ALBERT

All Library Books, journals and Electronic Records Telegrafenberg

feed icon rss

Your email was sent successfully. Check your inbox.

An error occurred while sending the email. Please try again.

Proceed reservation?

Export
  • 1
    Publication Date: 2021-07-04
    Description: Understanding the relation between injection‐induced seismic moment release and operational parameters is crucial for early identification of possible seismic hazards associated with fluid‐injection projects. We conducted laboratory fluid‐injection experiments on permeable sandstone samples containing a critically stressed fault at different fluid pressurization rates. The observed fluid‐induced fault deformation is dominantly aseismic. Fluid‐induced stick‐slip and fault creep reveal that total seismic moment release of acoustic emission (AE) events is related to total injected volume, independent of respective fault slip behavior. Seismic moment release rate of AE scales with measured fault slip velocity. For injection‐induced fault slip in a homogeneous pressurized region, released moment shows a linear scaling with injected volume for stable slip (steady slip and fault creep), while we find a cubic relation for dynamic slip. Our results highlight that monitoring evolution of seismic moment release with injected volume in some cases may assist in discriminating between stable slip and unstable runaway ruptures.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: Anthropogenic earthquakes caused by fluid injection have been reported worldwide to occur in the frame of waste‐water disposal, CO2 sequestration, and stimulation of hydrocarbon or deep geothermal reservoirs. To study the dynamics of injection‐induced seismic energy release in a controlled environment, we performed laboratory fluid injection experiments on critically stressed high‐permeability sandstone samples with a prefabricated fault. We monitored acoustic emission occurring during injection‐induced fault sliding. We find that the total seismic deformation (expressed as total seismic moment) is related to total injected volume, independent of fault slip modes (i.e., dynamic slip, steady slip, and fault creep). Seismic moment release rate roughly scales with fault slip velocity. In our experiments, the fluid pressure front migrates faster than the rupture front by about 5 orders of magnitude, resulting in fault slip within a zone of homogeneous fluid overpressure. We find that cumulative seismic moment scales linearly with the injected volume for stable slip (steady slip and fault creep), while it follows a cubic relation for dynamic slip. Our experimental results suggest that the deviation of cumulative moment release with injected volume from a linear trend in practice might be a sign for potential seismic risk. This may be considered in modifying current injection strategies.
    Description: Key Points: Injection‐induced fault deformation is dominantly aseismic. Total moment release depends on total injected volume, independent of fault slip behavior. Moment‐injected volume scaling is linear for stable slip but shows a cubic relation for dynamic slip.
    Keywords: 551.22 ; induced seismicity ; seismic moment release ; fluid injection ; stick slip ; fault creep ; acoustic emission
    Type: article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 2
    Publication Date: 2021-10-06
    Description: Understanding the physical mechanisms governing fluid-induced fault slip is important for improved mitigation of seismic risks associated with large-scale fluid injection. We conducted fluid-induced fault slip experiments in the laboratory on critically stressed saw-cut sandstone samples with high permeability using different fluid pressurization rates. Our experimental results demonstrate that fault slip behavior is governed by fluid pressurization rate rather than injection pressure. Slow stick-slip episodes (peak slip velocity 〈 4 μm/s) are induced by fast fluid injection rate, whereas fault creep with slip velocity 〈 0.4 μm/s mainly occurs in response to slow fluid injection rate. Fluid-induced fault slip may remain mechanically stable for loading stiffness larger than fault stiffness. Independent of fault slip mode, we observed dynamic frictional weakening of the artificial fault at elevated pore pressure. Our observations highlight that varying fluid injection rates may assist in reducing potential seismic hazards of field-scale fluid injection projects.
    Keywords: 550.724 ; fault slip ; fluid injection ; induced seismicity ; fluid pressurization rate ; stick-slip ; fault creep
    Language: English
    Type: map
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 3
    Publication Date: 2022-11-26
    Description: We investigate induced seismicity associated with a hydraulic stimulation campaign performed in 2020 in the 5.8 km deep geothermal OTN‐2 well near Helsinki, Finland as part of the St1 Deep Heat project. A total of 2,875 m3 of fresh water was injected during 16 days at well‐head pressures 〈70 MPa and with flow rates between 400 and 1,000 L/min. The seismicity was monitored using a high‐resolution seismic network composed of 10 borehole geophones surrounding the project site and a borehole array of 10 geophones located in adjacent OTN‐3 well. A total of 6,121 induced earthquakes with local magnitudes MLHel〉−1.9 ${M}_{\mathrm{L}}^{\mathrm{H}\mathrm{e}\mathrm{l}} 〉 -1.9$ were recorded during and after the stimulation campaign. The analyzed statistical parameters include magnitude‐frequency b‐value, interevent time and interevent time ratio, as well as magnitude correlations. We find that the b‐value remained stationary for the entire injection period suggesting limited stress build‐up or limited fracture network coalescence in the reservoir. The seismicity during the stimulation neither shows signatures of magnitude correlations, nor temporal clustering or anticlustering beyond those arising from varying injection rates. The interevent time statistics are characterized by a Poissonian time‐varying distribution. The calculated parameters indicate no earthquake interaction. Focal mechanisms suggest that the injection activated a spatially distributed network of similarly oriented fractures. The seismicity displays stable behavior with no signatures pointing toward a runaway event. The cumulative seismic moment is proportional to the cumulative hydraulic energy and the maximum magnitude is controlled by injection rate. The performed study provides a base for implementation of time‐dependent probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for the project site.
    Description: Plain Language Summary: We investigate anthropogenic seismicity associated with fluid injection into the 5.8 km deep geothermal OTN‐2 well near Helsinki, Finland, as a part of St1 Deep Heat Project. A total of 2,875 m3 of fresh water was injected during 16 days at well‐head pressures 〈70 MPa and with flow rates between 400 and 1,000 L/min. The seismicity was monitored using a seismic network composed of 20 borehole geophones located in Helsinki area and in the OTN‐3 well located close by the injection site. A total of 6,121 earthquakes indicating fractures of 1–30 m size were recorded during and after stimulation campaign. Using a handful of statistical properties derived from earthquake catalog we found no indication for earthquakes being triggered by other earthquakes. Instead, the earthquake activity rates, as well as the maximum earthquake size stayed proportional to the fluid injection rate. The spatio‐temporal behavior of seismicity and its properties suggest earthquakes occurred not on a single fault, but in a distributed network of similarly oriented fractures, limiting the possibility for occurrence of violent earthquakes. The performed study provides evidence that the induced seismicity due to injection performed within St1 Deep Heat project is stable and allow to constrain seismic hazard.
    Description: Key Points: Induced seismicity associated with stimulation campaign in a 5.8 km deep geothermal OTN‐2 well passively responds to injection operations. Seismicity is a non‐stationary Poisson process with seismicity rate and maximum magnitude modulated by the hydraulic energy input rate. Seismicity clusters in space and time in response to fluid injection but no interaction between earthquakes is observed.
    Description: Helmholtz Association http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009318
    Description: https://doi.org/10.5880/GFZ.4.2.2022.001
    Keywords: ddc:551.22 ; induced seismicity ; hydraulic stimulation ; earthquake clustering ; earthquake interactions ; Poissonian distribution ; magnitude correlations ; interevent times
    Language: English
    Type: doc-type:article
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 4
    Publication Date: 2022-08-22
    Description: Abstract
    Description: This data publication contains seismic catalog developed by the analysis of seismicity recorded during hydraulic stimulation campaign performed in May 2020 in the 5.8-km deep OTN-2 well near Helsinki, Finland as part of the St1 Deep Heat project (Kwiatek et al., 2022). The original seismic data to develop the seismic catalog were acquired with the high-resolution seismic network composed of 22 geophones surrounding the project site. The centerpiece of the network was a 10-level borehole array of Geospace OMNI-2400 geophones (3C/15 Hz) sampled at 2 kHz placed in the OTN-3 well adjacent to the OTN-2 injection well, and located at 1.93 - 2.55 km depth, approx. 3km from injection intervals. Additional 12 stations at distances 〈10 km from project site formed the satellite network that was equipped with short-period 3C 4.5 Hz Sunfull PSH geophones, completing the seismic network. Near-real-time processing of induced seismicity data started on Jan 26, 2020, i.e. about 3 months prior to the onset of the injection, covering entire period of the stimulation campaign in May 2020. The monitoring stopped end of June 2020, about one month after the stimulation finished. The monitoring campaign resulted in initial industrial seismicity catalog containing 6,243 events that was refined and further extended (cf. Kwiatek et al., 2022). The final catalog associated with this data publication contains 6,318 earthquakes, including 197, 5427 and 694 events recorded before, during, and after stimulation campaign. The core catalog data contains origin time, local magnitude, (re)location and focal mechanism data.
    Description: Methods
    Description: The initial induced seismicity catalog provided by the industrial operator contained 6,243 detections including earthquakes, electronic noises and signals originating from or near the surface. A coincidence trigger was first run on the database of P-wave arrivals not associated with any earthquake (see details of the procedure in Kwiatek et al., 2019; Leonhardt et al., 2021a,b). This enhanced the initial catalog by 3,720 newly detected events resulting in a total number of 9,963 detected events. Automated inspection of observed hodographs was then performed, comparing the observed patterns of P- and S-wave arrivals on sensors forming the OTN-3 array with those predicted for earthquakes originating from injection site. This allowed to confirm that 6,318 detections out of the 9,963 are seismic events originating from the stimulated crustal volume, and these events constitute the catalog included in the data publication. The remaining 3,645 events, manually identified as electronic noises of various types or surface blasts were excluded from the catalog. The vast majority of the 6,318 confirmed induced seismic events were visible only on seismograms from sensors forming the OTN-3 array, but not on the satellite sensors located within Helsinki municipal area. This means that the accurate hypocentral locations could not be achieved for most of events without additional P- and S- phase arrivals from sensors forming the satellite network. In fact, only the 72 largest events could be reliably located using additional P- and S-wave onsets available from the satellite network. These 72 earthquakes were further relocated using the Double-Difference method (Waldhauser and Ellsworth, 2000). For the location and relocation, the 1D P-wave velocity model based on a vertical seismic profiling campaign (Leonhardt et al., 2021a,b) assuming a V_P⁄V_S ratio of 1.71 for inverting S-wave arrival times was used. The relocation limited the final hypocentral location catalog to 45 events. The achieved relative location precision (95% confidence interval) for these events in horizontal and vertical direction was not exceeding ±85 m and ±42 m, respectively. Although limited number of hypocenter locations could be estimated, the local “Helsinki” magnitude was calculated for all 6,318 events. This was possible because S-P times could be easily extracted from downhole recordings of OTN-3 array. To calculate the local magnitude, we followed the procedure presented by Uski and Tuppurainen (1996) and Uski et al. (2015), which was applied in our previous studies as well (Kwiatek et al., 2019; Leonhardt et al., 2021a,b). Finally, 8 double-couple constrained focal mechanism were calculated using the hybridMT moment tensor inversion package (Kwiatek et al., 2016) and time integrals of the first P-wave ground displacement pulses including sign information (e.g. Amemoutou et al., 2021).
    Keywords: induced seismicity ; hydraulic fracturing ; triggering ; earthquake interaction ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 HUMAN DIMENSIONS 〉 ECONOMIC RESOURCES 〉 ENERGY PRODUCTION/USE 〉 GEOTHERMAL ENERGY PRODUCTION/USE ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 HUMAN DIMENSIONS 〉 HUMAN SETTLEMENTS 〉 URBAN AREAS ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 HUMAN DIMENSIONS 〉 NATURAL HAZARDS 〉 EARTHQUAKES ; EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES 〉 DATA ANALYSIS AND VISUALIZATION 〉 STATISTICAL APPLICATIONS ; EARTH SCIENCE SERVICES 〉 HAZARDS MANAGEMENT 〉 HAZARDS MITIGATION
    Type: Dataset , Dataset
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
  • 5
    Publication Date: 2023-03-13
    Description: Abstract
    Description: This data publication contains seismic waveform data of 507 earthquakes recorded during the St1 Deep Heat project in June and July 2018, where the 6.1 km deep OTN-3 well near Helsinki, Finland, was hydraulically stimulated over 49 days (Kwiatek et al., 2019). The waveforms were recorded on a surrounding seismic monitoring network consisting of 12 stations, deployed at epicentral distances between 0.6 to 8.2 km and at depths between 0.23 to 1.15 km. Each station consists of three-component, 4.5 Hz, Sunfull PSH geophones, sampling at 500 Hz. The 507 earthquakes analysed were chosen from the relocated event catalogue by Leonhardt et al. (2021a). The dataset is supplementary material to the Geophysical Research Letters research article of Holmgren et al. (2022), which applied the Empirical Green’s Function technique to examine microseismic rupture behaviour at the Helsinki site.
    Keywords: induced seismicity ; earthquake directivity ; rupture velocity ; earthquake hazard ; hydraulic stimulation ; rupture propagation ; unilateral ruptures ; bilateral ruptures ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 HUMAN DIMENSIONS 〉 NATURAL HAZARDS 〉 EARTHQUAKES ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 SOLID EARTH 〉 TECTONICS 〉 EARTHQUAKES 〉 EARTHQUAKE OCCURRENCES ; EARTH SCIENCE 〉 SOLID EARTH 〉 TECTONICS 〉 EARTHQUAKES 〉 SEISMIC PROFILE 〉 SEISMIC BODY WAVES ; geological process 〉 seismic activity 〉 earthquake
    Type: Dataset , Dataset
    Location Call Number Expected Availability
    BibTip Others were also interested in ...
Close ⊗
This website uses cookies and the analysis tool Matomo. More information can be found here...