ Pre-B ALL or MPAL are eligible including those with prior blinatumomab and/or prior allogeneic transplant (allo-SCT). Patients ≥60 years may be untreated and those 16-21 must be R/R to ³2 lines of therapy. The trial started at dose level (DL) A1 (Fig. 1). Upon determining the MTD for the combination of blinatumomab and nivolumab, dose escalation will add ipilimumab (DLB1). Patients may receive up to 5 cycles of blinatumomab and 1 year of nivolumab/ipilimumab. Patients achieving CR may proceed to allo-SCT. Patients removed from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (days 1-10) will be replaced. Results: As of July 31, 2018, 8 adults (4 males/4 females) had enrolled at DLA1. The median age was 55 (range, 25-75) and baseline BM blast percentage was 73% (range, 8-98%). Baseline characteristics are presented in Figure 2. Seven patients received cytoreduction before treatment (6 steroids only and 1 steroids + Cytoxan). Two patients previously treated with blinatumomab were withdrawn from the study during the blinatumomab lead-in (1 for G3 pericardial effusion 2/2 disease progression and 1 for G3 hyperbilirubinemia). Among the 5 patients who received nivolumab to date, drug-related non-hematologic AEs of grade ≥3 included elevated AST (20%), ALT (20%), amylase (20%), and lipase (G4, 20%); hypophosphatemia (20%); rash (20%); infusion-related reaction (G4, 20%); and hypotension (20%). The elevated AST, ALT, amylase and lipase occurred prior to nivolumab dosing and resolved. One patient was removed from the study for a G4 infusion-related reaction following the 2nd dose of nivolumab that was considered a DLT. One patient in CR developed G4 neutropenia in cycles 2 + 3 but recovered spontaneously. Among the 5 evaluable patients, 4 (80%) achieved CR without MRD (2 after 1 cycle and 2 after 2 cycles of blinatumomab) with 3 ongoing remissions (median f/u 5 months) and 1 extramedullary relapse at day 125. Data on biomarkers including changes in T cell subpopulations in both BM and PB, and co-signaling molecule expression will be presented. Conclusions: Combination therapy with blinatumomab and nivolumab in R/R ALL with is feasible with acceptable toxicity. The MRD-negative CR rate was (80%) despite heavily pre-treated patients with significant baseline disease burden. The last patient treated at DLA1 is undergoing treatment before dose escalation to include ipilimumab. Disclosures DeAngelo: Shire: Honoraria; ARIAD: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Blueprint Medicines: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer Inc: Consultancy, Honoraria; Glycomimetics: Research Funding; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Luznik:WIndMIL Therapeutics: Equity Ownership, Patents & Royalties. Gojo:Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Research Funding; Merck inc: Research Funding; Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: Background:PD-1 and PD-L1/PD-L2 are expressed by malignant T-cells in mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS). PD-1 is additionally expressed by tumor-infiltrating cytotoxic T-cells and PD-L1 is expressed by macrophages and other stromal components of the tumor microenvironment in these diseases. Moreover, reports of 9p24.1/PD-L2 translocation and CTLA4-CD28 fusion events in MF/SS support a genomic basis for immune evasion. Here, we explore the clinical activity of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, in MF/SS. Methods:Patients (pts) with MF/SS stages IB-IV treated with at least 1 prior systemic therapy were enrolled in this phase 2, single-arm study coordinated by the Cancer Immunotherapy Trials Network (CITN). A Simon two-stage design was applied where stage 2 is initiated if 1 of 9 pts had an objective response. An additional 15 pts were planned in stage 2. Pembrolizumab was administered at 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks and treatment was allowed up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) as determined by the consensus global response criteria. Secondary endpoints were safety/tolerability, time to response (TTR), duration of response (DOR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Correlative biomarker studies included immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining for PD-L1, PD-L2, and multiple immune subsets as well as serum analysis of 62 cytokines and chemokines. Phenotypic and functional profiling of malignant and non-malignant immune cells will be performed by flow cytometry and mass cytometry (CyTOF). Results: The study completed enrollment and all 24 patients received at least one dose of pembrolizumab. Median age was 67 (range 44-85); 18 were male. Patients were advanced stage with 23 patients (96%) stage IIB or higher, including 15 patients (63%) with stage IVA SS. Most pts were heavily treated with a median of 4 prior systemic therapies (range 1-11). The median follow-up time was 40 weeks (range 9-60 weeks). The objective response rate (ORR) was 38% with 1 complete response (CR) and 8 partial responses (PR). Of the responding pts, 6 pts had 90% or greater improvement in skin disease as measured by mSWAT. An additional 9 pts (38%) had stable disease (SD). The median TTR was 11 weeks (range 8-41 weeks). Responses were durable with 8 of 9 (89%) responses currently ongoing at a median of 32 weeks of duration (4-46). The median PFS has not yet been reached, and the one-year PFS was 69%. There was no significant association between response and clinical characteristics including stage, disease type (MF vs. SS), and number of prior therapies, nor with skin tissue expression of PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, or infiltrating CD8+ T-cells as determined by IHC. Planned additional correlatives including CyTOF profiling, gene expression profiling, T cell receptor high throughput sequencing, multiplexed ion beam imaging (MIBI), and whole exome sequencing will explore potential predictive biomarkers of response. Adverse events (AE) were consistent with those seen in prior studies of pembrolizumab with the exception of an immune-mediated skin flare reaction seen in 6 pts (2 grade 2 and 4 grade 3). Skin flares occurred exclusively in patients with SS (6/15; 40%) and were associated with lower serum levels of the cytokines IL-7 and SCF prior to pembrolizumab treatment (p=0.01 and p=0.02 respectively, n.s. by Bonferroni correction). Pts with the skin flare reaction experienced increases in serum IFN-gamma, IL-12p40, IL-15, LIF, G-CSF, and CCL4 following treatment. There were two treatment related serious adverse events (SAE), both immune related. One pt experienced grade 2 pneumonitis which resolved with systemic corticosteroids. Another patient experienced grade 3 diarrhea secondary to steroid-refractory duodenitis. Conclusions: Pembrolizumab has significant clinical activity in pts with previously treated MF/SS. Responses were durable and were not associated with any identifiable clinical or pathologic characteristics. Treatment was well tolerated with a toxicity profile consistent with prior pembrolizumab studies, though 40% of pts with SS developed a notable skin flare reaction. These findings support further study of PD-1 blockade in the treatment of MF and SS. A phase 2 trial of pembrolizumab in combination with interferon-gamma is being developed based on these results. Disclosures Porcu: Millenium: Other: investigator in a clinical trial; miRagen: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; celgene: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial. Foss:Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Eisai: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Spectrum Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy. Moskowitz:Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria; Merck: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding. Sokol:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Spectrum: Consultancy. Yearley:Merck: Employment. Chartash:Merck: Employment. Townson:Merck: Employment. Horwitz:Spectrum: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Huya: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kyowa Hakka Kirin: Consultancy, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy; ADCT Therapeutics: Research Funding. Kim:Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Merck: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Neumedicine: Consultancy; Soligenix: Consultancy; Galderma: Consultancy; Genentech: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Innate Pharma: Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Kyowa Hakko Kirin: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other, Research Funding; Millenium: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Eisai: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Actelion: Consultancy, Other: Investigator in a clinical trial; Celgene: Consultancy; MiRagen: Consultancy; Horizon: Consultancy.

Description: Summary The exponential growth in available genomic data is expected to reach full sequencing of a million genomes in the coming decade. Improving and developing methods to analyze these genomes and to reveal their utility is of major interest in a wide variety of fields, such as comparative and functional genomics, evolution and bioinformatics. Phylogenetic profiling is an established method for predicting functional interactions between proteins based on similarities in their evolutionary patterns across species. Proteins that function together (i.e. generate complexes, interact in the same pathways or improve adaptation to environmental niches) tend to show coordinated evolution across the tree of life. The normalized phylogenetic profiling (NPP) method takes into account minute changes in proteins across species to identify protein co-evolution. Despite the success of this method, it is still not clear what set of parameters is required for optimal use of co-evolution in predicting functional interactions. Moreover, it is not clear if pathway evolution or function should direct parameter choice. Here, we create a reliable and usable NPP construction pipeline. We explore the effect of parameter selection on functional interaction prediction using NPP from 1028 genomes, both separately and in various value combinations. We identify several parameter sets that optimize performance for pathways with certain biological annotation. This work reveals the importance of choosing the right parameters for optimized function prediction based on a biological context. Availability and implementation Source code and documentation are available on GitHub: https://github.com/iditam/CompareNPPs. Contact yuvaltab@ekmd.huji.ac.il Supplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Description: Clinical trials in the past decade have established the antitumor effects of immune checkpoint inhibition as a revolutionary treatment for cancer. Namely, blocking antibodies to cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed death 1 or its ligand have reached routine clinical use. Manipulation of the immune system is not without side effects, and autoimmune toxicities often known as immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) are observed. Endocrine IRAEs, such as hypophysitis, thyroid dysfunction, and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, can present with unique profiles that are not seen with the use of traditional chemotherapeutics. In this Review, we discuss the current hypotheses regarding the mechanism of these endocrinopathies and their clinical presentations. Further, we suggest guidelines and algorithms for patient management and future clinical trials to optimize the detection and treatment of immune checkpoint–related endocrinopathies.

Description: Background: Current treatment of advanced stage Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) remains unsatisfactory. Complete responses (CR) are typically

Description: Introduction: Patients (pts) with HIV have a 6-fold increased risk of developing classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) over the general population. The outcome of frontline therapy for HIV-associated cHL (HIV-cHL) using doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) is similar to the non-HIV population. However, pts with advanced stage cHL continue to have a 30% chance of refractory/relapsed disease with ABVD. Brentuximab vedotin (BV) is an anti-CD30 antibody drug conjugate that selectively induces apoptosis of CD30+ cells. The FDA approved BV with AVD (BV-AVD) after the Echelon-1 (E1) study for advanced stage disease demonstrated improved modified progression free survival (mPFS) at 2 years compared with standard ABVD: 82% vs. 77%. Pts with HIV were excluded from both relapsed/refractory and frontline BV trials. Here we present the final results of the phase 2 trial of BV-AVD in previously untreated HIV-associated cHL, an AIDS Malignancy Consortium/LYSA collaboration (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT01771107). Methods: Forty-one pts were treated on days 1 and 15 of 6, 28 day cycles, with 1.2mgs/kg of BV in combination with doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, vinblastine 6 mg/m2, and dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 (AVD). Eligibility criteria included untreated cHL stage II-IV, CD4 + T-cell counts ≥50 cells/mm3, and initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART) at least 1 week prior to therapy. Ritonavir, zidovidine, cobisistat, and other strong CYP3A4 or P-glycoprotein inhibitors were excluded with a washout of at least 1 week being required. Hematopoietic growth factor was mandated. The primary objective was 2 year PFS. The sample size was based on providing an estimate of the PFS with a 95% CI +/- 10% under the assumption of a 2 year progression free survival (PFS) estimate of 85%. Secondary objectives included toxicity, effects on CD4/CD8 + T-cells, HIV-1 viral load, prognostic significance of post C2 and end of treatment PET-CT. Results: Forty-one pts (93% men) were treated with a median age of 48y (range 24-67). Pts presented with stage II (17%), III (27%), and IV (56%) disease. Two year PFS estimate in the overall population (N=41) was 86% (95% CI: .74, .98). The 2-year overall survival (OS) estimate was 92% (95% CI: 0.83, 1.0) with 3 deaths at the time of analysis, including 1 which was a treatment related death (Figure 1A). For pts with advanced disease (N=34), the 2-year PFS estimate was 87% (95% CI: 0.76, 0.99) with an OS estimate of 90% (95% CI: 0.8, 1.00) (Figure 1B). Safety profiles were quite similar to the BV-AVD arm in the E1 study of the pts who received growth factor. Neuropathy was higher in our study compared to E1, (49% vs. 29% for any grade, P=0.01; 9.8% vs. 5% for G3/4, p=0.06). G3 Neutropenia was greater in AMC 085 compared to E1 BV-AVD arm with growth factor: 57% vs. 29% (p

Description: Background: The DIAL study is testing the efficacy of dual immunomodulation in patients with advanced aggressive B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL). Sponsored by the Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program (CTEP), the trial combines the use of a programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor (nivolumab) with an agonist of the CD27 receptor (varlilumab) in a randomized phase 2 design. CD27, a co-stimulatory receptor, regulates T cell activation in the context of T cell receptor (TCR) engagement through interaction with CD70. T cell exhaustion plays a major role in immune evasion in B-NHL. Varlilumab is an agonistic IgG1 monoclonal antibody that recognizes CD27 leading to prevention or reversal of exhaustion in pre-clinical models. Varlilumab also demonstrates direct anti-tumoral activity in xenograft models of human lymphoma cell lines via antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Phase 1 data supports the safety and tolerability of single-agent varlilumab in advanced hematologic malignancies (NCT01460134). We hypothesize that CD27 activation synergizes with PD-1 inhibition resulting in a superior anti-lymphoma effect compared to PD-1 blockade alone. The study will also evaluate the effect of these agents on tumor and immune cells using immunohistochemistry (IHC), mass cytometry (CyTOF), multiplex ELISA, imaging mass cytometry (IMC), and whole exome sequencing. Methods: The trial is enrolling patients with advanced aggressive B-NHL. Standard inclusion criteria and prior treatment with at least 2 lines of standard therapy are required. Prior autologous stem cell transplant and/or chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy is allowed. Patients with active CNS disease are excluded. Eligible patients are randomized to treatment with single-agent nivolumab (group 1) or dual immunotherapy with nivolumab and varlilumab. Group 1 is allowed to cross-over at the time of progression. Nivolumab will be administered intravenously (IV) every 2 weeks (240 mg) for 4 months followed by monthly dosing thereafter (480 mg). Varlilumab will be given IV every 4 weeks (3 mg/kg). Response assessment will be done by PET-CT scan every 12 weeks. Primary outcome is overall response rate (ORR) according to the LYRIC criteria. The trial will enroll 48 patients per arm, allowing 80% power to detect at least 20% increase in ORR in the experimental arm (group 2) assuming a 25% ORR in the control arm (group 1). The trial is registered (NCT03038672) and open to participation to members of the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network (ETCTN) and Early Drug Development Opportunity Program (EDDOP). Figure Disclosures Tun: BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Curis: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mundi-pharma: Research Funding; DTRM Biopharma: Research Funding. Bartlett:Pharmacyclics: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; Immune Design: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Autolus: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; Forty Seven: Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Kline:Merck: Honoraria; Merck: Research Funding. Awan:Janssen: Consultancy; Gilead: Consultancy; Sunesis: Consultancy; Genentech: Consultancy; Abbvie: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Lazaryan:Kadmon: Consultancy. Ansell:Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; Trillium: Research Funding; Mayo Clinic Rochester: Employment; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Affimed: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; Regeneron: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding. Diefenbach:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Denovo: Research Funding; Genentech: Consultancy, Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding; LAM Therapeutics: Research Funding; MEI: Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millenium/Takeda: Research Funding; Trillium: Research Funding.