ALBERT

Description: This study proposes the use of spatial–temporal Neyman–Scott Rectangular Pulses model—RainSim V3, the modified Climate Research Unit daily Weather Generator (CRU‐WG)—ICAAM‐WG, change factor approach, and the physically based spatially distributed hydrological model—SHETRAN for hydrological impact assessments at a catchment scale. We demonstrated its validity for a 705‐km2 Mediterranean climate basin. By generating synthetic runoff and sediment series with unlimited length, the methodology makes possible downscaling of water availability, sediment yield and extreme events for middle‐sized catchments. A robust hydrological impact assessment is indispensable for mitigation and adaptation planning. This study presents an integrated modelling methodology for evaluating climate change impacts on water availability, sediment yield and extreme events at the catchment scale. We propose the use of the spatial–temporal Neyman–Scott Rectangular Pulses (STNSRP) model—RainSim V3 and the rainfall conditioned daily weather generator—ICAAM‐WG, as well as the physically based spatially distributed hydrological model—SHETRAN. The change factor approach was applied for obtaining unbiased rainfall and temperature statistics. The ICAAM‐WG was developed based on the modified Climate Research Unit daily Weather Generator (CRU‐WG). The methodology is proposed to generate synthetic series of hourly precipitation, daily temperature and potential evapotranspiration, hourly runoff and hourly sediment discharge. We demonstrated a possible application in a 705‐km2 Mediterranean climate basin in southern Portugal. The case study showed the evaluation of future climate change impacts on annual and monthly water balance components and sediment yield, annual and seasonal flow duration curves, empirical extreme value distributions and the theoretical fits. It did not consider the possible uncertainty due to the limit of computational resources. The methodology can be well justified as follows: (a) the use of synthetic hourly instead of daily precipitation enables SHETRAN to be more capable of reproducing reliable storm runoff processes and the consequent sediment transport processes; (b) the use of SHETRAN makes possible the impact assessment to be accessible for any model grid square within the study basin; (c) the use of a statistical–stochastic downscaling method facilitates the generation of the synthetic series with unlimited length. It makes possible robust hydrological impact assessments if uncertainties related to the global climate model, regional climate model, greenhouse gas emission scenario, downscaling method, hydrological model and observational data are considered.

Description: Introduction: PI3Kδ signaling is critical for the proliferation, survival and homing/tissue retention of malignant B cells. Idelalisib is a first-in-class, highly selective, oral inhibitor of PI3Kδ recently approved for the treatment of relapsed CLL in combination with R. This report summarizes the long-term follow-up of the Phase 1 combination experience of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies. Methods: This Phase 1 study evaluated idelalisib for relapsed/refractory CLL continuously given at 100 mg BID (4 of the pts receiving R) or 150 mg BID (all other pts) in combination with a total of 8 infusions of rituximab (R, 375 mg/m2 weekly x 8), or a total of 12 infusions of ofatumumab (O, 300mg initial dose either on Day 1 or Day 2 relative to the first dose of idelalisib, then 1,000 mg weekly x 7, then 1,000 mg every 4 wks x 4). Pts on treatment after 48 weeks were eligible to continue idelalisib on an extension study. Clinical response was evaluated according to published criteria (Hallek 2008; Cheson 2012). Results: 40 pts (12F/28M) with a median (range) age of 66 (43-87) years and a WHO performance status of 0 (24, 60%) or 1 (16, 40%) were enrolled. 19 pts received idelalisib in combination with R and 21 with O. Adverse disease characteristics (n, %) included Rai Stage III/IV (20, 50%), bulky lymphadenopathy (23, 58%), refractory disease (15, 38%), multiple prior therapies (median 2, range: 1-9). Almost all pts (39, 98%) had at least 1 prior therapy containing R, and 3 of the 21 pts (14%) receiving idelalisib + O had received prior O. 63% of the pts receiving idelalisib + R, and 48% of the pts receiving idelalisib + O were refractory to R. Prior therapies also included alkylating agents (31, 78%, [bendamustine: 20, 50%]) and purine analogs (31, 78%, [fludarabine: 28, 70%]). Data available from 39 pts showed that 11 (28%) pts had evidence of del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations and 30 (75%) had unmutated IGHV. As of 7/15/2014, the median (range) treatment duration was 18 (0-44) months. 23 (58%) pts have completed the primary study and enrolled into the extension study. Primary reasons for study discontinuation (as reported by investigators) included disease progression (14, 35%), adverse events (AEs) (12, 30%), investigator request (3, 8%), withdrawal of consent (n=1), BMT (n=1). There were a total of 8 deaths on study: 2 deaths occurred after disease progression, and 6 pts died because of AEs (all assessed as unrelated/unlikely related to idelalisib by investigators). A total of 4 pts (10%) were continuing idelalisib treatment on the extension study at time of analysis. Selected treatment-emergent AEs (any Grade/≥Gr 3, regardless of causality) included diarrhea/colitis (55%/23%), cough (40%/3%), pyrexia (40%/3%), dyspnea (30%/3%), fatigue (25%/0%) nausea (25%/0%), rash (20%/0%), pneumonia (20%/18%), and pneumonitis (8%/5%). Elevation of liver transaminases (TA, any Grade/≥Gr 3) was seen in 30%/10%. Re-exposure to idelalisib after resolution of TA elevation generally was successful; only 1 patient discontinued the study because of (recurrent) TA elevation. Other AEs leading to study discontinuation and reported as possibly/probably related to idelalisib included diarrhea/colitis (4, 10%), pyrexia (n=1), interstitial lung disease (n=1), pneumonia (n=1), rash (n=1), psoriasis (n=1). Secondary malignancies leading to discontinuation (all reported as unrelated) were breast cancer (n=1), recurrent colon cancer (n=1), AML (n=1). There was no obvious overall difference in the toxicity reported for pts receiving idelalisib with rituximab compared to those with ofatumumab. The ORR (N=40) was 83% (33/40), with 2 CRs (5%) reported. Median PFS (N=40) and duration of response (DOR) (n=33) were 24 months. Median (range) time to response was 1.9 (range 1.7-16.9) months. Median overall survival (OS) has not been reached with a KM estimate for OS of 80% at 24 months. For the 11 pts with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutations, the response rate was 73%, and the median PFS and DOR were 20 and 24 months, respectively. Conclusions: Combinations of idelalisib with anti-CD20 antibodies such as R or O represent non-cytotoxic regimens with acceptable safety profiles and considerable activity resulting in durable tumor control in pts with relapsed/refractory CLL, including those with high risk factors such as del(17p) or TP53 mutations. A Phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy of idelalisib in combination with ofatumumab is ongoing (NCT01659021). Disclosures Furman: Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Zydelig is a kinase inhibitor indicated for the treatment of patients with: 1) Relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), in combination with rituximab, in patients for whom rituximab alone would be considered appropriate therapy due to other co-morbidities; 2) Relapsed follicular B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (FL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies; and 3) Relapsed small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) in patients who have received at least two prior systemic therapies.. de Vos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Barrientos:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Schreeder:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Flinn:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Sharman:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Boyd:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Fowler:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Leonard:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Rai:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding. Kim:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Viggiano:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Jahn:Gilead Sciences: Employment, Equity Ownership. Coutre:Gilead Sciences: Research Funding.

Description: The results of gene expression profiling (GEP) and immunohistochemical studies indicate that survival is worsened by macrophages (MΦ) in the tumor microenvironment of various B-cell lymphomas including follicular lymphoma (FL) and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) are known to be different from other types of MΦ, but the effects of TAMs that worsen prognosis in B-cell lymphoma are essentially unknown, as are the mechanisms of these effects. Here, we determined the phenotype and effects of TAMs on tumor survival, proliferation, and drug resistance in B-cell lymphomas and evaluated strategies to reverse their effects. As compared to peripheral blood monocytes (Mo) from normal donors (ND), Mo from FL patients were differentiated less into M1 MΦ (defined as CD68+CD163loCD206loCD86hi) by culture with CSF-1 for 5 days followed by IFN-g + LPS for 2 days more. In contrast, Mo from FL patients and ND were differentiated similarly into M2 MΦ (defined as CD68+CD163hiCD206hiCD86lo) by culture with CSF-1 followed by IL-4. Consistent with this, MΦ gene signatures from FL tumors were more similar to previously-described signatures of M2 rather than M1 MΦ (Martinez et al, J Immunol, 2006, 177(10):7303-11). In co-culture, primary FL tumor cells and lymphoma cell lines (including RL, a transformed FL cell line; Granta 519, a mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) cell line; and Raji, a Burkitt lymphoma cell line) induced differentiation of Mo into MΦ. Differentiation could be prevented by CS4 monoclonal antibody (mAb), a fully human IgG1 anti-human CSF-1R mAb (ImClone/Eli Lilly), but not isotype control Ab. Elevated levels of CSF-1 in culture supernatants after addition of CS4 mAb and real-time PCR of tumor cells suggested secretion of CSF-1 by lymphoma cells. Spontaneous apoptosis of primary FL and MCL tumor cells, determined by Annexin V and propidium iodide staining, was significantly reduced by co-culture with ND Mo (p

Description: Introduction. Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurotoxicity (NT)(also known as immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome or ICANS) are commonly observed after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. While the clinical features of CRS have been extensively described, limited data exists for NT. Here, we report clinical and radiological features of NT after standard of care (SOC) axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) in patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory (r/r) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Methods. Pts with r/r LBCL treated with SOC axi-cel at MD Anderson Cancer Center between 01/2018 and 04/2019 were included in the study. All pts received anti-seizure prophylaxis with levetiracetam starting on the day of axi-cel infusion for 30 days. CRS and NT were prospectively graded according to CARTOX criteria (Neelapu et al, Nat Rev Clin Oncol, 2018). Association between continuous variables were assessed using the bivariate Pearson correlation. Results. Ninety-five pts were included in the study, 72 (76%) with diffuse LBCL, 17 (18%) with transformed follicular lymphoma, and 6 (6%) with primary mediastinal LBCL. Median age was 60 (range, 18-85), 71 (75%) were male. Median number of previous therapies was 4 (range, 2-15), 26 (27%) had a previous autologous stem cell transplant (SCT), and 1 (1%) a previous allogeneic SCT. Eight (8%) pts had prior central nervous system lymphomatous involvement (parenchymal in 5), and 39 (41%) had prior neurological and/or psychiatric medical history. After axi-cel infusion, NT of any grade was observed in 65 (68%) pts, grade ³3 in 46 (48%)(Table). No significant association was observed between above outlined baseline characteristics and development of NT. Median time from axi-cel infusion to NT onset was 5 days (range, 0-25 days) and median duration was 6 days (range, 1-52 days); no new onset/recurrent NT was observed beyond day 30. Among the 65 pts who developed NT, a CT head without contrast was performed in 48, and was not evaluable in 2 because of motion artifacts. Among the 46 evaluable scans, 1 (4%) was abnormal as compared to baseline, and showed new onset cortical edema (non-diffuse but symmetrical). An MRI brain with contrast was performed in 36 pts, but was not evaluable in 10 because of lack of baseline, motion artifacts or differences in imaging sequences. Among the 26 evaluable scans, 15 (58%) showed abnormal findings, including autoimmune encephalitis-like, characterized by symmetric white matter changes of the pons and hippocampus (6; Fig. A), stroke-like (4; Fig. B), LMD-like (3; Fig. C) and PRES-like (2; Fig. D), with concomitant cortical edema in 5. EEGs were performed in 52 pts (〉1/pt, for a total of 116 EEGs) and were abnormal in 47 (90%). Focal and/or diffuse slowing was the most common abnormality (isolated finding in 35 [73%] pts), while epileptiform discharges and/or non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) were observed 12 (27%) pts. A lumbar puncture was performed in 12 pts: median white blood cell count was 2 cells/µL (range, 0-6), median protein 47 mg/dL (range, 13-600), median glucose 69 mg/dL (range, 30-111), and cytology was positive for malignant cells in 2 (7%) pts. Convulsive seizure was observed in 4 (6%) pts and 10 (15%) received additional anti-seizure therapy for convulsive or non-convulsive seizures. Among the 65 pts with NT, dexamethasone up to 20 mg IV Q6H was given to 42 (65%) pts, methylprednisolone 1000 mg IV daily to 12 (18%), and tocilizumab to 64 (98%; during CRS or CRS with concurrent NT). Overall, 93 (98%) pts developed CRS, grade 〉3 in 27 (28%). A significantly higher rate of NT of any grade (96% vs 57%, p3 (81% vs 35%, p3 CRS. After a median follow-up of 4 months, 6-month progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 60% and 65%, respectively. Significantly shorter 6-month PFS (46% vs 80%, p=0.02) and OS rates (56% vs 83%, p=0.01) were observed among pts developing NT of any grade. Conclusions. Our results suggest that multiple radiological patterns of NT after axi-cel are possible in r/r LBCL pts, MRI being more sensitive than CT scan for their detection. NCSE is a common event, supporting the use of seizure prophylaxis and EEGs for evaluation of these pts. Pts with NT experience a worse outcome, and additional clinical and biological predictors of NT will be analyzed and presented at the meeting. Figure Disclosures Nastoupil: Spectrum: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Bayer: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech, Inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; TG Therapeutics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria. Westin:47 Inc: Research Funding; Novartis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Juno: Other: Advisory Board; MorphoSys: Other: Advisory Board; Unum: Research Funding; Curis: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Genentech: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Celgene: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Kite: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding; Janssen: Other: Advisory Board, Research Funding. Fowler:Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Abbvie: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Lee:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Research Funding. Parmar:Cellenkos Inc.: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Wang:Guidepoint Global: Consultancy; BioInvent: Consultancy, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Pharmacyclics: Honoraria, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; MoreHealth: Consultancy, Equity Ownership; Acerta Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite Pharma: Consultancy, Research Funding; VelosBio: Research Funding; Loxo Oncology: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Research Funding; Aviara: Research Funding; Dava Oncology: Honoraria. Pinnix:Merck: Research Funding. Hawkins:Novartis Pharmaceuticals: Other: advisory panels. Neelapu:Precision Biosciences: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy; Allogene: Consultancy; Incyte: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Cellectis: Research Funding; Poseida: Research Funding; Karus: Research Funding; Acerta: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Kite, a Gilead Company: Consultancy, Research Funding; Merck: Consultancy, Research Funding; Cell Medica: Consultancy; Unum Therapeutics: Consultancy, Research Funding; Pfizer: Consultancy. Chi:Kite, A Gilead Company: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Kite Patient Management Advisory Board.

Description: Introduction: High standardized uptake value (SUV) on FDG PET scan in follicular lymphoma (FL) suggests aggressive disease and possible transformation to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Schoder et al, J Clin Oncol, 2005, reported that SUV 〉10 predicted aggressive lymphoma with 〉80% certainty and SUV 〉13 with 〉90% certainty. However, it is unknown whether the maximum SUV (SUVmax) on FDG PET scan at baseline, suggesting the possibility of focal aggressive or transformed disease, has prognostic value in FL. Here, we determined the prognostic value of SUVmax on baseline FDG PET scan in patients with advanced stage FL treated uniformly with R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy at initial diagnosis. Methods: We reviewed medical records of all patients with stage III or IV FL who had FDG PET scan at initial diagnosis and were treated with R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy at MD Anderson Cancer Center between January 2001 and December 2012. Patients with histological diagnosis of concurrent diffuse large B-cell lymphoma were excluded. Results: For the 225 patients studied, the median age was 57 years (range, 20-82). 83 (37%) patients were 〉= age 60, 137 (61%) had grade 1 or 2 FL, and 88 (39%) had grade 3A (n=57, 25%) or 3B (n=31, 14%). The Ki-67 score was 40% for 56 (40%) patients. FLIPI risk groups were 54 patients (24%) low, 74 (33%) intermediate, and 97 (43%) high. GELF criteria were met in 133 (59%) patients. Tumor bulk of 〉= 6 cm was seen in 97 (43%) patients. The absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) was normal or high in 155 (69%) patients and low in 70 (31%). Sixty-nine (31%) patients received rituximab maintenance. There was no correlation between baseline SUVmax on FDG PET scan and Ki-67 score (Pearson correlation co-efficient of 0.168). The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 87%, respectively. The median follow-up time was 66 months. At 5 years, progression-free survival (PFS) was 85% and overall survival (OS) was 90%. Male gender, stage IV, high risk FLIPI, presence of GELF criteria, high beta-2 microglobulin, and low ALC were associated with significantly inferior PFS and OS (p= 60 was associated with inferior OS but not PFS. Rituximab maintenance was associated with improved PFS but not OS. On baseline FDG PET scan, median SUVmax was 13.7 and the SUVmax range was 1.5-42.1. 105 (47%) patients had SUVmax 13. Patient characteristics including age, gender, histological grade, Ki-67 score, and FLIPI risk groups were not significantly different between the two SUVmax populations (p〉0.05). The overall response rates were 94% and 96% for the SUVmax 13 groups, respectively. The complete response rate was 87% in both groups. At 5 years, the PFS and OS were not significantly different between the low and high SUVmax groups (61% vs 63% for PFS, p=0.98 and 90% vs 89% for OS, p=0.63). PFS and OS were not significantly different even when the patients were grouped into SUVmax 10 (p=0.9 and 0.61, respectively) or when other cut-offs were used. SUVmax was also not predictive of PFS and OS when only the patients meeting GELF criteria were analyzed. Conclusions: In this large cohort of advanced stage FL patients treated uniformly with R-CHOP chemoimmunotherapy, SUVmax on baseline FDG PET scan was not predictive of clinical outcome or correlated with other features. It is possible that the doxorubicin-based chemotherapy regimen may have benefited patients with high SUVmax who may have underlying aggressive or undiagnosed transformed disease. It remains to be determined whether SUVmax is predictive of clinical outcome in FL patients treated with other commonly used therapies such as rituximab monotherapy, rituximab and bendamustine, or R-CVP. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Wang: Pharmacyclics, Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding. Westin:Novartis: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 1714 Poster Board I-740 Background Despite advances in therapy and a better understanding of the natural history of indolent non-Hodgkins lymphomas (NHL), the optimal treatment for newly diagnosed patients (pts) has not been determined. While several chemotherapy regimens have response rates approaching 90%, toxicity is common with standard genotoxic combinations, particularly with retreatment at relapse. Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) mutation. In pts with indolent relapsed or refractory NHL, treatment with lenalidomide resulted in durations of response lasting 〉 16.5 months (Witzig et al JCO in press). Rituximab has been shown to have clinical activity in indolent NHL, both as a single agent and in combination with chemotherapy. The aim of this phase II, single arm study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide and rituximab in pts with untreated, stage III or IV, indolent NHL. Methods Previously untreated pts with indolent NHL and with measurable disease (〉1.5 cm), were eligible for enrollment. For each 28-day cycle, pts received lenalidomide 20mg orally once daily on days 1-21 and rituximab 375mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, for up to 6 cycles of therapy. Response was assessed after 3 cycles and at the end of therapy using the International Working Group Response Criteria (Cheson et al 1999). Results At the time of this report, the planned accrual of 30 pts is complete. Response and adverse events are reported for the first 20 patients, which included 19 pts eligible for response assessment and 1 patient, who discontinued from study prior to response evaluation, secondary to leukocytoclastic vasculitis, which occurred during cycle 1. The median age was 55 yrs (range: 38-77) and 55% were male. The 20 currently evaluable patients include10 pts with follicular lymphoma, 8 pts with marginal zone lymphoma and 2 pts with small lymphocytic lymphoma. Of 19 pts eligible for response assessment, 18 completed 6 cycles of therapy and 1 pt, who was previously treated for Hodgkin's lymphoma, withdrew consent following cycle 3. The overall response rate was 84%, which included complete responses in 15 pts (79%; 58% CR/21% CRu) and 1 patient who achieved a partial response. An additional 3 pts (16%) remain with stable disease. By completion of 6 cycles of therapy, all 10 pts with follicular lymphoma achieved a complete response to therapy. No pt experienced progression of disease. The following grade 3/4 adverse events were reported; rash (6 pts), neutropenia (4 pts), myalgia (3 pts), neuropathy (1 pt), infection (1 pt), and fatigue (1 pt). Rashes, of all grades, occurred in 10 pts, which were mostly erythematous and transient, nonrecurring events. Response and toxicity assessment for the remaining 10 pts is ongoing and will be reported. Conclusion The biologic regimen of lenalidomide and rituximab as front line therapy produces excellent overall and complete response rates in pts with indolent B cell NHL. The combination was well tolerated with a manageable toxicity profile. Disclosures Fowler: Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BiogenIdec: Honoraria. Off Label Use: lenalidomide and rituximab for indolent B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. McLaughlin:Genentech: Consultancy, Honoraria. Hagemeister:Genentech: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; BiogenIdec: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy. Kwak:Celgene: Research Funding. Samaniego:Celgene: Consultancy.

Description: Purpose: We assessed the survival outcome of patients with anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) who experienced disease progression or relapse after first line and subsequent therapy. We sought to evaluate the impact of brentuximab vedotin (BV), and survival outcome of patients with ALCL who experienced progression after BV. Patients and Methods: A total of 176 patients (74 ALK+, 102 ALK-) initially diagnosed between 1999 and 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after the progression/relapse following first-line chemotherapy (PFS1 and OS1), after first salvage therapy (PFS2 and OS2) and after second salvage therapy (PFS3 and OS3) were calculated. Outcome was separately analyzed according to the ALK status focusing on the use of BV. Results: The median age of the patients was 50 (range: 18-89). With a median follow up of 64 months, 111 patients (38 ALK+, 73 ALK-) experienced progression/relapse after the first-line therapy, of which 4 ALK- patients were post upfront stem cell transplant (SCT). Thirty and 15 patients eventually underwent autologous and allogeneic SCT after salvage chemotherapy, respectively. The median PFS1 and OS1 in patients with ALK+ALCL and ALK-ALCL were 8.4 and 28.5 months, and 13.1 and 47.7 months, respectively. In patients with ALK+ALCL, the median PFS1, PFS2 and PFS3 were 53.6, 5.2 and 2.3 months, respectively. The median OS1, OS2 and OS3 were not reached, 47.3 and 6.1 months, respectively. In patients with ALK-ALCL, the median PFS1, PFS2 and PFS3 were 12.9, 3.0 and 2.0 months, respectively. The median OS1, OS2 and OS3 were 54.3, 10.8 and 5.8 months, respectively. Interestingly, there were no significant difference in PFS2 between ALK+ALCL and ALK-ALCL. However, OS2 was significantly longer in patients with ALK+ALCL, suggesting possibly continued chemosensitivity of recurrent ALK+ALCL. A total of 30 patients received BV in 1st salvage (15 patients) and after 2nd salvage (15 patients).The use of BV at 1st salvage was associated with significantly longer PFS2 and OS2 both in patients with ALK-ALCL but not with ALK+ALCL likely due to small number of cases. Mutivariate analysis adjusting baseline PIT risk factors and the duration of the response to first line therapy revealed that use of BV (at any point in the salvage setting) is significantly associated with longer OS2 (HR: 0.43, 95%CI: 0.23-0.80). Overall, 12 patients experienced relapse/progression after BV treatment. The median OS after BV failure was 1.4 months (95%CI: 0.5-9.5 months) (Figure). Summary: Survival outcome for relapsed/refractory patients with ALK+ and ALK- patients is improved with BV. However, survival outcome after BV failure is very poor. A new treatment strategies to consolidate or maintain the response after BV and to develop more safe and better therapeutic options are needed. Figure 1. Figure 1. Disclosures Fanale: Merck: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; BMS: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Takeda: Honoraria, Research Funding; Infinity: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Spectrum: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Medimmune: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Bayer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Molecular Templates: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding; Gilead: Research Funding. Westin:Spectrum: Research Funding. Nastoupil:Celgene: Honoraria; Genentech: Honoraria; AbbVie: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding; TG Therapeutics: Research Funding. Wang:Celgene: Research Funding.

Description: Introduction Plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL) is a rare, aggressive subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Published data are predominantly in the form of case reports and small retrospective case series. Initial reports of PBL were described in HIV positive patients (pts) with disease in the oral cavity, and in pts after organ transplantation on immunosuppressive therapy. The natural history may have evolved recently, with case reports of PBL in immunocompetent patients. There is no established standard of care therapy, though HIV positive pts benefit from initiation of anti-retroviral therapy, tend to respond to chemotherapy, have historically been associated with CD20 expression, and have increased overall survival rates compared with HIV negative pts with PBL. We now describe our experience in pts with PBL who received treatment at the University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (UTMDACC). Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of pts diagnosed with PBL between August 2000 and August 2012. We evaluated the baseline demographics, stage, therapy, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results 28 pts (males n=23) with PBL were identified, with a median age of 51 (range 26-81). 10 patients had a diagnosis of HIV, and 15 were EBV positive. 7 pts had stage I disease, 2 had stage II, 1 had stage III and 18 had stage IV disease. The primary site of disease in the 7 pts with stage I disease was: 2 in the maxillary sinus, 2 in the nasal cavity, and 1 each in the colon, testicle, and lower jaw. 2 pts with stage II disease had primary sites in bowel and tonsils. 7/17 (41%) of HIV negative pts and 2/10 (20%) of HIV positive pts had stage I/II disease. The median LDH was 492 IU/L (313-618), median Ki-67 proliferation index was 85%, and all pathological samples were CD20 negative. Median follow up was 16 months (1-120). 27 pts received systemic therapy (1 pt elected hospice care). PBL was an initial cancer diagnosis for 25 pts who received the following as first line therapy: Hyper-CVAD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, Adriamycin, dexamethasone alternating with methotrexate and cytarabine) (n=10), CHOP (cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, vincristine, prednisone) (n=7), modified CVAD, 2 with EPOCH (etoposide, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, Adriamycin, prednisone) (n=4), bortezomib/dexamethasone (n=1), and the DeAngelis protocol (methotrexate, vincristine, procarbazine, with intrathecal methotrexate) (n=1) for CNS involvement. 2 pts had prior therapy for diagnosis of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) prior to diagnosis of PBL. The first pt with DLBCL was treated with Rituximab-hyper-CVAD 6 years earlier, and gemcitabine/oxaliplatin for the diagnosis of PBL. The second pt had CLL which underwent Richter's transformation to PBL, and was treated with hyper-CVXD (cyclophosphamide, vincristine, liposomal daunorubicin and dexamethasone). 1 pt underwent auto-stem cell transplant, while 8 pts received localized radiation (5 for consolidation and 3 for palliative therapy); 5/7 pts with stage I disease received consolidation with involved field radiation. After first line therapy, 20/27 patients (74%) achieved complete response, 5/27 (19%) partial response, and 2/27 (7%) stable disease. Median PFS and OS were 24.1 and 28.8 months, respectively. 5 year PFS and OS were 40% and 38%, respectively. Early stage disease (stage I or II) and younger age at diagnosis (less than 40 years old) were associated with improved survival. 5 year PFS for stage I/II pts was 90%. Conclusion 41% of HIV negative pts had stage I/II disease. Early stage PBL pts who received combined chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy achieved a good PFS of 90% at 5 years. PBL consistently lacked CD20 expression irrespective of HIV status. PBL can be seen in both HIV+ and HIV– patients with overall 40% long term survival. Disclosures: Qazilbash: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Fanale:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Advisory/scientific board membership and travel expenses Other, Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Orlowski:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Millenium Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Onyx Pharmaceuticals: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Resverlogix: Research Funding; Genentech: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Array Biopharma: Honoraria, Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees; Merck: Membership on an entity’s Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Description: INTRODUCTION More active high-dose regimens are needed for non-Hodgkin’s (NHL) and Hodgkin’s lymphomas (HL), where standard BEAM offers poor results in refractory or poor-risk relapsed tumors. We previously developed a regimen of infusional gemcitabine with busulfan and melphalan (Gem/Bu/Mel), exploiting the synergy between gemcitabine and alkylators based on inhibition of DNA damage repair. Gem/Bu/Mel was safe and highly active against refractory lymphomas (Nieto, BBMT 2012). To further increase its activity we combined it in preclinical experiments with SAHA, which induces relaxation of the chromatin and renders DNA more accessible to DNA-targeting agents. Concurrent exposure to SAHA and Gem/Bu/Mel resulted in markedly increased apoptosis and cytotoxicity in refractory B- and T-NHL lines, with increased PARP1 cleavage and γ-H2AX reflecting increased DNA damage (Valdez, Exp Hematol 2012). SAHA has a dose-response effect in refractory lymphoma lines up to clinically achievable levels with doses of 1,000 mg, higher than its usual dose. We wished to clinically study the concurrent combination of SAHA and Gem/Bu/Mel in refractory NHL and HL. Methods Patients ages 12-65 with refractory lymphomas and adequate end-organ function were eligible for this dose-finding study of SAHA combined with Gem/Bu/Mel. SAHA was given on days -8 to -3 at 200-1,000 mg PO daily (levels 1-11), preceding all chemotherapy. Gemcitabine was given as a loading dose of 75 mg/m2 followed by infusion at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2/min over 3.5 (levels 1-5), 4 (level 6) or 4.5 hours (levels 7-11) on days -8 and -3. Each gemcitabine dose was immediately followed by the corresponding dose of busulfan or melphalan. After a test dose on day -10, busulfan was given from days-8 to -5 targeting a daily AUC of 4,000. Melphalan was infused at 60 mg/m2/day on days -3 and -2. ASCT was on day 0. Patients with CD20+ tumors received rituximab (375 mg/m2) on days +1 and +8. Dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were defined as any G4-5 nonhematological organ toxicity, or as G3 skin or G3 mucositis lasting 〉3 days at peak severity. Dose escalation followed a Bayesian design targeting a maximal DLT probability of 20%. Results Between 10/11 and 6/13, 66 patients were enrolled with DLCL, HL and T-NHL (Table 1). SAHA was escalated up to 1,000 mg PO daily, combined with full doses of Gem/Bu/Mel without encountering DLTs. There were no treatment-related deaths. The toxicity profile was manageable, including mucositis (48% G2, 31% G3), skin (11% G2, 3% G3), self-limited transaminase elevation (30% G2, 6% G3), and self-limited elevation of bilirubin not associated to VOD (22% G2, 16% G3). There were no cardiac, pulmonary, renal or CNS toxicities. There was no QT prolongation detected after SAHA. Neutrophils and platelets engrafted promptly at median days +10 (range, 8-13) and +12 (range, 8-55), respectively. This toxicity profile is undistinguishable from the one we previously described with Gem/Bu/Mel. Activity and patient outcomes at median follow-up of 8 months (1-23) are shown on Table 2 and Figures: Conclusions Concurrent administration of SAHA with high-dose GemBuMel is feasible up to a daily dose of SAHA of 1,000 mg, with no increased toxicities compared to Gem/Bu/Mel alone. Early results indicate that SAHA/Gem/Bu/Mel is highly active in refractory or poor-risk relapsed HL and DLCL and warrants further study in earlier disease stages. Longer follow-up is needed to confirm these findings. Disclosures: Nieto: Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Vorinostat not approved for DLCL or Hodgkin's lymphoma. Qazilbash:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Andersson:Otsuka Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding.