ALBERT

Description: Introduction:SMM is an asymptomatic and heterogeneous plasma cell disorder. The Spanish Myeloma Group demonstrated that patients at high risk of progression benefit from early treatment with Rd. In addition, our preliminary results of the curative approach (GEM-CESAR) showed encouraging results (Mateos ASH 2017). Aim: The primary end-point was to evaluate the Minimal Residual Disease negative (MRD-ve) rate by next generation flow (NGF) after induction and ASCT and the sustained MRD-ve rate at 3 and 5 yrs after ASCT as secondary end-points. Our aim was to increase the MRD -ve rate from 34% (reported in NDMM patients after VTD and ASCT) to 50%. As all patients have completed induction and ASCT, we report the results of the primary end point, efficacy and safety after induction and ASCT. Methods: In this phase II single arm trial, 90 SMM patients at high-risk of progression (〉50% at 2 yrs), younger than 70 yrs and transplant candidates were included. The high risk was defined by the presence of both ≥PC 10% and MC ≥3g/dL (Mayo criteria) or ifonly one criterion was present, patients must have a proportionof aberrant PCs within the total PCsBM compartment by immunophenotypingof 95% plus immunoparesis (Spanish criteria). Asymptomatic MM patients with any of the three biomarkers recently included into the definition of active MM were allowed to be included. Induction therapy consisted on six 4-weeks cycles of KRd in which K was given at dose of 36 mg/m2twice per week plus R at dose of 25 mg on days 1-21 and dexamethasone at dose of 40 mg weekly. Melphalan at dose of 200 mg/m2followed by ASCT was given as intensification therapy and three months later, patients received two KRd consolidation cycles followed by maintenance with R at dose of 10 mg on days 1-21 plus dex at dose of 20 mg weekly for up to 2 yrs Results: Between June 2015 and June 2017, the 90 SMM patients at high risk of progression were recruited. Twenty-eight pts (32%) shared at least one of the new biomarkers predicting imminent risk of progression to MM. The primary end point of the trial was met, since 55% of the patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved MRD -ve by NGF (sensitivity 3 x 10-6). Upon analyzing the results after induction, 88 patients completed the 6 induction cycles and were evaluable for response (two patients early discontinued): the ORR was 98% including 41% of ≥CR (32% sCR and 9% CR) and 41% of VGPR rate. Two patients were mobilization failures and one patient rejected ASCT. Two additional patients experienced biological progression before ASCT and went off the study. Eighty-three patients, therefore, proceeded to HDT-ASCT and were evaluable at day +100: the ORR was 100% including ≥CR in 63% of the patients (51% sCR and 12% CR) and VGPR rate in 23%. The MRD-ve rate increased from 31% after induction to 55% with the ASCT. No differences in outcome have been observed according neither to the definition of high risk (Mayo or Spanish model) nor ultra high risk SMM. Concerning toxicity, during induction, G3-4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were reported in 5 (6%) and 10 pts (11%), respectively. G3-4 infections were the most frequent non-hematological AE observed in 16 pts (18%), followed by skin rash in 8 pts (9%). One patient reported G1 atrial fibrillation and another cardiac failure secondary to respiratory infection. Three patients reported hypertension (G2 in two and G3 in one). Thirteen patients required lenalidomide dose reduction whilst carfilzomib was not reduced in any patient. In four patients, dexamethasone was reduced. In all but two of the pts, PBSC collection was successful with a median of 4.10 x 106/Kg CD34 cells collected. All patients engrafted. Consolidation and maintenance phases are ongoing. After a median follow-up of 17 months (5-36), 94% of patients remain alive and free of progression and 97% of them alive. Three patients experienced biological progression and discontinued the study: one of them was refractory to the rescue therapies and died and the other two are receiving rescue therapies. One additional patient died early during induction due to a massive ischemic stroke unrelated to the treatment. Conclusions: Although longer follow-up is required, this "curative strategy for high risk SMM" continues being encouraging with an acceptable toxicity profile. The study has met its primary endpoint. The depth of response improved over the treatment: 63% of patients who completed induction and ASCT achieved ≥CR with a MRD-ve rate of 55%. Disclosures Mateos: Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Rodriguez Otero:Takeda: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Bristol Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Clínica Universidad de Navarra: Employment. Ocio:AbbVie: Consultancy; Pharmamar: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria; BMS: Consultancy; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria; Sanofi: Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Array Pharmaceuticals: Research Funding. Oriol:Celgene: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Takeda: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Rios:Amgen, Celgene, Janssen, and Takeda: Consultancy. Rosinol:Janssen, Celgene, Amgen, Takeda: Honoraria. Alegre:Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Puig:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria. De La Rubia:Ablynx: Consultancy, Other: Member of Advisory Board. García Mateo:Binding Site: Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Bladé:Janssen: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. San-Miguel:Novartis: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria; Amgen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Sanofi: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria.

Description: BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed and/or refractory non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), especially those with aggressive lymphomas, have overall poor prognosis. Novel targets and therapies are under investigation. Molibresib (GSK525762) is a potent and specific inhibitor of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family of proteins, the inhibition of which prevents transcriptional complex assembly and the subsequent expression of oncogenic drivers. Molibresib inhibits growth in NHL cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo. Study BET116183 was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy of molibresib in relapsed and refractory hematologic malignancies. Here we report the results from the NHL dose escalation cohort. METHODS: Eligible subjects were adults with relapsed or refractory NHL. An accelerated dose titration was employed with one subject per dose level until the occurrence of a ≥Grade 2 drug-related toxicity; thereafter, subjects were enrolled in a standard 3+3 design. A Neuenschwander continual reassessment method (N-CRM) model was used to provide guidance for the next dose level. Dose escalation continued until the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was identified. All data, including safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy, were used to identify the recommended part 2 dose (RP2D). RESULTS: From 14 May 2014 to the data cutoff date of 24 June 2018, 27 NHL subjects were enrolled and received at least one dose of study drug. Of these, 19 (70%) had B-cell lymphomas (diffuse large B-cell lymphoma [DLBCL], mantle cell lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma, follicular lymphoma , and Burkitt's lymphoma); eight subjects (30%) had T-cell lymphomas (cutaneous T-cell lymphoma [CTCL], anaplastic T-cell lymphoma [ATCL], peripheral T-cell lymphoma, and adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma). The median age was 64 years (range 24 to 76); 20 subjects (76%) were male and 7 subjects (24%) were female. The median number of prior treatments was 3 (range 1 to 〉 4). From the starting dose of 10 mg molibresib orally once daily (QD), the dose was escalated to 80 mg QD. The median time on study was 1.4 months (range 0.2 to 20 months). Two dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were identified in subjects treated at 60 mg QD, though one was subsequently determined not to be a DLT. One subject experienced Grade 4 thrombocytopenia related to study drug. A second subject experienced a Grade 2 mechanical fall; this event was later revised to unrelated to study drug. Across all dose levels, all subjects experienced an adverse event (AE); 25 subjects (93%) experienced at least one AE that was deemed to be related to molibresib treatment. The most common related AEs across all dose levels were thrombocytopenia (n = 21 [78%]), fatigue (n = 6 [22%]), nausea (n = 6 [22%]), diarrhea (n = 4 [15%]), and rash (n = 4 [15%]). Blood bilirubin was increased in 3 subjects (11%), and prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time were prolonged in 2 subjects each (7%). Common Grade 3 and Grade 4 related events included thrombocytopenia (n = 19 [70%]), as well as anemia, asthenia, and increased blood bilirubin (n = 2 [7%] each). No Grade 5 related AEs were reported. Among all subjects, 11 (41%) required dose reduction for toxicity: 7 subjects at the 60 mg dose level (39% treated at that dose) and 4 at the 80 mg dose level (57% treated at that dose). PK analyses showed dose-proportionality after single and repeat dosing, with large variability between subjects. One subject with DLBCL achieved a complete remission that was durable through week 54 on study. Four additional subjects (one DLBCL and 3 CTCL) achieved partial remission, for an objective response rate (ORR) of 5/27 (18.5%). Five more subjects had stable disease as best response. Of six CTCL/ATCL subjects enrolled, three subjects had partial response for an ORR of 50% in this sub-population. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the BET inhibitor molibresib in NHL subjects. Overall, thrombocytopenia and other AEs were monitorable, manageable and reversible. The RP2D was identified as 60 mg QD. Single-agent activity was observed across multiple NHL subtypes at both 60 mg and 80 mg doses; most notable was a 50% response rate in subjects with CTCL. Because of the promising data, Part 2 of the BET116183 study is currently open and enrolling subjects with CTCL to better define the clinical activity of BET bromodomain inhibition in this histology. Disclosures Dickinson: GSK: Consultancy. Kamdar:Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Speakers Bureau. Mateos:Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; GSK: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Abbvie: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Alegre:Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Takeda: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Kim:Roche: Research Funding; Mundipharma: Research Funding; J&J: Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Kyowa-Kirin: Research Funding; Celltrion: Research Funding; Takeda: Research Funding. Martín:Janssen: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses; Servier: Honoraria, Other: Travel expenses. Horner:GSK: Employment. Winnberg:GSK: Employment. Mathew:GSK: Employment. Botbyl:GSK: Employment. Karpinich:GSK: Employment. Kremer:GSK: Employment. Dhar:GSK: Employment. Karadimitris:GSK: Research Funding; Gilead: Honoraria; Celgene: Research Funding.

Description: Abstract 3045 Background: Lenalidomide is an oral IMiD® immunomodulatory compound with a dual mechanism of action, namely tumoricidal and immunomodulatory activity, and established clinical efficacy and safety in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (Len + Dex) was well tolerated and demonstrated significant improvements in response and favorable overall survival (OS) compared with Placebo + Dex in 2 pivotal phase 3 registration trials in patients with relapsed/refractory MM (RRMM; Weber et al, NEJM 2007; Dimopoulos et al, NEJM 2007). Previously, in a phase 3, multicenter, single-arm, open-label, expanded-access study (MM-018), Len + Dex demonstrated a predictable safety profile that can preserve patient quality of life (QoL) (Yong et al Haematologica 2010 [abstract #0944]). Here we report efficacy, safety, and QoL data for patients enrolled in the Spanish cohort of MM-018. Methods: Patients with progressive disease after 〉 2 cycles of antimyeloma treatment, or after relapse from treatment, with ECOG performance status ≤ 2 received 28-day cycles of Len (25 mg/day, D 1–21) plus Dex (40 mg/day, D 1–4, 9–12, and 17–20 for cycles 1–4; D 1–4 in subsequent cycles). Endpoints included overall response (≥ partial response [PR] by European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria) and QoL assessments measured by EORTC QLQ C-30 and EORTC QLQ MY-20 questionnaires at baseline and week 24. All prophylaxis was administered at the investigator's discretion. Results: Sixty-three patients receiving ≥ 1 dose of Len + Dex were evaluated for efficacy, safety, and QoL. Median age was 62 years (21 [33.3%] were 〉 65 years). Prior therapies included thalidomide (n = 15, 24%) and bortezomib (n = 37, 59%). Additionally, 5 (8%) patients had a history of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), and 23 (37%) had a history of peripheral neuropathy. A PR or better was observed in 49 (78%) patients, including complete response (CR) in 13 (21%), very good partial response (VGPR) in 13 (21%), and PR in 23 (37%) patients. Median time to first response and best response was 2.7 and 4.5 months, respectively. Median duration of response was 18.4 months. Response depth improved after long-term treatment with Len + Dex, and 32/63 (51%) patients received 〉12 cycles of therapy. Beyond 12 cycles of therapy, 8 patients achieved VGPR and 12 patients achieved CR; compared with 5 patients and 1 patient, respectively, prior to 12 cycles. Median time to progression and progression-free survival were both 13.3 months; median OS has not yet been reached. Forty-two (67%) patients remained on study at 6 months. Compliance to QoL assessment questionnaires was ≥ 80%. Patient-reported improvements in QoL and disease symptoms measured by both questionnaires were observed in nearly all scales. EORTC QLQ C-30 scores revealed clinically meaningful improvement (〉 5 points) for global QoL (n = 15, 40%), fatigue (n = 16, 42%), emotional function (n = 15, 40%), physical function (n = 12, 32%), role function (n = 11, 29%), social function (n = 11, 29%), cognitive function (n = 10, 26%), and pain (n = 9, 24%) at 6 cycles compared with baseline. Preservation of QoL in role function, emotional function, social function, and pain scores was observed at 6 cycles when compared with baseline in responders (≥ PR). EORTC QLQ MY-20 results revealed no relevant median change (〉 5 points) from baseline in all scales for all patients completing questionnaires at baseline and 6 cycles, except for a meaningful improvement in future perspective scores (median 11.1-point change). Adverse events observed in this study were consistent with those previously reported with Len + Dex. Grade 3/4 hematologic events were experienced by 40 (64%) patients, and included neutropenia (n = 32, 51%), thrombocytopenia (n = 11, 17%), anemia (n = 10, 18%), and febrile neutropenia (n = 4, 6%). DVT (all grades) was experienced by 5 (8%) patients, and only one grade 3/4 new-onset peripheral neuropathy was observed after 6 cycles of treatment. Conclusions: Len + Dex treatment in this expanded-access study demonstrated efficacy and predictable safety, consistent with that of previously published trials for patients with RRMM. More patients achieved VGPR and CR after long-term therapy compared with those receiving 〈 12 cycles of therapy. Furthermore, QoL assessments at baseline and 6 months revealed that patients treated with Len + Dex showed meaningful improvements in certain QoL and symptom scores. Disclosures: Oriol-Rocafiguera: Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy. García-Laraña:Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy. Mateos:Celgene: Honoraria. Cibeira:Celgene: Honoraria for Lectures; Janssen-Cilag: Honoraria for Lectures; Pharmion: Honoraria for Lectures. Knight:Celgene: Employment. Rosettani:Celgene Corporation: Employment.

Description: Abstract 1811 Poster Board I-837 The prognostic significance of achieving complete remission (CR) in Multiple Myeloma (MM) has finally been accepted. However, available studies have been based on series with a median follow-up around 5 years. This time period is insufficient according to the current life expectation of MM. Aim To establish the real effect of prognosis of the different response categories in a cohort of MM patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) after long term follow up. Patients and methods Follow-up from diagnosis of 344 MM patients transplanted between 1989 and 1998 has been updated. These patients were previously included in a study aimed at establishing the post-ASCT response significance in MM and to validate the EBMT classification (Br J Haemat 2000;109:438-46). It was possible to update the follow up of 322 patients as at April 2009. At this date 99 patients were alive with a median follow-up form diagnosis of 12.5 years. Response categories and evaluated cases were: i) Complete Response (IF-) (CR), n= 84 ii) near Complete Response (EF-/IF+) (nCR), n= 66 iii) Very good partial response (VGPR) (

Description: Background Bortezomib-based combinations, including alkylating agents (VMP or CyBorD) or immunomodulatory drugs (VTD or RVD) have been established as regimens widely used in newly diagnosed MM patients. Bendamustine is a bifunctional alkylating agent effective in relapsed and/or refractory MM patients, and approved in Europe in combination with prednisone for elderly newly diagnosed MM. Since bendamustine may be more efficient than other alkylators, an attractive possibility would be to explore it in combination with bortezomib and prednisone (BVP) in newly diagnosed MM patients both transplant and non transplant candidates. Patients and Methods 60 newly diagnosed MM patients were included in the trial. The first cycle consisted on bendamustine at 90 mg/m2 given IV on days 1 and 4, in combination with bortezomib at 1,3 mg/m2 given IV on days 1, 4, 8, 11, 22, 25, 29 and 32 and prednisone at 60 mg/m2 given PO on days 1 to 4. In the following cycles, bendamustine was given on days 1 and 8, and bortezomib on days 1, 8, 15 and 22 (weekly schedule), and prednisone as it was previously described. Patients younger than 65 years proceeded to peripheral blood stem cell collection (PBSC) using growth factors alone after 4 cycles; HDT-ASCT was performed after 6 cycles. Patients older than 65 years received up to nine 28-day cycles. Results Between May 2011 and July 2012 enrollment was completed (60 pts). Median age was 61 years (range 38-82; 18 pts ≥65), 67% had ISS stage II/III, and 67% had unfavorable cytogenetics: t(4;14), t(14;16), del 17p or 1q gains by FISH. After a median of 6 cycles (2-9), 75% of patients achieved at least PR, including 16% of sCR, 9% CR and 28% of VGPR. Although the differences were not statistically significant, there was a trend to higher CR rate in the group of patients

Description: Abstract 991 Smoldering Multiple Myeloma (SMM) is an asymptomatic proliferative disorder of plasma cells (PCs) defined by a serum monoclonal component (MC) of 30 g/L or higher and/or 10% or more plasma cells in the bone marrow (BM). There are several risk factors predicting high-risk of progression to symptomatic disease: 〉10% of PCs in BM, serum MC 〉30g/L, 〉95% aberrant PCs by immunophenotyping, or abnormal free-light chains. Standard of care of SMM is no treatment until progression disease. In this phase III trial, SMM patients at high-risk of progression were randomized to receive Len-dex as induction followed by Len alone as maintenance vs no treatment in order to evaluate whether the early treatment prolongs the time to progression (TTP) to symptomatic disease. The high-risk population was defined by the presence of both 〉PC 10% and MC 〉30g/L or if only one criterion was present, patients must have a proportion of aberrant PCs within the total PCsBM compartment by immunophenotyping of 95% plus immunoparesis. Len-dex arm received an induction treatment consisting on nine four-weeks cycles of lenalidomide at dose of 25 mg daily on days 1–21 plus dexamethasone at dose of 20 mg daily on days 1–4 and 12–15 (total dose: 160mg), followed by maintenance until progression disease with Lenalidomide at dose of 10 mg on days 1–21 every two months (amended in May 2010 into monthly). The 124 planned patients were already recruited, and 118 were evaluable (six patients didn't meet inclusion criteria). According to baseline characteristics, both groups were well balanced. On an ITT analysis (n=57), based on IMWG criteria, the overall response rate during induction therapy was 81%, including 56% PR, 11% VGPR, 7% CR and 7% sCR. 51 patients have completed the nine induction cycles, and the ORR was 87%, including 12% VGPR, 8% CR and 8% sCR. After a median of 7 cycles of maintenance therapy (1-21), the sCR increased to 12%. After a median follow-up of 22 months (range: 5–42), six patients progressed to symptomatic disease in the Len-dex arm: four of them during maintenance therapy and the other two progressed 3 and 8 months after early discontinuation of the trial due to personal reasons. In addition, twelve patients have developed biological progression during maintenance, and dex was added according to the protocol. In nine of them, the addition of dex was able to control again the disease without CRAB symptoms (median of 11 months). In the therapeutic abstention arm, 28 out of 61 patients (46%) progressed to active MM. The estimated hazard ratio was 6·2 (95%CI= 2·6-15), corresponding to a median TTP from inclusion of 25 months for the not treatment arm vs median not reached in the treatment arm (p

Description: Abstract 3962 Introduction: In April 2006, the Spanish Myeloma Group (PETHEMA/GEM) activated a randomized phase III trial comparing induction with TD vs. VTD vs. VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib (VBMCP/VBAD/B) in patients 65 years-old or younger with newly diagnosed symptomatic MM and ASCT with MEL-200 followed by maintenance with thalidomide/bortezomib (TV) vs. thalidomide (T) vs. alfa-2b-interferon (alfa2-IFN). Primary end points : response rate after induction and after ASCT and time to progression. Patients and Methods: The maintenance program consisted of TV (thalidomide 100 mg daily plus one cycle of bortezomib-1.3 mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 every 3 months) versus T (single agent thalidomide at a dose of 100 mg daily) versus alfa2-IFN (subcutaneous alfa2b-IFN at a dose of 3 MU three times per week). The planned maintenance duration was three years or until disease progression or toxicity. From February 1, 2007 to January 27, 2011 266 patients were randomized to maintenance therapy (TV:90; T: 89, alfa2-IFN: 87). Response and survival were evaluated on an intention-to-treat basis. Responses and progressions reported by the investigators were centrally reassessed. Results: the patient's characteristics at diagnosis such as age, ISS stage, cytogenetics and presence of extramedullary plasmacytomas as well as induction regimen (VTD, TD and VBMCP/VBAD/Bortezomib) and diagnosis-randomization interval were similarly distributed among the 3 arms. The response status at the time of randomization after ASCT was CR: 51%, VGPR: 23%, PR: 24% and SD: 2% and was well balanced in the three groups. The CR rate with maintenance was improved by 23% with TV, 11% with T and 19% with alfa2-IFN (p=NS). After a median follow-up of 24 months, the PFS was significantly longer with TV compared with T and alfa2-IFN (PFS at 2 yrs: 78% vs. 63% vs. 49%, p=0.01). However, OS was not significantly different among the 3 arms. Grade 3 and 4 hematological toxicity was similar (22.2% vs. 16% vs. 21.8%). No peripheral neuropathy (PN) was observed with alfa2-IFN being its frequency similar with TV (12.2%) and T (10.1%). No grade IV PN was observed. Dose reductions for TV, T and alfa2-IFN were required in 33.3%, 33.7% and 19.5% of the patients, respectively. The discontinuation rate due to toxicity was significantly higher with thalidomide compared with TV (30.3% vs. 15.6%, p= 0.08) and with alfa2-IFN (30.3% vs. 18.3%, p= 0.17). Conclusion: the addition of bortezomib to thalidomide maintenance resulted in a significantly longer PFS when compared with thalidomide alone or with IFN with no increased toxicity. Disclosures: Rosiñol: Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Cibeira:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Mateos:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Martinez:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. de la Rubia:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Díaz-Mediavilla:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Alegre:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. Lahuerta:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria. San Miguel:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen-Cilag: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Blade:Janssen: Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria.

Description: Introduction and Objectives. Lenalidomide is a new inmunomodulatory drug which has shown effectiveness, in combination with dexamethasone, in relapsed or progressive Multiple Myeloma (MM). In our country, little experience outside clinical trials exists since lenalidomide is only currently available in the compassionate use program, for patients with advanced MM. With the purpose of sharing the clinical practical experience with this drug, we considered it interesting to gather the outstanding data on the use of lenalidomide in a multicentric registry, throughout the Spanish scope. We present the preliminary results of this registry. Patients and methods. We designed a registry, canalized through GEM-PETHEMA, in which main clinical data of MM patients relapsed or progressive treated with lenalidomide within the compassionate use program, were collected. The decision to treat these patients was prior to and independent of the decision to make this registry and was only based on clinical criteria. The selected patients had at least one response assessment. Results. 19 valid questionnaires have been received, 14 patients (pts.) being assessable for response. The treatment was started between 03/06 and 04/07. Average age: 63 years (40–77); 9 men and 5 women. Type of MM: IgG 9 pts, IgA 3 pts, 1 non-secretory, 1 Bence Jones K. Average M-protein 3.25 g/dL(SD: 3,32); average creatinine 1,05 (SD: 0.36); average bm plasma cells infiltration: 36%. Median lines of previous treatments: 4 (2–8). 13 pts had received bortezomib, 8 pts had received thalidomide, and 7 had undergone autologous PBSCT. 7 pts showed extramedullary plasmocytomas.2 patients received the standard dose (25 mg daily, P.O. 21 days every 4 weeks). 2 patients received lower doses. All the patients, except one, received Dexamethasone simultaneously (average 56 mg per week). Prophylaxis for DVT: 7 pts with LWMH and 3 pts with salicylates. 4 patients did not receive prophylaxis. At the time of data collection 10 patients where still on the treatment. Lenalidomide was discontinued in 2 patients due to progression (median time to progression 6 months (1–8); 1 pts underwent PBSCT after reaching PR and discontinued the treatment due to stable disease after 6 months. Response: 2 CR (14%), 1 VGPR (7%), 6 PR (43%), 3 SD (21%). Among the 9 pts with a favorable response (64%): 8 had previously received bortezomib, 4 had received thalidomide, and 4 had undergone PBSCT - Toxicity: Neutropenia G3: 5 pts/G4: 2 pts; 5 patients needed G-CSF. Thrombocytopenia G3: 3 pts/G4: 3 pts. Skin rash in 1 pt. Neither TVP/TEP nor neutropenic fever were observed. Conclusions. Although a more detailed analysis and a longer follow-up is needed the results of our registry are consistent with other published clinical trials: lenalidomide associated with dexamethasone induces durable objective responses in a high percentage of patients with relapsed or progressive MM, after several treatment lines. The tolerance of this drug is acceptable, being the mielosuppression the most relevant toxicity. The role of this drug at low dose for long term maintenance have to be investigated.

Description: Stem cell factor (SCF) has been shown to synergize with filgrastim to mobilize CD34+ cells into the peripheral blood. To determine if addition of SCF to chemotherapy and filgrastim reduces the number of leukaphereses required to achieve a target yield of 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg, 102 patients with multiple myeloma were randomized to receive mobilization chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide (4 g/m2) and either SCF (20 μg/kg/d) combined with filgrastim (5 μg/kg/d) or filgrastim alone (5 μg/kg/d), administered daily until leukaphereses were completed. After collection, patients were treated with myeloablative therapy supported by autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) infusion and filgrastim (5 μg/kg/d). There was a significant difference between the treatment groups in the number of leukaphereses required to collect 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg (median of 1 v 2 for SCF + filgrastim and filgrastim alone, respectively, P = .008). Patients receiving the combination of SCF plus filgrastim had a 3-fold greater chance of reaching 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg in a single leukapheresis compared with patients mobilized with filgrastim alone. The median CD34+ cell yield was significantly increased for the SCF group in the first leukapheresis (11.3 v 4.0 × 106/kg, P = .003) and all leukaphereses (12.4v 8.2 × 106/kg, P = .007). Total colony-forming unit–granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) and mononuclear cell counts were also significantly higher in the SCF group in the first leukapheresis and in all leukaphereses. As expected for patients mobilized to an optimal CD34+ cell yield, the time to engraftment was similar between the 2 treatment groups. Cells mobilized with the combination of SCF plus filgrastim were thus considered effective and safe for achieving rapid engraftment. Treatment with SCF plus filgrastim was well tolerated, with mild to moderate injection site reactions being the most frequently reported adverse events. There were no serious allergic-like reactions to SCF. The addition of SCF to filgrastim after cyclophosphamide for PBPC mobilization resulted in a significant increase in CD34+cell yield and a concomitant reduction in the number of leukaphereses required to collect an optimal harvest of 5 × 106CD34+ cells/kg.

Description: Abstract 4952 Background Current clinical observations on extramedullary myeloma (EM) are based on small series of relapsed myeloma patients (pts) and, in this situation, results suggest that the disease course is often aggressive. Among novel therapies for extramedullary involvement, thalidomide has provided poor results and bortezomib is emerging as a possible useful drug. The role of lenalidomide for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) with EM is still under investigation. Aim A multicenter retrospective study was performed by PETHEMA (Spanish Myeloma Group, Spain) to evaluate the response rate and toxicity profile of lenalidomide-based regimens in myeloma patients with extramedullary involvement at relapse or progression. All the cases were evaluated for response of MM and improvement of extramedullary plasmacytoma. Patients and Methods From October 2007 to March 2009, thirteen patients (median age 67 years; range 61–87; 7 females) treated with lenalidomide-containing regimens were recorded. Patients with bone disease without extramedullary manifestations were excluded. Response of MM was evaluated according to the new international criteria and the response of EM by measuring size changes by physical examination, CT scans and/or MR imaging. Adverse events were graded based on the WHO toxicity scale. The M-protein type was IgG in 7 cases, IgA in 5 and light chain in 1. The type of light chain was κ in 7 pts and l in 6. In eight patients the soft-tissue plasmacytomas may have developed from underlying bone lesions [(skull (n=2), rib cage (n=4) and paravertebral (n=2)], two patients had subcutaneous nodules and three had visceral involvement (liver (n=1), lung and kidney (n=1) and pleura (n=1). Multiple localizations were present in 4 pts (30.7%). Six cases (79.6%) received previous antimyeloma treatment for EM before lenalidomide therapy and the incidence of prior bone plasmacytomas was 61.5%. Median time from initial antimyeloma therapy to treatment with lenalidomide was 34 months (range 5 - 115). Median number of prior lines of chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range 1 – 4), including autologous stem cell transplantation in 2 pts, bortezomib-containing regimens in 12 (92.3%) and previous exposure to thalidomide in 1 patient. Ten pts received standard lenalidomide dose (25 mg/day every 4 weeks) plus dexamethasone (40 mg/d PO ranging from 1 to 12 doses/cycle) every 3-week; and three patients received lower doses of lenalidomide and/or different schedules. Involved-field radiotherapy was given in 2 cases. Thirty percent of patients required lenalidomide dose reduction, because of toxicity or intolerance. Results Median duration of lenalidomide treatment was 3.6 months (1 – 15). One case was not evaluable for response because of death from disease progression after one cycle. In nine out of twelve evaluable patients (75%), MM responded to lenalidomide regimens according to EBMT criteria. Three (25%) achieved complete response, five (41.6%) partial response and 1 (8.3%) minimal response. Median time to response was 63 days (range 37 – 180). Regarding EM, nine patients showed response in the size of extramedullary plasmacytomas. Seven (58.3%) achieved complete disappearance of EM and two pts reduction of the size. Response of EM was also achieved in 75% of pts previously exposed to bortezomib, and in 4/9 cases who received therapies for prior extramedullary involvement. Median follow-up period was 6.3 months (1 – 15.8). Median overall survival from the start of lenalidomide therapy was 4.7 months. At the time of analysis, seven patients were still on therapy, and ten (76.9%) were alive. Only one out of the 9 patients who had achieved a response has relapsed so far. Toxicity profile (grade 3/4) was: thrombocytopenia, 4 (30.7%); anemia, 2 (15.3%); neutropenia, 5 (46.4%); neutropenic fever, 1 (7.6%) and others, 3 (11.8%). No deep venous thrombosis (DVT) was reported. Thrombosis prophylaxis was used in most cases (92%) patients. Conclusions We report one of the first investigations specifically evaluating the activity of lenalidomide on EM. Lenalidomide-containing regimens could be an alternative promising approach to achieve clinical response in heavily treated MM patients with extramedullary disease. The duration of response and the best regimen or combination are at present unknown. These preliminary observations require further analysis and longer follow-up. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.